Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: the concept of Inner Asia
- 2 The geographic setting
- 3 Inner Asia at the dawn of history
- 4 The Scythians and Sarmatians
- 5 The Hsiung-nu
- 6 Indo-Europeans in Inner Asia
- 7 The Hun period
- 8 The Avars
- 9 The peoples of the Russian forest belt
- 10 The peoples of the south Russian steppes
- 11 The establishment and dissolution of the Türk empire
- 12 The Uighurs
- 13 The Karakhanids and early Islam
- 14 Early and medieval Tibet
- 15 The forest peoples of Manchuria: Kitans and Jurchens
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
6 - Indo-Europeans in Inner Asia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008
By
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- 1 Introduction: the concept of Inner Asia
- 2 The geographic setting
- 3 Inner Asia at the dawn of history
- 4 The Scythians and Sarmatians
- 5 The Hsiung-nu
- 6 Indo-Europeans in Inner Asia
- 7 The Hun period
- 8 The Avars
- 9 The peoples of the Russian forest belt
- 10 The peoples of the south Russian steppes
- 11 The establishment and dissolution of the Türk empire
- 12 The Uighurs
- 13 The Karakhanids and early Islam
- 14 Early and medieval Tibet
- 15 The forest peoples of Manchuria: Kitans and Jurchens
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
No barbarians survived so long and became so famous as those who are conventionally known as the Indo-Europeans. No discovery has created such a mirage as the possibility that so many languages of Europe and Asia are derived from a common origin and that we must look for the original people and their home in antiquity. For more than a century, this pursuit has withstood the challenges of science and prejudice alike. The truth may defy us, but the lure of it is still there. This gift of the comparative philologist is yet to be accepted by the archeologist, and the task of the historian is unenviable. While the original home of the Indo-Europeans remains to be finally settled, the charm of Chinese links with them has not ceased to attract. Perhaps Inner Asia holds the key.
The earliest linguistic remains of the Indo-Europeans in this area date from about the third quarter of the first millenium A.D. This consists of a literature, largely of Indic origin, Buddhistic in content, mostly translations or adaptations of religio-philosophical works, and a few commercial documents. They are written in a variety of the Indian syllabic script known as Brāhmī, remains of which have been recovered in various states of preservation from the ruins in the region of the modern cities of Kucha, Karashahr and Turfan. This linguistic relic, which is demonstrably Indo-European, strangely enough bears close affinity with the Western languages of the so-called “centum” group, rather than with the Indic and Iranian, the so-called “satem,” languages of the geographically contiguous areas.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge History of Early Inner Asia , pp. 151 - 176Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1990
References
1950, “Catalogue of the Mathura Museum,” The Journal of the Uttar Pradesh Historical Society, 23, pts.Google Scholar
, 1943, “Researches into the Pre-History of the Chinese”, Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 15.Google Scholar
, 1947, “Recent Works on Tokharian,” Transactions of the Philological Society (London).Google Scholar
, 1970a, “Saka Studies: The Ancient Kingdom of Khotan,” Iran. Journal of the British Institute of Persian Studies 8.Google Scholar
, 1962, “The Rise and Fall of the Kushana Empire,” in Comprehensive History of India edited by , vol. 2, chapter 7 (Calcutta).Google Scholar
(Editor), 1968, Papers on the Date of Kaniṣka, submitted to the Conference on the Date of Kaniṣka, London, 20–22 April, 1960 (Leiden 1968).Google Scholar
, 1956, “The Kushana-Sassanian Coin Series,” Journal of the Numismatic Society of India, 18.Google Scholar
, 1963, “The Kaniṣka Dating from Surkh Kotal,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1965, “Comments on Third-Century Shan-shan and the History of Buddhism,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1970, “Supplementary Notes on the Third-Century Shan-shan,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 31.Google Scholar
, 1935, “Tokharian Elements in the Kharoṣṭhī Documents from Chinese Turkistan,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
, 1888, “Coins of the Indo-Scythian King Miaus or Heraus,” The Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Royal Numismatic Society 3rd Series, 8.Google Scholar
, 1889, “Coins of the Tochari, Kushans or Yue-ti,” Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Royal Numismatic Society 3rd Series, 9.Google Scholar
, 1892, “Coins of the Kushanas or Great Yueti,” Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Royal Numismatic Society 3rd Series, 12.Google Scholar
, 1893, 1894, “Later Indo-Scythians,” Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Royal Numismatic Society 3rd Series, 13; 14.Google Scholar
and , 1953 Trésors monétaires d'Afghanistan, Mémoires de la Délégation Archéologique Française en Afghanistan 14.
