Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Historical Approaches
- Normative Approaches
- Chapter 4 Research in Normative Business Ethics
- Chapter 5 The Universalist Approach and Kant in Business Ethics
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Chapter 4 - Research in Normative Business Ethics
A Coherence Approach
from Normative Approaches
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2017
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Historical Approaches
- Normative Approaches
- Chapter 4 Research in Normative Business Ethics
- Chapter 5 The Universalist Approach and Kant in Business Ethics
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility , pp. 51 - 68Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Childress, James F., and Beauchamp, Tom L.. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman. 1979. Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics. The Journal of Philosophy, 76(5): 256–282.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 1981. Ethical Responsibilities of Engineers in Large Organizations: the Pinto case. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, I: 1–14.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 1990. Ethics and Coherence. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 64(3): 39–52.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 2003. The Ethics of Information Technology and Business. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 2006a. The History of Business Ethics. In Epstein, Marc and Hanson, Kirk (eds.) The Accountable Corporation. Vol. II, p. 47–58. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 2006b. The Relevance of Philosophy to Business Ethics: A Response to Rorty’s “Is Philosophy Relevant to Applied Ethics?” Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(3): 381–389.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. 2010. Business Ethics. (7th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. (1st, 2nd, 3rd eds., N.Y.: Macmillan and London: Collier, 1982, 1986, 1990; 4rd-6th eds., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1995, 1999, 2006.)Google Scholar
De George, Richard T., Gert, Bernard, and Magnell, Thomas. 1994. The Place for Coherence and Moral Rules in Ethics: Richard De George and Bernard Gert (Dialogue moderated and edited by Thomas Magnell). The Journal of Value Inquiry, 28(3): 463–479.Google Scholar
DeGrazia, David. 2003. Common Morality: Coherence, and the Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 13(5): 219–230Google Scholar
DeMarco, Joseph P. 1997. Coherence and Applied Ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 14(3): 289–300.Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael. 1987. Two Conceptions of Coherence Methods in Ethics. Mind, 96: 384, 463–481.Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael. 1988. The Problem of the Criterion and Coherence Methods in Ethics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 18(1): 67–86.Google Scholar
Dorsey, Dale. 2006. A Coherence Theory of Truth in Ethics. Philosophical Studies, 127: 493–523.Google Scholar
Engel, Mylan Jr. 2012. Coherentism and the Epistemic Justification of Moral Beliefs: A Case Study in How to Do Practical Ethics Without Appeal to a Moral Theory. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 50(1): 50–74.Google Scholar
Guarini, Marcello. 2007. Computation, Coherence, and Ethical Reasoning. Minds and Machines, 17: 27–46.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1651/2017. Leviathan. Part I, chapter 13. Web site www.bartleby.com/34/5/13.html retrieved April 10, 2017.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. B. 1974–1975. The independence of moral theory. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, XLVII, 5–22.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1987. The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Revised ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar