Ahl, F. (ed. and trans.) (2007). Virgil: Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Albouy, P. (ed.) (1964). Victor Hugo: Oeuvres poétiques i. Avant l’exil 1802–1851. Paris.Google Scholar

Albouy, P. (1967). Victor Hugo: Oeuvres poétiques ii. Les châtiments, les contemplations. Paris.Google Scholar

Arnaud-Lindet, M.-P. (ed.) (1990). Orose: Histoires (contre les païens). Paris.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (ed.) (1964). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber secundus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1971). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber primus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1977). P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber sextus: With a Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Boudout, J. (ed.) (1957). Victor Hugo: Quatrevingt-treize. Paris.Google Scholar

Braudel, F. (ed.) (1978). Tocqueville: Souvenirs. Paris.Google Scholar

Bruneau, J. (ed.) (1991). Flaubert: Correspondance, vol. iii. Paris.Google Scholar

Cambien, M. (ed.) (1972). Victor Hugo: La preface de “Cromwell.” Paris.Google Scholar

Camus, R. (2011). Le grand remplacement. Plieux.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (ed.) (1994). Virgil: Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cocteau, J. (1950). “Le mystère laïc,” in Oeuvres complètes, vol. 10. Lausanne, 9–46.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E. (ed.) (2009). Res gestae divi Augusti. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Daoud, K. (2013). Meursault, contre-enquête. Arles.Google Scholar

Diderot, D. (1800). “Les bijoux indiscrèts,” in Oeuvres de Denis Diderot, vol. 10. Paris.Google Scholar

Dyson, R. W. (ed.) (1998). Augustine: The City of God against the Pagans. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1977). “Theatrum Philosophicum,” in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, trans. and ed. Bouchard, D. F. and Simon, S.. Ithaca, 165–96.Google Scholar

Gide, A. (2002). Hugo, hélas! Saint-Clément-de-Rivière.Google Scholar

Giono, J. (1982). L’homme qui plantait des arbres. Paris.Google Scholar

Giono, J (2001). Virgile ou les palais de l’Atlantide. Paris.Google Scholar

Gohin, Y. (ed.) (1979). Victor Hugo: Quatrevingt-treize. Paris.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (ed.) (1976). Virgil: “Aeneid” Book viii. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Heyworth, S. J. (ed.) (2019). Ovid, Fasti, Book iii. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (ed.) (2013). Virgil, Aeneid 6: A Commentary. Berlin.Google Scholar

Houellebecq, M. (2015a). Soumission. Paris.Google Scholar

Houellebecq, M. (2015b). Submission, trans. L. Stein. New York.Google Scholar

Housman, A. E. (ed.) (1926). M. Annaei Lucani Belli Civilis. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hugo, V. (1867). Paris-Guide de l’exposition universelle. Paris.Google Scholar

Hugo, V. (1889). Ninety Three, trans. F. L. Benedict, 2 vols. London and New York.Google Scholar

Hugo, V. (1970). Bug Jargal et le dernier jour d’un condamné. Paris.Google Scholar

Huysmans, J. K. (1969). Against the Grain (A Rebours). New York.Google Scholar

Jerphagnon, L. (ed.) (1998). Saint Augustin: Oeuvres. Cité de Dieu, vol. 2. Paris.Google Scholar

Kirchhoff, B. (2002). Schundroman. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (ed.) (1989). Catull, 6th ed. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Lankheit, K. (ed.) (1978). Marc: Schriften. Cologne.Google Scholar

Leduc-Adine, J.-P. (ed.) (1991). Zola: Ecrits sur l’art. Paris.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1960). Der achtzehnte Brumaire des Louis Bonaparte, in Marx, K. and Engels, F., Werke, vol. 8. Berlin, 111–207.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. (ed.) (1981). Lucan, Civil War viii. Warminster.Google Scholar

Mayer, J. P., and Kerr, P. (eds.) (1970). Alexis de Tocqueville: Recollections, trans. G. Lawrence. Garden City, NJ.Google Scholar

Michelet, J. (1966–7). Histoire de France, 1837–1867, ed. Mettra, C.. Lausanne.Google Scholar

Michelet, J. (1952). Histoire de la Révolution française i & ii, ed. Walter, G.. Paris.Google Scholar

Montaigne, M. (2007 [1580]). “De l’amitié,” in Balsamo, J. and Legros, A. (eds.), Essais. Paris, 189–202.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, C. L. de Secondat de (1951 [1748]). “De l’esprit des lois,” in Caillois, R. (ed.), Œuvres complètes de Montesquieu, vol. 2. Paris, 225–995.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, C. L. de Secondat de (1949 [1721]). “Lettres persanes,” in Caillois, R. (ed.), Œuvres complètes de Montesquieu, vol. 1. Paris, 129–373.Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (ed.) (1969). P. Vergili Maronis Opera. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (1990). Virgil: Georgics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M., and Hubbard, M. (eds.) (1975). Horace: Odes Book 1, corrected edition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Purnal, P., Thierry, J.-J., and Mélèze, J. (eds.) (1963). Préface de Cromwell, in Théâtre complet de Victor Hugo i. Paris, 409–54.Google Scholar

Seebacher, J., and Rosa, G. (eds.) (1987). Oeuvres complètes de Victor Hugo. Paris.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. (ed.) (1985). The Annals of Quintius Ennius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Tarrant, R. J. (ed.) (2012). Virgil. Aeneid Book xii. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. (ed.) (1988). Virgil: Georgics, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Voltaire, (1762). Mahomet. Brussels.Google Scholar

Watson, L. C. (ed.) (2003). Horace’s Epodes. Oxford.Google Scholar

West, M. L. (ed.) (1978). Hesiod: Works and Days. Oxford.Google Scholar

Woodman, A. J. (ed.) (1983). Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Zemmour, E. (2014). Le suicide français. Paris.Google Scholar

Abdurraqib, H. (2017). “Johnny Cash Never Shot a Man in Reno. Or, The Migos: Nice Kids from the Suburbs,” National Post, November 16: https://nationalpost.com/entertainment/books/johnny-cash-never-shot-a-man-in-reno-or-the-migos-nice-kids-from-the-suburbs.Google Scholar

Agamben, G. (2015). Stasis: La guerra civile come paradigma politica. Turin.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1976). Lucan: An Introduction. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1993). “Form Empowered: Lucan’s Pharsalia,” in Boyle (1993a): 125–42.Google Scholar

Alfaro, M. J. M. (1996). “Intertextuality: Origins and Development of the Concept,” Atlantis 18/1–2: 268–85.Google Scholar

Al Malik, A. (2013). L’Islam au secours de la République. Paris.Google Scholar

Alston, R., and Spentzou, E. (2011). Reflections of Romanity: Discourses of Subjectivity in Imperial Rome, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar

Ambuhl, A.-M. (2010). “Lucan’s ‘Iliupersis’: Narrative Patterns from the Fall of Troy in Book 2 of the Bellum Civile,” in Hömke, N. and Reitz, C. (eds.), Lucan’s Bellum Civile Between Epic Tradition and Aesthetic Innovation. Berlin, 17–38.Google Scholar

Ambuhl, A.-M. (2016). “Thessaly as an Intertextual Landscape of Civil War in Latin Poetry,” in McInerney, J. and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Valuing Landscape in Classical Antiquity. Leiden, 297–322.Google Scholar

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London.Google Scholar

Ando, C. (2015). Roman Social Imaginaries: Language and Thought in Contexts of Empire. Toronto.Google Scholar

Ando, C. (ed.) (2016). Citizenship and Empire in Europe 200–1900: The Antonine Constitution after 1800 Years. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

André, J. (1993). La Révolution fratricide: essai de psychanalyse du lien social. Paris.Google Scholar

Antoine, A. (2003). L’impensé de la démocratie: Tocqueville, la citoyenneté et la religion. Paris.Google Scholar

Arasse, D. (1987). La guillotine et l’imaginaire de la Terreur. Paris. Translated into English as The Guillotine and the Terror (1989), trans. Christopher Miller, London.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1963). On Revolution. London. Repr. 1965.Google Scholar

Armitage, D. (2017a). Civil Wars: A History in Ideas. New York.Google Scholar

Armitage, D. (2017b). “On the Genealogy of Quarrels,” Critical Analysis of Law 4/2: 178–89.Google Scholar

Armus, S. (2017). “Trying on the Veil: Sexual Autonomy and the End of the French Republic in Michel Houellebecq’s Submission,” French Politics, Culture & Society 35/1: 126–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arquillière, H.-X. (1934). L’Augustinisme politique. Paris.Google Scholar

Arum, E. (2020). “Machiavelli’s Principio: Political Renewal and Innovation in the Discourses on Livy,” The Review of Politics 82/4: 525–47.Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2009). “Fission and Fusion: Shifting Roman Identities in the Histories,” in Woodman (2009): 85–99.Google Scholar

Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., and Tiffin, H. (1989). The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literature. London.Google Scholar

Asholt, W. (2016). “Vom Terrorismus zum Wandel durch Annäherung: Houellebecqs Soumission,” Romanische Studien 3: 119–36.Google Scholar

Auer, M. (2019). “Autonomie als Anlass: Die Ode zwischen politischer und literarischer Moderne,” dissertation, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich.Google Scholar

Auerbach, E. (1965). “Sermo humilis,” in Literary Language and Its Public, trans. R. Manheim, ed. Ziolkowski, J. M. Princeton, NJ, 25–66. Orig. publ. in Auerbach, E. (1958). Literatursprache und Publikum in der lateinischen Spätantike und im Mittelalter. Bern.Google Scholar

Auerbach, E. (2016). Mimesis und Figura, ed. Balke, F and Engelmeier, H. Munich.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Badinter, E. (1984). Émilie, Émilie: L’amibition feminine au XVIIIe siècle. Paris.Google Scholar

Badinter, E. (2010). Le conflit: La mère et la femme. Paris.Google Scholar

Baggesgaard, M. A. (2006). “The Complexities of Honesty: On the Prose of Michel Houellebecq,” in Bowd (2010): 159–70.Google Scholar

Bandera, C. (1981). “Sacrificial Levels in Virgil’s Aeneid,” Arethusa 14: 217–39.Google Scholar

Bannon, C. (1997). The Brothers of Romulus: Fraternal Pietas in Roman Law, Literature, and Society. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1994). “Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell’Eneide,” Antike und Abendland 40: 109–24.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A., Rüpke, J., and Stephens, S. (eds.) (2004). Rituals in Ink. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Barr, R. R. (1962). “The Two Cities in Saint Augustine,” Laval théologique et philosophique 18: 211–29.Google Scholar

Barrera, G. (2021). La guerre civile: Histoire, philosophie, politique. Paris.Google Scholar

Barrett, A. (1999). Agrippina: Sex, Power, and Politics in the Early Empire. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Bartleson, J. (2017). “That Brutal Uncivilizer of Nations,” Critical Analysis of Law 4/2: 153–59.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (ed.) (1994). Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1997). Ideology in Cold Blood: A Reading of Lucan’s Civil War. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (2012). “The Art of Sincerity: Pliny’s Panegyricus,” in Rees (2012): 148–93. Orig. publ. in Bartsch (1994): 148–87.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (2015). Persius: A Study in Food, Philosophy, and the Figural. Chicago.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (trans.) (2021). Vergil: The Aeneid. New York.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S., and Elsner, J. (eds.) (2007). Ekphrasis, special vol. Classical Philology 102.Google Scholar

Bastiaensen, A. (2001). “Augustine’s Pauline Exegesis and Ambrosiaster,” in Van Fleteren, F. and Schnaubelt, J. C. (eds.), Augustine: Biblical Exegete. Pieterlin and Bern, 33–54.Google Scholar

Batinsky, E. E. (1993). “Julia in Lucan’s Tripartite Vision of the Dead Republic,” in DeForest, M. (ed.), Woman’s Power, Man’s Game: Essay on Classical Antiquity in Honor of Joy K. King, Wauconda, IL, 264–78.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. (1997). “Virgilian Didaxis: Value and Meaning in the Georgics,” in Martindale (1997): 125–44.Google Scholar

Beacham, R. C. (1999). Spectacle Entertainments of Early Imperial Rome. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (1993). “Looking (Harder) for Roman Myth: Dumézil, Declamation and Problems of Definition,” in Graf, F. (ed.), Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft: Das Paradigma Roms. Stuttgart, 44–64.Google Scholar

Bénichou, P. (1973). Le sacre de l’écrivain 1750–1830: essai sur l’avènement d’un pouvoir spiritual laïque dans la France moderne. Paris.Google Scholar

Bénichou, P. (1977). Le Temps des prophètes: doctrines de l’âge romantique. Paris.Google Scholar

Benjamin, W. (1982 [1927–1940]). Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 5, part 1: 5. Das Passagen-Werk 1, Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Berest, A. (2015). Recherche femme parfaite. Paris.Google Scholar

Bettenworth, A. (2004). Gastmahlszenen in der Antiken Epik von Homer bis Claudian. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyer de Ryke, B. (1999). “L’apport augustinien: Augustin et l’augustinisme politique,” in Renaut (1999): 43–86.Google Scholar

Bhatt, S. (2017). “The Augustan Principate and the Emergence of Biopolitics: A Comparative Historical Perspective,” Foucault Studies 22: 72–93.Google Scholar

Binder, G. (1971). Aeneas und Augustus: Interpretationen zum 8. Buch der Aeneis. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar

Blaschka, K. (2015). Fiktion im Historischen. Die Bildsprache und die Konzeption der Charaktere in Lucans Bellum Civile. Rahden.Google Scholar

Bloch, H. (1994). God’s Plagiarist: Being an Account of the Fabulous Industry and Irregular Commerce of the Abbé Migne. Chicago.Google Scholar

Bloom, H. (1973). The Anxiety of Influence. New York.Google Scholar

Blössner, N. (2007). “The City-Soul Analogy,” in Ferrari, G. R. F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge, 345–85.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. (1973). Der Prozeß der theoretischen Neugierde. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Blumenberg, H. (1988 [1959]). “Kritik und Rezeption antiker Philosophie in der Patristik,” in Bohn, V. (ed.), Typologie: Internationale Beiträge zur Poetik. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Bochet, I. (2004). “Le firmament de l’Écriture”: l’herméneutique augustinienne. Paris.Google Scholar

Boime, A. (1987). Art in an Age of Revolution, 1750–1800, vol. 1: Social History of Modern Art. Chicago.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (ed.) (1986). P. Ovidius Naso: Metamorphosen, Buch XIV–XV. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Börm, H., and Havener, W. (2012). “Octavians Rechtsstellung im Januar 27 v. Chr. und das Problem der ‘Übertragung’ der res publica,” Historia. Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte 61/2: 202–20.Google Scholar

Börm, H., Mattheis, M., and Wienand, J. (eds.) (2016). Civil War in Ancient Greece and Rome: Contexts of Disintegration and Reintegration. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Borrutta, M. (2010). Antikatholizismus, Deutschland und Italien im Zeitalter der europäischen Kulturkämpfe. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Bossuet, J. (1694). Maximes et réflexions sur la comédie. Paris.Google Scholar

Bowd, G. (2010). Le monde de Houellebecq. Glasgow.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1986). The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics, and Aeneid of Virgil. Leiden.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (ed.) (1993a). Roman Epic. London.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1993b). “Introduction: The Roman Song,” in Boyle (1993a): 1–18.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1993c). “The Canonic Text: Virgil’s Aeneid,” in Boyle (1993a): 79–107.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. (1999). “Aeneid 8: Images of Rome,” in Perkell (1999): 148–61.Google Scholar

Bramble, J. C. (1983). “Lucan,” in Kenney, E. J. (ed.), Cambridge History of Latin Literature, vol. 2.4. Cambridge, 37–61. Orig. publ. 1982.Google Scholar

Braund, S. (2012). “Praise and Protreptic in Early Imperial Panegyric,” in Rees (2012): 85–108.Google Scholar

Bredekamp, H. (2012). Thomas Hobbes, der Leviathan: das Urbild des modernen Staates und seine Gegenbilder. 1651 – 2001. Berlin.Google Scholar

Breed, B., Damon, C., and Rossi, A. (2010). Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford.Google Scholar

Briant, P. (2012). Alexandre des lumières: fragments d’histoire européenne. Paris.Google Scholar

Brier, B. (2016). Cleopatra’s Needles: The Lost Obelisks of Egypt. London.Google Scholar

Bright, P. (ed. and trans.) (1999). Augustine and the Bible. Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar

Brombert, V. (1984). Victor Hugo and the Visionary Novel. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brooks, C. (1984). “‘Recalled to Life’: The Christian Myth of A Tale of Two Cities,” in Signs of the Times: Symbolic Realism in the Mid-Victorian World. London, 84–95.Google Scholar

Brooks, P. (2008). “Death in the First Person,” South Atlantic Quarterly 107/3: 530–46.Google Scholar

Brown, P. R. L. (1967). Augustine of Hippo. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Brown, P. R. L. (1972). “Political Society,” in Markus, R. A. (ed.), Augustine: A Collection of Critical Essays. New York, 311–29.Google Scholar

Brown, P. R. L. (2012). Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth, The Fall of Rome, and the Making of Christianity in the West, 350–550 a.d. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Bruère, R. T. (1951). “Lucan’s Cornelia,” Classical Philology 46: 221–36.Google Scholar

