Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:04:06.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 19 - Rethinking Right

Moral Epistemology in Management Research

from Part III - A Researcher in the Spotlight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

Patricia H. Werhane
Affiliation:
DePaul University, Chicago
R. Edward Freeman
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Sergiy Dmytriyev
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abend, G. (2010). What’s new and what’s old about the new sociology of morality. In Hitlin, S. and Valsey, S. (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., and Willmott, H. (1992). On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 17, 432464.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., and Willmott, H. (2012). Making sense of management. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Alzola, M. (2015). Virtuous persons and virtuous actions in business ethics and organizational research. Business Ethics Quarterly, Online First.Google Scholar
Andreas, W. F. (2004). When in Rome… moral maturity and ethics for international economic organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 1732.Google Scholar
Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably irrational: The hidden forces that shape our decisions (1st ed.). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . (1962). Nicomachean ethics (Ostwald, M., Trans.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Asher, C. C., Mahoney, J. M., and Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 9, 532.Google Scholar
Astley, W. (1985). Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 497513.Google Scholar
Astley, W., and Zammuto, R. F. (1992). Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 3, 443460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillie, J., and Meckler, M. R. (2012). Truth and objectivity regained. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21, 248260.Google Scholar
Bambrough, R. (1979). Moral skepticism and moral knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baum, J. C. (2014). European and North American approaches to organizations and strategy research: An Atlantic divide? Not. Organization Science, 22, 11641679.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., and Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, M. H., and Watkins, M. (2004). Predictable surprises: The disasters you should have seen coming, and how to prevent them. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Bechara, J. P., and Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Philosophy of science underlying engaged scholarship. In Van de Ven, A. H. (Ed.), Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. (1984). Spreading the word. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (Nice, R., Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (Nice, R., Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. N. (1988). How to be a moral realist. In Sayre-McCord, G. (Ed.), Essays on moral realism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. (1967). Ethical relativism. In Edwards, P. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brink, D. (1989). Moral realism and the foundations of ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burrell, G. (1997). Organization paradigms. In Sorge, A. and Warner, M. (Eds.), The handbook of organization behavior. London: International Thompson Business Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. A. (1999). Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry, 37, 4759.Google Scholar
Cartwright, N., and Hardie, J. (2012). Evidence-based policy: A practical guide to do it better. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coff, R. W. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10, 119133.Google Scholar
Cohen, T. R. (2014). Moral character in the workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 943963.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B., and Folger, R. (2003). Deontic justice: The role of moral principles in workplace fairness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 8, 10191024.Google Scholar
Dalton, D. D., Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., and Roengpitya, R. (2003). Meta-analysis of financial performance and quality: Fusion or confusion? Academy of Management Journal, 46, 1316.Google Scholar
Dalton, D. D., Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., and Ellstrand, A. E. (1999). Number of directions and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 674686.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. (1996). Justice and justification. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, reasons, and causes. The Journal of Philosophy, 60, 685700.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1973). Radical interpretation. Dialectica, 27, 314328.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1991). Three varieties of knowledge’. In Griffiths, A. Phillips (ed.), A. J. Ayer memorial essays: Royal institute of philosophy supplement, vol. 30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deetz, S. (2009). Organizational research as alternative ways of attending to and talking about structures and activities. In Buchanan, D. and Bryman, A. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
De los Reyes, G., Kim, T. W., and Weaver, G. (Unpublished). Teaching ethics in business schools: A conversation on disciplinary differences, academic provincialism, and the case for integrated pedagogy.Google Scholar
DeHaan, C. R., Hirai, T., and Ryan, R. M. (2015). Nussbaum’s capabilities and self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs: Relating some fundamentals of human wellness. Journal of Happiness Studies, Online first.Google Scholar
DePaul, M. R. (1993). Balance and refinement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (1985). In defense of organization theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. (1994). When integration fails: The logic of prescription and description in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 157169.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2003). Organization theory as a positive science. In Tsoukas, H. and Knudsen, C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organization theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2005). For positive management theories while retaining science: Reply to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 109113.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. (2012). The epistemic fault line in corporate governance. Academy of Management Review, 37, 256271.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., and Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporate concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 6591.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., and Walsh, J. P. (2015). Toward a theory of business. Research in Organizational Behavior. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2015.10.002.Google Scholar
