Abbott, Don Paul 1996. Rhetoric in the New World. Columbia: University of South Carolina PressGoogle Scholar

Abdurrahman, Abdi Paşa 2008. Abdurrahman Abdi Paşa Vekâyi’-nâmesi. Istanbul: ÇamlıcaGoogle Scholar

Abu-Deeb, Kamal 1979. Al-Jurjānī’s Theory of Poetic Imagery. Warminster: Aris & PhillipsGoogle Scholar

al-Ṭayyib, Abū Faraj b 1967. Commentaire sur la Genèse par Ibn aṭ-Ṭaiyib, ed. Josephus Sanders, Joannes Cornelis. CSCO 274–75, Scriptores Arabici, vols. XXIV–XXV. Leuven: Secrétariat du Corpus SCOGoogle Scholar

Abullif, Wadīʿ 1991. “La Traduction des Quatre Evangiles d’al-Asʿad Ibn al-ʿAssāl (XIIIe Siècle),” Studia Orientalia Christiana 24: 216–24Google Scholar

Abullif, Wadīʿ 1997. Dirāsa ʿan al-Muʾtamin b. al-ʿAssāl wa-kitābihi “majmūʿ uṣūl al-dīn” wa-taḥ;qīqihi. Cairo: Franciscan Printing PressGoogle Scholar

Abullif, Wadīʿ 2006. “Al-Asʿad Ibn al-ʿAssal: Introduzioni alla Traduzione dei Quattro Vangeli [in Arabic],” Studia Orientalia Christiana 34: 47–120Google Scholar

Ács, Pál 2011. “‘Pro Turcis’ and ‘contra Turcos’: Curiosity, Scholarship and Spiritualism in Turkish Histories by Johannes Löwenklau (1541–1594),” Acta Comeniana 25: 25–46Google Scholar

Ahl, Frederick 1984. “The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome,” American Journal of Philology 105: 174–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahmed, Shahab, and Filipovic, Nenad 2004. “The Sultan’s Syllabus: A Curriculum for the Ottoman Imperial Medreses Prescribed in a Fermān of Qānūnī Süleymān, Dated 973 (1565),” Studia Islamica 98/99: 183–218Google Scholar

Aithal, Parameshavara Kota 1991. Veda-lakṣaṇa. Vedic Ancillary Literature: A Descriptive Bibliography. Stuttgart: Franz SteinerGoogle Scholar

Akgündüz, Ahmet 1992. Osmanlı Kanunnameleri ve Hukuki tahlileri 4. Istanbul: Fey VakfiGoogle Scholar

Aklujkar, Ashok 2004. “Can the Grammarians’ Dharma Be a Dharma for All?” Journal of Indian Philosophy 32: 687–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Philip S. 1998. “Homer the Prophet of All and ‘Moses our teacher’: Late Antique Exegesis of the Homeric Epics and of the Torah of Moses,” in Rutgers, L.V. et al. (eds), The Use of Sacred Books in the Ancient World. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 127–42Google Scholar

Alexander, Philip S. 2004. “The Etymology of Proper Names as an Exegetical Device in Rabbinic Literature,” Studia Philonica Annual 16: 169–87Google Scholar

Allen, James 2005. “The Stoics on the Origin of Language and the Foundations of Etymology,” in Frede and Inwood (eds), pp. 14–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alpers, K. 1969. Bericht über Stand und Methode der Ausgabe des Etymologicum Genuinum. Copenhagen: MunksgaardGoogle Scholar

Altmann, Alexander 1981. Essays in Jewish Intellectual History. Hanover N. H.: Brandeis & New England University PressGoogle Scholar

Amsler, Mark 1989. Etymology and Grammatical Discourse in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Amsterdam: BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antolin, Guillermo 1921. “La real Biblioteca del Escorial: organización y catalogación,” in Discursos leidos ante la Real Academia de la Historia en la recepción pública del P. Fr. Guillermo Antolin y Pajares O.S.A., el dia 5 de Junio de 1921. San Lorenzo del Escorial: Imprenta del Real MonasterioGoogle Scholar

Arrighetti, Graziano 1987. Poeti, eruditi e biografi: Momenti della riflessione dei Greci sulla letteratura, Pisa: GiardiniGoogle Scholar

Assmann, Jan 1996. “Translating Gods: Religion as a Factor of Cultural (Un)Translatability,” in Budick, S. and Iser, W. (eds), The Translatability of Cultures: Figurations of the Space Between. Stanford University Press, pp. 25–36, 306–10Google Scholar

Assmann, Jan 1997. Moses the Egyptian: The Memory of Egypt in Western Monotheism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audebert, Claude-France 1982. Al-Hattabi et l’inimitabilité du Coran. Institut français de DamasGoogle Scholar

Augustijn, Cornelis 1972. “Hyperaspistes I: la doctrine d’Erasme et de Luther sur la claritas scripturae,” in Margolin, Jean-Claude (ed.), Colloquia Erasmiana Turonensia, vol. II. Paris: Vrin, pp. 737–48Google Scholar

Augustine of Hippo, 1978. On the Greatness of the Soul, trans. Colleran, Joseph M.. Ancient Christian Writers: The Works of the Fathers in Translation 9. New York: Newman PressGoogle Scholar

Augustine of Hippo, 1986. De quantitate animae, ed. Hörmann, Wolfgang. CSEL 89. Vienna: Hoelder- Pichler-TempskyGoogle Scholar

Auroux, S., Koerner, E. F. K., Niederehe, H.-J., and Versteegh, K. (eds) 2000. History of the Language Sciences, vol. I/1. Berlin: De GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baalbaki, Ramzi 1983. “The Relation Between naḥ;w and balāgha: A Comparative Study of the Methods of Sibawayhi and Gurgani,” Zeitschrift für arabische Linguistik 11: 7–23Google Scholar

Babinger, Franz 1949. “Herkunft und Jugend Hans Löwenklaw’s,” Westfälische Zeitschrift 98/99: 112–27Google Scholar

Babinger, Franz 1951. “Johannes Löwenklaws Lebensende,” Basler Zeitschrift für Geschichte und Altertumskunde 50: 5–26Google Scholar

Babylonian Talmud 1520–23. Venice: BombergGoogle Scholar

Babylonian Talmud 1578–81. Basel: FrobenGoogle Scholar

Babylonian Talmud 1602. Cracow: Isaac ProstitzGoogle Scholar

Bacon, Francis 2000. The Advancement of Learning, ed. Kiernan, Michael. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Al-Baghdādī, Abū Muḥ;ammad b. Ghānim b. Muḥ;ammad 1999. Majma’ al-ḍamānāt fī madhhab al-Imām al-A’ẓam Abī Ḥanīfa al-Nu’mān. Dār al-Salām li-l-Tabā’a wa-l-Nashr wa-Tawzī’Google Scholar

Bahya ben, Asher 1545. Kad haKemah. Venice: GiustinianiGoogle Scholar

Bākre, M. (ed.) 1909. Brahmasūtra-Sāṅkarabhāṣyam, 2nd ed. Bombay: Nirnaya- Sagar PressGoogle Scholar

Baldinger, Kurt 1990. “L’étymologie hier et aujourd’hui,” in Baldinger, Kurt, Die Faszination der Sprachwissenschaft: Ausgewählte Aufsätze zum 70. Geburtstag. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 40–69Google Scholar

Baltacı, Cahid 2005. XV–XVI. Yüzyıllarda Osmanlı Medreseleri. Istanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi VakfıGoogle Scholar

Bantly, Francisca Cho 1989. “Buddhist Allegory in the Journey to the West,” Journal of Asian Studies 48: 512–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barker-Benfield, Bruce 1976. “A Ninth-Century Manuscript from Fleury: Cato de senectute cum Macrobio,” inAlexander, J. J. G. and Gibson, M. T. (eds), Medieval Learning and Literature. Oxford University Press, pp. 145–65Google Scholar

Barker-Benfield, Bruce 1983. “Macrobius,” in Reynolds, L. D. (ed.), Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford University Press, pp. 222–32Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan 1992. “Metacommentary,” in Annas, Julia (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. X. Oxford University Press, pp. 267–81Google Scholar

Barney, Rachel 2001. Names and Nature in Plato’s Cratylus. New York: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barwick, Karl 1957. Probleme der stoischen Sprachlehre und Rhetorik. Berlin: Akademie VerlagGoogle Scholar

Baxter, Timothy M. S. 1992. The Cratylus: Plato’s Critique of Naming. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bearzot, Cinzia 1999. “La storia greca nella Suda,” in Zecchini, Giuseppe (ed.), Il lessico Suda e la memoria del passato a Bisanzio: Atti della giornata di studio (Milano 29 aprile 1998). Bari: Edipuglia, pp. 35–74Google Scholar

Becker, Johannes 1915. De Suidae excerptis historicis. Bonn: Typis Caroli Georgi Typographi AcademiciGoogle Scholar

Becker, Peter, and Clark, William (eds) 2000. Little Tools of Knowledge: Historical Essays on Academic and Bureaucratic Practices. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

Beda, Venerabilis 1991. Libri II De arte metrica et De schematibus et tropis, ed. and trans. Kendall, Calvin B.. Saarbrücken: AQ-VerlagGoogle Scholar

Belardi, Walter 2002. L’etimologia nella storia della cultura occidentale. Rome: Il CalamoGoogle Scholar

Bellièvre, Claude 1956. Souvenirs de voyages en Italie et en Orient: notes historiques, pièces de vers, ed. Perrat, Charles. Geneva: DrozGoogle Scholar

Belvalkar, S. K. (ed.) 1938. Brahmasūtrapātha with Word-Index. Poona: Bilvakuñja Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar

Benedetti, Marina 2003. “Etymology Between Typology and History,” in Mancini, Marco (ed.), Il cambiamento linguistico. Rome: Carocci, pp. 209–62Google Scholar

Benedict of Nursia, 1977. Regula, ed. Hanslik, Rudolph. CSEL 75. Vienna: Hoelder- Pichler-TempskyGoogle Scholar

Ben-Zaken, Avner 2010. Cross-Cultural Scientific Exchanges in the Eastern Mediterranean, 1560–1660. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bepler, Jill 2007. “Early Modern German Libraries and Collections,” in Reinhart, Max (ed.), Early Modern German Literature, 1350–1700. Rochester, N.Y.: Camden House, pp. 697–735Google Scholar

Bertrac, Pierre 1993. Diodore de Sicile: Bibliothèque historique, vol. I. Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar

Betegh, Gabor 2004. The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Betegh, Gabor 2007. “The Derveni Papyrus and Early Stoicism,” Rhizai 4: 133–52Google Scholar

Bhadkamkar, Hari Mahadev, and Bhadkamkar, Ramkrishna Govind (eds) 1985 [1918]. The Nirukta of Yāska (with Nighaṇṭu) Edited with Durga’s Commentary. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research InstituteGoogle Scholar

Bhat, Govind Keshav 1978. “The Conception of Mantradevatā,” in Bhat, Govind Keshav, Vedic Themes: Articles on Vedic Topics. Delhi: Ajanta Publications, pp. 11–16Google Scholar

Bhattacharya, Bishnupada 1958. Yāska’s Nirukta and the Science of Etymology: An Historical and Critical Survey. Calcutta: K. L. MukhopadhyayGoogle Scholar

Bibliotheca historico-philologico-theologica IV.3 1721. Bremen: GrimmGoogle Scholar

Bischoff, Bernhard 1966. Mittelalterliche Studien: Ausgewählte Aufsätze zur Schriftkunde und Literaturgeschichte, vol. I. Stuttgart: Anton HiersemannGoogle Scholar

Bischoff, Bernhard 1990. Latin Palaeography: Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Jeremy, and Green, Anthony 1992. Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia: An Illustrated Dictionary. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar

Blair, Ann 1997. The Theater of Nature: Jean Bodin and Renaissance Science. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Blair, Ann 2003. “Reading Strategies for Coping with Information Overload, ca. 1550–1700,” Journal of the History of Ideas 64: 11–28Google Scholar

Blair, Ann 2004. “Note-Taking as an Art of Transmission,” Critical Inquiry 31: 85–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, Ann 2008. “Textbooks and Methods of Note-Taking in Early Modern Europe,” in Campi, Emidio, Angelis, Simone de, Goeing, Anja-Silvia, and Grafton, Anthony (eds), Scholarly Knowledge: Textbooks in Early Modern Europe. Geneva: Droz, pp. 39–73Google Scholar

Blair, Ann 2010a. “The Rise of Note-Taking in Early Modern Europe,” Intellectual History Review 20, no. 3: 303–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blair, Ann 2010b. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information Before the Modern Age. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Blank, David L. (ed.) 1998. Sextus Empiricus: Against the Grammarians. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Blank, David L. 2011. “Reading Between the Lies: Plutarch and Chrysippus on the Uses of Poetry,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40: 237–64Google Scholar

Blau, Joshua 1999. The Emergence and Linguistic Background of Judaeo-Arabic: A Study of the Origins of Neo-Arabic and Middle Arabic, 3rd ed. Jerusalem: Ben-Zvi InstituteGoogle Scholar

Bloch, R. Howard 1983. Etymologies and Genealogies: A Literary Anthropology of the French Middle Ages. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Blume, F., Lachmann, K., and Rudorff, A. (eds) 1848. Die Schriften der römischen Feldmesser. Berlin: Georg ReimerGoogle Scholar

Boatti, Anna 2000. “Il grammatico Tolemeo Pindarione e l’analogia,” in Arrighetti, G. and Tulli, M. (eds), Letteratura e riflessione sulla letteratura nella cultura classica. Pisa: Giardini, pp. 265–79Google Scholar

Bobzin, Hartmut 1995. Der Koran im Zeitalter der Reformation: Studien zur Frühgeschichte der Arabistik und Islamkunde in Europa. Stuttgart: Franz SteinerGoogle Scholar

Bobzin, Hartmut 1996. “‘A Treasury of Heresies’: Christian Polemics Against the Koran,” in Wild, Stefan (ed.), The Qur’an as Text. Leiden: Brill, pp. 157–75Google Scholar

Böhtlingk, Otto, and Roth, Rudolf 1855–75. Sanskrit-Wörterbuch, 7 vols. St. Petersburg: Buchdruckerei der Kaiserlichen Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar

Boissevain, Ursul Philip (ed.) 1895. Cassii Dionis Cocceiani historiarum Romanarum quae supersunt, 4 vols. Berlin; repr. Berlin: Weidmann, 1955Google Scholar

Bol, Peter K. 1989. “Chu Hsi’s Redefinition of Literati Learning,” in de Bary, Wm. Theodore and Chaffee, John W. (eds), Neo-Confucian Education: The Formative Stage. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 151–85Google Scholar

Bol, Peter K. 1992. “This Culture of Ours”: Intellectual Transitions in T’ang and Sung China. Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Bol, Peter K. 2008. Neo-Confucianism in History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia CenterGoogle Scholar

Bonebakker, Seeger 1970. “Aspects of the History of Literary Rhetoric and Poetics in Arabic Literature,” Viator 1: 75–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonfil, Robert 1992. “The Book of Honeycomb’s Flow by Judah Messer Leon,” in The Frank Talmage Memorial Volume, vol. II. Haifa University Press, pp. 21–33Google Scholar

Borello, Benedetta (ed.) 2009. Pubblico e Pubblici di antico regime. Pisa: PaciniGoogle Scholar

Bottéro, Jean 1992. Mesopotamia: Writing, Reasoning, and the Gods. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Boullata, Issa J. 1988. “The Rhetorical Interpretation of the Qur’ān: I’jāz and Related Topics,” in Rippin, Andrew (ed.), Approaches to the History of the Interpretation of the Qur’ān. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 139–57Google Scholar

Boullata, Issa J. 2003. “Literary Structures of the Qur’ān,” in EQ, vol. III, pp. 192–205Google Scholar

Bouza, Fernando 1989. “La Biblioteca de El Escorial y el orden de los saberes en el siglo XVI,” in Cremades, Fernando Checa (ed.), El Escorial: Arte, poder y cultura en la Corte de Felipe II. Universidad Complutense de MadridGoogle Scholar

Boys-Stones, George R. (ed.) 2003. Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brann, Rose 1991. The Compunctious Poet. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Brereton, J. 1986. “’Tat tvam asi’ in Context,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 136: 98–109Google Scholar

Brick, D. 2006. “Transforming Tradition into Texts: The Early Development of smṛti,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 34: 287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bridge, John 1930. “De quibusdam libris Suetonianis qui ex fonte Z emanaverunt.” Diss., Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar

Brisson, Luc 2004. How Philosophers Saved Myths: Allegorical Interpretation and Classical Mythology, trans. Tihanyi, Catherine. Chicago University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brock, Sebastian 1982. “A Fourteenth-Century Polyglot Psalter,” in Kadish, Gerald E. and Freeman, Geoffrey E. (eds), Studies in Philology in Honour of Ronald James Williams: A Festschrift. Toronto: SSEA Publication, pp. 1–15Google Scholar

Brockopp, Jonathan E. 2000. Early Mālikī Law: Ibn ʻAbd al-Ḥakam and His Major Compendium of Jurisprudence. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brody, Robert 2000. “The Geonim of Babylonia as Biblical Exegetes,” in Hebrew Bible, vol. I/2, pp. 74–88Google Scholar

Broggiato, Maria (ed.) 2001. Cratete di Mallo: I Frammenti. La Spezia: AgoràGoogle Scholar

Broggiato, Maria 2014. Filologia e interpretazione a Pergamo. Rome: Sapienza Università EditriceGoogle Scholar

Bronkhorst, Johannes 1981. “Nirukta and Aṣṭādhyāyī: Their Shared Presuppositions,” Indo-Iranian Journal 23: 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronkhorst, Johannes 2001. “Etymology and Magic: Yāska’s Nirukta, Plato’s Cratylus, and the Riddle of Semantic Etymologies,” Numen 48: 147–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronner, Yigal 2011. “A Text with a Thesis: The Rāmāyana from Appayya Dīksita’s Receptive End,” in Bronner, Yigal, Cox, Whitney, and McCrae, Lawrence (eds), South Asian Texts in History: Critical Engagements with Sheldon Pollock. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Asian Studies, pp. 45–63Google Scholar

Bronner, Yigal 2016. “A Renaissance Man in Memory: Appayya Dīkṣita Through the Ages,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 44: 11–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browning, Robert 1995. “Eustathios of Thessalonike Revisited,” Bulletin of the Institute for Classical Studies 40: 83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunt, Peter Astbury 1980. “On Historical Fragments and Epitomes,” Classical Quarterly 30: 477–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buffière, Félix 1956. Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar

Buffière, Félix 1973. Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque, 2nd ed. Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar

Burak, Guy 2012. “The Abū Ḥanīfah of His Time: Islamic Law, Jurisprudential Authority and Empire in the Ottoman Domains (16th–17th centuries).” Ph.D. diss., New York UniversityGoogle Scholar

Burak, Guy 2015. “Reflections on Canonization, Censorship and the Ottoman Practices of Takriz and Imza,” in Aynur, Hatice, Çakır, Müjgan, Koncu, Hanife, Kuru, Selim S. and Özyıldırım, Ali Emre (eds), Eski Metinlere Yeni Bağlamlar: Osmanlı Edebiyatı Çalışmalarında Yeni Yönelimler. Eski Türk Edebiyatı Çalışmaları X. Istanbul: Klasik Yayınları, pp. 96–117Google Scholar

Buridant, Claude (ed.) 1998. L’étymologie de l’antiquité à la Renaissance. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du SeptentrionGoogle Scholar

Burke, Peter 2000. A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity Press. Italian ed., 2002. Bologna: il MulinoGoogle Scholar

Burkert, Walter 2011. Griechische Religion der archaischen und klassischen Epoche. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: KohlhammerGoogle Scholar

Burman, Thomas 2007. Reading the Qur’àn in Latin Christendom, 1140–1560. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnett, Stephen 1996. From Christian Hebraism to Jewish Studies: Johannes Buxtorf (1564–1629) and Hebrew Learning in the Seventeenth Century. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Büttner-Wobst, Theodor 1906. “Die Anlage der historischen Encyclopädie des Konstantinos Porphyrogennetos,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 15: 88–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buxtorf, Johann 1603. Synagoga judaica: Das ist, Jüden Schul. Basel: Seb. Henricpetri. 4th ed., 1680. Synagoga Judaica, ed. Buxtorf, Johann II. Basel: KönigGoogle Scholar

Buxtorf, Johann 1604. Synagoga Judaica, hoc est, Schola Judaeorum. Hanau: AntoniusGoogle Scholar

Buxtorf, Johann 1607. Epitome radicum hebraicarum et chaldaicarum. Basel: WaldkirchGoogle Scholar

Buxtorf, Johann 1610. Institutio epistolaris hebraica. Basel: WaldkirchGoogle Scholar

Buxtorf, Johann 1613. De abbreviaturis hebraicis liber novus & copiosus. Basel: WaldkirchGoogle Scholar

Buxtorf, Johann 1639. Lexicon chaldaicum talmudicum et rabbinicum. Basel: KönigGoogle Scholar

Buxtorf, Johann 1651. Thesaurus grammaticus linguae sanctae Hebraeae. Basel: KönigGoogle Scholar

Buxtorf-Falkeisen, Carl 1860. Johannes Buxtorf Vater, Prof. ling. hebr. 1564–1629, erkannt aus seinem Briefwechsel. Basel: DetloffGoogle Scholar

Cahn, Michael 1986. Kunst der Überlistung. Munich: W. Fink VerlagGoogle Scholar

Cai, Zong-Qi 2001. A Chinese Literary Mind. Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Alan 1993. The Greek Anthology from Meleager to Planudes. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Alan 2004. “Poetry and Literary Culture in Late Antiquity,” in Swain, Simon and Edwards, Mark (eds), Approaching Late Antiquity. Oxford University Press, pp. 327–54Google Scholar

