Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:19:30.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Plaits, debates, and judgments in the Roman de Thèbes, the Roman de Troie and the Roman d'Eneas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2009

Barbara Nolan
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

In the Roman de Thèbes, in a delicate moral situation involving an accusation of political treachery, Othon, one of King Eteocles' vassals, directs his lord to “have the judgment first and then act accordingly.” The judgment Othon demands of Eteocles points tellingly to one of the most distinctive formal features of the twelfth-century romans antiques. In this chapter I examine ways in which both vernacular epic and classical academic forms of debate, questioning, and jugement help to shape the Roman de Thèbes, the Roman de Troie, and the Roman d'Eneas. These forms – inherited equally from the judicial trials or plaits of earlier vernacular literature (and life), the oratory of Latin epic, and medieval school practices of rhetorical disputation – enter more or less centrally into the making of all three of the twelfth-century French romans antiques. Ingeniously sidestepping matters of Christian doctrine by translating ancient secular matter, the clerkly romanciers used dramatized debate and argumentation to pose circumstantial moral questions of crucial interest to their lay aristocratic public. The issues they raised had to do not with religious belief but rather with possible or hypothetical systems of ethical conduct and value put to the test in the context of an uncertain world without the benefit of Christian revelation.

Signs of a twelfth-century academic interest in ancient modes of ethical argumentation appear in a manuscript of great importance for the history of medieval romance – the codex containing the only extant remnant of Alberic of Pisançon's Alexandre?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×