Bruggisser, P. (1987). Romulus servianus: la légende de Romulus dans les commentaires de Virgile de Servius: mythographie et idéologie à l’époque de la dynastie Théodosienne. Bonn.Google Scholar

Burton, P. (2012). “Augustine and Language,” in Vessey (2012): 113–24.Google Scholar

Bynum, C. W. (1984). Jesus as Mother: Studies in the Spirituality of the High Middle Ages. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (1977). “Paganism and Literature in Late Fourth Century Rome,” in Christianisme et formes littéraires de l’antiquité tardive en Occident: huit exposés suivis de discussions, Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 23 (Geneva), 1–40.Google Scholar

Cameron, M. (1999). “The Christological Substructure of Augustine’s Exegesis,” in Bright (1999): 74–103.Google Scholar

Cameron, M. (2012). Christ Meets Me Everywhere: Augustine’s Early Figurative Exegesis. Oxford.Google Scholar

Campion, P. (2004). “Raisons de la littérature: Quatrevingt-treize de Victor Hugo,” Romantisme 124/2: 103–14.Google Scholar

Cantarella, E. (1995). “Marzia e la locatio ventris,” in Raffaelli, R. (ed.), Vicende e figure femminili in Grecia e a Roma. Atti del Convegno Pesaro, 28–30 aprile 1994. Ancona, 251–58.Google Scholar

Caputo, J. D. (2012). “Augustine and Postmodernism,” in Vessey (2012): 492–504.Google Scholar

Caputo, J. D. and Scanlon, M. J. (eds.) (2005). Augustine and Postmodernism: Confessions and Circumfession. Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar

Cary, P. (2005). “United Inwardly by Love: Augustine’s Social Ontology,” in Doody, Hughes, and Paffenroth (2005): 3–33.Google Scholar

Catani, D. (2011). “The French Revolution: Historical Necessity or Historical Evil? Terror and Slavery in Hugo’s Quatrevingt-treize and Confiant’s L’Archet du colonel,” in Evans, D. and Griffiths, K. (eds.), Institutions and Power in Nineteenth-Century French Literature and Culture. Amsterdam, 51–67.Google Scholar

Celotto, G. (2015). “Lucan’s Influence on Tacitus’ Account of the Civil War between Otho and Vitellius.” Classical Association of the Mid-Western States (abstract at camws.org/sites/default/files/meeting2015/Abstracts2015/033.LucanonTacitus.pdf).Google Scholar

Chamarat-Malandain, G. (1991). “Voix et parole du peuple dans Quatrevingt-treize,” in Peyronie, André (ed.), Révolution française, peuple et littératures: images du peuple révolutionnaire, théâtralité sans frontières. Actes du XXIIe Congrès de la Société Française de Littérature Générale et Comparée (Nantes-Angers 1989). Paris.Google Scholar

Chamarat-Malandain, G. (2005). “Langue, parole et savoir dans Quatrevingt-treize,” in Naugrette, F. and Rosa, G. (eds.), Victor Hugo et la langue. Bréal, 279–97.Google Scholar

Chaplin, J. D. (2000). Livy’s Exemplary History. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chew, K. (2002). “Ignorance and Aeneas’ Identity in the ‘Aeneid’,” Latomus 61/3: 616–27.Google Scholar

Chiu, A. (2010). “The Importance of Being Julia: Civil War, Historical Revision, and the Mutable Past in Lucan’s Pharsalia,” Classical Journal 105/4: 343–60.Google Scholar

Cho, M.-A. (1998). “La théorie des deux cités et le pouvoir politique selon saint Augustin,” in Jehasse and McKenna (1998): 11–16.Google Scholar

Christgau, R. (2006). “The Psychological Crafts of Marshall Bruce Mathers III,” The Believer, February: www.robertchristgau.com/xg/music/eminem-06.php.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (2015). “La vittoria e il tempio: interpretazione del proemio al iii libro delle Georgiche,” in Fedeli and Günther (2015): 39–88.Google Scholar

Classen, C. J. (1991). “Virtutes Imperatoriae,” Arctos 25: 17–39.Google Scholar

Coates, T.-N. (2013) “Hip-hop Speaks to the Guns.” New York Times, February 6: www.nytimes.com/2013/02/07/opinion/coates-hip-hop-speaks-to-the-guns.html.Google Scholar

Compagnon, A. (2005). Les antimodernes: de Joseph de Maistre à Roland Barthes. Paris.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2015). The Life of Roman Republicanism. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. (2017). “The Romans Tried to Save the Republic from Men like Trump. They Failed.” Village Voice, January 17.Google Scholar

Connors, C. (1998). Petronius the Poet: Verse and Literary Tradition in the Satyricon. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1986). The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, trans. and ed. Segal, C. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1988). La “guerra civile” di Lucano: studi e prove di commento. Urbino.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1992). “Proems in the Middle.” Yale Classical Studies 29: 147–59.Google Scholar

Cornwell, H. (2017). Pax and the Politics of Peace: Republic to Principate. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cramer, T. (2005). “Das Subjekt und sein Widerschein. Beobachtung zum Wandel der Spiegelmetapher in Antike und Mittelalter,” in Bausch, M. (ed.), Inszenierungen von Subjektivität in der Literatur des Mittelalters. Königstein, 213–29.Google Scholar

Creuzer, F. (1837). Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker, besonders der Griechen, vol. 3. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Curtius, E. R. (2013). European Literature and the Latin Middles Ages. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Dahlmann, H. (1954). Der Bienenstaat in Vergils Georgica. Mainz.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2015). Studies on the Text of Caesar’s Bellum Civile. Oxford.Google Scholar

De Bruyn, T. (1993). “Ambivalences within a Totalizing Discourse: Augustine’s Sermons on the Sack of Rome,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 1: 405–21.Google Scholar

De Maistre, J. (1884). “Éclaircissement sur les Sacrifices,” in Oeuvres complètes de J. de Maistre. New edition, vol. 5. Lyon, 283–360.Google Scholar

De Man, P. (1979). Allegories of Reading. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Della Corte, F. (ed.) (1984–91). Enciclopedia Virgiliana, 6 vols. Florence.Google Scholar

Denby, D. (1997). “Civil War, Revolution and Justice in Victor Hugo’s Quatrevingt-treize,” Romance Studies 15/2: 7–17.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1994). Politique de l’amitié. Paris.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1998). Demeure: Maurice Blanchot. Paris.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (2000). Demeure: Fiction and Testimony. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Dilmac, B. (2014). “Houellebecq’s ‘Fin de Siècle’: Crisis of Society, Crisis of the Novel: Thematic and Poetological Intertextuality between Michel Houellebecq and Joris-Karl Huysmans,” in Landgraf, D. (ed.), Decadence in Literature and Intellectual Debate Since 1945. New York, 153–69.Google Scholar

Dodaro, R. (2004). Christ and the Just Society in the Thought of Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dodaro, R. (2012). “Augustine on the Statesman and the Two Cities,” in Vessey (2012): 386–97.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, C. (1967). Gli obelischi di Roma. Rome.Google Scholar

Doody, J., Hughes, K. L., and Paffenroth, K. (2005). Augustine and Politics. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar

Drinkwater, M. O. (2013). “Militia amoris: Fighting in Love’s Army,” in Thorsen, T. S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy. Cambridge, 194–206.Google Scholar

Drumont, E. (1886). La France juive devant l’opinion. Paris.Google Scholar

Dworkin, A. (1981). Pornography: Men Possessing Women. London.Google Scholar

Dyson, J. (1996). “Caesi Iuvenci and Pietas Impia in Virgil,” The Classical Journal 91/3: 277–86.Google Scholar

Dyson, J. (2001). King of the Wood: The Sacrificial Victor in Virgil’s Aeneid. Norman, OK.Google Scholar

Earl, D. C. (1961). The Political Thought of Sallust. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Earl, D. C. (1967). The Moral and Political Tradition of Rome. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Eco, U. (2006). “Excess and History in Hugo’s Ninety-three,” in Moretti, F. (ed.), The Novel, vol. 2, Forms and Themes. Princeton, NJ, 274–94.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. (1992). From a Sabine Jar: Reading Horace, Odes 1.9. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1993). The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (ed.) (1999). Roman Presences: Receptions of Rome in European Culture, 1789–1945. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (2007). Death in Ancient Rome. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Elm, S. (1996). The Virgins of God: The Making of Asceticism in Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar

Elm, S. (2017). “Signs under the Skin: Flogging Eternal Rome,” in Därmann, I. and Macho, T. (eds.), Unter die Haut: Tätowierungen als Logo- und Piktogramme. Paderborn, 51–75.Google Scholar

Elshtain, J. B. (1995). Augustine and the Limits of Politics. South Bend, IN.Google Scholar

