Part IV - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 June 2017
Edited by
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Clinical Emergency Radiology , pp. 515 - 629Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Suggested Readings
Ahmed, S, Shellock, FG: Magnetic resonance imaging safety: implications for cardiovascular patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;3(3):171–82.Google Scholar
Blumenfeld, H: Neuroanatomy through clinical cases. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 2002.Google Scholar
Chakeres, DW, Schmalbrock, P: Fundamentals of magnetic resonance imaging. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 1992.Google Scholar
Feast, R, Gledhill, M, Hurrell, M, Tremewan, R: Magnetic resonance imaging safety guidelines. Available at: www.nrl.moh.govt.nz/publications/1996-5.pdfGoogle Scholar
Guy, C, Ffytche, D: An introduction to the principles of medical imaging, revised ed. London: Imperial College Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Mugler, JP III: Basic principles. In: Edelman, RR, Hesselink, JR, Zlatkin, MB, Crues, JV III (eds), Clinical magnetic resonance imaging, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2006.Google Scholar
Nitz, W: Principles of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography. In: Reimer, P, Parizel, PM, Stichnoth, FA (eds), Clinical MR imaging, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar
Shellock, FG, Kanal, E, Society for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (SMRI) Safety Committee: SMRI report: policies, guidelines, and recommendations for MR imaging safety and patient management. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:97–101.Google Scholar
Suggested Readings
Allen, LM, Hasso, AN, Handwerker, J, Farid, H: Sequence-specific MR imaging findings that are useful in dating ischemic stroke. Radiographics 2012;32(5):1285–97; discussion 97–9.Google Scholar
Avci, E, Fossett, D, Aslan, M, et al.: Branches of the anterior cerebral artery near the anterior communicating artery complex: an anatomic study and surgical perspective. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2003;43(7):329–33; discussion 333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, WG Jr.: MR appearance of hemorrhage in the brain. Radiology 1993;189(1):15–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleetwood, IG, Marcellus, ML, Levy, RP, et al.: Deep arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia and thalamus: natural history. J Neurosurg 2003;98(4):747–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, RJ, Rudick, RA: Multiple sclerosis: disease markers accelerate progress. Lancet Neurol 2004;3:10.Google Scholar
Jackson, EF, Ginsberg, LE, Schomer, DF, Leeds, NE: A review of MRI pulse sequences and techniques in neuroimaging. Surg Neurol 1997;47(2):185–99.Google Scholar
Kuker, W, Nägele, T, Schmidt, F, et al.: Diffusion-weighted MRI in herpes simplex encephalitis. Neuroradiology 2004;46(2):122–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osborn, A, Blaser, S, Salzman, K: Diagnostic imaging: Brain. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys, 2004.Google Scholar
Purcell, EM, Torrey, HC, Pound, RV: Resonance absorption by nuclear magnetic moments in a solid. Phys Rev 1946;69(1–2):37–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, PW, Grant, PE, Gonzalez, RG: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 2000;217(2):331–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schellinger, PD, Fiebach, JB, Hoffmann, K, et al.: Stroke MRI in intracerebral hemorrhage: is there a perihemorrhagic penumbra? Stroke 2003;34(7):1674–9.Google Scholar
Tintinalli, J: Emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide, 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.Google Scholar
Tsuchiya, K, Katase, S, Yoshino, A, Hachiya, J: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of encephalitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:1097–9.Google Scholar
Yousem, DM, Grossman, RI: Neuroradiology: the requisites. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby/Elsevier, 2010.Google Scholar
References
Tintinalli, J, Stapczynski, J, Ma, OJ, et al. (eds): Tintinalli’s emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide, 6th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2004.Google Scholar
Van Goethem, JW, Maes, M, Ozsarlak, O, et al.: Imaging in spinal trauma. Eur Radiol 2005;15(3):582–90.Google Scholar
