Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:40:58.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 20 - Ultrasound-Guided Procedures

from Part II - Ultrasound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2017

By
Daniel D. Price  and
Sharon R. Wilson
Edited by
J. Christian Fox
J. Christian Fox
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Clinical Emergency Radiology , pp. 284 - 312
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chen, L, Hsiao, AL, Moore, CL, et al.: Utility of bedside bladder ultrasound before urethral catheterization in young children. Pediatrics 2005;115(1):108–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witt, M, Baumann, BM, McCans, K: Bladder ultrasound increases catheterization success in pediatric patients. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12(4):371–4.Google Scholar
Chu, RW, Wong, YC, Luk, SH, Wong, SN: Comparing suprapubic urine aspiration under real-time ultrasound guidance with conventional blind aspiration. Acta Paediatr 2002;91(5):512–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Nieto, V, Navarro, JF, Sanchez-Almeida, E, Garcia-Garcia, M: Standards for ultrasound guidance of suprapubic bladder aspiration. Pediatr Nephrol 1997;11(5):607–9.Google Scholar
Gochman, RF, Karasic, RB, Heller, MB: Use of portable ultrasound to assist urine collection by suprapubic aspiration. Ann Emerg Med 1991;20(6):631–5.Google Scholar
Goldberg, BB, Meyer, H: Ultrasonically guided suprapubic urinary bladder aspiration. Pediatrics 1973;51(1):70–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiernan, SC, Pinckert, TL, Keszler, M: Ultrasound guidance of suprapubic bladder aspiration in neonates. J Pediatr 1993;123(5):789–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozkan, B, Kaya, O, Akdag, R, et al.: Suprapubic bladder aspiration with or without ultrasound guidance. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2000;39(10):625–6.Google Scholar
Sagi, EF, Alpan, G, Eyal, FG, et al.: Ultrasonic guidance of suprapubic aspiration in infants. J Clin Ultrasound 1983;11(6):347–8.Google Scholar
Raad, I: Intravascular-catheter–related infections. Lancet 1998;351(9106):893–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merrer, J, De Jonghe, B, Golliot, F, et al.: Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;286(6):700–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallieni, M, Cozzolino, M: Uncomplicated central vein catheterization of high risk patients with real time ultrasound guidance. Int J Artif Organs 1995;18(3):117–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hind, D, Calvert, N, McWilliams, R, et al: Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ 2003;327(7411):361.Google Scholar
Kohn, L, Corrigan, J, Molla, S, Donaldson, M: To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, 1999.Google Scholar
Shojania, KG, Duncan, BW, McDonald, KM, Wachter, R, eds: Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 43. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2001. AHRQ Publication No. 01-E058.Google Scholar
Grebenik, CR, Boyce, A, Sinclair, ME, et al.: NICE guidelines for central venous catheterization in children: is the evidence base sufficient? Br J Anaesth 2004;92(6):827–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Domino, KB, Bowdle, TA, Posner, KL, et al.: Injuries and liability related to central vascular catheters: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 2004;100(6):1411–18.Google Scholar
McGee, DC, Gould, MK: Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 2003;348(12):1123–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terai, C, Anada, H, Matsushima, S, et al.: Effects of mild Trendelenburg on central hemodynamics and internal jugular vein velocity, cross-sectional area, and flow. Am J Emerg Med 1995;13(3):255–8.Google Scholar
Lobato, EB, Florete, OG Jr, Paige, GB, Morey, TE: Cross-sectional area and intravascular pressure of the right internal jugular vein during anesthesia: effects of Trendelenburg position, positive intrathoracic pressure, and hepatic compression. J Clin Anesth 1998;10(1):1–5.Google Scholar
Mallory, DL, Shawker, T, Evans, RG, et al.: Effects of clinical maneuvers on sonographically determined internal jugular vein size during venous cannulation. Crit Care Med 1990;18(11):1269–73.Google Scholar
Armstrong, PJ, Sutherland, R, Scott, DH: The effect of position and different manoeuvres on internal jugular vein diameter size. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994;38(3):229–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, AC, Saliken, JC, Johns, D, et al.: US-guided puncture of the internal jugular vein: complications and anatomic considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9(2):333–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gualtieri, E, Deppe, SA, Sipperly, ME, Thompson, DR: Subclavian venous catheterization: greater success rate for less experienced operators using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med 1995;23(4):692–7.Google Scholar
