Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Qualitative Approaches
- Quantitative and Experimental Approaches
- Contemporary Approaches
- Case Study Approaches
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Case Study Approaches
from Part II - Empirical Approaches
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2017
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Qualitative Approaches
- Quantitative and Experimental Approaches
- Contemporary Approaches
- Case Study Approaches
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
References
Andriani, P., Biotto, G., and Ghezzi, D. M. (2012). “The Emergence of Trust-Based Knowledge Ecosystems: The Case of illycaffè in Brazil. In Belussi, F. and Staber, U. H. (Eds.), Managing Networks of Creativity (pp. 191–211). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benner, Katie. 2014. “How LinkedIn Cracked the Chinese Market.” Bloomberg View. www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2014-1 Accessed July 10, 201Google Scholar
Bollier, D., Weiss, S., and Hanson, K. O. 1991. Aiming Higher. New York: American Management Association.Google Scholar
Clark, Che, Greniuk, Holly, Riherd, Jacob, Rome, Brendan and Jessica, YU. 2010. “The Great Fire Wall of China: Google’s Market Entry into China.” Forbes India.http://forbesindia.com/article/thunderbird/the-great-fire-wall-of-china-googles-market-entry-into-china/16472/1#ixzz4F1bCoZ8o Accessed July 22, 2016.Google Scholar
Columbia Accident Report. 2003. Report of Columbia Accident Investigation Board. www.nasa.gov/columbia/home/CAIB_Vol1.html Accessed February 24, 2015.Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman. 1979. “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics.” Journal of Philosophy.76: 256–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Norman. 1996. Justice and Justification. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanaraj, C., Branzei, O., and Subramanian, S. (2011). Bayer CropScience in India (A): Value-Driven Strategy. Ivey Case Publishing, Case No. 9. Retrieved from www.iveycases.com/ProductView.aspx?id=45590. Accessed January 14, 2016.Google Scholar
Mozur, Paul and Goel, Vindu. 2014. To reach China, LinkedIn plays by local rules. New York Times. October 5. www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/technology/to-reach-china-linkedin-plays-by-local-rules.html Accessed July 14, 2016.Google Scholar
Pallardy, Richard. 2016. “Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill of 2010.” Encyclopedia Britannica. www.britannica.com/event/Deepwater-Horizon-oil-spill-of-2010 Accessed August 2, 2016.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1951. “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics.” Philosophical Review. 60: 177–197.Google Scholar
Rogers Commission Report. 1986. The Report of The Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Accident. www.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs. Accessed June 3, 2014.Google Scholar
Waddell, Kaveh. 2016. “Why Google Quit China and Why It’s Heading Back.” The Atlantic, January 19, 2016.Google Scholar
Werhane, Patricia H. 2004. “The Principle of Double Effect and Moral Risk: Some Case Studies of US Transnational Corporations,” in Responsibility in World Business: Managing Harmful Side-effects of Corporate Activity. ed. Bomann-Larsen, Lene and Wiggin, Oddny. New York and Japan: United Nations University Press, pp. 105–120.Google Scholar
Woollaston, Victoria. 2013. “China lifts ban on Facebook – but only for people living in a 17 square mile area of Shanghai.” www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2431861/China-lifts-ban-Facebook–people-living-working-small-area-Shanghai.html September 23. Accessed July 27, 2015.Google Scholar
References
Aquinas, Saint Thomas. Treatise on the Virtues. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. 3 vols. New York: Benziger Brothers, Inc., 1947.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Ostwald, Martin. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1962.Google Scholar
Arras, John D. “Common Law Morality.” Hastings Center Report, July/August (1990): 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Louis B., Roland Christensen, C., and Hansen, Abby J.. Teaching and the Case Method: Texts, Cases, and Readings. 3rd ed. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L., ed. Case Studies in Business, Society, and Ethics 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
Boeyink, David E. “Casuistry: A Case-Based Method for Journalists.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7, 2 (1992): 107–120.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Johannes and Ims, Knut J.. “A Conflict Case Approach to Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 53 (2004): 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, Rogene A. Fundamental Concepts and Problems in Business Ethics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1989.Google Scholar
Calkins, Martin. “Casuistry and the Business Case Method.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11, 2 (April 2001): 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, Martin “How Casuistry and Virtue Ethics Might Break the Ideological Stalemate Troubling Agricultural Biotechnology.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12, 3 (July 2002): 305–330.Google Scholar
Calkins, Martin “Developing a Virtue-Imbued Casuistry for Business Ethics.” Vol. 42 Issues in Business Ethics. New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2014.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Gerald F. American Business Values with International Perspectives. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
Ciulla, Joanne B. “Casuistry and the Case for Business Ethics.” In Business as a Humanity, ed. Donaldson, Thomas J. and Edward Freeman, R., 167–183. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Coleman, Kari Gwen. “Casuistry and Computer Ethics.” Metaphilosophy 38, 4 (July 2007): 471–488.Google Scholar
