Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T07:42:33.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

96. - Individual

from I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

There are two texts that are crucial for Spinoza’s account of an “individual” (individuus), both of which focus on the case of bodily individuals. The first of these is a 1665 letter to the Secretary of the Royal Society, Henry Oldenburg, in which Spinoza responds to the request of his correspondent that he address “that difficult question concerning our knowledge of how each part of Nature agrees with its whole and in what way it agrees with other things” (Ep31). In response, Spinoza claims that since “all bodies are surrounded by others, and are determined by one another to existing and producing an effect in a fixed and determinate way, the same ratio of motion to rest [eadem rationem motus ad quietam] always being preserved in all of them at once,” it follows that “every body, insofar as it exists modified in a definite way, must be considered as a part of the whole universe, must agree with its whole and must cohere with the remaining bodies” (Ep32).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Curley, E. M. (1969). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, D. (1994). Descartes and Spinoza on persistence and conatus. Studia Spinozana, 10, 4368.Google Scholar
Garrett, D. (1994). Spinoza’s theory of metaphysical individuation. In Barber, K. and Gracia, J. (eds.), Individuation and Identity in Early Modern Philosophy (pp. 73101). State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Joachim, H. H. (1901). A Study of the Ethics of Spinoza. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lachterman, D. (1977). The physics of Spinoza’s Ethics. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy, 8, 71111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman, A. (2017). The ‘Physical’ Interlude. In Melamed, Y. (ed.), Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide (pp. 102–20). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T. M. (1997). Spinoza’s mediate infinite mode. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 35, 174205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×