Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Introduction
- Part I Theoretical and Methodological Issues
- 1 The Human Psyche Lives in Semiospheres
- 2 Cultural Psychology as the Science of Sensemaking: A Semiotic-cultural Framework for Psychology
- 3 Knowledge and Experience: Interobjectivity, Subjectivity, and Social Relations
- 4 “Mediationism” in Cognitive and Social Theory
- 5 Sociocultural Psychology and Interpersonal Psychoanalysis: The Semiotic Space in the Consulting Room
- Part II Action, Objects, Artifacts, and Meaning
- Part III The Agent Rises a Reflective Self: Education and Development
- Part IV Institutional Artifacts for Value
- Part V Aesthetic and Religious Experiences
- Part VI Practices and Artifacts for Imagining Identity
- Part VII Experiences Make the Person
- General Conclusion
- Index
- References
3 - Knowledge and Experience: Interobjectivity, Subjectivity, and Social Relations
from Part I - Theoretical and Methodological Issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Introduction
- Part I Theoretical and Methodological Issues
- 1 The Human Psyche Lives in Semiospheres
- 2 Cultural Psychology as the Science of Sensemaking: A Semiotic-cultural Framework for Psychology
- 3 Knowledge and Experience: Interobjectivity, Subjectivity, and Social Relations
- 4 “Mediationism” in Cognitive and Social Theory
- 5 Sociocultural Psychology and Interpersonal Psychoanalysis: The Semiotic Space in the Consulting Room
- Part II Action, Objects, Artifacts, and Meaning
- Part III The Agent Rises a Reflective Self: Education and Development
- Part IV Institutional Artifacts for Value
- Part V Aesthetic and Religious Experiences
- Part VI Practices and Artifacts for Imagining Identity
- Part VII Experiences Make the Person
- General Conclusion
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology , pp. 49 - 62Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bauer, M. W. (2015). On (social) representations and the iconoclastic impetus. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 43–63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, M. W. & Gaskell, G. (2008). Social representations theory: A progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 335–353.Google Scholar
Coelho, N. E. & Figueiredo, L. C. (2003). Patterns of intersubjectivity in the constitution of subjectivity: Dimensions of otherness. Culture and Psychology, 9, 193–208.Google Scholar
Costall, A. (2013). Things that help make us what we are. In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 66–76). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daanen, P. & Sammut, G. (2012). G. H. Mead and knowing how to act: Practical meaning, routine interaction and the theory of interobjectivity. Theory and Psychology, 22(5), 556–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, R. & Sammut, G. (2013). What lies between? In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 15–30). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. Hove, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S. & Priego-Hernández, J. (2015). Cognitive polyphasia, knowledge encounters and public spheres. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 163–178). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kärrholm, M. (2014). Interobjectivity in architectural research and theory: Towards a meta-theory of materiality and the effects of architecture and everyday life. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 64–80.Google Scholar
Kolakowski, L. (1972). Positivist Philosophy: From Hume to the Vienna Circle. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Marsico, G., Cabell, K. R., Valsiner, J., & Kharlamov, N. A. (2013). Interobjectivity as a border: The fluid dynamics of “betweenness.” In Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity (pp. 51–65). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2003). Interobjectivity and culture. Culture & Psychology, 9(3), 221–232.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2010). Intersubjectivity, interobjectivity and the embryonic fallacy in developmental science. Culture & Psychology, 16(4), 465–475.Google Scholar
Ross, L. & Ward, A. (1996). Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In Brown, T., Reed, E. S., & Turiel, E. (Eds.),Values and Knowledge (pp. 103–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sammut, G. (2015). Attitudes, social representations and points of view. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 96–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sammut, G. & Bauer, M. (2011). Social influence: Modes and modalities. In Hook, D., Franks, B., & Bauer, M. (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Communication (pp. 87–106). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sammut, G., Bezzina, F., & Sartawi, M. (2015). The spiral of conflict: Naïve realism and the black sheep effect in attributions of knowledge and ignorance. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21(2), 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Moghaddam, F. M. (Eds.). (2013). Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in Intersubjectivity and Interobjectivity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sammut, G., Daanen, P., & Sartawi, M. (2010). Interobjectivity: Representations and artefacts in Cultural Psychology. Culture & Psychology, 16(4), 451–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sammut, G. & Howarth, C. (2014). Social representations. In Teo, T. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 1799–1802). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Sammut, G. & Moghaddam, F. (2014). Interobjectivity. In Teo, T. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 991–993). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Sammut, G. & Sartawi, M. (2012). Perspective-taking and the attribution of ignorance. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 42(2), 181–200.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. J. (2012). What Money Can't Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. (2015). Representation in action. In Sammut, G., Andreouli, E., Gaskell, G., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 12–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, W., Sen, R., Permanadeli, R., & Howarth, C. (2012). The veil and Muslim women's identity: Cultural pressures and resistance to stereotyping. Culture & Psychology, 18(4), 79–99.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by