Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science
- The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Book part
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Premeeting Activities and Context
- Part III The Meeting Itself
- Part IV Special Types of Meetings
- Postevent Meetings
- Virtual Meetings
- 28 Meeting Organization Strategy
- 29 The Successful Facilitation of Virtual Team Meetings
- Part V Synthesis and Conclusion
- Book part
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
28 - Meeting Organization Strategy
The “Why” and “How” of Meetings with Virtual Presence
from Virtual Meetings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2015
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science
- The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Tables
- Figures
- Contributors
- Book part
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Premeeting Activities and Context
- Part III The Meeting Itself
- Part IV Special Types of Meetings
- Postevent Meetings
- Virtual Meetings
- 28 Meeting Organization Strategy
- 29 The Successful Facilitation of Virtual Team Meetings
- Part V Synthesis and Conclusion
- Book part
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
Abstract
Hybrid meetings – a combination of virtual and face-to-face attendance – represent an increasingly popular form of meeting. This chapter reviews factors that we contend are instrumental in the effectiveness of such meetings. It is important that the decision to hold a meeting with virtual presence is congruent with the meeting type or purpose and attendee goals; this chapter also acknowledges the contribution of attendee behaviors and cultural styles of communication to the effectiveness of hybrid meetings. Future research directions, emphasizing the importance of taking a holistic approach, are discussed.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science , pp. 663 - 679Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Adams, L., Toomey, L., & Churchill, E. (2006). Distributed research teams: Meeting asynchronously in virtual space. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4, 0–10. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.1999.tb00108.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. H., McEwan, R., Bal, J., & Carletta, J. (2007). Virtual team meetings: An analysis of communication and context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2558–2580. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, V., England, W., & Ward, S. (2011). Virtual teams. Research-Technology Management, 54, 62–63.Google Scholar
Brummelhuis, L. L., Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., & Keulemans, L. (2012). Do new ways of working foster work engagement? Psicothema, 24, 113–120.Google ScholarPubMed
Challenger, R., Clegg, C. W., & Robinson, M. A. (2010). Understanding crowd behaviours; Vol. 1: Practical guidance and lessons identified. London, UK: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Cichomska, K. (2013a). Chairing and attending virtual meetings: The importance of shared experience. Assessment & Development Matters, 5, 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichomska, K. (2013b, May). Virtual meetings of the future: A socio-technical perspective for the improved management of meetings. Paper presented at the 16th Congress of the European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Münster, Germany.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, J. A., & Luong, A. (2011). Meeting design characteristics and attendee perceptions of staff/team meeting quality. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 15, 90–104. doi:10.1037/a0021549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curseu, P. L., Schalk, R., & Wessel, I. (2007). How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 628–652. doi:10.1108/02683940810894729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daim, T. U., Ha, A., Reutiman, S., Hughes, B., Pathak, U., Bynum, W., & Bhatla, A. (2012). Exploring the communication breakdown in global virtual teams. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 199–212. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dani, S. S., Burns, N. J., Backhouse, C. D., & Kockhar, A. K. (2006). The implications of organizational culture and trust in the working of virtual teams. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 220, 951–960. doi:10.1243/09544054JEM415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frese, M. (2008). The changing nature of work. In Chmiel, N. (Ed.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (pp. 397–413). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geimer, J. L., Leach, D. J., DeSimone, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., & Warr, P. B. (in press). Meetings at work: Perceived effectiveness and recommended improvements. Journal of Business Research.Google Scholar
Gratton, L. (2010). The future of work. Business Strategy Review, 21, 16–23. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8616.2010.00678.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosse, C. U. (2002). Managing communication within virtual intercultural teams. Business Communication Quarterly, 65, 22–38. doi:10.1177/108056990206500404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, M., Novicevic, M. M., & Garrison, G. (2004). Challenges to staffing global virtual teams. Human Resource Management Review, 14, 275–294. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2004.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15, 69–95. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791–815. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.1998.tb00080.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P., Heimann, V., & O'Neill, K. (2001). The “wonderland” of virtual teams. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 24–29. doi:10.1108/13665620110364745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerres, M., & De Witt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements, Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 101–113. doi:10.1080/1358165032000165653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimble, C., Hildreth, P., & Wright, P. (2001). Communities of practice: Going virtual. In Malhotra, Y. (Ed.), Knowledge management and business model innovation (pp. 220–234). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700–718. doi:10.1177/0149206305279113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, D. J., Rogelberg, S. G., Warr, P. B., & Burnfield, J. L. (2009). Perceived meeting effectiveness: The role of meeting design characteristics. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 65–76. doi:10.1007/s10869–009–9092–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lurey, J. S., & Raisinghani, M. S. (2001). An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams. Information & Management, 38, 523–544. doi:10.1016/S0378–7206(01)00074-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., & Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24, 569–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, G., Grudin, J., & Poltrock, S. E. (1999). Meeting at the desktop: An empirical study of virtually collocated teams. In Bodker, S., Kyng, M., & Schmidt, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 12–16 September 1999 (pp. 159–178). Copenhagen, Denmark: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 805–835. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejias, R. J. (2007). The interaction of process losses, process gains, and meeting satisfaction within technology-supported environments. Small Group Research, 38, 156–194. doi:10.1177/1046496406297037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montoya, M. M., Masset, A. P., Hung, Y. C., & Crisp, C. B. (2009). Can you hear me now? Communication in virtual product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 139–155. doi:10.1111/j.1540–5885.2009.00342.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijholt, A., den Akker, R., & Heylen, D. (2006). Meetings and meeting modelling in smart environments. AI & Society, 20, 202–220. doi:10.1007/s00146–005–0016–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2009). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139–178. doi:10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J., & Willcocks, L. P. (2007). Global software development: Exploring socialization and face-to-face meetings in distributed strategic projects. Strategic Information Systems, 16, 25–49. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pape, W. R. (1997). Group insurance: Virtual teams can quickly gather the knowledge of even far-flung staff. Inc. Tech, 2, 29–32.Google Scholar
Paul, S., Seetharaman, P., Samarah, I., & Mykytyn, P. P. (2004). Impact of heterogeneity and collaborative conflict management style of the performance of synchronous global virtual teams. Information and Management, 41, 303–321. doi:10.1016/S0378–7206(03)00076–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, R. D. (2009). How executive coaching can change leader behavior and improve meeting effectiveness: An exploratory study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 61, 298–318. doi:10.1037/a0017842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghuram, S., London, M., & Larsen, H. H. (2001). Flexible employment practices in Europe: Country versus culture. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(5), 738–753. doi:10.1080/09585190122083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapoza, K. (2013). One in five Americans work from home, numbers seen rising over 60%. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2013/02/18/one-in-five-americans-work-from-home-numbers-seen-rising-over-60/Google Scholar
Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information and Management, 45, 131–142. doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, N. (2008). Telework. In. Chmiel, N. (Ed.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (pp. 190–208). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sinangil, H. K., & Kucakaslan, A. (2008). Mergers and acquisitions through perspectives of work and organizational psychology and management. In. Chmiel, N. (Ed.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (pp. 377–394). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stough, S., Eom, S., & Buckenmyer, J. (1998). Virtual teaming: A strategy for moving your organization into the new millennium. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(8), 370–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartiainen, M., & Andriessen, J. H. E. (2008). Virtual team-working and collaboration technology. In. Chmiel, N. (Ed.), An introduction to work and organizational psychology: A European perspective (pp. 209–233). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vinciarelli, A., Pantic, M., & Bourland, H. (2009). Social signal processing: Survey of an emerging domain. Image and Vision Computing, 27, 1743–1759. doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2008.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivacqua, A. S., Marques, L. C., Ferreira, M. S., & de Souza, J. M. (2011). Computational indicators to assist meeting facilitation. Group Decision and Negotiation, 20, 667–684. doi:10.1007/s10726–011–9235–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, J. (2003). Understanding distributed work. London, UK: Work Design Collaborative.Google Scholar
Wasson, C. (2004). Multitasking during virtual meetings. HR. Human Resource Planning, 27, 47–60.Google Scholar
Zakaria, N., Amelinckx, A., & Wilemon, D. (2004). Working together apart? Building a knowledge-sharing culture for global virtual teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 15–29. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8691.2004.00290.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5
- Cited by