Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:11:35.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The search for peace in the interwar period

from Part II - The Era of Total War, 1914–1945

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Roger Chickering
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Dennis Showalter
Affiliation:
Colorado College
Hans van de Ven
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

War has not only escaped direction and control, it involves all civilization and its elimination is a question of practical politics.

It wasn’t worth it.

World War I ended on an ominous note, with divided victors, unrepentant losers, and a shattered global economy. After unprecedented military and civilian casualties and huge physical destructiveness – followed by brutal armed conflicts in eastern Europe, the Near East, and Northern Asia – history’s first total war came to an official end almost a decade after the shots in Sarajevo. Throughout the war anguished combatants and neutrals had made proposals to prevent future explosions of violence, and they expected a more peaceful world to emerge. The length, ferocity, and inconclusive outcome of World War I guaranteed, however, that the quest for a permanent peace would be arduous.

Ultimately, it was also unsuccessful. There is now a scholarly consensus that its failure was due to the punitive peace treaties, the victors’ unwillingness or inability to enforce or revise these documents in the 1920s, and their craven surrender to aggressive states in the 1930s. Underlying this failure were the postwar national realities: Germany’s drive to regain world power, France’s futile efforts to maintain a costly victory, imperial Britain’s obsession with maintaining a power balance in Europe, the United States’ withdrawal from the obligations of treaty enforcement, the Soviet Union’s destabilizing influence, Fascist Italy’s adventurism, disunity in the new east-central and southern Europe, and the increasingly volatile non-western world. With a massive supply of diplomatic and political records, scholars have now examined the goals and methods of statesmen, private figures, and organizations that spoke in the name of peace but failed to forge a durable order.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shotwell, James T., “Plans and Protocols to End War,” International Conciliation, No. 208 (March 1925): 7Google Scholar
Taylor, A. J. P., The Origins of the Second World War (2nd edn., Greenwich, CT, 1967)Google Scholar
Crozier, Andrew J., The Causes of the Second World War (Oxford, 1997)Google Scholar
Krüger, Peter, Versailles: Deutsche Aussenpolitik zwischen Revisionismus und Friedenssicherung (Munich, 1986)Google Scholar
Ádám, Magda, The Versailles System and Central Europe (Aldershot, 2004)Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy, Mandates under the League of Nations (Chicago, 1930), 3–126Google Scholar
Pederson, Susan, “The Meaning of the Mandates System: An Argument,” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 32 (2006): 560–82Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard, The Economic Consequences of the Peace (London, 1922)Google Scholar
Nitti, Francesco S., Peaceless Europe (London and New York, 1922)Google Scholar
Montgelas, Graf Max, The Case for the Central Powers: An Impeachment of the Versailles Verdict (New York, 1925)Google Scholar
Cortright, David, Peace: A History of Movements and Ideas (Cambridge, 2008), 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masaryk, Thomas Garrigue, The Making of a State (London, 1927), 385–90Google Scholar
Steiner, Zara, “The League of Nations and the Quest for Security,” in Ahmann, R. et al., eds., The Quest for Stability: Problems of West European Security, 1918–1957 (London, 1993), 38Google Scholar
Scott, J. M., Fridjof Nansen (Geneva, 1971), 237–38Google Scholar
Balinska, Marta, A Life for Humanity: Ludwik Rajchman, 1881–1965 (Budapest and New York, 1998)Google Scholar
Weindling, Paul, ed., International Health Organizations and Movements, 1918–1939 (Cambridge and New York, 1995)CrossRef
Crowdy, Rachel E., “The Humanitarian Activities of the League of Nations,” Journal of the Royal Institute of International Affairs 6 (1927): 153–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzer, Barbara, “Towards an International Human Rights Regime during the Inter-War Years: The League of Nations’ Combat of Traffic in Women and Children,” in Grant, Kevin et al., eds., Beyond Sovereignty: Britain, Empire, and Transnationalism, c. 1880–1950 (Basingstoke and New York, 2007), 54–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnet, Henri, “La Société des Nations et la coopération intellectuelle,” Cahiers d’histoire mondiale 10 (1966): 198–209Google Scholar