Engels, D. (2013). Le déclin: la crise de l’Union européenne et la chute de la République romaine: quelques analogies historiques. Paris.Google Scholar

Esposito, R. (2011). Immunitas: The Protection and Negation of Life, trans. A. Hanafi. Cambridge, MA. Orig. publ. 2002.Google Scholar

Fagen, L. (2017). “Kendrick Lamar goes back to Bangers.” Hyperallergic, July 22: https://hyperallergic.com/391650/kendrick-lamar-goes-back-to-bangers/.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1985). “Caesar and the Mutiny: Lucan’s Reshaping of the Historical Tradition in De bello civili 5.237–373,” Classical Philology 80: 119–31.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1989) “Allecto’s First Victim: A Study of Vergil’s Amata,” in Stahl (1998): 135–53.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2010). “Discordia Fratrum: Aspects of Lucan’s Conception of Civil War”, in Breed, B. W., Damon, C., and Rossi, A. (eds.), Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars. Oxford, 207–20.Google Scholar

Farrell, J., and Nelis, D. (eds.) (2013). Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Farrell, J., and Putnam, M. C. J. (eds.) (2010). A Companion to Virgil’s Aeneid and Its Tradition. Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Favier, J. (1971). Finance et fiscalité au bas Moyen Âge. Paris.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P., and Günther, H.-C. (eds.) (2015). Studies on Vergil in Honour of Mario Geymonat (26.1.1941–17. 2.2012). Nordhausen.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1984). “The Reconciliations of Juno,” Classical Quarterly ns 34: 179–94.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991). The Gods in Epic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1998). Literature and Religion at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2004). “Sacrificial Ritual in Roman Poetry,” in Barchiesi, Rüpke, and Stephens (2004): 1–22.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2017). “Carthage and Rome: An Introduction,” Classical Philology 112/3: 301–11.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (ed.) (2009). The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feldherr, A. (2014). “Viewing Myth and History on the Shield of Aeneas,” Classical Antiquity 33/2: 281–318.Google Scholar

Felman, S. (1981). “Rereading Femininity,” Yale French Studies 62: 19–44.Google Scholar

Ferguson, P. P. (1994). Paris as Revolution: Writing the Nineteenth-Century City. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Ferguson, P. P. (1998). “Quatrevingt-treize: Turning the Terror to Account,” in Denommé, R. T. and Simon, R. H. (eds.), Unfinished Revolutions: Legacies of Upheaval in Modern French Culture. University Park, PA.Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F. (2005). City and Soul in Plato’s Republic. Chicago.Google Scholar

Fertik, H. (2018). “Obligation and Devotion: Creating a New Community in Lucan’s Bellum Civile,” Classical Philology 113: 449–71.Google Scholar

Fertik, H. (2019). The Ruler’s House: Contesting Power and Privacy in Julio-Claudian Rome. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Flower, H. (2006). The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar

Flower, H. (2010). Roman Republics. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Fögen, M. T. (2002). Römische Rechtsgeschichten: Über Ursprung und Evolution eines sozialen Systems. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Fomin, A. (1977). “Theatrum Philosophicum,” in Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, trans. D. F. Bouchard and S. Simon. Ithaca, NY, 165–96.Google Scholar

Fomin, A. (2016). “Speeches in Dio Cassius,” in Lange, C. J. and Madsen, J. M. (eds.), Cassius Dio: Greek Intellectual and Roman Politician. Leiden, 217–37.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1987). “Vergil on Killing Virgins,” in Whitby, M. et al. (eds.), Homo Viator: Essays for John Bramble. Bristol, 185–98.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1990). “Deviant Focalization in Vergil’s Aeneid,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 216: 42–63.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1995). “Horace and the Aesthetics of Politics,” in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration. Oxford, 248–66.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (1998). “Opening the Gates of War: Aeneid 7.601–640,” in Stahl (1998): 155–74.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (2000). Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford.Google Scholar

Frank, T., Koschorke, A., Lüdemann, S., and Matala de Mazza, E. (2002). Des Kaisers neue Kleider: Über das Imaginäre politischer Herrschaft. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Freccero, J. (1975). “The Fig Tree and the Laurel: Petrarch’s Poetics,” Diacritics 5/1: 34–40.Google Scholar

Freccero, J. (1986). Dante: The Poetics of Conversion. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (2001). Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (ed.) (2005). The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (2014). “Recusatio as Political Theatre: Horace’s Letter to Augustus,” Journal of Roman Studies 104: 105–32.Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (2018a). “Donald Trump and Rome’s Mad Emperors,” Common Dreams, April 29.Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (2018b). “Donald Trump and the Tiberian Lie,” Common Dreams, December 4.Google Scholar

Frisch, A. (2018). “Emotional Justice in Agrippa d’Aubigné’s Tragiques,” Forum for Modern Language Studies 54/1: 73–84.Google Scholar

Fuhrer, T. (2004). Augustinus. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Fuhrer, T. (2011). “Krieg und (Un-)Gerechtigkeit. Augustin zu Ursache und Sinn von Kriegen,” in Formisano, M. and Böhme, H. (eds.), War in Words: Transformation of War from Antiquity to Clausewitz. Berlin, 23–36.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, M. (1959). “Proscriptio,” in Paulys Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft, vol. 23.2. Stuttgart, 2439–44.Google Scholar

Fumaroli, M. (2001). “Les abeilles et les araignées,” in Lecoq, A.-M. (ed.), La querelle des anciens et des modernes: XVIIe–XVIIIe siècles. Paris, 7–218.Google Scholar

Funkenstein, A. (1965). Heilsplan und natürliche Entwicklung: Formen der Gegenwartsbestimmung im Geschichtsdenken des hohen Mittelalters. Munich.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method. London.Google Scholar

Gagliardi, D. (1987). “Il banchetto in Lucano (note a Phars. 10.104–71),” Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica 5: 186–92.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2000). Virgil on the Nature of Things. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2003). “Poetry and the Backward Glance in Virgil’s ‘Georgics’ and ‘Aeneid’,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 133/2: 323–52.Google Scholar

Gale, M. R. (2013). “Virgil’s Caesar: Intertextuality and Ideology,” in Farrell and Nelis (2013): 278–96.Google Scholar

Gauvard, , C., de Libera, A., and Zink, M. (2004). Dictionnaire du Moyen Âge. Paris.Google Scholar

Geue, T. (2018). “Soft Hands, Hard Power: Sponging Off the Empire of Leisure (Virgil, Georgics 4),” Journal of Roman Studies 108: 115–40.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2006). The Structured Self in Hellenistic and Roman Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gillis, D. (1983). Eros and Death in the Aeneid. Rome.Google Scholar

Ginsberg, L. D. (2011). “Ingens as an Etymological Pun in the Octavia,” Classical Philology 106/4: 357–60.Google Scholar

Ginsberg, L. D. (2017a). Staging Memory, Staging Strife: Empire and Civil War in the Octavia. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ginsberg, L. D. (2017b). “Ut et hostem amarem: Jocasta and the Poetics of Civil War in Seneca’s Phoenissae,” in Trinacty, C. and Sampson, M. (eds.), Verba Aliter Instructa: Senecan Poetics, special volume on Senecan poetics. Ramus 46/1–2: 58–74.Google Scholar

Ginsberg, L. D., and Krasne, D. A. (eds.) (2018). After 69 ce: Writing Civil War in Flavian Rome. Trends in Classics, supplementary vol. 65. Berlin.Google Scholar

Girard, R. (1972). La violence et le sacré. Paris.Google Scholar

Giusti, E. (2018). Carthage in Virgil’s Aeneid: Staging the Enemy under Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gohin, Y. (2002). “Alternance et adherence des contraires dans Quatrevingt-treize,” in Hiddleston, J. A. (ed.), Victor Hugo: romancier de l’abîme. Oxford, 156–78.Google Scholar

Gorman, R. J., and Gorman, V. B. (2014). Corrupting Luxury in Ancient Greek Literature. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Götze, K.-H. (2016). “Sind wir noch zu retten? Überlegungen zur Kulturkritik und Handlungsstruktur in Houellebecqs Unterwerfung,” in Lendemains: Etudes Comparées sur la France / Vergleichende Frankreichforschung 41: 239–50.Google Scholar

Govrin, J. (2016). Sex, Gott und Kapital: Houellebecqs “Unterwerfung” zwischen neoreaktionärer Rhetorik und postsäkularen Politiken. Münster.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. M. (2005). Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. M. (2013). “Afterword,” in Farrell and Nelis (2013): 319–32.Google Scholar

Gransden, K. W. (1985). “The Fall of Troy,” Greece and Rome 32: 60–72.Google Scholar