Doris, J. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drier, J. (1996). Expressivist embeddings and minimalist truth. Philosophical Studies, 83, 2951.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1975). Hard cases. Harvard Law Review, 88, 10571109.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1984). Rights as trumps. In Waldron, J. (Ed.), Theories of rights. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1996). Objectivity and truth: You’d better believe it. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 25, 87139.Google Scholar
Easterby-Smith, M., Thrope, R., and Jackson, P. (2012). Management research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. R., and Rothbard, N. P. (1999). Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person–environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 85129.Google Scholar
Enoch, D. (2011). Taking morality seriously: A defense of robust realism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ezzamel, M., and Willmott, H. (2014). Registering ‘the ethical’ in organization theory formation: Toward the disclosure of an ‘invisible’ force. Organization Studies, 35, 10131039.Google Scholar
Fabian, F. H. (2000). Keeping the tension: Pressures to keep the controversy in the management discipline. Academy of Management Review, 25, 350371.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1992). In defense of moral rights. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 12, 149169.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S., and Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22, 12401253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folger, R., and Salvador, R. (2008). Is management theory too “selfish”? Journal of Management, 34, 11271151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409421.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (2000). Business ethics at the millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10, 169180.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. (1960). Ascriptivism. Philosophical Review, 69, 221225.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 7591.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, S., and Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1347.Google Scholar
Gibbard, A. (1990). Wise choices, apt feelings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1986). The constitutions of society. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gino, F., and Ariely, D. (2012). The dark side of creativity: Original thinkers can be more dishonest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(445), 459.Google Scholar
Gino, F., Ayal, S., and Ariely, D. (2013). Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 93, 285292.Google Scholar
Gino, F., and Pierce, L. (2009). The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 142155.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A. (2003). Give it up: Reflections on the interpreted world. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 285292.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, fiction, and forecast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guillen, M. (2001). The limits of convergence: Globalization and organizational change in Argentina, South Korea, and Spain. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hampton, J. E. (2012). The authority of reason. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harman, G. (2002). No character or personality. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 8794.Google Scholar
Harman, E. (2015). The irrelevance of moral ignorance. In Shafer-Landau, Russ (Ed.), Oxford studies in metaethics (Vol. 10). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hassard, J., and Kelemen, M. (2002). Production and consumption in organization knowledge. Organization, 9, 331355.Google Scholar
Hill, A. (2015). Scorpions, cockroaches and the reality of unpleasant leaders, Financial Times: September 9. London: FT.Com.Google Scholar
Hollensbe, E., Wookey, C., Hickey, L., George, G., and Nichols, V. (2014). Organizations with purpose. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 12271234.Google Scholar
Hooker, J. (2010). Business ethics as rational choice. Boston: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hunt, S. D. (2004). For truth and realism in management research. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 2004.Google Scholar
John, P., and Duberley, J. (2000). Understanding management research: An introduction to epistemology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366395.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76, 728.Google Scholar
Keeley, M. (1983). Values in organizational theory and management education. Academy of Management Review, 8, 376386.Google Scholar
Khurana, R., and Spender, J. C. (2012). Herbert A. Simon on what ails business schools: More than ‘a problem in organizational design’. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 619639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of highest stage of moral judgement. Journal of Philosophy, 70, 630646.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development (1st ed.). San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Leplin, J. (1984). Scientific realism. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. T., and Kor, Y. (2015). Advancing the human capital perspective on value creation by joining capabilities and governance approach. Academy of Management Perspectives, Online First.Google Scholar
Mantere, S., and Ketokivi, M. (2013). Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, 38, 7089.Google Scholar
McGrath, S. (2010). Moral realism without convergence. Philosophical Topics, 38, 5990.Google Scholar
McMahan, J. (2004). Moral intuition. In LaFollette, H. (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to ethical theory. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McMahon, C. (2009). Reasonable disagreement: A theory of morality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Melé, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 7788.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1980). Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35, 10121027.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher, 18, 511.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 50, 741749.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371378.Google Scholar
Mitroff, I. I. (1972). The myth of objectivity or why science needs a new psychology of science. Management Science, 18, 613618.Google Scholar
Modzelewski, E. (2001). CMU’s Tom Kerr retiring after teaching business ethics for 35 years. Post-Gazette, April 17.Google Scholar