David, Paul, L’Ésprit de Genève: Histoire de la Société des Nations (Geneva, 2000), 305–9Google Scholar
Renoliet, Jean-Jacques, L’UNESCO oubliée: La Société des Nations et la coopération intellectuelle (1919–1946) (Paris, 1999), 323–33Google Scholar
Ghébali, Victor-Yves, La Société des Nations et la Réforme Bruce, 1939–1940 (Geneva, 1970)Google Scholar
Chowdhuri, R. N., International Mandates and Trusteeship Systems: A Comparative Study (The Hague, 1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colban, Erik, “The Minorities Problem,” The Norseman 2 (1944): 310–36Google Scholar
Gütermann, Christoph, Das Minderheitenschutzverfahren des Völkerbundes (Berlin, 1979)Google Scholar
Fink, Carole, “The League of Nations System of Minority Protection, 1920–1939,” in Petricioli, Marta and Cherubini, Donatella, eds., Pour la paix en Europe: Institutions et société civile dans l’entre-deux-guerres (Brussels, 2007), 41–56Google Scholar
Scheuermann, Martin, Minderheitenschutz contra Konflktverhütung? Die Minderheitenpolitik des Völkerbundes in den zwanziger Jahren (Marburg, 2000)Google Scholar
Phelan, Edward J., Albert Thomas et la création du B.I.T. (Paris, 1936)Google Scholar
Hudson, Manley O., The Permanent Court of International Justice, 1920–1942: A Treatise (New York, 1943)Google Scholar
Hudson, Manley O., ed., World Court Reports (Washington, DC, 1934), 268–319
Lauterpacht, Hersh, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London, 1958), 173–76Google Scholar
Dunne, Michael, The United States and the World Court, 1920–1935 (New York, 1988)Google Scholar
Lloyd, Lorna, Peace through Law: Britain and the International Court in the 1920s (Bury St. Edmunds, 1997), 9–11Google Scholar
Henig, Ruth, “Britain, France, and the League of Nations in the 1920s,” in Sharp, Alan and Stone, Glyn, eds., Anglo-French Relations in the Twentieth Century: Rivalry and Cooperation (London and New York, 2000), 139–57Google Scholar
de Madariaga, Salvador, Disarmament (New York, 1929)Google Scholar
Fabre, Alfred, La Crise des alliances: Essai sur les relations franco-britanniques depuis la signature de la paix (1919–1922) (Paris, 1922)Google Scholar
Wolfers, Arnold, Britain and France between Two Wars (New York, 1966)Google Scholar
British Commitments in their Relative Order of Importance, Documents on British Foreign Policy, Ser. 1A, 1 (London, 1966): 846–48Google Scholar
Fisher, Conan, The Ruhr Crisis, 1923–1924 (Oxford, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohrs, Patrick O., The Unfinished Peace after World War I: America, Britain, and the Stabilisation of Europe, 1919–1932 (Cambridge, 2006), 202–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. J. Noel, The Geneva Protocol for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes (London, 1925)Google Scholar
Kimmich, Christoph M., Germany and the League of Nations (Chicago and London, 1976), 76–149Google Scholar
McKercher, B. J. C., “Of Horns and Teeth: The Preparatory Commission and the World Disarmament Conference, 1926–1934,” in McKercher, B. J. C., ed., Arms Limitation and Disarmament (Westport, CT, and London, 1992), 173–80Google Scholar
Boyce, R. W., “Britain’s First ‘No’ to Europe: Britain and the Briand Plan, 1929–30,” European Studies Review 10 (1980): 17–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gifford, Sydney, Japan among the Powers, 1890–1990 (New Haven, 1994), 57Google Scholar
Van de Ven, Hans J., War and Nationalism in China, 1925–1945 (London and New York, 2003), 74–75Google Scholar
Baer, George H., Test Case: Italy, Ethiopia, and the League of Nations (Stanford, 1976)Google Scholar
Yepes, J. M. and da Silva, Pereira, La Question de la réforme du pacte de la Société des Nations (Paris, 1937)Google Scholar
Raschhofer, Hermann, Völkerbund und Münchener Abkommen (Munich and Vienna, 1976).Google Scholar
Uldricks, Teddy J., “Soviet Security Policy in the 1930s,” in Gorodetsky, Gabriel, ed., Soviet Foreign Policy, 1917–1991: A Retrospective (London, 1994), 65–74Google Scholar
Permanent Mandates Commission, Minutes (1939), 95–98, 275–89
League of Nations, Official Journal (1939), 107, 501

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×