, 1982, “The Han shu Hsi yü chuan retranslated. A Review Article,” T'oung Pao 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1959, “On the Nationality of the Ephtalites,” Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko 18.Google Scholar
, 1963, “The Location of the Capital of Lou-Ian and the Date of KharoṣṬhī Inscriptions,” Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko. 22.Google Scholar
, 1968, “Hsieh, Fu-wang or Wang of the Yüeh-shih,” Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko 26.Google Scholar
, 1969, “On the Date of the Kidarites (1),” Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko 27.Google Scholar
, 1970, “On the Date of the Kidarites (2),” Memoirs of the Research Department of the Toyo Bunko. 28.Google Scholar
1886, The Coins of the Greek and Scythic Kings of Bactria and India in the British Museum (London). Reprinted: Chicago 1966.Google Scholar
, 1946, Begram. Recherches archéologiques et historiques sur les Kouchans. Mémoires de la Délégation Archéologique Françhise en Afghanistan 12 (Cairo).Google Scholar
, 1967, Dokumente zur Geschichte der iranischen Hunnen in Baktrien undlndien, i–iii (Wiesbaden). [Controversial in its conclusions, it is an impressive catalogue of coins attributed to the Hephthalites, Kidarites and some other peoples].Google Scholar
, 1937, “Zur Üse-Ḥsi Frage,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 91.Google Scholar
Han shu, [History of the (Former) Han], compiled by [A.D.], edition, vols. 49–52 (Shanghai, 1936).Google Scholar
, 1948, “The Date of the Sogdian Ancient Letters,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 12. [Discovers the Sogdian name of the Hsiung-nu. On the conclusions to be drawn from this discovery see , 1955, and for a new interpretation see Harmatta, 1971].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1938, “Argi and the ‘Tokharians’,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1939, “The Great Inscription of Šāpūr I,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1948, “The Date of the Sogdian Ancient Letters,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1960, “The Bactrian Inscription,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1965, “Surkh-Kotal und Kaniṣka,” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 115.Google Scholar
, 1924, Paikuli. Monument and Inscription of the Early History of the Sasanian Empire, , vol. iv (Berlin).Google Scholar
Hou Han shu, [History of the Later Han], compiled by [A.D.], edition, vols. 53–5 (Shanghai, 1936).Google Scholar
, (Ta T'ang) Hsi-yü chi [Record of the Western Region of the Great T'ang Dynasty], see: Zücher 1968, Watters 1904, Beal 1906.Google Scholar
, 1979, China in Central Asia. The Early Stage: 125 B.C.–A.D. 23. An Annotated Translation of the Chapters 61 and 96 of the History of the Former Han Dynasty. With an Introduction by M.A.N. Loewe, Sinica Leidensia xiv. [See the important reviews by Daffinà 1982, and 1981].Google Scholar
, 1929, Kharoṣṭhī Inscriptions with the Exception of those of Aśoka, Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum ii, Pt. i (Calcutta).Google Scholar
1955, “Tocharisch,” Handbuch der Orientalistik, edited by , Vol. 4, Iranistik, Abschnitt 3.Google Scholar
, 1958, “The Present State of Tocharian Studies,” Proceedings of the VIIIth International Congress of Linguists ff. (Oslo).Google Scholar
, 1964, “On the Significance of Tocharian for Indo-European Linguistics,” in Classical, Mediaeval and Renaissance Studies in Honor of Louis Ullman, edited by , vol. i (Roma).Google Scholar
, 1970, “Tocharian: Indo-European and Non-Indo-European Relationships,” in Indo-European and Indo-Europeans, edited by , and (Philadelphia).Google Scholar
, 1969, “Chinese Relations with Central Asia,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, 1960, “The Weight Standards of the Gold and Copper Coinages of the Kushana Dynasty from Kadphises to Vasudeva,” Journal of the Numismatic Society of India 22.Google Scholar
, 1958a, “La grande inscription de Kaniṣka et l'étéo-tokharien, l'ancienne langue de la Bactriana”, Journal asiatique.Google Scholar
, 1951, Taxila. An Illustrated Account of Archaeological Excavations Carried out at Taxila under the Orders of the Government of India between the Years 1913 and 1934, 3 volumes (Cambridge).Google Scholar
, 1937–38, “Coins of Kidara and the Little Kushans,” Numismatic Supplement of the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 47.Google Scholar
, 1968, “K voprosu o severnykh granicakh gosudarstva ‘velikikh kushan’,” Obshchestvennye nauki v Uzbekistane 8.Google Scholar
, 1969, “The Early Movement of the Sakas and the Pahlavas,” Studies in Asian History, Proceedings of the Asian History Congress 1961 (Delhi).Google Scholar
, 1987, On the “First” Indo-Europeans. The Tokharian – Yuezhi and their Chinese Homeland, Papers on Inner Asia, No. 2, Indiana University Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies (Bloomington, IN).Google Scholar
, 1962, The Purāna Text of the Dynasties of the Kali Age, The Chowkamba Sanskrit Studies, vol. 49 (Varanasi).Google Scholar
, 1971, Chinese Statelets and the Northern Barbarians in the Period 1400–300 B.C. (Dordrecht).Google Scholar
, 1966, “Diskussii o ‘Sotera Megase’,” Trudy Gosudarstvennyj Universitet Tashkent 295.Google Scholar
, 1931, Die sogdischen Handschriftenreste des Britischen Museums, ii. Die nicht-buddhistischen Texte (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
San Kuo chih [Memoirs of the Three Kingdoms] compiled by , edition (Taipei 1967), Wei Chih 3: 6a; Cf. Zürcher 1968.Google Scholar
, 1952–1964, “Le temple de Surkh Khotal en Bactriane,” Journal asiatique 1952; 1954; 1955; 1964.Google Scholar
, 1961, “The Excavations of Surkh Khotal and the Problem of Hellenism in Bactria and India,” Proceedings of the British Academy 47.Google Scholar
, 1900, Kalhana's Rājataranginī, a Chronicle of the Kings of Kashmir, translated by -, 2 vols. (Westminster). Reprinted Delhi–Varanasi, 1961.Google Scholar
, 1944, “Sino-Kharoṣṭhī Coins,” The Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Royal Numismatic Society. 6th Series, vol. 4.Google Scholar
, 1914, Catalogue of the Coins in the Punjab Museum, Lahore, vol. i, Indo-Greek Coins (Oxford).Google Scholar
, 1967, Trade and Expansion in China. A Study in the Structure of Sino-Barbarian Economic Relations (Berkeley and Los Angeles).Google Scholar
, 1971, “Sino-kharoshtijskie monety. (K datirovke khotanskogo dvujazychnogo chekana),” Strany i narody Vostoka 10.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by