Moldoveanu, M. C., and Baum, J. A. (2005). Contemporary debates in organizational epistemology. In Baum, J. A. (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. (2009). On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nystrom, P. C., and Starbuck, W. H. (1977). Why prescription is prescribed. TIMS Studies in Management Studies, 5, 15.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations: A critical essay. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (2015). Leadership BS: Fixing workplaces and careers one truth at a time. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and proper function. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Preston, L. E. (1986). Business and public policy. Journal of Management, 12, 261275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, D. P., and Jones, T. M. (1995). An agent morality view of business policy. Academy of Management Review, 20, 2242.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Risen, J. (2015). Psychologists approve ban on role in national security interrogations, New York Times: August 7.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. (1993). Empiricism in business ethics: Suggested research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(8), 585599.Google Scholar
Root, J. (1991). Philosophy of social science. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. (2012). Philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sandberg, J. (2008). Understanding the separation thesis. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 213232.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. (2014). Being realistic about reasons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., and Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 10961120. doi:10.2307/20159358.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1962). Meaning and speech acts. Philosophical Review, 71, 423432.Google Scholar
Sepielli, A. (Forthcoming). Subjective and objective reasons. In Daniel Star (Ed.), Oxford handbook of reasons and normativity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Setiya, K. (2015). Knowing right from wrong. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. (2003). Moral realism: A defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shepherd, C., and Challenger, R. (2013). Revisiting paradigm(s) in management research: A rhetorical analysis of the paradigm wars. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15, 225244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1967). The business school: A problem in organizational design. Journal of Management Studies, 4, 116.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1977). Models of discovery: And other topics in the methods of science. Boston: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2000). Expressivism and embedding. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61, 677693.Google Scholar
Sison, A. J. G. (2014). Happiness and virtue ethics in business: The ultimate value proposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skorupski, J. (2010). The domain of reasons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (1994). The moral problem. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. (1991). Knowledge in perspective: Selected essays in epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steup, M., and Sosa, E. (2005). Contemporary debates in epistemology. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Strudler, A. (2005). Deception unraveled. Journal of Philosophy, 102(9), 458473.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571610.Google Scholar
Swanson, D. L. (1999). Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24, 506521.Google Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A. E., and Smith-Crown, K. (2008). Ethical decision-making: Where we’ve been and where we’re going. In Walsh, J. P. and Brief, A. P. (Eds.), Academy of Management Annals, 2 (pp. 545607). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. J. (1990). The realm of rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., and Weaver, G. R. (1994). Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 113128.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., and Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951990.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. (2013). The spirit of science and socially responsible scholarship. Management and Organization Review, 9, 375394.Google Scholar
Van Maanen, J. (1995a). Fear and loathing in organization studies. Organization Science, 6, 687692.Google Scholar
Van Maanen, J. (1995b). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6, 133143.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (Ed.). (1984). Theories of rights. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, G. R., Reynolds, S. J., and Brown, M. E. (2014). Moral intuition: Connecting current knowledge to future organizational research and practice. Journal of Management, 40, 100129.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. New York: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Newbury Park: SAGE.Google Scholar
Wellman, C. (1963). The ethical implications of cultural relativity. Journal of Philosophy, 60, 169184.Google Scholar
Wenar, L. (2005). The nature of rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 33, 223253.Google Scholar
Wenar, L. (2008). The analysis of rights. In Kramer, M., Grant, C., Colburn, B., and Hatzistavrou, A. (Eds.), The legacy of H.L.A. Hart. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. H. (1994). The normative/descriptive distinction in methodologies of business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 175180.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 7.Google Scholar
Westwood, R., and Clegg, S. (2002). Debating organization: Point-counterpoint in organization studies. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wicks, A. C. (1996). Overcoming the separation thesis: The need for a reconsideration of business and society research. Business and Society, 35, 89118.Google Scholar
Wicks, A. C., and Freeman, R. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science, 9, 123140.Google Scholar
William, J. 1975 (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (2005). The economics of governance. American Economic Review, 95, 118.Google Scholar
York, J. G., Sarasvathy, S. D., and Wicks, A. (2013). An entrepreneurial perspective on value creation in public-private ventures. Academy of Management Review, 35, 307309.Google Scholar
Zajac, E. J., and Westphal, J. D. (1994). The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. corporations: When is more not better? Strategic Management Journal, 15, 121142.Google Scholar
Zald, M. N. (1991). Sociology as a discipline: Quasi-science and quasi-humanities (pp. 165187). Fall/Winter: The American Sociologist, Fall/Winter 165–187Google Scholar
Zald, M. N. (1993). Organization studies as a scientific and humanistic enterprise: Toward a reconceptualiza. Organization Science, 4, 513527.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. (1971). The power and pathology of imprisonment. Congressional Record. (Serial No. 15, October 25, 1971). Hearings before Subcommittee No. 3, of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, 92nd Congress, First Session on Corrections, Part II, Prisons, Prison Reform and Prisoners’ Rights: California. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Zingales, L. (2000). In search of new foundations. Journal of Finance, 55, 16231653.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×