Cancik, Hubert 1999. “Crusius contra Frischlinum: Geschichte einer Feindschaft,” in Holtz, S. and Mertens, D. (eds), Nicodemus Frischlin (1547–1590): Poetische und prosaische Praxis unter den Bedingungen des konfessionellen Zeitalters. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, pp. 261–95Google Scholar

Cantarino, Vicente 1975. Arabic Poetics in the Golden Age. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carmi, Thomas 1981. The Penguin Book of Hebrew Verse. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar

Cassiodorus, M. Aurelius 2012. Cassiodoro: Expositio Psalmorum, ed. Stoppacci, P., vol. I. Florence: SismelGoogle Scholar

Catalogus librorum bibliothecae publicae quam vir ornatissimus Thomas Bodleius eques auratus in Academia Oxoniensi nuper instituit 1605. Oxford: Apud Iosephum BarnesiumGoogle Scholar

Cavigneaux, Antoine 1976. “Die sumerisch-akkadischen Zeichenlisten.” Ph.D. diss., Munich: Ludwig Maximilian UniversityGoogle Scholar

Cavigneaux, Antoine 1980–83. “Lexikalische Listen,” Reallexicon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie 6: 609–41Google Scholar

Cavigneaux, Antoine 1981. Textes scolaires du Temple de Nabû Ša Harê, vol. I. Baghdad: Republic of Iraq Ministry of Culture & InformationGoogle Scholar

Cavigneaux, Antoine 1987. “Aux sources du Midrash: l’herméneutique babylonienne,” Aula Orientalis 5: 243–55Google Scholar

Cerquiglini, Bernard 1999. In Praise of the Variant: A Critical History of Philology, trans. Wing, Betsy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Chambon, Jean-Pierre, and Lüdi, Georges (eds) 1991. Discours étymologiques. Tübingen: Max NiemeyerGoogle Scholar

Chan, Wing-tsit [Chen Rongjie] (ed.) 1963. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Chan, Wing-tsit 1969. Neo-Confucianism, etc.: Essays by Wing-tsit Chan. Hong Kong: Oriental SocietyGoogle Scholar

Chan, Wing-tsit 1987. Chu Hsi: Life and Thought. Hong Kong: Chinese University PressGoogle Scholar

Chan, Wing-tsit 1989. Chu Hsi: New Studies. Honolulu: University of Hawaii PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chan, Wing-tsit 2007. Zhuzi menren [Master Zhu’s disciples]. Shanghai: Huadong shifan daxue chubansheGoogle Scholar

Chaplin, J. D. 2010. “The Livian Periochae and the Last Republican Writer,” in Horster and Reitz (eds), pp. 451–67Google Scholar

Charpin, Dominique 2010. Reading and Writing in Babylon. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Chartier, Roger 2007. “The Order of Books Revised,” Modern Intellectual History 4, no. 3: 509–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chatelain, Jean-Marc 1997. “Les recueils d’Adversaria aux xvie et xviie siècles: des pratiques de la lecture savante au style de l’érudition,” in Barbier, Frederic et al. (eds), Le livre et l’historien: Études offertes en l’honneur du Professor Henri-Jean Martin. Geneva: Droz, pp. 169–86Google Scholar

Chemla, Karine, Harper, Donald, and Kalinowski, Marc (eds) 1999. Divination et rationalité en Chine ancienne. Saint-Denis: Presses Universitaires de VincennesGoogle Scholar

Chen, Kuang Yu 2005. “The Book of Odes: A Case Study of the Chinese Hermeneutic Tradition,” in Ching-I, Tu (ed.), Interpretation and Intellectual Change: Chinese Hermeneutics in Historical Perspective. London: Transaction, pp. 47–61Google Scholar

Cheng, Hao and Cheng, Yi 1981. Er Cheng Ji [The collection of the Cheng brothers], ed. Wang, Xiaoyu. Beijing: Zhonghua shujuGoogle Scholar

Cherniack, Susan 1994. “Book Culture and Textual Transmission in Sung China.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 54, no. 1: 5–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chiesa, Bruno 2000. Filologia storica della Bibbia ebraica, vol. I. Brescia: PaideiaGoogle Scholar

Chiron, Pierre 2000. “Quelques observations sur la théorie du discours figuré dans la Τέχνη du Ps.-Denys d’Halicarnasse,” in Montefusco, Lucia Calboli (ed.), Papers on Rhetoric, vol. III. Bologna: CLUEB, pp. 75–94Google Scholar

Chow, Kai-wing 1999. “Between Canonicity and Heterodoxy: Hermeneutical Moments of the Great Learning (Ta-Hsueh),” in Chow, Kai-wing, Ng, On-cho, and Henderson, John B. (eds), Imagining Boundaries: Changing Confucian Doctrines, Texts, and Hermeneutics. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 147–63Google Scholar

Śāstrī, Cinnasvāmī (ed.) 1941. Madhvatantramukhamardanam. Kāśī: Hitacinta- kamudraṇālayaGoogle Scholar

Civil, Miguel 1975. “Lexicography,” in Lieberman, Stephen J. (ed.), Sumerological Studies in Honor of Thorkild Jacobsen on His Seventieth Birthday, June 7, 1974. Assyriological Studies 20. University of Chicago Press, pp. 123–57Google Scholar

Civil, Miguel 1995. “Ancient Mesopotamian Lexicography,” in Sasson, Jack M. (ed.), Civilizations of the Ancient Near East. New York: Scribners, pp. 2305–14Google Scholar

Clanchy, Michael 1979. From Memory to Written Record: England, 1066–1307. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Clooney, F. X. 1993. Theology After Vedānta: An Experiment in Comparative Theology. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Mordechai Z. 2000. “Moses ibn Ezra,” in Hebrew Bible, vol. I/2, 282–301Google Scholar

Cohen, Mordechai Z. 2003. Review of Fenton, P., Philosophie et exégèse, Jewish Quarterly Review 93: 533–56Google Scholar

Cohen, Naomi G. 2007. Philo’s Scriptures: Citations from the Prophets and Writings. Evidence for a Haftarah Cycle in Second Temple Judaism. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Yoram 2009. The Scribes and Scholars of the City of Emar in the Late Bronze Age. Harvard Semitic Studies 59. Winona Lake, Ind.: EisenbraunsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colas, G. 2001. “Critique et transmission des textes dans la littérature sanskrite,” in Giard, L. and Jacob, C. (eds), Des Alexandries I: Du livre au texte. Paris: Bibliothèque Nationale de France, pp. 309–28Google Scholar

Colas, G., and Gerschheimer, G. (eds) 2009. Écrire et Transmettre en Inde Classique. Paris: École française d’Extrême-OrientGoogle Scholar

Cole, Thomas 1991. The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Colish, Marcia 1990. Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages: Stoicism in Christian Latin Thought Through the Sixth Century. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

“Commonplace Books,” in Reading: Harvard Views of Readers, Readership and Reading History. http://ocp.hul.harvard.edu/reading/commonplace.html, consulted July 18, 2012Google Scholar

Conley, Thomas M. 1990. Rhetoric in the European Tradition. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Connolly, Joy 2010. “The New World Order: Greek Rhetoric in Rome,” in Worthington, Ian (ed.), A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. London: Blackwell, pp. 139–65Google Scholar

Copeland, Rita, and Sluiter, Ineke 2009. Medieval Grammar and Rhetoric. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Copeland, Rita, and Struck, Peter T. (eds) 2010. The Cambridge Companion to Allegory. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cramer, A. (ed.) 1839. Anecdota Graeca e codd. manuscriptis bibliothecae regiae Parisiensis, vol. II. Oxford: E Typographeo AcademicoGoogle Scholar

Cribiore, Raffaella 2001. Gymnastics of the Mind. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croiset, Maurice 1874. De publicae eloquentiae principiis apud Graecos in Homericis carminibus. Montpellier: J. MartelGoogle Scholar

Crown, Alan D., Pummer, Reinhard, and Tal, Abraham (eds) 1993. A Companion to Samaritan Studies. Tübingen: Mohr SiebeckGoogle Scholar

Crusius, Martin 1584. Turcograeciae Libri Octo: Quibus Graecorum Status Sub Imperio Turcico in Politia & Ecclesia, Oeconomia & Scholis, iam inde ab amissa Constantinopoli, ad haec usq[ue] tempora, luculenter describitur. Basel: HenricpetrusGoogle Scholar

Crusius, Martin 1927–61. Diarium, ed. Göz, Wilhelm, Conrad, Ernst, Stahlecker, Reinhold, and Staiger, Eugen, 4 vols. Tübingen: LauppGoogle Scholar

Cullhed, Eric 2014. “Eustathios of Thessalonike: Parekbolai on Homer’s Odyssey 1–2.” Diss., UppsalaGoogle Scholar

Al-Curcani, [Al-Jurjānī] 1959. Die Geheimnisse der Wortkunst, trans. Ritter, Hellmut. Wiesbaden: SteinerGoogle Scholar

Dahan, Gilbert 1993. “La connaissance de l’hébreu dans les correctoires de la Bible du XIII^e siècle: Notes préliminaire,” in Sed-Rajna, Gabrielle (ed.), Rachi 1040–1990: Hommage à Ephraïm E. Urbach. Paris: Éd. du Cerf, pp. 567–78Google Scholar

Dahan, Gilbert 1997.” La critique textuelle dans les correctoires de la Bible du XIII^e siècle,” in Libera, Alain de, Elamrani-Jamal, Abdelali, and Galonnier, Alain (eds), Langages et Philosophie: Hommage à Jean Jolivet. Paris: Vrin, pp. 365–92Google Scholar

Dahan, Gilbert 2000. “Genres, Forms and Various Methods in Christian Exegesis of the Middle Ages,” in Hebrew Bible, vol. I/2, pp. 196–236Google Scholar

Dai, Lianbin 2012. “Books, Reading, and Knowledge in Ming China.” D. Phil thesis, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar

Daston, Lorraine J. 1986. “The Physicalist Tradition in Early Nineteenth Century French Geometry,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 17, no. 3: 269–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daston, Lorraine J. 2001. “Perchè i fatti sono brevi?” Quaderni storici, n.s. 108: 745–70Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine J. 2011. “The Empire of Observation: 1600–1800,” in Daston, and Lunbeck, (eds), pp. 81–113Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine, and Lunbeck, Elizabeth (eds) 2011. Histories of Scientific Observation. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Dawson, David 1992. Allegorical Readers and Cultural Revision in Ancient Alexandria. Berkeley: University of California PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Bary, William Theodore, Bloom, Irene, and Chan, Wing-tsit (eds) 1999. Sources of Chinese Tradition, 2 vols., 2nd ed. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

de Boor, Carl (ed.) 1883–85. Theophanis Chronographia, 2 vols. Leipzig: Teubner; repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 1963Google Scholar

de Boor, Carl 1884. “Zu den Excerptsammlungen des Konstantin Porphyrogennetos,” Hermes 19: 123–48Google Scholar

de Boor, Carl 1886. “Die Chronik des Georgios Monachos als Quelle des Suidas,” Hermes 21: 1–26Google Scholar

de Boor, Carl 1912. “Suidas und die Konstantinische Excerptsammlung 1,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 21: 381–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Boor, Carl 1914–19. “Suidas und die Konstantinische Excerptsammlung 2,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 23: 1–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Defterdar Sarı, Mehmet Paşa 1995. Zübde-i Vekayiât. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu BasımeviGoogle Scholar