Copeland, Melvin T. “The Genesis of the Case Method in Business Instruction.” In The Case Method at the Harvard Business School: Papers by Present and Past Members of the Faculty and Staff, ed. McNair, Malcolm P., 25–33. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., 1954.Google Scholar
Culliton, James W. “Writing Business Cases.” In The Case Method at the Harvard Business School: Papers by Present and Past Members of the Faculty and Staff, ed. McNair, Malcolm P.. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1954.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. Business Ethics. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1999.Google Scholar
Dewing, Arthur Stone. “An Introduction to the Use of Cases.” In The Case Method at the Harvard Business School: Papers by Present and Past Members of the Faculty and Staff, ed. McNair, Malcolm P., 1–5. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1954.Google Scholar
Donahue, James A. “The Use of Virtue and Character in Applied Ethics.” Horizons 17 (1990): 228–243.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas and Werhane, Patricia H., eds. Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1999.Google Scholar
Drucker, Peter F. “What is ‘business ethics’?” National Affairs 63 (Spring 1981): 18–36.Google Scholar
Hanson, K. O. and Weiss, S.. Merck & Co., Inc.: Addressing Third-World Needs. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Publishing, 1991, no. 9–991-021 to 024.Google Scholar
Hunter, Kathryn Montgomery. “A Science of Individuals: Medicine and Casuistry.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14, April (1989): 193–212.Google Scholar
James, William. Pragmatism and Four Essays from The Meaning of Truth, ed. Perry, Ralph Barton. Cleveland: Meridian Books, 1969.Google Scholar
Johansen, Baber. “Casuistry: Between Legal Concept and Social Praxis.” Islamic Law and Society 2, 2 (1995): 135–156.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. “Casuistry and Clinical Ethics.” Theoretical Medicine 7 (1986): 65–74.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. “Casuistry as Methodology in Clinical Ethics.” Theoretical Medicine 12, December (1991): 295–307.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. and Toulmin, Stephen. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill, 2004. Accessed 30 August 2016. Internet. Available from http://philosophy.eserver.org/kant/metaphys-of-morals.txt.Google Scholar
Keenan, S. J., James, F. Virtues for Ordinary Christians. Kansas City: Sheed & Ward, 1996.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Craig C. “Case Method.” In Mastering Management Education: Innovations in Teaching Effectiveness, ed. Vance, Charles M., 45–52. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc., 1993.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar
McLaren, B.M. “Computational Models of Ethical Reasoning: Challenges, Initial Steps, and Future Directions.” Intelligent Systems, IEEE 21, 4 (July-August 2006): 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Thomas F. “Creed, Cult, Code and Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 5, 6 (1986): 453–463.Google Scholar
Porter, Jean. The Recovery of Virtue: The Relevance of Aquinas For Christians. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980).Google Scholar
Reporter. “Miracle Worker.” Time, 2 November 1987, 78.Google Scholar
Rotch, William. Casewriting. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, 1992, no. UVA-G-0364.Google Scholar
Rotch, William “Casewriting Workshop Handout.” Charlottesville: Unpublished, 20 May 1996.Google Scholar
Statman, Daniel, ed. Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. “Commentary on Analogical Reasoning.” Harvard Law Review 106, January (1993): 741–791.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Tom. “Casuistry in Medical Ethics: Rehabilitated, or Repeat Offender?” Theoretical Medicine 15, March (1994): 5-20.Google Scholar
van der Burg, Wibren and van Willigenburg, Theo, eds. Reflective Equilibrium: Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
Velasquez, Manuel G. “Some Lessons and Nonlessons of Casuist History.” In Business as a Humanity, ed. Donaldson, Thomas J. and Edward Freeman, R., 184–195. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
References
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4): 932–968.Google Scholar
Ählström, J., & Egels-Zandén, N. (2008). The process of defining corporate social responsibility: A study of Swedish garment retailers’ responsibility. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17: 230–244.Google Scholar
Bansal, P., & Song, H-C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate responsibility from sustainability. Academy of Management Annals. 11(1): 105–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barter, N., & Bebbington, J. (2013). Actor-network theory: a briefing note and possibilities for social and environmental accounting research. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 33(1): 33–50.Google Scholar
Bergström, O. & Diedrich, A. (2011). Exercising social responsibility in downsizing: Enrolling and mobilizing actors at a Swedish high-tech company. Organization Studies, 32(7): 897–919.Google Scholar
Bled, A. J. (2010). Technological choices in international environmental negotiations: an actor–network analysis. Business & Society, 49(4): 570–590.Google Scholar
Boltanski, L. (2013). The Foetal Condition: A Sociology of Engendering and Abortion. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Briers, M., & Chua, W. F. (2001). The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(3): 237–269.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1995. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cabantous, L., & Gond, J. P. (2011). Rational decision making as performative praxis: explaining rationality’s éternel retour. Organization Science, 22(3): 573–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge: 196–223. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In Law, J. (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination: 132–161. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1998a). Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. In Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets: 1–58. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1998b). An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology. In Callon, M. (ed.), The Laws of the markets: 244–269. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (2009). Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3): 535–548.Google Scholar
