Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Theory and Research on Undergraduate Research
- Part II Implementation, Approaches, Methods
- Part III Disciplines
- Part IV International Perspective
- Part V Avenues for Developing Undergraduate Research
- 73 Synopsis and Introduction
- 74 Community-Based Undergraduate Research
- 75 Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Research
- 76 Undergraduate Research in Digital Learning Environments
- 77 Crosscultural Undergraduate Research
- Index
- References
73 - Synopsis and Introduction
Toward a Democratization of Knowledge
from Part V - Avenues for Developing Undergraduate Research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 August 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Foreword
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Theory and Research on Undergraduate Research
- Part II Implementation, Approaches, Methods
- Part III Disciplines
- Part IV International Perspective
- Part V Avenues for Developing Undergraduate Research
- 73 Synopsis and Introduction
- 74 Community-Based Undergraduate Research
- 75 Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Research
- 76 Undergraduate Research in Digital Learning Environments
- 77 Crosscultural Undergraduate Research
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter provides a synopsis of our Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research. We argue that undergraduate research is made possible by, and responds to, changes in the ways we think about knowledge. Readers will be familiar with the contemporary social context, which often sees knowledge as a kind of free-for-all in which opinion is presented as fact, where knowledge gained through research competes in the political realm with supposition, and public discourse is steeped in deliberate misinformation. In the context of our handbook, such developments not only open up opportunities for students to engage in research, they also emphasize the importance of all students developing the skills to engage meaningfully and rigorously in evidence-based practice and to challenge unfounded assumptions. Knowledge has become democratized, and it is this that provides both the impetus and opportunity for widespread and equitable undergraduate research engagement.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Undergraduate Research , pp. 661 - 669Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Ambos, E. (2015). Promoting student engagement. In Dunfee, R. & Vaidya, A. (Eds.), Operationalizing stewards of place: Implementing regional engagement and economic development strategies (pp. 13–31). American Association of State Colleges and Universities. https://aascu.org/freepubs/OperationalizingStewardsofPlace.pdfGoogle Scholar
Auchincloss, L. C., Laursen, S. L., Branchaw, J. L., Eagan, K., Graham, M., Hanauer, D. I., Lawrie, G., McLinn, , et al. (2014). Assessment of course-based undergraduate research experiences: A meeting report. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 13(1), 29–40.Google Scholar
Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413.Google Scholar
Brew, A., & Saunders, C. (2020). Making sense of research-based learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookfield, S., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for university teachers. Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. W., Hammons, J., Nolan, J., Dufek, S., & Wynn, M. (2019). The purpose of research: What undergraduate students say. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 3(1), 39–47.Google Scholar
Ceccaroni, L., & Piera, J. (Eds.). (2017). Analyzing the role of citizen science in modern research. IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, D., & Thorme, T. (2011). A practical handbook for supporting community-based research with undergraduate students. Council on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar
Crowe, M., & Brakke, D. (2019). Assessing undergraduate research experiences: An annotative bibliography. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 3(2), 21–30.Google Scholar
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage.Google Scholar
Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. An Ernest L. Boyer project of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Grönlund, A., Bächtiger, A., & Setälä, M. (Eds.). (2014). Deliberative mini-publics: Involving citizens in the democratic process. ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Healey, M., Flint, A., & Harrington, K. (2016). Students as partners: Reflections on a conceptual model. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 4(2), 1–13.Google Scholar
Hensel, N. (Ed.). (2018). Course-based undergraduate research: Educational equity and high-impact practice. Stylus/Council on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar
Hopf, H., Krief, A., Mehta, G., & Mathin, S. A. (2019). Fake science and the knowledge crisis: Ignorance can be fatal. Royal Society Open Science, 6, 190161. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190161Google Scholar
Hudley, A. H. C., Dickter, C. L., & Franz, H. A. (2017). The indispensable guide to undergraduate research: Success in and beyond college. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Inefuku, H. W. (2017). Globalization, open access, and the democratization of knowledge. EDUCAUSE Review, 52(4), 62–63.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mieg, H. A. (Ed.). (2019). Inquiry-based learning – Undergraduate research: The German multidisciplinary experience. Springer (open access). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0Google Scholar
Mieg, H. A., & Evetts, J. (2018). Professionalism, science, and expert roles: A social perspective. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 127–148). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Parnell, R., Berutich, L., Henn, A., & Koressel, N. (2014). The campus as a four-year undergraduate learning laboratory on sustainability: Linking facilities, operations, curriculum and community engagement. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 35(1), 11–19.Google Scholar
Scholz, R. W. (2013). Transdisciplinarity. In Mieg, H. A. & Töpfer, K. (Eds.), Institutional and social innovation for sustainable urban development (pp. 305–322). Earthscan.Google Scholar
Shanahan, J. O., Walkington, H., Ackley, E., Hall, E. E., & Stewart, K. A. (2017). Award-winning mentors see democratization as the future of undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 37(4), 4–11.Google Scholar
Vandermaas-Peeler, M., Miller, P., & Moore, J. (Eds.). (2018). Excellence in mentoring undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research.Google Scholar