Degenais, John 1994. The Ethics of Reading in Manuscript Culture. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Delaruelle, Louis 1900. “Un recueil d’adversaria autographes de Girolamo Aleandro,” Mélanges d’archéologie et d’histoire publiés par l’École française de Rome 20: 3–21Google Scholar

Delaunois, Marcel 1952. “Comment parlent les héros d’Homère,” Les Etudes Classiques 20: 80–92Google Scholar

Del Bello, Davide 2007. Forgotten Paths: Etymology and the Allegorical Mindset. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America PressGoogle Scholar

Delnero, Paul 2010. “Sumerian Extract Tablets and Scribal Education,” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 62: 53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Man, Paul 1979. Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Dentice di Accadia, Stefano (ed.) 2010. Ps. Dionigi di Alicarnasso: I discorsi figurati 1 e 2. Pisa: Fabrizio SerraGoogle Scholar

de Regt, Lenart, and Fokkelman, Jan P. (eds) 1996. Literary Structure and Rhetorical Strategies in the Hebrew Bible. Assen: van GorcumCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deshpande, Madhav 1996. “The Vedic Traditions and Origins of Grammatical Thought in Ancient India,” in Balbir, Nalini and Pinault, Georges-Jean (eds), Langue, style et structure dans le monde indien. Centenaire de Louis Renou; Actes du Colloque international (Paris, January 25–27), pp. 145–70Google Scholar

Deshpande, Madhav 2011. “Will the Winner Please Stand Up: Conflicting Narratives of a Seventeenth-Century Philosophical Debate from Karnataka,” in Talbot, C. (ed.), Knowing India: Colonial and Modern Constructions of the Past: Essays in Honor of Thomas Trautmann. New Delhi: Yoda Press, pp. 366–80Google Scholar

Deshpande, Madhav 2016. “Appayya Dīkṣita and the Lineage of Bhaṭṭojī Dīkṣita,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 44: 115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deussen, P. 1906a. Das System des Vedānta, nach den Brahmasūtra’s des Bādarāyaṇa und dem Kommentare des Śaṅkara über dieselben als ein Kompendium der Dogmatik des Brahmanismus, 2nd ed. Leipzig: BrockhausGoogle Scholar

Deussen, P. 1906b. The Philosophy of the Upanishads, trans. Geden, A. V.. Edinburgh: T. & T. ClarkGoogle Scholar

Deutsch, Yaacov 2012. Judaism in Christian Eyes: Ethnographic Descriptions of Jews and Judaism in Early Modern Europe, trans. Aronsky, Avi. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Valois, Henri (ed.) 1634. Polybij, Diodori Siculi, Nicolai Damasceni, Dionysij Halicar., Appiani Alexand, Dionis et Ioannis Antiocheni excerpta ex collectaneis Constantini Augusti Porphyrogenetae. Paris: Sumptibus Mathurini du PuisGoogle Scholar

De Weerdt, Hilde 2006. “Changing Minds Through Examinations: Examination Critics in Late Imperial China,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 126, no. 3: 367–77Google Scholar

Dichy, Joseph 2009. “Aux sources interprétatives de la rhétorique arabe et de l’exégèse coranique,” in Woerther (ed.), pp. 45–77Google Scholar

Diener, Ronald 1978. “The Magdeburg Centuries: A Bibliothecal and Historiographical Analysis.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard Divinity SchoolGoogle Scholar

Dikken, Berend Jan 2012. “Some Remarks About Middle Arabic and Saʿadya Gaon’s Arabic Translation of the Pentateuch in Manuscripts of Jewish, Samaritan, Coptic Christian, and Muslim Provenance,” in Zack, Liesbeth and Schippers, Arie (eds), Middle Arabic and Mixed Arabic: Diachrony and Synchrony. Leiden: Brill, pp. 51–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dingel, Joachim 1974. Seneca und die Dichtung. Heidelberg: C. Winter VerlagGoogle Scholar

Dionisotti, A. C. 1997. “On Fragments in Classical Scholarship,” in Most (ed.), pp. 1–33Google Scholar

Donatus, Tib. Claudius 1905–06. Interpretationes Vergilianae, ed. Georges, Heinrich, 2 vols. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Dönitz, Saskia 2008. “Überlieferung und Rezeption des Sefer Yosippon – eine Studie zur Historiographie und zum Geschichtsbewusstsein des Judentums im Mittelalter.” Ph.D. thesis, Freie Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar

Dotan, Aaron 2000. “The Origins of Hebrew Linguistics and the Exegetic Tradition,” in Auroux et al. (eds), vol. I/1, pp. 215–28Google Scholar

Dubischar, Markus 2010. “Survival of the Most Condensed? Auxiliary Texts, Communications Theory, and Condensation of Knowledge,” in Horster and Reitz (eds), pp. 39–67Google Scholar

Dunston, A. John 1952. “Two Manuscripts of Suetonius’ De vita Caesarum,” Classical Quarterly 2: 146–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkin, Philip 2009. The Oxford Guide to Etymology. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

EAL 1998 = ed. Julie Schott Meisami and Paul Starkey (eds), Encyclopedia of Arabic Literature, 2 vols. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Edzard, Dietz O. 1999. “Sumerisch-akkadische Listenwissenschaft und andere Aspekte altmesopotamischer Rationalität,” in Gloy, Karen (ed.), Rationalitätstypen. Freiburg: Alber-Reihe Philosophie, pp. 246–67Google Scholar

Eideneier, Hans (ed.) 1994a. Graeca recentiora in Germania: Deutsch-griechische Kulturbeziehungen vom 15. bis 19. Jahrhundert. Wolfenbütteler Forschungen 59. Wiesbaden: HarrassowitzGoogle Scholar

Eideneier, Hans 1994b. “Martinus Crusius Neograecus und die Folgen,” in Eideneier (ed.) 1994a, pp. 123–36Google Scholar

Eideneier, Hans 1994c. “Von der Handschrift zum Druck: Martinus Crusius und David Höschel als Sammler griechischer Venezianer Volksdrucke des 16. Jahrhunderts,” in Eideneier (ed.) 1994a, pp. 93–111Google Scholar

Elman, Benjamin A. 1984. From Philosophy to Philology: Intellectual and Social Aspects of Change in Late Imperial China. Cambridge, Mass.: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar

Elman, Benjamin A. 2000. A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China. Berkeley: University of California PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

El Shamsy, Ahmed 2013. The Canonization of Islamic Law: A Social and Intellectual History. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elyada, Aya 2009. “Protestant Scholars and Yiddish Studies in Early Modern Europe,” Past and Present 203, no. 1: 69–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Endress, Gerhard 1986. “Grammatik und Logik: Arabische Philologie und griechische Philosophie im Widerstreit,” in Mojsisch, Burkhard (ed.), Sprachphilosophie in Antike und Mittelalter. Amsterdam: Grüner, pp. 163–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eustathii archiepiscopi, Thessalonicensis (ed.) 2006. Organizing Knowledge: Encyclopaedic Activities in the Pre-Eighteenth Century Islamic World. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

EQ 2001–06 = Jane D. McAuliffe (gen. ed.), Encyclopedia of the Qur’ān, 5 vols. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Erler, Michael 1991. “Epitêdeuein asapheian,” Cronache Ercolanesi 21: 83–88Google Scholar

Erünsal, İsmail E. 2008. Ottoman Libraries: A Survey of the History, Development and Organization of Ottoman Foundation Libraries. Department of Near Eastern Languages and Literatures, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar

Eustathius archiepiscopus, Thessalonicensis 1825–26. Commentarii in Homeri Odysseam, 2 vols., ed. Stallbaum, Johann G.. Leipzig: WeigelGoogle Scholar

Eustathii archiepiscopi, Thessalonicensis 1971–87. Commentarii ad Homeri Iliadem pertinentes, 4 vols., ed. van der Valk, Marchinus. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Evans, Gillian 1976. “The ‘Sub-Euclidean’ Geometry of the Earlier Middle Ages up to the Mid-Twelfth Century,” Archive for the History of Exact Sciences 16: 105–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, Robert J. W 1979. The Making of the Habsburg Monarchy. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Excerpta historica iussu imperatoris Constantini Porphyrogeniti confecta, 4 vols. Vol. I, 1, Excerpta de legationibus Romanorum ad gentes, ed. de Boor, C., Berlin, 1903. Vol. I, 2, Excerpta de legationibus gentium ad Romanos, ed. de Boor, C., Berlin, 1903. Vol. II, 1, Excerpta de virtutibus et vitiis I, ed. Büttner-Wobst, Th. and Roos, A. G., Berlin, 1906. Vol. II, 2, Excerpta de virtutibus et vitiis II, ed. Roos, A. G., Berlin, 1910. Vol. III, Excerpta de insidiis, ed. de Boor, C., Berlin, 1905. Vol. IV, Excerpta de sententiis, ed. Ph. Boissevain, U., Berlin, 1906. All vols. repr. Hildesheim: Olms, 2003Google Scholar

Fabian, Claudia, Bubenik, Claudia, Hernad, Béatrice, and Jahn, Cornelia (eds) 2008. Kulturkosmos der Renaissance: die Gründung der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek. Wiesbaden: HarrassowitzGoogle Scholar

Feder, K. A. L. (ed.) 1848–55. Excerpta e Polybio, Diodoro Dionysio Halicarnassensi, atque Nicolas Damasceno … Darmstadt: C. W. LeskeGoogle Scholar

Findlen, Paula 2003. “The Museum: Its Classical Etymology and Renaissance Genealogy,” in Preziosi, Donald and Farago, Claire (eds), Grasping the World: The Idea of the Museum. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 159–91Google Scholar

Finkelberg, Margalit 2003. “Homer as a Foundation Text,” in Finkelberg, Margalit and Stroumsa, Guy G (eds), Homer, the Bible and Beyond. Leiden: Brill, pp. 75–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, E. 2012. “The Sources of Sectarian Debate: The Extra-textual Life of Sanskrit Philology in Seventeenth-Century South India.” South Asia Graduate Student Conference, ChicagoGoogle Scholar

Flusin, Bernard (2002) “Les Excerpta Constantiniens: Logique d’une anti-histoire,” in Pittia (ed.), pp. 537–59Google Scholar

Flusin, Bernard 2004. “Les Excerpta Constantiniens et la chronographie de Malalas,” in Beaucamp, Joëlle et al. (eds), Recherches sur la chronique de Jean Malalas I. Paris: Association des Amis du Centre d’Histoire et Civilisation de Byzance, pp. 119–36Google Scholar

Fögen, Thorsten 2003. “Metasprachliche Reflexionen antiker Autoren zu den Charakteristika von Fachtexten und Fachsprachen,” in Horster, Marietta and Reitz, Christiane (eds), Antike Fachschriftsteller: Literarischer Diskurs und sozialer Kontext. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 31–60Google Scholar

