Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T14:32:15.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Youth and Information Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Ronald E. Anderson
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Jeylan T. Mortimer
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Reed W. Larson
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access

Summary

Economists around the world acknowledge rapid movement toward a global, knowledge-oriented economy, although this transformation is labeled different things such as “information society,” “global economy,” and the “new economy.” Although they do not agree on projections for the speed of this transition, policy decision makers in numerous countries have adopted the rhetoric of the information society and the inevitability of rapid social change. For instance, a UNESCO study group on Learning Without Frontiers released a report on Information and Communications Technology (ICT) (Blurton, 1999), as did the World Bank (1998) Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. Both reports projected major social changes from the global information economy and both recommended special attention to developing new mechanisms for lifelong learning using information technology.

This chapter analyzes how these global and societal changes have influenced the lives of adolescents and how they are likely to affect them in the future. For contemporary youth, the most immediate consequences of the growing information infrastructure are the technologies that help them interact with friends and family. With personal computers and hand held mobiles, more and different forms of interpersonal communication have become possible. New forms of leisure, shopping, and working also have become possible. Perhaps most noteworthy is the rapid access to new forms and types of knowledge.

All of these new opportunities, made possible by rapidly evolving information technology, are forcing young users of this technology to confront new ethical and legal issues.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Changing Adolescent Experience
Societal Trends and the Transition to Adulthood
, pp. 175 - 207
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. E. (ed. 1993). Computers in American Schools, 1992: An Overview, IEA Computers in Education Study, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Department of Sociology
Anderson, R. E., and Lundmark, V. (1996). “Cross-national perspectives on inequity in computer education.” In Plomp, T., Anderson, R. E., and Kontogiannopoulou-Polydorides, G. (eds.). Cross National Policies and Practices on Computers in Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Anderson, R. E., Lundmark, Vicki, Harris, Linda, and Magnan, Shon (1994). “Equity in computing.” Pp. 352–385 in Huff, Charles and Fineholt, Tom (eds.). Social Issues in Computing: Putting Computing in its Place. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Anderson, R. E., and Ronnkvist, Amy. (1999). “Teaching, learning, and computing, 1998,” University of California, Irvine. (http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/html/findings.html)
Barnes, Cecily. (2000). “Half of U.S. teens to own cell phones by 2004,” CNET News (December 19). (http://news.cnet.com/news/)
Baym, N. K. (1995). “The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication.” Pp. 138–163 in Jones, S. G. (ed.). Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Bell, Gordon, and Gray, Jim. (2001). “Digital immortality,”Communications of the ACM, 44, 3 (March):28–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blurton, C. (1999). “New directions of ICT-use in education,” UNESCO World Communication and Information Report, UNESCO, Paris, France
Brummelhuis, A. C. A. (1999). “ICT-monitor 1997–1998,” “Voortgezet Onderwijs. Enschede, the Netherlands: University of Twente, OCTO
Chon, Kilnam. (2001). “The future of the Internet digital divide,”, Communications of the ACM, 44, 3 (March):116–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Jeffey (2000). “Surveying the digital future,” The UCLA Internet Report, UCLA Center for Communication Policy, Los Angeles, CA. (http://www.ccp.ucla.edu/pages/internet-report.asp)
Collis, B., (1996). Tele-Learning in a Digital World – The Future of Distance Learning. London, UK: International Thomson Computer Press
Drexler, K. Eric. (1992). Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation, New York: Wiley Interscience
Finkelhor, David, Mitchell, Kimberly J., and Wolak, Janis. (2000). “Online victimization: A report on the nation's youth,” National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Alexandria, Virginia. (http://www.missingkids.com/download/nc62.pdf)
Gotcher, M., and Kanervo, E. (1997). “Perceptions and uses of electronic mail: A function of rhetorical style.”Social Science Computer Review, 15, 2:145-158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurak, L. J. (1996). “The case of Lotus Market-Place: Organization and ethos in a Net-based protest.” In Herring, Susan (ed.). Computer-Mediated Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Jones, S. G., (ed). (1995). Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Joy, Bill. (2000) “Why the future doesn't need us,”Wired, 8, 4 (April):1–11Google Scholar
Jupiter Media Metrix. (2001). “Targeting teens is a gender game.” (http://us.mediametrix.com/data/feature.jsp)
