Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T00:23:38.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

78. - God

from G

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2025

Karolina Hübner
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Justin Steinberg
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

In his Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Hegel offers the following verdict on Spinoza’s ontology: “According to Spinoza what is, is God, and God alone. Therefore, the allegations of those who accuse Spinoza of atheism are the direct opposite of the truth; with him there is too much God” (Hegel 1995, 3.281–82). It is not easy to dismiss Hegel’s grand pronouncement, since Spinoza indeed clearly affirms: “whatever is, is in God [Deo]” (E1p15). Crocodiles, porcupines (and your thoughts about crocodiles and porcupines) are all in God. There is nothing that is not in Spinoza’s God.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Recommended Reading

Ariew, R. (1990). The infinite in Spinoza’s philosophy. In Curley, E. & Moreau, P.-F. (eds.), Spinoza: Issues and Directions (pp. 1631). Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (1984). A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Hackett.Google Scholar
Carlisle, C. (2021). Spinoza’s Religion: A New Reading of the Ethics. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Rocca, M. (2002). Spinoza’s substance monism. In Koistinen, O. and Biro, J. (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes (pp. 1137). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, D. (1979). Spinoza’s ‘ontological’ argument. Philosophical Review, 88, 198223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gueroult, M. (1968). Spinoza, vol. i: Dieu (Éthique, 1). Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1995). Lectures on the History of Philosophy, ed. Rockmore, T., trans. Haldane, E. S. and Simson, F. H.. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2022). Spinoza’s metaphysics of substance. In Garrett, D. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, 2nd edn (pp. 61112). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melamed, Y. (2024). Spinoza’s ‘atheism,’ the Ethics and the TTP. In Garber, D. et al. (eds.), Spinoza: Reason, Religion, Politics: The Relation between the Ethics and the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×