Folkerts, Menso 1982. “Die Altercatio in der Geometrie I des Pseudo-Boethius: Ein Beitrag zur Geometrie im mittelalterlichen Quadrivium,” in Van de Vyver, A. (ed.), Fachprosa-Studien: Beiträge zur mittelalterlichen Wissenschafts- und Geistesgeschichte. Berlin: Erich Schmidt, pp. 84–114Google Scholar

Folkerts, Menso 2006. The Development of Mathematics in Medieval Europe: The Arabs, Euclid, Regiomontanus. Aldershot, UK: AshgateGoogle Scholar

Frahm, Eckart 2011. Babylonian and Assyrian Text Commentaries: Origins of Interpretation. Mesopotamian Textual Records 5. Münster: Ugarit-VerlagGoogle Scholar

Frank, David 2000. “Karaite Exegesis,” in Hebrew Bible, vol. I/2, pp. 110–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin, James 2000. “Diagrammatic Reasoning and Modeling in the Imagination: The Secret Weapons of the Scientific Revolution,” in Freeland, Guy and Corones, Anthony (eds), 1543 and All That: Image and Word, Change and Continuity in the Proto-Scientific Revolution. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 53–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, P. M., and Matthews, E. (eds) 1987–2013 A Lexicon of Greek Personal Names. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Frede, Dorothea, and Inwood, Brad (eds) 2005. Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frede, Michael 1987. “Principles of Stoic Grammar,” in Frede, Michael, Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 301–37Google Scholar

Freedman, Joseph 1998. Review of Ann Moss, Printed Common-Place Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought, Scientia poetica 2: 222–42Google Scholar

Frisius, Johann Jakob 1583. Bibliotheca instituta et collecta, primum a Conrado Gesnero: deinde in epitomen redacta, & novorum librorum accessione locupletata, tertio recognita, & in duplum post priores editiones aucta, per Iosiam Simlerum: iam verò postremò aliquot mille, cum priorum tum novorum authorum opusculis, ex instructissima Viennensi Austriae imperatoria bibliotheca amplificata. Zurich: FroschoverusGoogle Scholar

Fuhr, Karl 1902. “Περὶ τῆς καθ᾿ Ὅμηρον ῥητορικῆς,” Berliner Philologische Wochenschrift 22: 1499–1500Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, Manfred 1966. “Obscuritas: Das Problem der Dunkelheit in der rhetorischen und literaturästhetischen Theorie der Antike,” in Iser, Wolfgang (ed.), Immanente Ästhetik – Ästhetische Reflexion: Lyrik als Paradigma der Moderne Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp. 47–72Google Scholar

Fujitsuka, Chikashi 1949. Rongo Sōsetsu [General discussions of the Analects]. Tōkyō: KōbundōGoogle Scholar

Gacek, Adam 1989. “Technical Practices and Recommendations Recorded in Classical and Post-classical Arabic Scholars Concerning the Copying and Correction of Manuscripts,” in Deroche, François (ed.), Les Manuscrits du Moyen-Orient: Essais de codicologie et paléographie. Istanbul: Bibliothèque Nationale, pp. 51–60Google Scholar

Gacek, Adam 2006. “The Copying and Handling of Qurʾān’s: Some Observations on the Kitāb al-Maṣāḥ;if by Ibn Abī Dāʾūd al-Sijistānī,” Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph 59: 229–51Google Scholar

Gacek, Adam 2007. “Taxonomy of Scribal Errors and Corrections in Arabic Manuscripts,” in Pfeiffer, Judith and Kropp, Manfred (eds), Theoretical Approaches to the Transmission and Edition of Oriental Manuscripts: Proceedings of a Symposium Held in Istanbul March 28–30, 2001. Würzburg: Ergon in Kommission, pp. 217–35Google Scholar

Gacek, Adam 2009. Arabic Manuscripts: A Vademecum for Readers. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gagarin, Michael 2007. “Background and Origins: Oratory and Rhetoric Before the Sophists,” in Worthington, Ian (ed.), A Companion to Greek Rhetoric. London: Blackwell, pp. 27–36Google Scholar

Galewicz, D. 2009. A Commentator in Service of the Empire: Sāyaṇa and the Royal Project of Commenting on the Whole of the Veda. Vienna: Institut für Indologie der Universität Wien, Sammlung De NobiliGoogle Scholar

Gantzert, Merijn 2006a. “Syrian Lexical Texts (1): A Comparison of the Ugaritic and Emar Syllabary A Paleography Texts,” Ugarit Forschungen 38: 269–81Google Scholar

Gantzert, Merijn 2006b. “Syrian Lexical Texts (3): The Peripheral Weidner God Lists,” Ugarit Forschungen 38: 299–311Google Scholar

Gardner, Daniel K. 1986. Chu Hsi and the Ta-Hsüeh: Neo-Confucian Reflection on the Confucian Canon. Cambridge, Mass.: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar

Gardner, Daniel K. 1990. Learning to Be a Sage: Selections from the Conversations of Master Chu, Arranged Topically. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Gardner, Daniel K. 1991. “Modes of Thinking and Modes of Discourse in the Sung: Some Thoughts on the Yü-lu (‘Recorded Conversations’) Texts,” Journal of Asian Studies 50, no. 3: 574–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, Daniel K. 1998. “Confucian Commentary and Chinese Intellectual History,” Journal of Asian Studies 57, no. 2: 397–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardner, Daniel K. 2003. Zhu Xi’s Reading of the Analects: Canon, Commentary, and the Classical Tradition. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Gardner, Daniel K. 2007. The Four Books: The Basic Teachings of the Later Confucian Tradition. Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar

Geldner, Karl Friedrich 1951. Der Rig-veda aus dem Sanskrit ins Deutsche übersetzt und mit einem laufenden Kommentar versehen. I–III. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Gencer, Yasemin 2010. “İbrahim Müteferrika and the Age of the Printed Manuscript,” in Gruber, Christiane (ed.), The Islamic Manuscript Tradition: Ten Centuries of Book Arts in Indiana University Collections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 154–93Google Scholar

Génébrard, Gilbert 1559. Eisagoge ad legenda Rabbinorum commentaria. Paris: Martin le JeuneGoogle Scholar

Gerbert of Aurillac, 1963. Gerberti postea Silvestri II papae Opera Mathematica (972–1003), ed. Bubnov, Nikolaus. Hildesheim: Georg Olms VerlagsbuchhandlungGoogle Scholar

Gerow, Edwin 1977. Indian Poetics. Wiesbaden: HarrassowitzGoogle Scholar

Gerow, Edwin 2008. Preface to Slaje, Walter (ed.), Śāstrārambha: Inquiries into the Preamble in Sanskrit. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, pp. ix–xvGoogle Scholar

Gesche, Petra D. 2000. Schulunterricht in Babylonien im ersten Jahrtausend v. Chr. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 275. Münster: Ugarit-VerlagGoogle Scholar

Gessner, Conrad 1545. Bibliotheca Uniuersalis, sive Catalogus omnium scriptorum locupletissimus, in tribus linguis, Latina, Græca, & Hebraica. Zurich: FroschoverusGoogle Scholar

Gessner, Conrad 1548. Pandectarum sive partitionum universalium Conradi Gesneri Tigurini, medici & philosophiae professoris, libri XXI. Zurich: FroschoverusGoogle Scholar

Al-Ghazzī, Najm al-Dīn Muḥ;ammad b. Muḥ;ammad 1982. Luṭf al-samar wa-qaṭf al-thamar. Beirut: Wizārat al-Thaqāfah wa-l-Irshād al-QawmīGoogle Scholar

Gierl, Martin 1997. Pietismus und Aufklärung: theologische Polemik und die Kommunikationsreform der Wissenschaft am Ende des 17. Jahrhunderts. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & RuprechtGoogle Scholar

Gilliot, Claude 1990. Exégèse, langue et théologie en Islam: L’exégèse coranique de Tabari. Paris: VrinGoogle Scholar

Gilliot, Claude 1999. “L’exégèse du Coran en Asie Centrale,” Studia Islamica 89: 129–64Google Scholar

Gilliot, Claude, and Larcher, Pierre 2004. “Language and Style,” in EQ, vol. III, pp. 123–35Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Carlo 1992. Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method, trans. Tedeschi, John and Tedeschi, Anne. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar

Glockmann, Günther 1968. Homer in der frühchristlichen Literatur bis Justinus. Berlin: Akademie VerlagGoogle Scholar

Goitein, S. D. 1967–93. A Mediterranean Society, 6 vols. Berkley: University of California PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldziher, Ignaz 1952. Die Richtungen der islamischen Koranauslegung. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Göllner, Carl 1961–78. Turcica. Vol. I, Die europäischen Türkendrucke des XVI. Jahrhunderts 1501–1550. Vol. II, 1551–1600. Vol. III, Die Türkenfrage in der öffentlichen Meinung Europas im 16. Jahrhundert. Bucharest: Editura Academiei R.P.R.Google Scholar

Gonda, Jan 1955. “The Etymologies in the Ancient Brāhmaṇas,” Lingua 5: 61–86. Repr.: Gonda, Jan 1975. Selected Studies, vol. II. Leiden: Brill, pp. 32–57Google Scholar

Gonda, Jan 1973ff. A History of Indian Literature. Wiesbaden: HarrassowitzGoogle Scholar

Gonda, Jan 1975. Vedic Literature: Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas. Wiesbaden: HarrasowitzGoogle Scholar

Gottlieb, Ephraim 1970. The Kabbalah in the Writings of R. Baḥ;ya ben Asher ibn Halawa [in Hebrew]. Jerusalem: Kiryat seferGoogle Scholar

Goukowsky, Paul 2006. “Introduction,” in Goukowsky, Paul (ed.), Diodore de Sicile: Bibliothèque historique, fragments, vol. II, books 21–24. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, pp. i–xxxivGoogle Scholar

Goulet, Richard 2005a. “Allégorisme et anti-allégorisme chez Philon d’Alexandrie,” in Dahan, Gilbert and Goulet, Richard (eds), Allégorie des poètes, allégorie des philosophes: Études sur la poétique et l’herméneutique de l’allégorie de l’Antiquité à la Réforme. Paris: Vrin, pp. 59–87Google Scholar

Goulet, Richard 2005b. “Le méthode allégorique chez les Stoïciens,” in Gourinat, Jean-Baptiste (ed.), Les Stoïciens. Paris: Vrin, pp. 93–119Google Scholar

Goyet, Francis 1996. Le sublime du “lieu commun”: l’invention rhétorique dans l’Antiquité et à la Renaissance. Paris: Champion; Geneva: SlatkineGoogle Scholar

Grabbe, Lester, 1988. Etymology in Early Jewish Interpretation: The Hebrew Names in Philo. Brown Judaic Studies 115. Atlanta: Scholars PressGoogle Scholar

Graf, Georg 1932. “Die koptische Gelehrtenfamilie der Aulād al-ʿAssāl und ihr Schriftum,” Orientalia 1: 34–56, 129–48, 93–204Google Scholar