Hilty, WM, Hudson, PA, Levitt, MA, Hall, JB: Real-time ultrasound-guided femoral vein catheterization during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29(3):331–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanay, O, Vaughan, DJ, Diab, M, et al.: Retained wooden foreign body in a child’s thigh complicated by severe necrotizing fasciitis: a case report and discussion of imaging modalities for early diagnosis. Pediatr Emerg Care 2001;17(4):354–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyse, TD, Fessell, DP, Jacobson, JA, et al.: Ultrasound of soft-tissue foreign bodies and associated complications with surgical correlation. Radiographics 2001;21(5):1251–6.Google Scholar
Hung, YT, Hung, LK, Griffith, JF, et al.: Ultrasound for the detection of vegetative foreign body in the hand – a case report. Hand Surg 2004;9(1):83–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, DD: Ultrasound in the emergency department: detection of wooden foreign bodies in the soft tissues. J Emerg Med 2002;22(1):75–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soudack, M, Nachtigal, A, Gaitini, D: Clinically unsuspected foreign bodies: the importance of sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2003;22(12):1381–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lammers, RL, Magill, T: Detection and management of foreign bodies in soft tissue. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1992;10(4):767–81.Google Scholar
Schlager, D: Ultrasound detection of foreign bodies and procedure guidance. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1997;15(15):895–912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trautlein, JJ, Lambert, RL, Miller, J: Malpractice in the emergency department – review of 200 cases. Ann Emerg Med 1984;13(9 p. 1):709–11.Google Scholar
Gilbert, FJ, Campbell, RS, Bayliss, AP: The role of ultrasound in the detection on non-radiopaque foreign bodies. Clin Radiol 1990;41(2):109–12.Google Scholar
Shiels, WE, Babcock, D, Wilson, J, Burch, R: Localization and guided removal of soft-tissue foreign bodies with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;155(6):1277–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockett, MS, Gentile, SC, Gudas, CJ, et al.: The use of ultrasonography for the detection of retained wooden foreign bodies in the foot. J Foot Ankle Surg 1995;34(5):478–84; discussion 510–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawford, R, Matheson, AB: Clinical value of ultrasonography in the detection and removal of radiolucent foreign bodies. Injury 1989;20(6):341–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blankstein, A, Cohen, I, Heiman, Z, et al.: Localization, detection and guided removal of soft tissue in the hands using sonography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000;120(9):514–17.Google Scholar
Jacobson, JA, Powell, A, Craig, JG, et al.: Wooden foreign bodies in soft tissue: detection with ultrasound. Radiology 1998;206(7):45–8.Google Scholar
Bradley, M, Kadzombe, E, Simms, P, Eyes, B: Percutaneous ultrasound guided extraction of non-palpable soft tissue foreign bodies. Arch Emerg Med 1992;9:181–4.Google Scholar
Heller, M, Jehle, D: Ultrasound in emergency medicine. Oxford, UK: WB Saunders, 1995.Google Scholar
Lyon, M, Brannam, L, Johnson, D, et al.: Detection of soft tissue foreign bodies in the presence of soft tissue gas. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23(5):677–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gooding, GA, Hardiman, T, Sumers, M, et al.: Sonography of the hand and foot in foreign body detection. J Ultrasound Med 1987;6(8):441–7.Google Scholar
Banerjee, B, Das, RK: Sonographic detection of foreign bodies of the extremities. Br J Radiol 1991;64(758):107–12.Google Scholar
Schlager, D, Johnson, T, Mcfall, R: Safety of imaging exploding bullets with ultrasound. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28(13):183–7.Google Scholar
Turner, J, Wilde, CH, Hughes, KC, et al.: Ultrasound-guided retrieval of small foreign objects in subcutaneous tissue. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29(5):731–4.Google Scholar
Schlager, D: Ultrasound detection of foreign bodies and procedure guidance. Emerg Med Clin North Am 1997;15(15):895–912.Google Scholar
Oikarinen, KS, Neiminen, T, Makarainen, H, Pyhtinen, J: Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;22(2):119–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scanlan, KA: Sonographic artifacts and their origins. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156(6):1267–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, R, Conron, R, Greissinger, P, Heller, M: Ultrasound for the detection of foreign bodies in human tissue. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29(10):353–6.Google Scholar
Fornage, BD: The hypoechoic normal tendon: a pitfall. J Ultrasound Med 1987;6(1):19–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, A, Patton, A, Navoy, J, Cummings, RJ: Intraoperative sonography-guided removal of radiolucent foreign bodies. J Pediatr Orthop 1998;18(2):259–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orlinsky, M, Knittel, P, Feit, T, et al.: The comparative accuracy of radiolucent foreign body detection using ultrasonography. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18(6):401–3.Google Scholar
