Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: Writing the History of Social Science
- PART I SCIENCES OF THE SOCIAL TO THE LATE NINETEENTH CENTURY
- PART II THE DISCIPLINES IN WESTERN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA SINCE ABOUT 1880
- PART III THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
- PART IV SOCIAL SCIENCE AS DISCOURSE AND PRACTICE IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LIFE
- 30 The Uses of the Social Sciences
- 31 Managing the Economy
- 32 Management and Accounting
- 33 Polling in Politics and Industry
- 34 Social Science and Social Planning During the Twentieth Century
- 35 Social Welfare
- 36 Education
- 37 The Culture of Intelligence
- 38 Psychologism and the Child
- 39 Psychiatry
- 40 Gender
- 41 Race and The Social Sciences
- 42 Cultural Relativism
- 43 Modernization
- Index
- References
34 - Social Science and Social Planning During the Twentieth Century
from PART IV - SOCIAL SCIENCE AS DISCOURSE AND PRACTICE IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LIFE
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: Writing the History of Social Science
- PART I SCIENCES OF THE SOCIAL TO THE LATE NINETEENTH CENTURY
- PART II THE DISCIPLINES IN WESTERN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA SINCE ABOUT 1880
- PART III THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
- PART IV SOCIAL SCIENCE AS DISCOURSE AND PRACTICE IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LIFE
- 30 The Uses of the Social Sciences
- 31 Managing the Economy
- 32 Management and Accounting
- 33 Polling in Politics and Industry
- 34 Social Science and Social Planning During the Twentieth Century
- 35 Social Welfare
- 36 Education
- 37 The Culture of Intelligence
- 38 Psychologism and the Child
- 39 Psychiatry
- 40 Gender
- 41 Race and The Social Sciences
- 42 Cultural Relativism
- 43 Modernization
- Index
- References
Summary
The social sciences, in broadly their contemporary shapes, emerged after the American and French Revolutions. They offered a variety of ways of dealing with the new postrevolutionary political situation, which enabled, and indeed obliged, human beings to create their own rules for social action and political order. It has been a part of the intellectual tradition of the social sciences from their beginnings to contribute to making the social world predictable in the face of modern uncertainties, or, in the stronger version, to reshape it according to a master plan for improvement.
The general idea of providing and using social knowledge for government and policy purposes was certainly not new. The cameral and policy sciences of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were designed for use by an absolute ruler; the very name “statistics” reflects the fact that it was considered science for governmental purposes. The postrevolutionary situation, however, was crucially different in two respects. On the one hand, a much more radical uncertainty had been created by the commitment, even if often a reluctant one, to self-determination of the people, which appeared to limit the possibility of predictive knowledge. On the other hand, this radical openness had been accompanied by a hope for the self-organization of society and its rational individuals, so that the search for laws governing society and human actions emerged beyond – and to some extent instead of – the desire for the increase of factual knowledge of the social world.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Science , pp. 591 - 607Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
References
The Invisible Hand of Planning: Capitalism, Social Science, and the State in the 1920s (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legislators and Interpreters: On Modernity, Post-Modernity and Intellectuals (Cambridge: Polity, 1987).Google Scholar
“Social Planning and the Mores,” in Human Side of Social Planning: Selected Papers from the Proceedings of the American Sociological Society 1935, ed. and (Chicago: American Sociological Society, 1935).Google Scholar
From Opportunity to Entitlement: The Transformation and Decline of Great Society Liberalism (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1996)Google Scholar
Philosophical Critiques of Policy Analysis: Lindblom, Habermas and the Great Society (Gainesville: University of Florida Press, 1988)Google Scholar
“Histoire de formes: statistiques et sciences sociales avant 1940,” Revue française de sociologie, 26 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La politique des grands nombres: Histoire de la raison statistique (Paris: La Découverte, 1993)Google Scholar
“The Mobilization of Society,” in The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. , , and (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar
“Les sciences sociales: utilisation, dépendance, autonomie,” Sociologie du Travail, 23 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds., The State and Economic Knowledge: The American and British Experiences (New York: Woodrow Wilson Center and Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
, , , , and , The Empire of Chance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), chap. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Positivist Republic: Auguste Comte and the Reconstruction of American Liberalism, 1865–1920 (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
, and , eds., The Rise of the Social Sciences and the Formation of Modernity (Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 20) (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997).Google Scholar
and , Karl Mannheim and the Crisis of Liberalism: The Secret of These New Times (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction, 1995).Google Scholar
Uncertain Victory: Social Democracy and Progressivism in European and American Thought, 1870–1920 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
and , eds., The State and Social Investigation in Britain and the United States (Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson Center and Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar
The Intellectual Development of Karl Mannheim: Culture, Politics, and Planning (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Otto Neurath und der Wiener Kreis: Revolutionäre Wissenschaftlichkeit als Anspruch (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1981).Google Scholar
Metasociology: An Inquiry into the Origins and Validity of Social Thought (Oslo: Norwegian University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Autocritique des années soixante par un Commissaire au Plan (Bulletin de l’Institut d’histoire du temps présent, Supplément no. 1, série “Politique économique,” no. 1) (Paris: l’Institut d’histoire du temps présent, 1981).Google Scholar
“La planification des sciences sociales,” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, no. 2/3 (1976).Google Scholar
“Paul F. Lazarsfeld – fondateur d’une multinationale scientifique,” Acts de la recherche en sciences sociales, no. 25 (1979).Google Scholar
The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
The Origins of American Social Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), chap. 3.Google Scholar
and , eds., Social Knowledge and the Origins of Modern Social Policies (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1996).Google Scholar
“Artisans, Factory Workers, and the Formation of the French Working Class, 1789–1848,” in Working-Class Formation: Nineteenth-Century Patterns in Europe and the United States, ed. and (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986)Google Scholar
“Alexander Hamilton and the Language of Political Science,” in The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Behaviorism and Logical Positivism (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
“The Emergence of Sociology in Austria, 1885–1935,” Archives européennes de sociologie, 17 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Quest of Control: A Critique of the Rational-Central-Rule Approach in Public Affairs (London: Wiley, 1976).Google Scholar
Vor dem Keynesianismus: Die Planwirtschaftsdebatte der frühen dreissiger Jahre im Kontext der “organisierten Moderne” (Berlin: WZB, 1995)Google Scholar
, and , “Social Sciences and Modern States,” in Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads, ed. , , , and (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Sociology and Contingency: Historicizing Epistemology,” Social Science Information, 34 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sozialwissenschaften und Staat: Frankreich, Italien, Deutschland, 1870–1980 (Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 1990), chap. 9.Google Scholar
The Religion of Humanity: The Impact of Comtean Positivism on Victorian Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by