Grewing, F., and Acosta-Hughes, B. (eds.) (2013). The Door Ajar: False Closure in Classical Antiquity. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1985). Latin Poets and Roman Life. London.Google Scholar

Grossman, K. (2012). The Later Novels of Victor Hugo: Variations on the Politics and Poetics of Transcendence. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. (2011). Rethinking the Other in Antiquity. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Gurval, R. A. (1995). Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of Civil War. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Haarhoff, T. J. (1960). “Vergil and Cornelius Gallus,” Classical Philology 55: 101–8.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. (1990). “Sacrifice, Society, and Vergil’s Ox-Born Bees,” in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses. Atlanta, 209–23.Google Scholar

Haecker, T. (1931). Vergil: Vater des Abendlands. Olten.Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1967). Augustine and the Latin Classics, 2 vols. Stockholm.Google Scholar

Hall, J. M. (1997). Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hamilton, J. F. (1994). “Terrorizing the ‘Feminine’ in Hugo, Dickens, and France,” Symposium 48.3: 204–15.Google Scholar

Hamilton, J. T. (2013). Security: Politics, Humanity, and the Philology of Care. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Hammer, D. (2014). Roman Political Thought: From Cicero to Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hampton, T. (1993). “‘Turkish Dogs’: Rabelais, Erasmus, and the Rhetoric of Alterity,” Representations 41: 58–82.Google Scholar

Harder, H. (2018). “Finding Fulfillment through Submission, or How the French Should Stop Worrying and Learn to Love Islam: Michel Houellebecq’s Soumission,” in Peer, L. H. (ed.), Transgressive Romanticism. Newcastle upon Tyne, 76–91.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1986). Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1993). The Epic Successors of Virgil: A Study in the Dynamics of a Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (2013). “Trojan Palimpsests: The Archaeology of Roman History in Aeneid 2,” in Farrell and Nelis (2013): 107–23.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (2014). The Last Cultural Hero: A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid. New York.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (2018). “Augustan and Late Antique Intratextuality: Virgil’s Aeneid and Prudentius’ Psychomachia,” in Harrison, Frangoulides, and Papanghelis (2018): 159–70.Google Scholar

Hardt, M., and Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Harich-Schwarzbauer, H., and Pollmann, K. (eds.) (2013). Der Fall Roms und seine Wiederauferstehungen in Antike und Mittelalter. Berlin.Google Scholar

Harris, W. (2001). Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (1990a). “Some Views of the Aeneid in the Twentieth Century,” in Harrison (1990b): 1–20.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (ed.) (1990b). Oxford Readings in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J., Frangoulides, S., and Papanghelis, T. D. (eds.) (2018). Intratextuality and Latin Literature. Berlin.Google Scholar

Haverkamp, A. (2000). “Allegorie,” in Barck, K., Fontius, M., Schlenstedt, D., Steinwachs, B., and Wolfzettel, F. (eds.), Ästhetische Grundbegriffe, vol. 1. Stuttgart, 49–103.Google Scholar

Haverkamp, A. (2004). Latenzzeit. Berlin.Google Scholar

Haverkamp, A. (2009). Metaphorologie. Zur Praxis von Theorie. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Hawkins, P. S. (1975). “Polemical Counterpoint in De Civitate Dei,” Augustinian Studies 6: 97–106.Google Scholar

Heil, A. (2007). “Christliche Deutung der Eklogen Vergils. Die Tityre-Initiale im Codex Klosterneuburg CCl 742,” Antike und Abendland 53: 100–19.Google Scholar

Heinze, R. (1915). Virgils Epische Technik, 2nd ed. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Heinze, R. (1993). Virgil’s Epic Technique, trans. of Heinze 1915 by H. Harvey, D. Harvey, and F. Robertson. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Hellegouarc’h, J. (1963). Le vocabulaire latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la république. Paris.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1987). “Lucan: The Word at War,” Ramus 16: 122–64.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1998). Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History and Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Henry, P. (1994). “Kénose,” in Supplément au Dictionnaire de la Bible. Paris.Google Scholar

Hershkowitz, D. (1998). The Madness of Epic: Reading Insanity from Homer to Lucan. Oxford.Google Scholar

Heyking, J. von (2001). Augustine and Politics as Longing in the World. Columbia, MO.Google Scholar

Hill, T. (2004). Ambitiosa Mors: Suicide and Self in Roman Thought and Literature. New York.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998). Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hofmann, F. (1933). Der Kirchenbegriff des heiligen Augustinus in seinen Grundlagen und in seiner Entwicklung. Munich.Google Scholar

Hollander, A. (1994). Sex and Suits. New York.Google Scholar

Hollingworth, M. (2010). The Pilgrim City: St Augustine of Hippo and His Innovation in Political Thought. London.Google Scholar

Holsclaw, G. (2016). Transcending Subjects: Augustine, Hegel, and Theology. Chichester.Google Scholar

Horne, A. J. (2018). “Georgic Justice,” Vergilius 64: 3–29.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1995). A Companion to the Study of Virgil. Leiden.Google Scholar

Huet, V. (1999). “Napoleon I: A New Augustus?” in Edwards, C. (ed.), Roman Presences: Receptions of Rome in European Culture, 1789–1945. Cambridge, 53–69.Google Scholar

Hugedé, N. (1957). La métaphore du miroir dans les épîtres de saint Paul aux Corinthiens. Paris.Google Scholar

Hunt, L. (1993). The Family Romance of the French Revolution. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York.Google Scholar

Hussey, A. (2010). “Présence humaine: Michel Houellebecq, poet-chansonnier,” in Bowd (2010): 59–70.Google Scholar

Huysmans, J.-K. (1977 [1884]). A rebours, ed. Fumaroli, M. Paris.Google Scholar

Inglebert, H. (1996). Les Romains chrétiens face à l’histoire de Rome. Histoire, chistianisme et romanité en Occident dans l’Antiquité tardive. Paris.Google Scholar

Inglebert, H. (2016). “Christian Reflections on Roman Citizenship (200–430),” in Ando (2016): 99–112.Google Scholar

Jal, P. (1962). “Le rôle des Barbares dans les guerres civiles de Rome, de Sylla à Vespasien,” Latomus 21: 8–48.Google Scholar

Jal, P. (1963). La Guerre civile à Rome. Étude littéraire et morale. Paris.Google Scholar

James, S. (1995). “Establishing Rome with the Sword: Condere in the Aeneid,” American Journal of Philology 116/4: 623–37.Google Scholar

Jauss, H. R. (1978). Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Jehasse, J., and McKenna, A. (eds.) (1998). Religion et Politique: Les avatars de l’augustinisme. Saint-Étienne.Google Scholar

Johnson, P. J. (2008). Ovid before Exile: Art and Punishment in the “Metamorphoses,” Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (1965). “Aeneas and the Ironies of Pietas,” Classical Journal 60: 360–4.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (1976). Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil’s Aeneid. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. (1987). Momentary Monsters: Lucan and His Heroes. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Johnston, P. A. (1977). “Eurydice and Proserpina in the Georgics,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 107: 161–72.Google Scholar

Johnston, P. A. (1980). Virgil’s Agricultural Golden Age: A Study of the Georgics. Leiden.Google Scholar

Joseph, T. A. (2012). Tacitus the Epic Successor: Virgil, Lucan and the Narrative of Civil War in the Histories. Leiden.Google Scholar

Josephson, M. (1942). Victor Hugo: A Realistic Biography of the Great Romantic. Garden City, NY.Google Scholar

Joshel, S. R. (2002). “The Body Female and the Body Politic: Livy’s Lucretia and Verginia,” in McClure, L. K. (ed.), Sexuality and Gender in the Classical World. Oxford, 163–87.Google Scholar

Junkerjürgen, R. (2009). Haarfarben: Eine Kulturgeschichte in Europa seit der Antike. Cologne.Google Scholar

Kallendorf, C. (1989). In Praise of Aeneas: Virgil and Epideictic Rhetoric in the Early Renaissance. Hanover, NH.Google Scholar

Kalyvas, S. N. (2006). The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kantorowicz, E. H. (1957). The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Kapust, D. J. (2011). Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kapust, D. J. (2018). “The Founders Hated Excessive Flattery. What Would They Think about the Trump Administration?” Washington Post, January 22.Google Scholar

Kasper, J., and Wild, C. (2015). Rom rückwärts: Europäische Übertragungsschicksale. Paderborn.Google Scholar

Kaster, R. (1988). The Guardians of Language. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Keitel, E. (2010). “The Art of Losing: Tacitus and the Disaster Narrative,” in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman (Oxford), 331–52.Google Scholar

Keith, A. (2018). “Engendering Civil War in Flavian Epic,” in Ginsberg and Krasne (2018): 295–320.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. (1992). “‘Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference,” in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London, 26–58.Google Scholar

Keyser, P. T. (2020). Recovering a Late-Antique Edition of Pliny’s Natural History. New York.Google Scholar

Kienast, D. (1969). “Augustus und Alexander,” Gymnasium 76: 430–56.Google Scholar

Kimmerle, N. (2015). Lucan und der Prinzipat. Inkonsistenz und unzuverlässiges Erzählen im “Bellum Civile.” Berlin.Google Scholar

King, P. (2014). “Augustine on Language,” in Meconi and Stump (2014): 292–310.Google Scholar

Kittsteiner, D. (1991). Die Entstehung des modernen Gewissens. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Knauer, G. N. (1964). Die Aeneis und Homer. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Knobloch, C. (2016). “Houellebecqs Unterwerfung als kulturkritische Diskursanalyse gelesen,” Lendemains: Etudes Comparées sur la France / Vergleichende Frankreichforschung 41: 251–63.Google Scholar

Kölmel, W. (1970). Regimen Christianum: Weg und Ergebnisse des Gewaltenverhältnisses und Gewaltenverständnisses (8. bis 14. Jahrhundert). Berlin.Google Scholar

Komorowska, A. (2016). “‘Mais c’est d’une ambigüité étrange’: die Rezeption von Michel Houellebecqs Roman ‘Soumission’ in Frankreich und Deutschland,” Romanische Studien 3: 137–69.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (1977). Catullus’ Indictment of Rome: The Meaning of Catullus 64. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Konstan, D. (2018). “Praise and Flattery in the Latin Epic: A Case of Intertextuality,” in Harrison, Frangoulides, and Papanghelis (2018): 341–52.Google Scholar

Koppenfels, M. von (2012). Schwarzer Peter: Der Fall Littell, die Leser und die Täter. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Kopperschmidt, J. (1990). Rhetorik und Theodizee: Studie zur hermeneutischen Funktionalität der Rhetorik bei Augustin. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Koschorke, A., Lüdemann, S., Frank, T., and Matala de Mazza, E. (2007). Der fiktive Staat: Konstruktionen des politischen Körpers in der Geschichte Europas. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, trans. K. Tribe. New York.Google Scholar

Kraus, C. S. (1991). “Initium turbandi omnia a femina ortum est: Fabia Minor and the Election of 367 b.c.,” Phoenix 45/4: 314–25.Google Scholar

Kristeva, J. (1980a). Pouvoir de l’horreur: Essai sur l’abjection. Paris.Google Scholar

Kristeva, J. (1980b). “The Bounded Text,” in Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York, 36–63.Google Scholar

Kristeva, J. (1980c). “Word, Dialogue and Novel,” in Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York, 64–91.Google Scholar

Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York.Google Scholar

Kristeva, J. (1989). Etrangers à nous-mèmes. Paris.Google Scholar

Krulic, B. (2011). “Une lecture théologico-politique de l’idée démocratique: Edgar Quinet.” www.dogma.lu.Google Scholar

La Bonnaridière, A.-M. (1999). “Augustine’s Biblical Initiation,” in Bright (1999): 5–25.Google Scholar

La Bua, G. (2013). “Horace’s East: Ethics and Politics.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 107: 265–96.Google Scholar

Lacchè, L. (2016). “Expanding Citizenship? The French Experience Surrounding the Code Napoléon,” in Ando (2016): 177–98.Google Scholar

Lachmann, R. (1990). Gedächtnis und Literatur: Intertextualität in der russischen Moderne. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Lammel, I. (2015). Der Toussaint-Louverture-Mythos: Transformationen in der französischen Literatur, 1791–2012. Bielefeld.Google Scholar

Lange, C. H. (2009). Res Publica Constituta. Leiden.Google Scholar

Lange, C. H. (2013). “Triumph and Civil War in the Late Republic,” Papers of the British School at Rome 81: 67–90.Google Scholar

Lange, C. H. (2016a). Review of Börm, Mattheis, and Wienand (2016), The Classical Review 66.2: 502–4; long version available at www.academia.edu/18710216/Review_of_Börm_H._Mattheis_M._and_Wienand_J._eds._2015_Civil_War_in_Ancient_Greece_and_Rome_Contexts_of_Disintegration_and_Reintegration_Stuttgart_Steiner_The_Classical_Review_forthcoming_long_version (accessed Jan. 25, 2016).Google Scholar

Lange, C. H. (2016b). Triumphs in the Age of Civil War: The Late Republic and the Adaptability of Triumphal Tradition. London.Google Scholar

Lange, C. H. (2017). “Stasis and Bellum Civile: A Difference in Scale?,” Critical Analysis of Law 4/1: 129–40.Google Scholar

Lange, C. H. (2019). “Augustus, the Res Gestae, and the End of Civil War: Unpleasant Events?” in Lange and Vervaet (2019a): 185–209.Google Scholar

Lange, C., and Vervaet, F. (eds.) (2019a). The Historiography of Late Republican Civil War. Leiden: 263–91.Google Scholar

Lange, C., and Vervaet, F. (2019b). “Sulla and the Origins of the Concept of Bellum Civile,” in Lange and Vervaet (2019a): 17–28.Google Scholar

Lange, K. (1966). “Geistliche Speise: Untersuchungen zur Metaphorik der Bibelhermeneutik,” Zeitschrift für deutsches Altertum und deutsche Literatur 95/2: 81–122.Google Scholar

Langlands, R. (2011). “Roman Exempla and Situation Ethics: Valerius Maximus and Cicero de Officiis,” Journal of Roman Studies 101: 100–22.Google Scholar

Langlands, R. (2015). “Roman Exemplarity: Mediating between General and Particular,” in Lowrie and Lüdemann (2015): 68–80.Google Scholar

Langlands, R. (2018). Exemplary Ethics in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Laurent, F. (2002). “‘La guerre civile? qu’est-ce à dire? Est-ce qu’il y a une guerre étrangère?’” in Millet, C. and Rebérioux, M. (eds.), Hugo et la guerre. Paris, 133–56.Google Scholar

Lavan, M. (2017). “Writing Revolt in the Early Roman Empire,” in Firnhaber-Baker, J. and Schoenars, D. (eds.), The Routledge History Handbook of Medieval Revolt. Abingdon, 19–38.Google Scholar

Lear, J. (1997). “Inside and Outside the Republic,” in Kraut, R. (ed.), Plato’s Republic: Critical Essays. New York, 61–94.Google Scholar

Lee, O. (1979). Fathers and Sons in Virgil’s Aeneid. Albany, NY.Google Scholar

Lee, O. (1989). “The Golden Age: Eclogue 4,” in Death and Rebirth in Virgil’s Arcadia. Albany, NY, 77–88.Google Scholar

Lee, O. (1996). Virgil as Orpheus: A Study of the Georgics. Albany, NY.Google Scholar

Lefèvre, E. (1998). “Vergil as a Republican,” in Stahl (1998): 101–18.Google Scholar

Lefort, C. (1981). “Permanence du théologico-politique?” Le temps de la reflexion 2: 13–60; reprinted in Lefort (1986): 251–300.Google Scholar

Lefort, C. (1986). Essais sur le politique (XIXe–XXe siècles). Paris.Google Scholar

Legendre, P. (1964). La pénétration du Droit romain dans le Droit canonique classique de Gratien à Innocent IV, 1140–1254. Paris.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. (1997). Lucan: Spectacle and Engagement. Oxford.Google Scholar

Leitao, D. D. (2004). “Ritual? What Ritual?”, in Barchiesi, Rüpke, and Stephens (2004): 149–53.Google Scholar

Leopold, S. (2014). “Eros und Polis: Aeneas und die Folgen: von Augustus zu Richelieu,” in Liebe im Ancien Régime: Eros und Polis von Corneille bis Sade. Paderborn, 62–76.Google Scholar

Leupin, A. (1993). Fiction et incarnation. Paris.Google Scholar

Levene, D. (2000). “Sallust’s ‘Catiline’ and Cato the Censor,” Classical Quarterly ns 50: 170–91.Google Scholar

Lewis, B. (1974). “The Rape of Troy: Infantile Perspective in Book ii of the Aeneid,” Arethusa 7: 103–13.Google Scholar

Lilla, M. (2015). “Slouching toward Mecca,” review of M. Houellebecq, Soumission, New York Review of Books, April 2: www.nybooks.com/articles/2015/04/02/slouching-toward-mecca/.Google Scholar

Lim, R. (2012). “Augustine and Roman Spectacles,” in Vessey (2012): 138–50.Google Scholar

Lim, W. S. H. (2010). John Milton, Radical Politics, and Biblical Republicanism. Cranbury.Google Scholar

Lind, L. R. (1994). “Thought, Life, and Literature at Rome,” Latomus 227: 5–71.Google Scholar