Nelson, AL, Sinow, RM: Real-time ultrasonographically guided removal of nonpalpable and intramuscular Norplant capsules. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;78(12):1185–93.Google Scholar
Frankel, DA, Bargiela, A, Bouffard, JA: Synovial joints: evaluation of intraarticular bodies with US. Radiology 1998;206(16):41–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manthey, DE, Storrrow, AB, Milbourn, JM, Wagner, BJ: Ultrasound versus radiography in the detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28(11):7–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teisen, HG, Torfing, KF, Skjodt, T: Ultrasound pinpointing of foreign bodies: an in vitro study. Ultraschall Med 1988;9(3):135–7.Google Scholar
Blankstein, A, Cohen, I, Heiman, Z, et al.: Ultrasonography as a diagnostic modality and therapeutic adjuvant in the management of soft tissue foreign bodies in the lower extremities. Isr Med Assoc J 2001;3(6):411–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Tayal, VS, Nicks, BA, Norton, HJ: Emergency ultrasound evaluation of symptomatic nontraumatic pleural effusions. Am J Emerg Med 2006;24(7):782–6.Google Scholar
Diacon, AH, Brutsche, MH, Soler, M: Accuracy of pleural puncture sites: a prospective comparison of clinical examination with ultrasound. Chest 2003;123(2):436–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartter, T, Mayo, PD, Pratter, MR, et al.: Lower risk and higher yield for thoracentesis when performed by experienced operators. Chest 1993;103(6):1873–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, TR, Sahn, SA: Thoracocentesis: clinical value, complications, technical problems, and patient experience. Chest 1987;91(6):817–22.Google Scholar
Grogan, DR, Irwin, RS, Channick, R, et al.: Complications associated with thoracentesis: a prospective, randomized study comparing three different methods. Arch Intern Med 1990;150(4):873–7.Google Scholar
Seneff, MG, Corwin, RW, Gold, LH, Irwin, RS: Complications associated with thoracocentesis. Chest 1986;90(1):97–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, PW, Moyers, JP, Rogers, JT, et al.: Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis: is it a safer method? Chest 2003;123(2):418–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayo, PH, Goltz, HR, Tafreshi, M, Doelken, P: Safety of ultrasound-guided thoracentesis in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest 2004;125(3):1059–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blaivas, M, Lyon, M, Duggal, S: A prospective comparison of supine chest radiography and bedside ultrasound for the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax. Acad Emerg Med 2005;12(9):844–9.Google Scholar
Coley, BD, Shiels, WE II, Hogan, MJ: Diagnostic and interventional ultrasonography in neonatal and infant lumbar puncture. Pediatr Radiol 2001;31(6):399–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cork, RC, Kryc, JJ, Vaughan, RW: Ultrasonic localization of the lumbar epidural space. Anesthesiology 1980;52(6):513–16.Google Scholar
Currie, JM: Measurement of the depth to the extradural space using ultrasound. Br J Anaesth 1984;56(4):345–7.Google Scholar
Peterson, MA, Abele, J: Bedside ultrasound for difficult lumbar puncture. J Emerg Med 2005;28(2):197–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandoval, M, Shestak, W, Sturmann, K, Hsu, C: Optimal patient position for lumbar puncture, measured by ultrasonography. Emerg Radiol 2004;10(4):179–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, DH, Currie, JM, Gilstrap, LC, Santos, R: Indirect sonographic guidance for epidural anesthesia in obese pregnant patients. Reg Anesth 1992;17(4):233–6.Google Scholar
Nomura, JT, Leech, SJ, Shenbagamurthi, S, et al.: A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture. J Ultrasound Med 2007;26(10):1341–8.Google Scholar
Cattau, EL Jr, Benjamin, SB, Knuff, TE, Castell, DO: The accuracy of the physical examination in the diagnosis of suspected ascites. JAMA 1982;247(8):1164–6.Google Scholar
Nazeer, SR, Dewbre, H, Miller, AH: Ultrasound-assisted paracentesis performed by emergency physicians vs the traditional technique: a prospective, randomized study. Am J Emerg Med 2005;23(3):363–7.Google Scholar
Bard, C, Lafortune, M, Breton, G: Ascites: ultrasound guidance or blind paracentesis? CMAJ 1986;135(3):209–10.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, H, Waldhausen, JA, Hyde, LP: Ultrasound diagnosis of pericardial effusion. JAMA 1965;191:711–14.Google Scholar
Mazurek, B, Jehle, D, Martin, M: Emergency department echocardiography in the diagnosis and therapy of cardiac tamponade. J Emerg Med 1991;9(1–2):27–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma: Advanced trauma life support course for doctors: student course manual, 7th ed. Chicago: ACS, 2004.Google Scholar