Graf, Georg 1940. “Ein Traktat über die Seele verfasst von Hibatallāh Ibn al-ʿAssāl,” Orientalia, n.s. 9: 374–77Google Scholar

Graf, Georg 1944–53. Geschichte der christlichen arabischen Literatur, 5 vols. Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica VaticanaGoogle Scholar

Grafton, Anthony 1983–93. Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship, 2 vols. Vol. I, Textual Criticism and Exegesis. Vol. II, Historical Chronology. Oxford-Warburg Studies. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Grafton, Anthony 1994. “Traditions of Invention and Inventions of Tradition in Renaissance Italy: Annius of Viterbo,” in Grafton, A., Defenders of the Text: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science, 1450–1800. Cambridge University Press, pp. 76–103Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony 1997. “Fragmenta Historicorum Graecorum: Fragments of Some Lost Enterprises,” in Most (ed.), pp. 124–43Google Scholar

Grafton, Anthony 2007. What Was History? The Art of History in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Grafton, Anthony 2009. Worlds Made by Words: Scholarship and Community in the Modern West. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Grafton, Anthony 2012. “The Republic of Letters in the American Colonies: Francis Daniel Pastorius Makes a Notebook,” American Historical Review 117: 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grafton, Anthony T., Most, Glenn W., and Settis, Salvatore (eds) 2010. The Classical Tradition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Grafton, Anthony, and Weinberg, Joanna 2011. “I have always loved the holy tongue”: Isaac Casaubon, the Jews, and a Forgotten Chapter in Renaissance Scholarship. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grafton, Anthony, and Williams, Megan Hale 2008. Christianity and the Transformation of the Book: Origen, Eusebius, and the Library of Caesarea. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Graham, A. C. 1958. Two Chinese Philosophers: Chʻêng Ming-Tao and Chʻêng Yi-Chʼuan. London: Lund HumphriesGoogle Scholar

Greetham, David 1994. Textual Scholarship: An Introduction. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar

Greetham, David 2012. “A History of Textual Scholarship,” in Fraistat, Neil and Flanders, Julia (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship. Cambridge University Press, pp. 16–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greg, W. W. 1998. Sir Walter Wilson Greg: A Collection of His Writings, ed. Rosenblum, Joseph. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow PressGoogle Scholar

Grévin, Benoît 2012. Le parchemin des cieux. Paris: SeuilCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. Paul 1975. “Logic and Conversation,” in Cole, Peter and Morgan, Jerry L. (eds), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58. Repr.: H. Paul Grice 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 22–40Google Scholar

Grunebaum, Gustave E. 1950. A Tenth-Century Document of Arabic Literary Theory. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Guy, Jean-Claude SJ. 1962. Recherches sur la tradition grecque des Apophthegmata Patrum. Brussels: Société des BollandistesGoogle Scholar

Haas, Volkert 1994. Geschichte der Hethitischen Religion. Handbuch der Orientalistik 5. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacker, P. 2006. “Dharma in Hinduism,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 34: 479–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, I. 2006. The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Ideas about Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hadot, Ilsetraut 1990. Simplicius: Commentaire sur les Catégories, Fascicule I. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Hajós, Elizabeth 1963. “References to Giulio Camillo in Samuel Quicchelberg’s ‘Inscriptiones vel tituli theatri amplissimi,’” Bibliotheque d’humanisme et Renaissance 25: 207–11Google Scholar

Halbertal, Moshe 1997. People of the Book: Canon, Meaning, and Authority. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halbfass, W. 1988. India and Europe: An Essay in Understanding. Albany: State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar

Hallaq, Wael B. 2001. Authority, Continuity, and Change in Islamic Law. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halldén, Philip 2005. “What Is Arab Islamic Rhetoric? Rethinking the History of Muslim Oratory Art and Homiletics,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 37: 19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, John T. 2003. Soliciting Darkness: Pindar, Obscurity, and the Classical Tradition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Harries, Jill 2013. “Encyclopaedias and Autocracy: Justinian’s Encyclopaedia of Roman Law,” in König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds), The Encyclopaedia from Antiquity to the Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press, pp. 178–96Google Scholar

Hartig, Otto 1917. Die Gründung der Münchener Hofbibliothek durch Albrecht V. und Johann Jacob Fugger. Munich: FranzGoogle Scholar

Hartman, Charles 1976. “Preliminary Bibliographical Notes on the Sung Editions of Han Yü’s Collected Works,” in Nienhauser, William H., Jr. (ed.), Critical Essays on Chinese Literature. Chinese University of Hong Kong, pp. 89–100Google Scholar

Hartman, Charles 1986. Han Yü and the T’ang Search for Unity. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartman, Charles 1989. “Images of Allegory: A Review Article,” Early China 14: 183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartmann, Marina 2001. Humanismus und Kirchenkritik: Matthias Flacius Illyricus als Erforscher des Mittelalters. Stuttgart: ThorbeckeGoogle Scholar

Harvey, Steven (ed.) 2000. The Medieval Hebrew Encyclopedias of Science and Philosophy. Dordrecht: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Has, Şükrü Selim 1981. “A Study of Ibrahim al-Halebi with Special Reference to the Multaqa.” Ph.D. diss., University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar

Has, Şükrü Selim 1988. “The Use of Multaqa’l-Abḥ;ur in the Ottoman Madrasas and in Legal Scholarship,” Osmanlı Araştırmaları 7/8: 393–418Google Scholar

Ḥasan Bey-zâde, Aḥ;med Paşa 2004. Ḥasan Bey-zâde Târîhi. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu BasımeviGoogle Scholar

Al-Ḥaṣkafī, Muḥ;ammad b. ‘Alī b. Muḥ;ammad al-Ḥaṣanī al-’Alā’ 1998. al-Durr al-muntaqā fī sharḥ; al-Multaqā. Ankara: Dār al-Kutub al-’IlmiyyahGoogle Scholar

Haury, Jakob 1905. “Prolegomena,” in Haury, Jakob (ed.), Procopii Caesariensis opera omnia. Vol. I, De bellis libri I–IV. Leipzig: Teubner, pp. v–lxiiiGoogle Scholar

Hawley, Robert 2008. “On the Alphabetic Scribal Curriculum at Ugarit,” in Biggs, R. D., Meyers, J., and Roth, M. (eds), Proceedings of the 51st Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale. Chicago: Oriental Institute, pp. 57–68Google Scholar

Heath, Malcolm 1993. “Stasis-Theory in Homeric Commentary,” Mnemosyne 49: 356–63Google Scholar

Heath, Malcolm 1995. Hermogenes: On Issues. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Heath, Malcolm 1997. “Invention,” in Porter, Stanley E. (ed.), Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period. Leiden: Brill, pp. 89–119Google Scholar

Heath, Malcolm 2003. “Pseudo-Dionysius Art of Rhetoric 8–11: Figured Speech, Declamation, and Criticism,” American Journal of Philology 124: 81–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heath, Peter 1992. Allegory and Philosophy in Avicenna. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar

Hebrew Bible 1996–2008 = Saebø, Magne (ed.), Hebrew Bible / Old Testament: The History of Its Interpretation, 2 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & RupprechtGoogle Scholar

Heinemann, Yizhak 1950–51. “Die wissenschaftliche Allegoristik des jüdischen Mittelalters,” Hebrew Union College Annual 23, no. 1: 611–43Google Scholar

Heinrichs, Wolfhart P. 1998a. “Al-Jurjānī,” in EAL, vol. I, pp. 16–17Google Scholar

Heinrichs, Wolfhart P. 1998b. “Naẓm,”, in EAL, vol. II, pp. 585–86Google Scholar

Heinrichs, Wolfhart P. 1998c. “Rhetoric and Poetics,” in EAL, vol. II, pp. 651–52Google Scholar

Heinrichs, Wolfhart P. 2009. “Early Ornate Prose and the Rhetorization of Poetry in Arabic Literature,” in Woerther (ed.), pp. 215–34Google Scholar

Heller, Yom Tov Lipmann 1836. Megillat Eivah. Breslau: SulzbachGoogle Scholar

Henderson, John B. 1991. Scripture, Canon, and Commentary: A Comparison of Confucian and Western Exegesis. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herbermann, Clemens-Peter 1981. “Moderne und antike Etymologie,” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 95: 22–48Google Scholar

Hess, Ernst 1601. Speculum iudaeorum, das ist Juden Spiegel. Cologne: Willhelm LützenkirchenGoogle Scholar

Heyd, Uriel 1969. “Some Aspects of the Ottoman Fetvā,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 32, no. 1: 35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hightower, James R. 1984. “Han Yü as Humorist,” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 44, no. 1: 5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hilgert, Markus 2009. “Von ‘Listenwissenschaft’ und ‘epistemischen Dingen’: Konzeptuelle Annäherungen an altorientalische Wissenspraktiken,” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40: 277–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hillgruber, Martin 1994. Die pseudoplutarchische Schrift De Homero, vol. I. Stuttgart: SaurGoogle Scholar

Hirschler, Konrad 2012. The Written Word in the Medieval Arabic Lands: A Social and Cultural History of Reading Practices. Edinburgh University PressGoogle Scholar

Hoeschel, David (ed.) 1603. Eclogae legationum Dexippi Atheniensis Eunapii Sardiani Petri Patricii et Magistri Prisci Sophistae Malchi Philadelphensis Menandri Protectoris Cum corollario excerptorum e libris Diodori Siculi amissis, XXI XXII XXIII XXIV XXV XXVI. AugsburgGoogle Scholar

Holford-Strevens, Leofranc, and Vardi, Amiel (eds) 2004. The Worlds of Aulus Gellius. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holtz, Louis 1981. Donat et la tradition de l’enseignement grammatical. Paris: CNRSGoogle Scholar

Hopkins, Simon 2005. “The Languages of Maimonides,” in Tamer, G. (ed.), The Trias of Maimonides: Jewish, Arabic, and Ancient Culture of Knowledge. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 85–106Google Scholar

Horowitz, Elliott 1989. “The Eve of the Circumcision: A Chapter in the History of Jewish Nightlife,” Journal of Social History 23: 45–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horster, Marietta, and Reitz, Christiane (eds) 2010. Condensing Texts – Condensed Texts. Palingenesia 98. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner VerlagGoogle Scholar

Hotson, Howard 2007. Commonplace Learning: Ramism and Its German Ramifications, 1545–1630. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, Bih-Shia 2002. “A Comparison of Greek and Chinese Rhetoric and Their Influence on Later Rhetoric.” Ph.D. diss., Texas Tech UniversityGoogle Scholar

Huang, Chun-chieh 2001. Mencian Hermeneutics: A History of Interpretations in China. New Brunswick, N.J.: TransactionGoogle Scholar

Huehnergard, John 2008. Ugaritic Vocabulary in Syllabic Transcription, rev. ed. Harvard Semitic Studies 32. Atlanta: Scholars PressGoogle Scholar

Hughes, John Caleb 1914. De Lagardes Ausgabe der Arabischen Übersetzung des Pentateuch. Leipzig: J. C. HinrichsGoogle Scholar

Huizinga, Johan 1955. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon PressGoogle Scholar