Lloyd, C. (1999). “The Evander–Anchises Connection: Fathers, Sons, and Homoerotic Desire in Vergil’s Aeneid,” Vergilius 45: 3–21.Google Scholar

Lobur, J. A. (2011). “Resuscitating a Text: Velleius’ History as Cultural Evidence,” in Cowan, E. (ed.), Velleius Paterculus: Making History. Swansea, 203–18.Google Scholar

Loraux, N. (1997a). “La guerre dans la famille,” Clio 5: 21–62.Google Scholar

Loraux, N. (1997b). La cité divisée: l’oubli dans la mémoire d’Athènes. Paris.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (1997). Horace’s Narrative Odes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2001). “Literature Is a Latin Word,” Vergilius 2001: 29–38.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2005). “Vergil and Founding Violence,” Cardozo Law Review 25: 945–76.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2007). “Making an Exemplum of Yourself: Cicero and Augustus,” in Heyworth, S. J., with Fowler, P. G. and Harrison, S. J. (eds.), Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Oxford, 91–112.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2008). “Evidence and Narrative in Mérimée’s Catilinarian Conspiracy,” New German Critique 103: 9–25.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2009). Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2010a). “Rom immer wieder gegründet,” in Döring, T., Vinken, B., and Zöller, G. (eds.), Übertragene Anfänge: Imperiale Figurationen um 1800. Paderborn, 23–49.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2010b). “Horace, Odes 4,” in Davis, G. (ed.), A Companion to Horace. Chichester, 210–30.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2013). “Foundation and Closure,” in Grewing and Acosta-Hughes (2013): 83–102.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2014). “Politics by Other Means: Horace’s Ars Poetica,” in Ferenczi, A. and Hardie, P. (eds.), New Approaches to Horace’s Ars Poetica, Materiali e Discussioni 72/1: 121–42.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2015a). “Rege incolumi: Orientalism and Security at Georgics 4.212,” in Fedeli and Günther (2015): 321–42.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2015b). “Le corps du chef: transformations dans la sphère publique à l’époque d’Horace,” in Delignon, B., Le Meur, N., and Thevenaz, O. (eds.), Le poète lyrique dans la cité antique. Lyon, 71–86.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2015c). “The Egyptian Within: A Roman Trope for Civil War,” in Vinken, B. (ed.), Translatio Babylonis: Unsere orientalische Moderne. Paderborn, 13–28.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2015d). “Reversio (Lucan),” in Kasper and Wild (2015): 171–8.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (2018). “Figures of Discord and the Roman Addressee in Horace, Odes 3.6,” in Harrison, Frangoulides, and Papanghelis (2018): 211–25.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (forthcoming a). “Political Thought,” in Gibson, R. and Whitton, C. (eds.), Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M. (forthcoming b). Security, Safety, and Care: A Roman Political Discourse. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M., and Lüdemann, S. (2015). Exemplarity and Particularity: Thinking through Particulars in Philosophy, Literature, and Law. London.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M., and Vinken, B. (2018). “Correcting Rome with Rome: Victor Hugo’s Quatrevingt-treize,” in Dufallo, B. (ed.), Roman Error: Classical Reception and the Problem of Rome’s Flaws. Oxford, 179–90.Google Scholar

Lowrie, M., and Vinken, G. (2019). “Married to civil war: a Roman trope in Lucan’s poetics of history,” in C. H. Lange and F. J. Vervaet (eds.), The Historiography of Late Republican Civil War. Leiden, 263–91.Google Scholar

Lubac, H. de (1984). “Augustinisme politique?” in Théologie d’occasion. Paris, 255–308.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1987). Further Voices in Vergil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mac Góráin, F. (2013). “Virgil’s Bacchus and the Roman Republic,” in Farrell and Nelis (2013): 124–45.Google Scholar

Mac Góráin, F. (2016). “The Poetics of Vision in Virgil’s Aeneid,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 109: 383–427.Google Scholar

Mac Góráin, F. (2018). “Vergil’s Sophoclean Thebans,” Vergilius 64: 131–56.Google Scholar

MacCormack, S. (1998). The Shadows of Poetry: Vergil in the Mind of Augustine. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

MacCormack, S. (1999). “Classical Authors,” in Fitzgerald, A. D. (ed.), Augustine Through the Ages: An Encyclopedia. Grand Rapids, MI, 202–6.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). “Sexuality, Pornography, and Method: ‘Pleasure under Patriarchy’,” Ethics 99/2: 314–46.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, C. A. (1996). Only Words. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

MacRae, D. (2016). Legible Religion. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Maltby, R. (1991). A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymologies. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mandouze, A., and Fouilheron, J. (eds.) (1985). Migne et le renouveau des études patristiques. Paris.Google Scholar

Maraval, P. (ed. and trans.) (2001). Eusèbe de Césarée: la théologie politique de l’Empire chrétien. Louanges de Constantin (Triakontaétérikos). Paris.Google Scholar

Marchesi, S. (2011). Dante and Augustine. Toronto.Google Scholar

Marchetta, A. (2013). Vita agreste e poesia agreste nel finale del ii libro delle Georgiche di Virgilio. Tivoli.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (2010). “Eros and Empire: Virgil and the Historians on Civil War,” in C. S. Kraus, J. Marincola, and C. Pelling (eds.), Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman (Oxford), 183–204.Google Scholar

Marion, J.-L. (1977). L`idole et la distance. Paris.Google Scholar

Maris, B. (2014). Houellebecq économiste. Paris.Google Scholar

Markell, P. (2009). Bound by Recognition. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Marrou, H.-I. (1958 [1938]). Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique. Paris.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. (ed.) (1997). The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Maschek, D. (2018). Die römischen Bürgerkriege: Archäologie und Geschichte einer Krisenzeit. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Masters, J. (1992). Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mathy, J.-P. (2017). “Le Terroir, l’Histoire, et la Vierge Noire: ce qui ne passe pas (encore) dans Soumission de Michel Houellebecq,” Contemporary French and Francophone Studies 21/3: 257–265.Google Scholar

Matthes, M. (2000). The Rape of Lucretia and the Founding of Republics. University Park, PA.Google Scholar

Mayer, C. (ed.) (1986–). Augustinus-Lexikon, 3 vols. Basel.Google Scholar

Mazzotta, G. (1979). Dante: Poet of the Desert. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

McAleer, G. (2020). “Victorian Pagans,” Law and Liberty, October 2: https://lawliberty.org/book-review/victorian-pagans/.Google Scholar

McCormick, J. (2011). Machiavellian Democracy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mebane, J. (2016). “Pompey’s Head and the Body Politic in Lucan’s De bello civili,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 146/1: 191–215.Google Scholar

Mebane, J. (2017). The Body Politic and Roman Political Languages. Chicago.Google Scholar

Mecke, J. (2003). “Der Fall Houellebecq: Zu Formen und Funktionen eines Literaturskandals,” in Eggeling, G. and Segler-Meßner, S. (eds.), Europäische Verlage und romanische Gegenwartsliteraturen: Profile, Tendenzen, Strategien. Tübingen, 194–217.Google Scholar

Meconi, D. V., and Stump, E. (2014). The Cambridge Companion to Augustine, 2nd ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mehlman, J. (1977). Revolution and Repetition: Marx/Hugo/Balzac. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Meizoz, J. (2007). Postures littéraires: mises en scène modernes de l’auteur. Geneva.Google Scholar

Mercati, M. (1981). Gli obelischi di Roma. Bologna.Google Scholar

Micale, M. S. (1990). “Charcot and the Idea of Hysteria in the Male,” Medical History 34: 363–411.Google Scholar

Migne, J. P. (1865). Patrologiae cursus completus. Latina series. Successores. Paris.Google Scholar

Miles, G. B. (1980). Virgil’s Georgics: A New Interpretation. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Milnor, K. (2005). Gender, Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. Oxford.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. N. (1991). “The Violence of Virginity,” Arethusa 24: 219–38.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1942). “Camillus and Concord,” Classical Quarterly 36: 111–20.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1977). “Pagan and Christian Historiography in the Fourth Century a.d.,” in Essays in Ancient and Modern Historiography. Oxford, 107–26. Orig. publ. Momigliano, A. (ed.) (1963). The Conflict between Paganism and Christianity in the Fourth Century. Oxford, 79–99.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. (1990). “Tacitus and the Tacitist Tradition,” in The Classical Foundations of Modern Historiography. Berkeley, CA, 109–31.Google Scholar

Morgan, L. (1999). Patterns of Redemption in Virgil’s ‘Georgics.’ Cambridge.Google Scholar

Morley, N. (2007). “Civil War and Succession Crisis in Roman Beekeeping,” Historia 56/4: 462–70.Google Scholar

Morrey, D. (2018). “The Banality of Monstrosity: On Michel Houellebecq’s Soumission,” Australian Journal of French Studies 55/2: 202–17.Google Scholar