Guberman, BA, Fowler, NO, Engel, PJ, et al.: Cardiac tamponade in medical patients. Circulation 1981;64(3):633–40.Google Scholar
Wong, B, Murphy, J, Chang, CJ, et al.: The risk of pericardiocentesis. Am J Cardiol 1979;44(6):1110–14.Google Scholar
Vayre, F, Lardoux, H, Pezzano, M, et al.: Subxiphoid pericardiocentesis guided by contrast two-dimensional echocardiography in cardiac tamponade: experience of 110 consecutive patients. Eur J Echocardiogr 2000;1(1):66–71.Google Scholar
Ball, JB, Morrison, WL: Cardiac tamponade. Postgrad Med J 1997;73(857):141–5.Google Scholar
Bishop, LH Jr, Estes, EH Jr, McIntosh, HD: The electrocardiogram as a safeguard in pericardiocentesis. JAMA 1956;162(4):264–5.Google Scholar
Buzaid, AC, Garewal, HS, Greenberg, BR: Managing malignant pericardial effusion. West J Med 1989;150(2):174–9.Google Scholar
Hingorani, AD, Bloomberg, TJ: Ultrasound-guided pigtail catheter drainage of malignant pericardial effusions. Clin Radiol 1995;50(1):15–19.Google Scholar
Krikorian, JG, Hancock, EW: Pericardiocentesis. Am J Med 1978;65(5):808–14.Google Scholar
Suehiro, S, Hattori, K, Shibata, T, et al.: Echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis with a needle attached to a probe. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61(2):741–2.Google Scholar
Tsang, TS, Enriquez-Sarano, M, Freeman, WK, et al.: Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77(5):429–36.Google Scholar
Tsang, TS, El-Najdawi, EK, Seward, JB, et al.: Percutaneous echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis in pediatric patients: evaluation of safety and efficacy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1998;11(11):1072–7.Google Scholar
Callahan, JA, Seward, JB, Tajik, AJ: Cardiac tamponade: pericardiocentesis directed by two-dimensional echocardiography. Mayo Clin Proc 1985;60(5):344–7.Google Scholar
Tsang, TS, Freeman, WK, Sinak, LJ, Seward, JB: Echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis: evolution and state-of-the-art technique. Mayo Clin Proc 1998;73(7):647–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appleton, CP, Hatle, LK, Popp, RL: Cardiac tamponade and pericardial effusion: respiratory variation in transvalvular flow velocities studied by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11(5):1020–30.Google Scholar
Armstrong, WF, Schilt, BF, Helper, DJ, et al.: Diastolic collapse of the right ventricle with cardiac tamponade: an echocardiographic study. Circulation 1982;65(7):1491–6.Google Scholar
Burstow, DJ, Oh, JK, Bailey, KR, et al.: Cardiac tamponade: characteristic Doppler observations. Mayo Clin Proc 1989;64(3):312–24.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, H, Zaky, A, Grabhorn, LL: Cardiac motion in patients with pericardial effusion: a study using reflected ultrasound. Circulation 1966;34(4):611–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kronzon, I, Cohen, ML, Winer, HE: Diastolic atrial compression: a sensitive echocardiographic sign of cardiac tamponade. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983;2(4):770–5.Google Scholar
Tsang, TS, Seward, JB, Barnes, ME, et al.: Outcomes of primary and secondary treatment of pericardial effusion in patients with malignancy. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75(3):248–53.Google Scholar
Tsang, TS, Barnes, ME, Hayes, SN, et al.: Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of significant pericardial effusions following cardiothoracic surgery and outcomes of echo-guided pericardiocentesis for management: Mayo Clinic experience, 1979–1998. Chest 1999;116(2):322–31.Google Scholar
Im, SH, Lee, SC, Park, YB, et al.: Feasibility of sonography for intra-articular injections in the knee through a medial patellar portal. J Ultrasound Med 2009;23(11):1465–70.Google Scholar
Cunnington, J, Marshall, N, Hide, G, et al.: A randomized, double-blind, controlled study of ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection into the joint of patients with inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62(7):1862–9.Google Scholar
Raza, K, Lee, CY, Pilling, D, et al.: Ultrasound guidance allows accurate needle placement and aspiration from small joints in patients with early inflammatory arthritis. Rheumatology 2003;42(8):976–9.Google Scholar
Sibbitt, W, Kettwich, L, Band, P, et al.: Does ultrasound guidance improve the outcomes of arthrocentesis and corticosteroid injections of the knee? Scand J Rheumatol 2012;41(1):66–72.Google Scholar
Wiler, JL, Constantino, TG, Filippone, L, et al.: Comparison of ultrasound-guided and standard landmark techniques for knee arthrocentesis. J Emerg Med 2010;39(1):76–82.Google Scholar
Sibbitt, WL, Peisajovich, A, Michael, AA, et al.: Does sonographic needle guidance affect the clinical outcome of intraarticular injections? J Rheumatol 2009;36(9):1892–1902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soh, E, Li, W, Ong, KO, et al.: Image-guided versus blind corticosteroid injections in adults with shoulder pain: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:137.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×