Hunger, Herbert 1991. “Was nicht in der Suda steht, oder Was konnte sich der gebildete Byzantiner des 10./11. Jahrhunderts von einem ‘Konversationslexikon’ erwarten,” in Hörandner, Wolfram and Trapp, Erich (eds), Lexicographica Byzantina, Beiträge zum Symposion zur Byzantinischen Lexikographie (Wien, 1.–4. 3. 1989). Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp. 137–53Google Scholar

Hunter, Michael 1998. “Mapping the Mind of Robert Boyle: The Evidence of the Boyle Papers,” in Hunter, Michael (ed.), Archives of the Scientific Revolution: The Formation and Exchange of Ideas in Seventeenth-Century Europe. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell, pp. 121–36Google Scholar

Hurst, André, and Kolde, Antje (eds) 2008. Lycophron, Alexandra. Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar

ibn Ezra, Moses 1985–86. Kitāb al-Muḥ;āḍara wa-l-Muḍākara (Book of Discussion and Conversation), 2 vols., ed. and trans. Abumalhan Mas, Montserrat. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasGoogle Scholar

Ibn Al-Nadīm, 1970. The Fihrist: A Tenth-Century Survey of Muslim Culture, trans. Dodge, Bayard. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Ibn Al-Ṭaiyib, 1967. Commentaire sur la Genèse par Ibn aṭ-Ṭaiyib, ed. Cornelis, Joannes Sanders, Josephus. Louvain: Secrétariat du Corpus SCOGoogle Scholar

Ichikawa, Yasuji 1966. “Shu Kaian no kōsho: Nitei bunshū o meguru Shu Chō no mondō o chūshin toshite [Zhu Xi’s collation: a discussion centered around the exchanges between Zhu Xi and Zhang Jingfu when co-editing the Cheng brothers’ collection],” Shoshigaku 3: 10–25Google Scholar

Ichiki, Tsuyuhiko 2002. Shu Ki monjin shūdan keisei no kenkyū [A study on the formation of the group of Zhu Xi’s principles]. Tōkyō: SōbunshaGoogle Scholar

Idema, Wilt 1995. “Satire and Allegory in All Keys and Modes,” in Tillman, Hoyt Cleveland and West, Stephen H. (eds), China Under Jurchen Rule: Essays on Chin Intellectual and Cultural History. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 238–80Google Scholar

Ihm, Maximilian 1902. “Beiträge zur Textgeschichte des Sueton,” Hermes 37: 590–97Google Scholar

Ihm, Maximilian 1907. C. Suetoni Tranquilli opera. Editio maior. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Imber, Colin 1997. Ebu’s-Su‘ud: The Islamic Legal Tradition. Stanford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingram, Anders 2015. Writing the Ottomans: Turkish History in Early Modern. New York: Palgrave MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Irigoin, Jean 1977. “Les manuscripts d’historiens grecs et byzantins à 32 lignes,” in Treu, Kurt (ed.), Studia codicologica: Mélanges Marcel Richard. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 237–45Google Scholar

Isidore of Seville, 1911. Etymologiarum sive originum libri XX, vol. I, ed. Lindsay, W. M.. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Isidore of Seville, 2006. The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville, trans. Barney, Stephen A., Lewis, W. J., Bach, J. A., and Berghof, Oliver. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Isidore of Seville, 2009. Etymologiae, ed. Gasparotto, G. and Guillaumin, J.-Y.. Les belles lettres 3. Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar

Isidore of Seville, 2012. Etymologiae, ed. Chaparro Gómez, C.. Les belles lettres 6. Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar

Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2000. Confucian Moral Self Cultivation, 2nd ed. Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar

Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2009. Readings from the Lu-Wang School of Neo-Confucianism. Indianapolis: HackettGoogle Scholar

Ivry, Alfred 1996. “Ibn Rushd’s Use of Allegory,” in Wahba, Mourad and Abousenna, Mona (eds), Averroës and the Enlightenment. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, pp. 113–25Google Scholar

İzgi, Cevat 1997. Osmanlı Medreselerinde İlim. Istanbul: İz YayıncılıkGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, Louis 1961. Studies in Talmudic Logic and Methodology. London: V. MitchellGoogle Scholar

Jaeger, C. Stephen 1994. The Envy of Angels: Cathedral Schools and Social Ideals in Medieval Europe, 905–1200. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar

Jamison, Stephanie 2007. The Ṛgveda Between Two Worlds/Le Ṛgveda entre deux mondes: quatre conferences au Collège de France en mai 2004. Paris: Collège de FranceGoogle Scholar

Jardine, Lisa, and Grafton, Anthony 1990. “‘Studied for Action’: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy,” Past and Present 129: 30–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jeffreys, Elisabeth 1979. “The Attitudes of Byzantine Chroniclers Towards Ancient History,” Byzantion 49: 199–238Google Scholar

Jha, G. (trans.) 1933. Śābara-Bhāṣya, 3 vols. Baroda: Oriental InstituteGoogle Scholar

Johns, Adrian 1998. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Carina 2011. Cultural Hierarchy in Sixteenth-Century Europe: The Ottomans and Mexicans. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Jones, John Robert 1988. “Learning Arabic in Renaissance Europe (1505–1624).” Ph.D. thesis, University of LondonGoogle Scholar

Jones, John Robert 1994. “The Medici Oriental Press (Rome 1584–1614) and the Impact of Its Arabic Publications on Northern Europe,” in Russell, G. A. (ed.), The “Arabick” Interest of the Natural Philosophers in Seventeenth-Century England. Leiden: Brill, pp. 88–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joshi, Shivram Dattray, and Roodbergen, Jouthe (eds. and trans.) 1986. Patañjali’s Vyākaraṇa-Mahābhāṣya, Paśpaśāhnika: Introduction, Text, Translation and Notes. Poona: Publications of the Centre of Advanced Study in SanskritGoogle Scholar

Jütte, Daniel 2011. Das Zeitalter des Geheimnisses: Juden, Christen und die Ökonomie des Geheimen (1400–1800). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & RuprechtGoogle Scholar

Kahrs, Eivind 1998. Indian Semantic Analysis: The Nirvacana Tradition. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Kanavou, Nikoletta 2011. Aristophanes’ Comedy of Names: A Study of Speaking Names in Aristophanes. Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar

Karp, Andrew J. 1977. “Homeric Origins of Ancient Rhetoric,” Arethusa 10: 237–58Google Scholar

Kashouh, Hikmat 2012. The Arabic Versions of the Gospels: The Manuscripts and Their Families. Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar

Kaster, Robert A. 1986. “‘Humanitas’ and Roman Education,” Storia della storiografia 9: 5–15Google Scholar

Kaster, Robert A. 1988. Guardians of Language. Berkeley: University of California PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaster, Robert A. 2014. “The Transmission of Suetonius’s Caesars in the Middle Ages,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 126: 133–86Google Scholar

Kâtip Çelebi, 1870–71. Fezleke-i Tarîh. Istanbul: Cerîde-i Ḥavâdis Matba’asıGoogle Scholar

Kâtip Çelebi, 1971. Kashf al-ẓunūn fī asāmī al-kutub wa-l-funūn. Istanbul: Milli Eğitim BasımeviGoogle Scholar

Katz, Joshua T. 2010. “Etymology,” in Grafton, Most, and Settis (eds), pp. 342–45Google Scholar

Kazhdan, Alexander, and Franklin, Simon (eds) 1984. Studies on Byzantine Literature of the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries. Cambridge University Press; Paris: Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’HommeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelleher, M. Theresa 1989. “Back to Basics: Chu Hsi’s Elementary Learning (Hsiao-Hsüeh),” in De Bary, Wm. Theodore and Chaffee, John W. (eds), Neo- Confucian Education: The Formative Stage. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 219–51Google Scholar

Kennedy, George A. 1957. “The Ancient Dispute over Rhetoric in Homer,” American Journal of Philology 78: 23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, George A. 1963. The Art of Persuasion in Greece. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, George A. 1980. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar

Kern, Martin 2007. “Beyond the Mao Odes: Shijing Reception in Early Medieval China,” Journal of the American Oriental Society 127: 131–42Google Scholar

Keuls, Eva 1981. “La retorica e i sussidi visivi in Grecia e a Roma,” in Havelock, E. A. and Hershbell, J. P. (eds), Arte e comunicazione nel mondo antico. Rome: Laterza, 167–84Google Scholar

Khan, Geoffrey 2000. The Early Karaite Tradition of Hebrew Grammatical Thought. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khan, Geoffrey, Gallego, Maria Angeles, and Olszowy-Schlanger, Judith (eds) 2003. The Karaite Tradition of Hebrew Grammatical Thought in Its Classical Form. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Kielhorn, Franz, and (rev. by) Abhyankar, Kashinath Vasudev (eds) 1962. Vyākaraṇa-Mahābhāṣya of Patañjali. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research InstituteGoogle Scholar

Kindstrand, Jan-Frederik 1973. Homer in der zweiten Sophistik. Uppsala UniversityGoogle Scholar

Kindstrand, Jan-Frederik 1990. [Plutarchus, ] De Homero. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Kleinlogel, Alexander 1965. Geschichte des Thukydidestextes im Mittelalter. Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar

Klinck, Roswitha 1970. Die lateinische Etymologie des Mittelalters. Medium Aevum Philologische Studien 17. Munich: W. FinkGoogle Scholar

Knorr, Wilbur 1975. The Evolution of the Euclidean Elements: A Study of the Theory of Incommensurable Magnitudes and Its Significance for Early Greek Geometry. Dordrecht: D. ReidelCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knudsen, Rachel Ahern 2014. Homeric Speech and the Origins of Rhetoric. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kouremenos, Theokritos, Parássoglou, George M., and Tsantsanoglou, Kyriakos (eds) 2006. The Derveni Papyrus. Studi e Testi per il Corpus dei Papiri Filosofici Greci e Latin 13. Firenze: Leo S. OlschkiGoogle Scholar

Kühlmann, Wilhelm 1982. Gelehrtenrepublik und Fürstenstaat: Entwicklung und Kritik des deutschen Späthumanismus in der Literatur des Barockzeitalters. Tübingen: Max NiemeyerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, Dieter 2009. The Age of Confucian Rule: The Song Transformation of China. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Kustas, George L. 1973. Studies in Byzantine Rhetoric. Thessaloniki: Patriarchal Institute for Patristic StudiesGoogle Scholar

Lagarde, Paul de 1867. Materialien zur Kritik und Geschichte des Pentateuchs, 2 vols. Leipzig: TeubnerGoogle Scholar

Laird, Andrew (ed.) 2006. Ancient Literary Criticism. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Laks, André 1997. “Between Religion and Philosophy: The Function of Allegory in the ‘Derveni Papyrus’,” Phronesis 42: 121–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laks, André, and Most, Glenn W. (eds) 2016. Early Greek Philosophy. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar

Lallot, Jean 1991a. “Etumologia: L’Etymologie en Grèce ancienne d’Homère aux grammairiens alexandrins,” in Chambon and Lüdi (eds), pp. 135–48Google Scholar