Burney, RE, Maio, RF, Maynard, F, Karunas, R: Incidence, characteristics, and outcome of spinal cord injury at trauma centers in North America. Arch Surg 1993;128(5):596–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center (NSCIS): Spinal cord injury: facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med 2011 Nov;34(6):620–1.Google Scholar
Farmer, JC, Vaccaro, AR, Balderston, RA, et al.: The changing nature of admissions to a spinal cord injury center: violence on the rise. J Spinal Disord 1998;11(5):400–3.Google Scholar
Vaccaro, AR, Kreidl, KO, Pan, W, et al.: Usefulness of MRI in isolated upper cervical spine fractures in adults. J Spinal Disord 1998;11(4):289–93.Google Scholar
Sances, A Jr, Myklebust, JB, Maiman, DJ, et al.: The biomechanics of spinal injuries. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1984;11(1):1–76.Google Scholar
Bates, D, Ruggieri, P: Imaging modalities for evaluation of the spine. Radiol Clin North Am 1991;29(4):675–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daffner, RH, Hackney, DB: ACR appropriateness criteria on suspected spine trauma. J Am Coll Radiol 2007 Nov;4(11):762–75.Google Scholar
Orrison, WW Jr, Benzel, EC, Willis, BK, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of acute spine trauma. Emerg Radiol 1995;2(3):120–8.Google Scholar
Slucky, AV, Potter, HG: Use of magnetic resonance imaging in spinal trauma: indications, techniques, and utility. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1998;6(3):134–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamashita, Y, Takakoshi, M, Malosuno, Y, et al.: Acute spinal cord injury: magnetic resonance imaging correlated with myelopathy. Br J Radiol 1991;64:201–9.Google Scholar
Mhuircheartaigh, NN, Kerr, JM, Murray, JG: MR imaging of traumatic spinal injuries. SeminMusculoskelet Radiol 2006;10(4):293–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedetti, PF, Fahr, LM, Kuhns, LR, et al.: MR imaging findings in spinal ligamentous injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175(3):661–5.Google Scholar
Daffner, RH, Hackney, DB: ACR appropriateness criteria on suspected spine trauma. J Am Coll Radiol 2007;4(11):762–75.Google Scholar
Kim, KY, Kim, YT, Lee, CS, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the lumbar herniated intervertebral disc. Int Orthop 1993;17(4):241–4.Google Scholar
Forristall, RM, Marsh, HO, Pay, NT: Magnetic resonance imaging and contrast CT of the lumbar spine: comparison of diagnostic methods and correlation with surgical findings. Spine 1988;13(9):1049–54.Google Scholar
Janssen, ME, Bertrand, SL, Joe, C, Levine, MI: Lumbar herniated disk disease: comparison of MRI, myelography, and post-myelographic CT scan with surgical findings. Orthopedics 1994;17(2):121–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yousem, DM, Atlas, SW, Goldberg, HI, Grossman, RI: Degenerative narrowing of the cervical spine neural foramina: evaluation with high-resolution 3DFT gradient-echo MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12(2):229–36.Google Scholar
Steinborn, MM, Heuck, AF, Tiling, R, et al.: Whole-body bone marrow MRI in patients with metastatic disease to the skeletal system. J Comput Assist Tomogr Jan-Feb 1999;23(1):123–9.Google Scholar
Avrahami, E, Tadmor, R, Dally, O, Hadar, H: Early MR demonstration of spinal metastasis in patients with normal radiographs and CT and radionuclide bone scans. JCAT 1989;13(4):598–602.Google Scholar
Baleriaux, DL, Neugroschl, C: Spinal and spinal cord infection. Eur Radiol 2004;14(Suppl 3):E72–83.Google Scholar
Erdman, WA, Tamburo, F, Jayson, HT, et al.: Osteomyelitis: characteristics and pitfalls of diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1991;180(2):533–9.Google Scholar
Unger, E, Moldofsky, P, Gatenby, R, et al.: Diagnosis of osteomyelitis by MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150(3):605–10.Google Scholar
Agosta, F, Absinta, M, Sormani, MP, et al.: In vivo assessment of cervical cord damage in MS patients: a longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study. Brain Aug 2007;130:2211–9.Google Scholar
Traboulsee, AL, Li, DK: The role of MRI in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Adv Neurol 2006;98:125–46.Google ScholarPubMed
Poser, CM, Brinar, VV: Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2001;103(1):1–11.Google Scholar
Kidd, D, Thorpe, JW, Kendall, BE, et al.: MRI dynamics of brain and spinal cord in progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1992;32:643–50.Google Scholar
Bradley, WG: Use of gadolinium chelates in MR imaging of the spine. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7(1):38–46.Google Scholar
