Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:59:45.651Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - Collective Judging in the French Cour de Cassation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2021

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The expression of collegiality in the decision-making process is as diverse as there are types of jurisdictional organisations. At any rate, collegiality cannot be reduced to decision by bare majority.

Because of a particular distrust of the judiciary in France, originating in the Revolutionary period, the judicial function has historically been split among countless small-sized courts which assume their role collegially in a manner that leaves no room in the making of the judgment to the personal individuality of judges. The judiciary is regarded as a branch of the civil service, where collegiality is traditionally perceived as a safeguard against the passions and arbitrariness of those who should not have been awarded a judicial position in the first place as well as a tool to counterbalance the lower level of experience of the most junior judicial panel members.

The function of a supreme court has repercussions on its internal organisation and on the rules of procedure which, in turn, influence the collegial decisionmaking process.

The Cour de cassation, which is the apex court of the general court system, was created in 1790 as a body attached to the National Assembly without power to interpret statute law. It was not before 1837 that the Cour de cassation, sitting in plenary session, could impose its decisions on the lower courts without referring questions of interpretation to the legislative branch of government.

In the context of an absence of an independent constitutional power, the Cour de cassation‘s role, although not that of an agent of the legislature today, is confined to applying statutes to the disputed cases, if need be, in interpreting statutory law, but – in doing so – only legal arguments can be made.

The so-called ‘motivation‘ of the judgment is necessarily brief, as is the statutory provision to be interpreted and applied. The Cour de cassation cannot modify, add or subtract anything to written law, nor even does the Court have to explain the interpretative method it uses.

Type
Chapter
Information
Collective Judging in Comparative Perspective
Counting Votes and Weighing Opinions
, pp. 129 - 140
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×