Kaiser Foundation. (1999). “Kids and media and the new millenium.” A report of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. (http://www.kff.org/content/1999/1535/KidsReport%20FINAL.pdf)
Kiesler, S. (1985). “Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion.”Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 1:77–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilger, M. (1996). “Emergence of the digital individual.” Paper presented at the 1996 Conference on Computer for the Social Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Kling, R. (ed.). (1996). Computerization and Controversy, 2nd edition, New York, NY: Academic Press
Kling, Rob, and Associates. (2000). Learning from Social Informatics. Bloomington, Indiana: Center for Social Informatics, Indiana University
Kraut, R.Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., and Scherlis, W. (1998). “Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?”American Psychologist, 53, 9:1017–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurzweil, Ray. (1999). The Age of Spiritual Machines, When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence. New York: Viking/Penguin Books
Kurzweil, Ray. (2000). “The future according to Ray Kurzweil,” Business Week Online. (http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/june2000/nf00629i.htm)
Kurzweil, Ray. (2001). “Promise and peril – The deeply intertwined poles of 21st century technology,”Communications of the ACM, 44, 3 (March):88–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampton, C. (1993). Nanotechnology Playhouse. Devon, UK: Waite Group Press
Leslie, John. (1996). The End of the World: The Science and Ethics of Human Extinction. New York, NY: Routledge
Markham, A. N. (1998). Life Online – Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press
Matheson, K. and Zanna, M. P. (1990). “Computer-mediated communication: The focus is on me.”Social Science Computer Review, 8, 1:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheson, K. (1991). “Social cues in computer-mediated communication: Gender makes a difference.”Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 3:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J. E., and Hollingshead, A. B. (1994). Groups Interacting with Technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
NPR. (2000). “NPR/Kaiser/Kennedy School Kids and Technology Survey.” (http://npr.org/programs/specials/poll/technology/technology.kids.html)
Orcutt, J., and Anderson, R. E. (1974). “Human-computer relationships: Interaction and attitudes,”Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 6, 2 (March):219–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelgrum, W., and Anderson, R. E. (ed.). ICT and the Emerging Paradigm for Life Long Learning: A Worldwide Educational Assessment of Infrastructure, Goals and Practices. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, 1999
Pelgrum, W. J., Janssen Reinen, I. A. J., and Plomp, T. (1993). Schools, Teachers, Students and Computers: A Cross-National Perspective. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), Hague, Netherlands
Pew. (2001). “Pew Internet Tracking Report.” Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington DC. (http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Changing_Population.pdf)
Reed, Mark A., and Tour, J. M. (2000). “Computing with molecules,”Scientific American, 282, 6 (June):68–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community; Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley
Robinson, J. P., and Godbey, G. (1997). Time for Life. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press
Robinson, J. P., Barth, K., and Kohut, A. (1997). “Personal computers, mass media, and use of time,”. Social Science Computer Review, 15, 1: 65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silberman, S. (1999). “Just say Nokia.”Wired 7, 9 September: 135–141Google Scholar
Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. (1993). “Computers, networks, and work. Global networks: Computers and international communication.” Pp. 105–119 in Harasim, L. M. (ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT
Stewart, James and Williams, Robin (1998). “The coevolution of society and multimedia technology: Issues in predicting the future innovation and use of a ubiquitious technology,”Social Science Computer Review, 16, 3:268–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkle, S. (1995). Life of the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1999). “Falling through the Net: Defining the digital divide.” (URL: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html)
Waldo, Jim. (2001). “When the network is every think,”. Communications of the ACM, 44, 3 (March):68–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, J. B. (1992). “Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective,”Communication Research, 19, 1:52–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Michael J. (2001). “Online America,” American Demographics (March). (Available online at http://www.demographics.com/publications/ad/01_ad/0103_ad/ad010301.htm)
Wellman, Barry, Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L.Gulia, M. and Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). “Computer networks as social networks: Virtual community, computer supported cooperative work and telework,”Annual Review of Sociology 22, 1(February):213–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×