Kanal, E, Borgstede, JP, Barkovich, AJ, et al.: American College of Radiology white paper on MR safety. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(6):1335–47.Google Scholar
Kanal, E, Shellock, FG: Patient monitoring during clinical MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185(3):623–9.Google Scholar
Schrader, R: Contrast material-induced renal failure: an overview. J Interv Cardiol 2005;18(6):417–23.Google Scholar
Pedersen, M: Safety update on the possible causal relationship between gadolinium-containing MRI agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25(5):881–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aydingoz, U: The need for radiologists’ awareness of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Diagn Interv Radiol 2006;12(4):161–2.Google ScholarPubMed
Kanal, E, Borgstede, JP, Barkovich, AJ, et al.: American College of Radiology white paper on MR safety: 2004 update and revisions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182(5):1111–4.Google Scholar
References
Atalay, MK: Establishing a cardiac MRI program: problems, pitfalls, and limitations. J Am Coll Radiology 2005;2(9):740–8.Google Scholar
Smulders, MW, Kietselaer, BL, Das, M, et al.: The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography in suspected non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients: design and rationale of the cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography (CARMENTA) trial. Am Heart J 2013;a66(6):968–75.Google Scholar
Earls, JP, Ho, VB, Foo, TK, et al.: Cardiac MRI: recent progress and continued challenges. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:111–27.Google Scholar
Clements, H, Duncan, KR, Fielding, K, et al.: Infants exposed to MRI in utero have a normal paediatric assessment at 9 months of age. Br J Radiol 2000;73:190–4.Google Scholar
De Wilde, JP, Rivers, AW, Price, DL: A review of the current use of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy and safety implications for the fetus. Progr Biophys Molec Biol 2005;87:335–53.Google Scholar
American College of Radiology (ACR): ACR appropriateness criteria: acute chest pain – suspected aortic dissection. 2011. Available at: www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/AcuteChestPainSuspectedAorticDissection.pdfGoogle Scholar
Marx, JA: Rosen’s emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practice, 8th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 2014.Google Scholar
Schleyer, AM, Jarman, KM, Calver, P, et al.: Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients: a descriptive study. J Hosp Med 2014;9(1):48–53.Google Scholar
Chang, J, Elam-Evans, LD, Berg, CJ, et al.: Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance – United States, 1991–99. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003;52(SS-2):1–8.Google Scholar
Scarsbrook, AF, Evans, AL, Owen, AR, Glees, FV: Diagnosis of suspected venous thromboembolic disease in pregnancy. Clin Radiol 2006;61:1–12.Google Scholar
Winer-Muram, HT, Boone, JM, Brown, HL, et al.: Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radiation dose with helical CT. Radiology 2002;224:487–92.Google Scholar
American College of Radiology (ACR): ACR appropriateness criteria: acute chest pain – suspected pulmonary embolism. 2011. Available at: www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/AcuteChestPainSuspectedPulmonaryEmbolism.pdfGoogle Scholar
Raizner, AE: Indications for diagnostic procedures: topics in clinical cardiology. New York: Igaku-Shoin Medical, 1997.Google Scholar
Miller, CD, Hwang, W, Hoekstra, JW, et al.: Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with observation unit care reduces cost for patients with emergent chest pain: a randomized trial. Ann Emerg Med 2009;56(3):209–19.Google Scholar
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA): ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2004;110:588–636.Google Scholar
Nienaber, CA, von Kodolitsch, Y, Nicolas, V, et al.: The diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection by noninvasive imaging procedures. N Engl J Med 1993;328(1):1–9.Google Scholar
Sechtem, U, Pflugfelder, PW, Cassidy, MM: Mitral or aortic regurgitation: quantification of regurgitant volumes with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1988;167:425–30.Google Scholar
Shapiro, MD, Guarraia, DL, Moloo, J, Cury, RC: Evaluation of acute coronary syndromes by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2008;19(1):25–32.Google Scholar
Herfkens, RJ, Higgins, CB, Hricak, H, et al.: Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the cardiovascular system: normal and pathologic findings. Radiology 1983;147:749–59.Google Scholar