Lallot, Jean 1991b. “L’étymologie chez les grammairiens grecs: principes et pratique,” Revue de Philologie 65: 135–48Google Scholar

Lambert, W. G. 1957–71. “Götterlisten,” Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie 3: 473–79Google Scholar

Lambert, W. G. 1975. “The Historical Development of the Mesopotamian Pantheon: A Study in Sophisticated Polytheism,” in Goedicke, H. and Roberts, J. J. M. (eds), Unity and Diversity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 191–200Google Scholar

Lambert, W. G. 1976–80. “Imzu’anna,” Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie 5: 74Google Scholar

Lamberton, Robert 1986. Homer the Theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Lamberton, Robert 2010. “Allegory,” in Grafton, Most, and Settis (eds), pp. 34–41Google Scholar

Landsberger, Benno 1976. The Conceptual Autonomy of the Babylonian World, trans. Jacobsen, T., Foster, B., and von Siebenthal, H.. Sources and Monographs on the Ancient Near East, vol. I fasc. 4. Malibu: Undena Publications. Originally published as “Die Eigenbegrifflichkeit der Babylonischen Welt,” Islamica 2 (1926): 355–72Google Scholar

Lane, Andrew J. 2006. A Traditional Mu’tazilite Qur’an Commentary. Leiden: BrillCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langer, Ruth 2011. Cursing the Christians. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larcher, Pierre 2000. “La relation entre la linguistique et les autres sciences dans la société arabo-islamique,” in Auroux et al. (eds), vol. I/1, pp. 312–18Google Scholar

Larcher, Pierre 2009. “Mais qu’est-ce donc que la balāgha?” in Woerther (ed.), pp. 197–213Google Scholar

Lardinois, André P. M. H. 2006. “The Polysemy of Gnomic Expressions and Ajax’s Deception Speech,” in de Jong, Irene J.F. and Rijksbaron, Albert (eds), Sophocles and the Greek Language: Aspects of Diction, Syntax and Pragmatics Leiden: Brill, pp. 213–24Google Scholar

Laroche, Emmanuel 1968. “Documents en langue Hourrite provenant de Ras Shamra,” in Nougayrol, Jean, Laroche, Emmanuel, Virolleaud, Charles, and Schaeffer, Claude F. A., Ugaritica V. Nouveaux textes accadiens, horrites et ugaritiques des Archives et Bibliothèques privées d’Ugarit. Mission de Ras Shamra 16. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, pp. 448–544Google Scholar

Laroche, Emmanuel 1980. Glossaire de la langue hourrite. Paris: KlincksieckGoogle Scholar

Laroche, Emmanuel 1989. “La version hourrite de la liste AN de Meskene-Emar,” in Académie des Inscriptions & Belles-Lettres: Comptes rendus des séances de l’année 1989, janvier–mars. Paris: de Boccard, pp. 8–12Google Scholar

Larsen, Mogens Trolle 1987. “The Mesopotamian Lukewarm Mind: Reflections on Science, Divination and Literacy,” in Rochberg-Halton, Francesca (ed.), Language, Literature, and History: Philological and Historical Studies Presented to Erica Reiner. New Haven, Conn.: American Oriental Society, pp. 203–25Google Scholar

Lausberg, Heinrich 1973. Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik: Eine Grundlegung der Literaturwissenschaft, 2nd ed. Munich: Max Hueber VerlagGoogle Scholar

Lausberg, Heinrich 1998. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric. Leiden: BrillGoogle Scholar

Law, Vivien, and Sluiter, Ineke (eds) 1995. Dionysius Thrax and the Technê grammatikê. Münster: Nodus. 2nd ed., 1998Google Scholar

Lazarus Yafeh, Hava 1992. Intertwined Worlds: Medieval Islam and Bible Criticism. Princeton University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Hur-Li, and Lan, Wen-Chin 2011. “Proclaiming Intellectual Authority through Classification: The Case of the Seven Epitomes,” Knowledge Organization 38 (1): 25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legge, James 1885. The Li Ki, in The Sacred Books of the East, vols. XXVII–XXVIII. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Legge, James 1960. The Chinese Classics, 5 vols. Hong Kong University PressGoogle Scholar

Lehnert, Georg 1896. De scholiis ad Homerum rhetoricis. Leipzig: HoffmannGoogle Scholar

Leitner, Gertraud 1968. “Hugo Blotius und der Straßburger Freundeskreis: Studien zur Korrespondenz des ersten Bibliothekars der österreichischen Nationalbibliothek.” Ph.D. thesis, University of ViennaGoogle Scholar

Lemerle, Paul 1971. Le premier humanisme byzantin: Notes et remarques sur enseignement et culture à Byzance des origines au Xe siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de FranceGoogle Scholar

Leonardi, Claudio 2000. “Intellectual Life,” in Reuter, Timothy (ed.), The New Cambridge Medieval History. Cambridge University Press, pp. 186–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Létoublon, Françoise 1994. “Le bon orateur et le génie selon Anténor dans l’Iliade: Ménélas et Ulysse,” in Galy, Jean-Michel and Thivel, Antoine (eds), La rhétorique grecque. Université de Nice, pp. 29–40Google Scholar

Levanoni, Amalia 2013. “A Supplementary Source for the Study of Mamluk Social History: The Taqārīẓ,” Arabica 60, no. 1–2: 146–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levey, Mathew 2000. “Chu Hsi Reading the Classics: Reading to Taste the Tao – ‘This Is … a Pipe,’” in Ching-i, Tu (ed.), Classics and Interpretations: The Hermeneutic Traditions in Chinese Culture. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, pp. 245–71Google Scholar

Li, Jingde (ed.) 1986. Zhuzi yulei [Conversations of Master Zhu, arranged topically]. Beijing: Zhonghua shujuGoogle Scholar

Lincoln, Bruce 2012. Gods and Demons, Priests and Scholars: Critical Explorations in the History of Religions. University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindberg, Gertrud 1977. Studies in Hermogenes and Eustathios. Lund: J. LindellGoogle Scholar

Lindberg, Gertrud 1997. “Hermogenes of Tarsus,” in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. II.34.4. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 1978–2063Google Scholar

Liu, Xiaolian 1991. “A Journey of the Mind: The Basic Allegory in Hou xiyou ji,” Chinese Literature: Essays, Articles, Reviews 13: 35–55Google Scholar

Liu, Zhenlun 2004. Han Yu ji Song Yuan chuanben yanjiu [Studies on the Song and Yuan circulations of Han Yu’s collected writings]. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubansheGoogle Scholar

Livne-Kafri, Ofer 2002. “A Note on Coptic and Judeo-Arabic on the Basis of a Bilingual Manuscript of the Pentateuch [in Hebrew],” Massorot 12: 97–101Google Scholar

Livne-Kafri, Ofer 2007. “Appendix II: Some Notes Concerning the Arabic Version,” in Shisha-Halevy, Ariel (ed.), Topics in Coptic Syntax: Structural Studies in the Bohairic Dialect. Dudley, Mass.: Peeters, pp. 685–94Google Scholar

Ljubarskij, Jakov Nikolaevič 1992. “Man in Byzantine Historiography from John Malalas to Michael Psellos,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 46: 177–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, A. C. 1996. “Grammar and Metaphysics in Stoicism,” in Long, A. A. (ed.),. Problems in Stoicism. Cambridge University Press, pp. 58–71Google Scholar

Löfgren, Oscar 1936. Studien zu den arabischen Danielübersetzungen, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der christlichen Texte: Nebst einem Beitrag zur Kritik des Peschittatextes. Uppsala: A. B. Lundequistska BokhandelnGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. 1997. “Allegory in Philo and Etymology in Stoicism: A Plea for Drawing Distinctions,” Studia Philonica Annual 9: 198–210Google Scholar

Long, A. A. 2005. “Stoic Linguistics, Plato’s Cratylus and Augustine’s De dialectica,” in Frede and Inwood (eds), pp. 36–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, A. A. 2006. “Stoic Readings of Homer,” in Long, A. A., Stoic Studies. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 58–84Google Scholar

Longinus, Cassius 2002. Fragments: Art rhétorique, ed. Patillon, Michel and Brisson, Luc. Paris: Les Belles LettresGoogle Scholar

Louthan, Howard 1997. The Quest for Compromise: Peacemakers in Counter- Reformation Vienna. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Löwenklau, Johannes 1588. Annales Sultanorum Othmanidarum … Frankfurt: Marnius & AubriusGoogle Scholar

Löwenklau, Johannes 1590. Neuwer Musulmanischer Histori Türckischer Nation von jhrem Herkommen, Geschichten, vnd Thaten: Drey Bücher… Frankfurt am Main: Marne & AubriGoogle Scholar

Löwenklau, Johannes 1591. Historiae Musulmanae Turcorum, de monumentis ipsorum exscriptae, libri XVIII. Frankfurt: Marnius & AubriusGoogle Scholar

Lu, Xing 1998. Rhetoric in Ancient China, Fifth to Third Century B.C.E.: A Comparison with Classical Greek Rhetoric. Charleston: University of South Carolina PressGoogle Scholar

Lubac, Henri de 1998–2009. Medieval Exegesis: The Four Senses of Scripture, trans. Sebanc, Mark. Grand Rapids, Mich.: W. B. EerdmansGoogle Scholar

Lundbrom, Jack R. 2013. Biblical Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism. Sheffield: Phoenix PressGoogle Scholar

Lutz, Cora E. 1956. “Remigius’ Ideas on the Origin of the Seven Liberal Arts,” Medievalia et Humanistica 10: 32–49Google Scholar

Luzzatto, Maria Tanja 1996. “Dialettica o retorica? La ‘polytropia’ di Odisseo da Antistene a Porfirio,” Elenchos 17: 275–357Google Scholar

Lyon, Gregory 2003. “Baudouin, Flacius, and the Plan for the Magdeburg Centuries,” Journal of the History of Ideas 64: 253–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maas, Paul 1958. Textual Criticism, trans. Flower, Barbara. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

McAuliffe, Jane Dammen, Walfish, Barry D., and Goering, Joseph W. (eds) 2003. With Reverence for the Word: Medieval Scriptural Exegesis in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macdonald, Duncan B. 1904. “Ibn al-ʿAssāl’s Arabic Version of the Gospels,” in Saavedra, Eduardo (ed.), Homenaje á D. Francisco Codera en su Julibilación del Profesorado. Zaragoza: M. Escart, pp. 375–92Google Scholar

Macdonell, Arthur Anthony (ed.) 1886. Kātyāyana’s Sarvānukramaṇī of the Ṛgveda; with Extracts from Ṣaḍguruśiṣya’s Commentary Entitled Vedārthadīpikā. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

McCrea, L. 2010. “Hindu Jurisprudence and Scriptural Hermeneutics,” in Lubin, T. et al. (eds), Hinduism and Law: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–36Google Scholar

Macrobius, 1952. The Commentary on the Dream of Scipio by Macrobius, trans. Stahl, W. H.. New York: Columbia University Press; repr. 1990Google Scholar

Macrobius, 1979. Commentarii in Somnium Scipionis, vol. II, ed. Willis, Jacob. Stuttgart: Teubner; repr. 1994Google Scholar