Morrissey, R. (2010). Napoléon et l’héritage de la gloire. Paris.Google Scholar

Muecke, F. (2005). “Ennius and Lucilius,” in Freudenburg (2005): 33–47.Google Scholar

Mulhern, E. V. (2017). “Roma(na) Matrona,” Classical Journal 112/4: 432–59.Google Scholar

Murphy, A. R. (1999). Jean-François Millet: Drawn into the Light. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Murphy, C. (2007). Are We Rome? The Fall of an Empire and the Fate of America. Boston.Google Scholar

Murphy, S. (ed.) (2017). Lecture de l’éducation sentimentale. Rennes.Google Scholar

Narducci, E. (2002). Lucano: Un’ epica contro l’impero. Rome.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. (2004). “From Didactic to Epic: Georgics 2.458–3.48,” in Gale, M. (ed.), Latin Epic and Didactic Poetry: Genre, Tradition and Individuality. Swansea, 73–108.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. (2013). “Past, Present, and Future in Vergil’s Georgics,” in Farrell and Nelis (2013): 244–62.Google Scholar

Nelsestuen, G. (2015). Varro the Agronomist: Political Philosophy, Satire, and Agriculture in the Late Republic. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar

Newman, J. K. (1967). The Concept of Vates in Augustan Poetry. Brussels.Google Scholar

Niemeyer, G. (1983). Augustine’s Philosophy in Relation to History and Politics (VHS recording).Google Scholar

Nirenberg, D. (2013). Anti-Judaism: The Western Tradition. New York.Google Scholar

Noiriel, G. (2019). Le venin dans la plume: Édouard Drumont, Éric Zemmour et la part sombre de la République. Paris.Google Scholar

Nonnenmacher, K. (2016). “Unterwerfung als Konversion: Als-Ob-Bekehrungen zu Katholizismus und Islam bei Carrère und Houellebecq,” Romanische Studien 3: 171–98.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, J. J. (1980). “Augustine’s Classical Readings,” Recherches Augustiniennes et patristiques 15: 144–75.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, J. J. (1991). “The Authority of Augustine,” Augustinian Studies 22: 7–35.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, J. J. (2000). “The Next Life of Augustine,” in Klingshirn, W. E. and Vessey, M. (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Christianity: Essays on Latin Antique Thought and Culture in Honor of R. A. Markus. Ann Arbor, MI, 215–31.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, J. J. (2001). “Augustine: His Time and Lives,” in Stump and Kretzman (2001): 8–25.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, J. J. (2005). Augustine, Sinner and Saint: A New Biography. London.Google Scholar

O’Gorman, E. (1995). “Shifting Ground: Lucan, Tacitus, and the Landscape of Civil War,” Hermathena 158: 117–31.Google Scholar

O’Gorman, E. (2000). Irony and Misreading in the Annals of Tacitus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

O’Hara, J. (1990). Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Ohly, F. (1977 [1958]). “Vom geistigen Sinn des Wortes im Mittelalter,” in Schriften zur mittelalterlichen Bedeutungsforschung. Darmstadt, 1–31.Google Scholar

Olender, M. (2002). Les langues du Paradis: Aryens et Sémites, un couple providential. Paris.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (1997). “Sons and Lovers: Sexuality and Gender in Virgil’s Aeneid,” in Martindale (1997): 294–311.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (1998). Horace and the Rhetoric of Authority. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (2001). “Freud’s Aeneid,” Vergilius 47: 39–63.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. (2009). Freud’s Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Orlin, E. (ed.) (2016). Routledge Encyclopedia of Ancient Mediterranean Religions. New York.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. (2006). Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. (2014). Turia: A Roman Woman’s Civil War. Oxford.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. (2015). “Ending Civil War at Rome: Rhetoric and Reality (88 bce – 197 ce),” American Historical Review 120/5: 1683–95.Google Scholar

Osgood, J. (2018). Rome and the Making of a World State. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Otis, B. (1964). Virgil: A Study in Civilized Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Otten, W., and Pollmann, K. (eds.) (2007). Poetry and Exegesis in Premodern Latin Christianity: The Encounter between Classical and Christian Strategies of Interpretation. Leiden.Google Scholar

Owens, P. (2017). “Decolonizing Civil War,” Critical Analysis of Law 4/2: 160–9.Google Scholar

Ozouf, M. (1989). L’homme régénéré: essai sur la Révolution française. Paris.Google Scholar

Pagán, V. (2004). Conspiracy Narratives in Roman History. Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Pagán, V. (2008). “Toward a Model of Conspiracy Theory for Ancient Rome,” in E. Horn (ed.), Dark Powers: Conspiracy and Conspiracy Theory in History and Literature, special issue, New German Critique 103: 27–49.Google Scholar

Palais de Tokyo (2016). Magazine Palais 23.Google Scholar

Pandey, N. (2018). The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome: Latin Poetic Response to Imperial Iconography. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Paris, G., and Buchon, J. A. C. (1827). Chronique métrique de Philippe-le-Bel suivie de la taille de Paris, en 1313. Verdière.Google Scholar

Parry, A. (1963). “The Two Voices of Virgil’s ‘Aeneid’,” Arion 2/4: 66–80.Google Scholar

Paschalis, M. (1998). Virgil’s Aeneid: Semantic Relations and Proper Names. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pedullà, G. (2011). Machiavelli in tumulto: Conquista, cittadinanza e conflitto nei “Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio.” Rome.Google Scholar

Peirano, I. (2019). Persuasion, Rhetoric and Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pellegrini, J. (2007). “Note sur la double description de la ‘bugonia’ au chant iv des ‘Géorgiques’ (295–314 et 538–47),” Latomus 66/2: 336–41.Google Scholar

Pépin, J. (1976 [1958]). Mythe et allégorie. Les origines grèques et les contestations judéo-chrétiennes. Paris.Google Scholar

Pépin, J. (1987). La tradition de l’allégorie de Philon d’Alexandrie à Dante. Paris.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (1978). “A Reading of Vergil’s Fourth Georgic,” Phoenix 32: 211–22.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (1989). The Poet’s Truth: A Study of the Poet in Virgil’s Georgics. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Perkell, C. G. (ed.) (1999). Reading Vergil’s Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide. Norman, OK.Google Scholar

Petrey, S. (1980). History in the Text: Quatrevingt-Treize and the French Revolution. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Peyrache-Leborgne, D. (1996). “Roman historique et roman-idylle chez Dickens et Hugo: A Tale of Two Cities and Quatrevingt-treize,” Dalhousie French Studies 36: 51–67.Google Scholar

Piccaluga, G. (1995). “Fondazione della realtà e uscita della storia nel Sermo ‘de urbis excidio’,” Augustinianum 53: 497–510.Google Scholar

Pichon, R. (1912). Les sources de Lucain. Paris.Google Scholar

Plass, P. (1988). Wit and the Writing of History: The Rhetoric of Historiography. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Pogorzelski, R. J. (2016). Virgil and Joyce: Nationalism and Imperialism in the Aeneid and Ulysses. Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Pollman, K., and Otten, W. (eds.) (2013). The Oxford Guide to the Historical Reception of Augustine. Oxford.Google Scholar

Pornschlegel, C. (2015). “Das unerhörte Verlangen: Zu Michel Houellebecqs Roman ‘Unterwerfung’,” Stimmen der Zeit 9: 611–22.Google Scholar

Price, J. J. (2001). Thucydides and Internal War. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Price, J. J. (2015). “Thucydidean Stasis and the Roman Empire in Appian’s Interpretation of History,” in Welch, K. (ed.), Appian’s Roman History. Swansea, 45–63.Google Scholar

Pugliese Carratelli, G. (ed.) (1992). Roma e l’Egitto nell’Antichità Classica. Atti del I Congresso Internazionale Italo-Egiziano, Cairo 6–9 febbraio 1989. Rome.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1965). The Poetry of the Aeneid. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1979). Virgil’s Poem of the Earth. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1985). “Possessiveness, Sexuality and Heroism in the ‘Aeneid’,” Vergilius 31: 1–21.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1994). “Virgil’s Danaid Ekphrasis,” Illinois Classical Studies 19: 171–89.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1998). Virgil’s Epic Designs. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (1999). “Aeneid 12: Unity in Closure,” in Perkell (1999): 10–30.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (2000). Horace’s Carmen Saeculare: Ritual Magic and the Poet’s Art. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. (2008). “Italian Virgil and the Idea of Rome,” in Volk (2008): 138–60. Orig. publ. 1975.Google Scholar

Quartarone, L. (2011). “Quantity, Quality, Tension, and Transition: The Dimensions of Vergil’s ‘Ingens’,” Vergilius 57: 3–34.Google Scholar