Shiga, T, Wajima, Z, Apfel, CC, et al.: Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2006;166(13):1350–6.Google Scholar
Hiratzka, LF, Bakris, GL, Beckman, JA, et al.: 2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with thoracic aortic disease. Circulation 2010;121(13):e266–369.Google Scholar
American College of Radiology (ACR): ACR appropriateness criteria: acute chest pain – acute nonspecific chest pain – low probability of coronary artery disease. 2011. Available at: www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/AcuteNonspecficChestPainLowProbabilityCoronaryArteryDisease.pdfGoogle Scholar
American College of Radiology (ACR): ACR appropriateness criteria: nontraumatic aortic disease. 2013. Available at: www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/NontraumaticAorticDisease.pdfGoogle Scholar
American College of Radiology (ACR): ACR appropriateness criteria: nonischemic myocardial disease with clinical manifestations. 2013. Available at: www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/AppCriteria/Diagnostic/NonischemicMyocardialDiseaseWithClinicalManifestations.pdfGoogle Scholar
Anderson, JL, Adams, CD, Antman, EM, et al.: 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61(23):e179–347.Google Scholar
Kluetz, PG, White, CS: Acute pulmonary embolism: imaging in the emergency department. Radiol Clin North Am 2006;44:259–71.Google Scholar
Stein, PD, Fowler, SE, Goodman, LR, et al.: Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2006;354(22):2317–27.Google Scholar
Stein, PD, Chenevert, TL, Fowler, SE, et al.: Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med 2010;152(7):434–43, W142–3.Google Scholar
Ersoy, H, Goldhaber, SZ, Cai, T, et al.: Time-resolved MR angiography: a primary screening examination of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and contraindications to administration of iodinated contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1246–54.Google Scholar
Sievers, B, Elliott, MD, Hurwitz, LM, et al.: Rapid detection of myocardial infarction by subsecond, free-breathing delayed contrast-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2007;115:236–44.Google Scholar
Cury, RC, Shash, K, Nagurney, JT, et al.: Cardiac magnetic resonance with T2-weighted imaging improves detection of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Circulation 2008;118(8):837–44.Google Scholar
Greenwood, JP, Maredia, N, Younger, JF, et al.: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 2012;379(9814):453–60.Google Scholar
Constantine, G, Kesavan, S, Flamm, SD, Sivananthan, MU: Role of MRI in clinical cardiology. Lancet 2004;363:2162–71.Google Scholar
Coulden, R: State-of-the-art imaging techniques in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006;3:577–83.Google Scholar
Pedersen, MR, Fisher, MT, van Beek, EJR: MR imaging of the pulmonary vasculature – an update. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1374–86.Google Scholar
Stemerman, DH, Krinsky, GA, Lee, VS, et al.: Thoracic aorta: rapid black-blood MR imaging with half-Fourier rapid acquisition with or without electrocardiographic triggering. Radiology 1999;213:185–91.Google Scholar
Shellock, FG, Fischer, L, Fieno, DS: Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: in vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation at 1.5-tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9(1):21–31.Google Scholar
Patel, MR, Albert, TS, Kandzari, DE, et al.: Acute myocardial infarction: safety of cardiac MR imaging after percutaneous revascularization with stents. Radiology 2006;240(3):674–80.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy associated with exposure to gadolinium-containing contrast agents – St. Louis, Missouri, 2002–2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56(7):137–41.Google Scholar
References
Noone, TC, Semelka, RC, Chaney, DM, Reinhold, C: Abdominal imaging studies: comparison of diagnostic accuracies resulting from ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the same individual. Magn Reson Imaging 2004;22(1):19–24.Google Scholar
Lumachi, F, Tregnaghi, A, Zucchetta, P, et al.: Sensitivity and positive predictive value of CT, MRI and [123]I-MIBG scintigraphy in localizing pheochromocytomas: a prospective study. Nucl Med Commun 2006;27(7):583–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedrosa, I, Levine, D, Eyvazzadeh, AD, et al.: MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 2006;238(3):891–9.Google Scholar
Huk, WJ, Gademann, G: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): method and early clinical experiences in diseases of the central nervous system. Neurosurg Rev 1984;7(4):259–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Whole body scanning: what are the radiation risks from CT? 2007. Available at: www.fda.gov/cdrh/ct/risks.htmlGoogle Scholar
Hall, EJ: Scientific view of low-level radiation risks. Radiographics 1991;11(3):509–18.Google Scholar
Wang, PI, Chong, ST, Kielar, AZ, et al.: Imaging of pregnant and lactating patients: part 2, evidence-based review and recommendations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012 Apr;198(4):785–92.Google Scholar
Kanal, E, Borgstede, JP, Barkovich, AJ: American College of Radiology white paper on MR safety. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178(6):1335–48.Google Scholar
Brenner, D, Elliston, C, Hall, E, Berdon, W: Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176(2):289–96.Google Scholar
McCaig, LF, Nawar, EW: National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2006:1–29.Google Scholar
Shea, JA, Berlin, JA, Escarce, JJ, et al.: Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med 1994;154(22): 2573–81.Google Scholar
Park, MS, Yu, JS, Kim, YH, et al.: Acute cholecystitis: comparison of MR cholangiography and US. Radiology 1998;3:781–5.Google Scholar
Hkansson, K, Leander, P, Ekberg, O, Hkansson, H-O: MR imaging in clinically suspected acute cholecystitis: a comparison with ultrasonography. Acta Radiol Choledocholithiasis 2000;41(4):322–8.Google Scholar
Oto, A, Ernst, R, Ghulmiyyah, L, et al.: The role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of pregnant patients with acute pancreaticobilliary disease. Br J Radiology 2009;82:279–85.Google Scholar
ACR: ACR Appropriateness Criteria Acute Pancreatitis. 1998 (amended 2013). Available at: www.acr.org/qualitysafety/~/~/media/2712288FE06B48A4B87F20E9C4B7D652.pdf.Google Scholar
Maurea, S, Caleo, O, Mollica, C, et al: Comparative diagnostic evaluation with MR cholangiopancreatography, ultrasonography and CT in patients with pancreatobiliary disease. Radiol Med 2009;114:390–402.Google Scholar
Lalani, T, Couto, CA, Rosen, MP, et al.: ACR appropriateness criteria jaundice. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Jun;10(6):402–9.Google Scholar
Stimac, D, Miletic, D, Radic, M, et al.: The role of nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the early assessment of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102(5):997–1004.Google Scholar
Czakó, L: Diagnosis of early-stage chronic pancreatitis by secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Gastroenterol 2007;42(Suppl 17):113–17.Google Scholar
Pungpapong, S, Wallace, MB, Woodward, TA, et al.: Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective comparison study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007;41(1):88–93.Google Scholar
Andriulli, A, Loperfido, S, Napolitano, G, et al.: Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102(8):1781–8.Google Scholar
Chan, YL, Chan, AC, Lam, WW, et al.: Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiology 1996;200(1):85–9.Google Scholar
Shanmugam, V, Beattie, GC, Yule, SR, et al.: Is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the new gold standard in biliary imaging? Br J Radiol 2005;78(934):888–93.Google Scholar
Williams, EJ, Green, J, Beckingham, I, et al.: Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 2008;57:1004–21.Google Scholar
Leeuwenburgh, MM, Wiarda, BM, Wiezer, MJ, et al.: Comparison of imaging strategies with conditional contrast-enhanced CT and unenhanced MR imaging in patients suspected of having appendicitis: a multicenter diagnostic performance study. Radiology 2013;268(1):135–43.Google Scholar
Pedrosa, I, Beddy, P, Pedrosa, I: MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 2006;238(3):891–9.Google Scholar
Terasawa, T, Blackmore, CC, Bent, S, Kohlwes, RJ: Systematic review: computed tomography and ultrasonography to detect acute appendicitis in adults and adolescents. Ann Intern Med 2004;141(7):537–46.Google Scholar
Oto, A, Ernst, RD, Ghulmiyyah, LM, et al.: MR imaging in the triage of pregnant patients with acute abdominal and pelvic pain. Abdom Imaging 2009;34(2):243–50.Google Scholar
Herliczek, TW, Swenson, DW, Mayo-Smith, WW: Utility of MRI after inconclusive ultrasound in pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis: retrospective review of 60 consecutive patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200(5):969–73.Google Scholar
Rountas, C, Vlychou, M, Vassiou, K, et al.: Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR angiography, and digital substraction angiography. Ren Fail 2007;29(3):295–302.Google Scholar
