Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables and Figures
- Map of Central Asia
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Transliteration
- 1 An Introduction to Political Development and Transition in Central Asia
- 2 Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia: A Framework for Understanding Politics in Clan-Based Societies
- 3 Colonialism to Stalinism: The Dynamic between Clans and the State
- 4 The Informal Politics of Central Asia: From Brezhnev through Gorbachev
- 5 Transition from Above or Below? (1990–1991)
- 6 Central Asia's Transition (1991–1995)
- 7 Central Asia's Regime Transformation (1995–2004): Part I
- 8 Central Asia's Regime Transformation (1995–2004): Part II
- 9 Positive and Negative Political Trajectories in Clan-Based Societies
- 10 Conclusions
- Epilogue
- Appendix
- Index
1 - An Introduction to Political Development and Transition in Central Asia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Tables and Figures
- Map of Central Asia
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Transliteration
- 1 An Introduction to Political Development and Transition in Central Asia
- 2 Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia: A Framework for Understanding Politics in Clan-Based Societies
- 3 Colonialism to Stalinism: The Dynamic between Clans and the State
- 4 The Informal Politics of Central Asia: From Brezhnev through Gorbachev
- 5 Transition from Above or Below? (1990–1991)
- 6 Central Asia's Transition (1991–1995)
- 7 Central Asia's Regime Transformation (1995–2004): Part I
- 8 Central Asia's Regime Transformation (1995–2004): Part II
- 9 Positive and Negative Political Trajectories in Clan-Based Societies
- 10 Conclusions
- Epilogue
- Appendix
- Index
Summary
In 1994, I had the opportunity to monitor the local elections in the Kyrgyz Republic. I was then given a first glimpse of clan politics. I talked with local elders who had come in to vote for their twenty or thirty closest relatives. The election monitors didn't mind. “This is our practice here,” they said. They did not stop the elders, nor report incidents of fraud. Election observers in other districts recounted the same story. This seemed odd in a country recently deemed a “democracy.” The election results were even more odd, as political parties gained less than 20 percent of the seats in parliament and did not even field a candidate in the presidential elections. Just as bizarre were the 1994 and 1999 Uzbek and Tajik parliamentary elections, where new authoritarian regimes had attempted since the Soviet collapse to create mass, pro-regime parties, based on their renamed Communist Party institutions, but had widely failed. As in the Kyrgyz Republic, the majority of seats went to so-called independents. None of these regimes was able to combat the widespread practice of voting for personalistic leaders along clan lines. Moreover, in spite of massive campaigns by all three governments since 1991 to create national, civic identities, at the mass level, in all regions of each country, most people strongly identified with their local clan networks, not with parties, not with ethnic groups, and certainly not with either the democratic opposition or the state.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia , pp. 1 - 22Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006