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologist help them to do so. In Knorr-Cetina, K. & Cicourel, A.V. (eds) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro- and Macro Sociologies: 277–303. Boston, MA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caron, M. A., & Turcotte, M. F. B. (2009). Path dependence and path creation: Framing the extra-financial information market for a sustainable trajectory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(2): 272–297.Google Scholar
Déjean, F, Gond, J.-P. & Leca, B. (2004). Measuring the unmeasured: An institutional entrepreneur strategy in an emerging industry. Human Relations, 57(6): 741–764Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 65–91.Google Scholar
El Abboubi, M., & Nicolopoulou, K. (2012). International social-related accountability standards: Using ANT towards a multi-stakeholder analysis. M@n@gement, 4(15): 392–414.Google Scholar
Füssel, L., & Georg, S. (2000). The institutionalization of environmental concerns: Making the environment perform. International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(3): 41–58.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P., & Boxenbaum, E. (2013). The glocalization of responsible investment: Contextualization work in France and Québec. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(4): 707–721.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2016). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews. 18(4): 440–463.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Igalens, J., & Brès, L. (2013). Rendre compte du social. L’art du compromis performatif. Revue Française de Gestion, 237: 201–238.Google Scholar
Gond, J.-P. & Nyberg, D. (2017). Materializing power to recover corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies. 38(8), 1127–1148.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 481–510.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, T., Sandström, J., & Helin, S. (2009). Corporate codes of ethics and the bending of moral space. Organization, 16(4), 529–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larssaether, S., & Nijhof, A. (2009). Moral landscapes: Understanding agency in corporate responsibility initiatives. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16: 228–236.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1986). The power of association. In Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? 264–280. Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. Bijker, W. E., Law, J. (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change: 225–258. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1996). Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaïa. Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. London: Polity Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Law, J. (1986). On the methods of long-distance control: Vessels, navigation and the Portuguese route to India. In Law, J. (ed), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?: 234–263. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of actor-network: ordering, strategy and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4): 379–393.Google Scholar
Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In Law, J. and Hassard, J. (eds) Actor Network Theory and After: 1–14. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ligonie, M. (2016). Management Control for Sustainability. A Practice-based Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility, PhD dissertation, ESSEC Business School.Google Scholar
Ligonie, M. (2017). The “forced performativity” of a strategy concept: Exploring how shared value shaped a gambling company’s strategy. Long Range Planning. Published online. DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D., & Millo, Y. (2003). Constructing a market, performing a theory: The historical sociology of a financial derivatives exchange. American Review of Sociology, 109(1):107–145Google Scholar
Malsch, B. (2013). Politicizing the expertise of the accounting industry in the realm of corporate social responsibility. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(2), 149–168.Google Scholar
Marti, E. & Gond, J.-P. 2017. When do theories become self-fulfilling? Exploring the boundary conditions of performativity. Academy of Management Review. Published online. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2016.0071.Google Scholar
Pasquero, J. (1996). Stakeholder theory as a constructivist paradigm. In: Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society, 7: 1153–1164.Google Scholar
Schaefer, S. M., & Wickert, C. (2016). On the potential of progressive performativity: Definitional purity, re-engagement and empirical points of departure. Human Relations, 69(2): 215–224.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.Google Scholar
Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing for political corporate social responsibility: New challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 273–298.Google Scholar
Van Grinsven, M., Heusinkveld, S. & Cornelissen, J. (2016). Translating management concepts: Towards a typology of alternative approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3): 271–289.Google Scholar
Wæraas, A. & Nielsen, J. A. (2016). Translation theory ‘translated’: Three perspectives on translation in organizational research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(3): 236–270.Google Scholar
Whelan, G., & Gond, J. P. (2017). Meat your enemy: Animal rights, alignment and radical change. Journal of Management Inquiry. 26(2): 123–138.Google Scholar
Wright, C, & Nyberg, D. (2014). Creative self-destruction: corporate responses to climate change as political myths. Environmental Politics, 23: 205–223.Google Scholar