Pei, Y, Shen, H, Li, J, et al.: Evaluation of renal artery in hypertensive patients by unenhanced MR angiography using spatial labeling with multiple inversion pulses sequence and by CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(5):1142–8.Google Scholar
ACR: ACR practice guideline for performing and interpreting magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). 2013, (amended 2014). Available at: www.acr.org/~/media/EB54F56780AC4C6994B77078AA1D6612.pdfGoogle Scholar
Shellock, FG: Biomedical implants and devices: assessment of magnetic field interactions with a 3.0-tesla MR system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16(6):731–2.Google Scholar
Uppot, RN, Sahani, DV, Hahn, PF, et al.: Impact of obesity on medical imaging and image-guided intervention. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188(2):433–40.Google Scholar
Pederson, M: Safety update on the possible causal relationship between gadolinium-containing MRI agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;25(5):881–3.Google Scholar
Grobner, T: Gadolinium – a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:1104–8.Google Scholar
References
Schrader, R: Contrast material-induced renal failure: an overview. J Interv Cardiol 2005;18:417–23.Google Scholar
Stacul, F: Reducing the risks for contrast-induced nephropathy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2005;28(Suppl 2):S12–18.Google Scholar
Toprak, O, Cirit, M: Risk factors for contrast-induced nephropathy. Kidney Blood Press Res 2006;29:84–93.Google Scholar
Thomsen, HS: How to avoid nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: current guidelines in Europe and the United States. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009 Sep;47(5):871–5.Google Scholar
Feldman, F, Staron, R, Zwass, A, et al.: MR imaging: its role in detecting occult fractures. Skeletal Radiol 1994;23:439–44.Google Scholar
Frihagen, F, Nordsletten, L, Tariq, R, et al.: MRI diagnosis of occult hip fractures. Acta Orthop 2005;76:524–30.Google Scholar
Memarsadeghi, M, Breitenseher, MJ, Schaefer-Prokop, C, et al.: Occult scaphoid fractures: comparison of multidetector CT and MR imaging–initial experience. Radiology 2006;240:169–76.Google Scholar
Verbeeten, KM, Hermann, KL, Hasselqvist, M, et al.: The advantages of MRI in the detection of occult hip fractures. Eur Radiol 2005;15:165–9.Google Scholar
Bencardino, JT, Rosenberg, ZS: Sports-related injuries of the wrist: an approach to MRI interpretation. Clin Sports Med 2006;25:409–32.Google Scholar
Chaipat, L, Palmer, WE: Shoulder magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Sports Med 2006;25:371–86.Google Scholar
Gehrmann, RM, Rajan, S, Patel, DV, et al.: Athletes’ ankle injuries: diagnosis and management. Am J Orthop 2005;34:551–61.Google Scholar
Hayes, CW, Coggins, CA: Sports-related injuries of the knee: an approach to MRI interpretation. Clin Sports Med 2006;25:659–79.Google Scholar
Kaplan, LJ, Potter, HG: MR imaging of ligament injuries to the elbow. Radiol Clin North Am 2006;44:583–94.Google Scholar
Meislin, R, Abeles, A: Role of hip MR imaging in the management of sports-related injuries. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2005;13:635–40.Google Scholar
Morag, Y, Jacobson, JA, Miller, B, et al.: MR imaging of rotator cuff injury: what the clinician needs to know. Radiographics 2006;26:1045–65.Google Scholar
Tuite, MJ, Kijowski, R: Sports-related injuries of the elbow: an approach to MRI interpretation. Clin Sports Med 2006;25:387–408.Google Scholar
Zlatkin, MB, Rosner, J: MR imaging of ligaments and triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist. Radiol Clin North Am 2006;44:595–623.Google Scholar
Pineda, C, Vargas, A, Rodriguez, AV: Imaging of osteomyelitis: current concepts. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2006;20:789–825.Google Scholar
Struk, DW, Munk, PL, Lee, MJ, et al.: Imaging of soft tissue infections. Radiol Clin North Am 2001;39:277–303.Google Scholar
Kanal, E, Shellock, FG: Patient monitoring during clinical MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:623–9.Google Scholar
Kanal, E, Shellock, FG: MR imaging of patients with intracranial aneurysm clips. Radiology 1993;187:612–4.Google Scholar
White, LM, Buckwalter, KA: Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2002;6:5–17.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, BA, Worters, PW, Pauly, KB, et al.: Metal-induced artifacts in MRI. AJR. 2011; 197:547–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed