Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Arabic Applied Linguistics
- Part II Arabic Variation and Sociolinguistics
- Part III Theoretical and Descriptive Studies
- Part IV Arabic Computational and Corpus Linguistics
- Part V Arabic Linguistics and New Media Studies
- Part VI Arabic Linguistics in Literature and Translation
- Index
- References
Part VI - Arabic Linguistics in Literature and Translation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 September 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Arabic Applied Linguistics
- Part II Arabic Variation and Sociolinguistics
- Part III Theoretical and Descriptive Studies
- Part IV Arabic Computational and Corpus Linguistics
- Part V Arabic Linguistics and New Media Studies
- Part VI Arabic Linguistics in Literature and Translation
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics , pp. 563 - 611Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
References
Abboud-Haggar, S. (2010). Linguistic varieties in twenty-first-century Arabic novels: An applied study. In Bassiouney, R., ed., Arabic and the Media: Linguistic Analyses and Applications. Leiden: Brill, 201–15.Google Scholar
Abū al-Saʿūd, R. (2012). ﻋﺸﺮ ﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﺟﻠﺪ ﺻﻔﺮﺍء [Ten Yellow Leather Chairs]. Al-Qāhira: Dār Laylā ‘Kayān Kūrb’.Google Scholar
Aguadé, J. (2005). ‘Darle Al Pico’: Un ‘bestiario’ de Youssouf Amine Elalamy En Árabe Marroquí. Estudios de dialectología norteafricana y andalusí, 9, 245–65.Google Scholar
Aguadé, J. (2006). Writing dialect in Morocco. Estudios de dialectología norteafricana y andalusí, 10, 253–74.Google Scholar
Al-Fāziʿ, F. (2018). أسرار عائلية [Family Secrets]. Tūnis: Dār Sindibād Tūnis lil-Nashr.Google Scholar
Al-Maʿarrī, A. (2016). رسالة الغفران [The Epistle of Forgiveness], translated by al-Šāmilī, N.. Al-Qāhira: Al-Kutub Khān.Google Scholar
Al-Tābiʿī, J. (2012). الحب في زمن البوتكس [Love in the Time of Botox]. Al-Jīza: Dār Aṭlas.Google Scholar
ʿĀṭif, A. (2016). بالطو وفانلة وتاب [Overcoat, T-Shirt and Tablet]. Al-Qāhira: Dār Tūyā.Google Scholar
Avallone, L. (2011). Autori Egiziani Degli Anni Duemila. Blogosfera, Graphic E Postmoderno: Nuovi Linguaggi Nel Panorama Letterario Arabo. Kervan – International Journal of Afro-Asiatic Studies, 13(14), 25–46.Google Scholar
Avallone, L. (2012). Scelte Linguistiche E Stile Nella Narrativa Di’ahmad Al-ʿAydi. Linguistica e filologia, 32, 161–92.Google Scholar
Avallone, L. (2016). Spelling variants in written Egyptian Arabic: A study on literary texts. In Grigore, G. and Bițună, G., eds., Arabic Varieties: Far and Wide. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Aida – Bucharest (2015). Bucharest: Editura Universității din București, 79–86.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (2010 [1981]) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, translated by Holquist, M. and Emerson, C.. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baldick, C. (2008). Skaz. In The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bassiouney, R. (2014). Language and Identity in Modern Egypt. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cachia, P. J. E. (1967). The use of the colloquial in modern Arabic literature. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 87(1), 12–22.Google Scholar
Caubet, D. (2017). Morocco: An informal passage to literacy in Dārija (Moroccan Arabic). In Høigilt, J. and Mejdell, G., eds., The Politics of Written Language in the Arab World. Leiden: Brill, 116–41.Google Scholar
Davies, H. (2006). Dialect literature. In Versteegh, K., Eid, M., Elgibali, A., Woidich, M., and Zaborski, A., eds., Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, vol. I. Leiden: Brill, 597–604.Google Scholar
Dayrakī, L. (2006). من سيرة الهر المنزلي [Excerpts from a House Cat’s Biography]. Beirut: Riad El-Rayyes Books.Google Scholar
Diem, W. (1974). Hochsprache und Dialekt im Arabischen. Untersuchungen zur heutigen arabischen Zweisprachigkeit. Wiesbaden: Deutsche Morgenländ.Google Scholar
Doss, M. (2006). Cultural dynamics and linguistic practice in contemporary Egypt. In Abdelrahman, M., Hamdy, I. A., Rouchdy, M., and Saad, R., eds., Cultural Dynamics in Contemporary Egypt, vol. 27. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press, 51–68.Google Scholar
Doss, M. and Davies, H. (2013). ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣﻴﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﺼﺮﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻜﺘﻮﺑﺔ [The Written Egyptian ʿāmmiyya]. Al-Qāhira: Al-Hayʾa al-Miṣriyya al-ʿĀmma lil-Kitāb.Google Scholar
Eid, M. (2002). Language is a choice: Variation in Egyptian women’s written discourse. In Rouchdy, A., ed., Language Contact and Language Conflict in Arabic: Variations on a Sociolinguistic Theme. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 203–322.Google Scholar
Eisele, J. C. (2003). Myth, values, and practice in the representation of Arabic. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 163, 43–59.Google Scholar
El-Ariss, T. (2010). Hacking the modern: Arabic writing in the virtual age. Comparative Literature Studies, 47(4), 533–48.Google Scholar
El-Farnawany, R. (1981). Ägyptisch-arabisch als gescriebene Sprache: Probleme der Verschriftung einer Umgangssprache. Doctoral dissertation, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen.Google Scholar
Elinson, A. E. (2013). Dārija and changing writing practices in Morocco. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 45(4), 715–30.Google Scholar
Elinson, A. E. (2017). Writing oral and literary culture: The case of the contemporary Moroccan Zajal. In Høigilt, J. and Mejdell, G., eds., The Politics of Written Language in the Arab World. Leiden: Brill, 190–211.Google Scholar
Fahmy, Z. (2011). Ordinary Egyptians: Creating the Modern Nation through Popular Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häusler, M. (1990). Fiktive ägyptische Autobiographien der zwanziger und dreißiger Jahre. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Holes, C. (2013). Orality, culture, and language. In Owens, J., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Arabic Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 281–99.Google Scholar
Høigilt, J. (2017). Dialect with an attitude: Language and criticism in new Egyptian print media. In Høigilt, J. and Mejdell, G., eds., The Politics of Written Language in the Arab World, Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics. Leiden: Brill, 166–89.Google Scholar
Høigilt, J. (2019). Comics in Contemporary Arab Culture: Politics, Language and Resistance. New York: IB Tauris.Google Scholar
Ha˚land, E. M. (2017). Adab Sākhir (satirical literature) and the use of Egyptian vernacular. In Høigilt, J. and Mejdell, G., eds., The Politics of Written Language in the Arab World, vol. 90. Leiden: Brill, 142–65.Google Scholar
Ha˚land, E. M. (2018). Language Choice in Egyptian Literature: A Study of Language Practices and Attitudes among Egyptian Authors in the Years 2011–2014. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Culture Studies and Oriental Languages, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Ha˚land, E. M. (2019). Voices in the novel: Ten Yellow Leather Chairs. In Guth, S. and Pepe, T., eds., Arabic Literature in a Posthuman World: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Association for Modern Arabic Literature Oslo, 30 May–4 June 2016. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 93–118.Google Scholar
Jacquemond, R. (2016). Satiric literature and other ‘popular’ literary genres in Egypt today. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies, 16, 349–67.Google Scholar
Kallas, E. (2009). Maurice Aouad un des Fleurons de la Littérature Vernaculaire Libanaise. Oriente Moderno, 89(1), 101–10.Google Scholar
Kallel, M. A. (2016). ‘La Rolls et la Volkswagen’ Ecrire en Tunisien Sur Facebook en (2016). Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies, 16, 253–72.Google Scholar
Kebede, T. A., Kindt, K. T., and Høigilt, J. (2013). Language Change in Egypt: Social and Cultural Indicators Survey – a Tabulation Report. Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
Kindt, K. T. and Kebede, A. T. (2017). A language for the people? Quantitative indicators of written dārija and ʿāmmiyya in Cairo and Rabat. In Høigilt, J. and Mejdell, G., eds., The Politics of Written Language in the Arab World: Writing Change. Leiden/Boston: Brill, 18–40.Google Scholar
Mejdell, G. (2006). The use of colloquial in modern Egyptian Literature – a Survey. In Edzard, L. and Retsö, J., eds., Current Issues in the Analysis of Semitic Grammar and Lexicon. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 195–213.Google Scholar
Mejdell, G. (2014). Strategic bivalency in written ‘mixed style’? A reading of Ibrahīm ʿīsā in Al-Dustūr. In Durand, O., Langone, A. D., and Mion, G., eds., Alf Lahga Wa Lahga: Proceedings of the 9th AIDA Conference. Münster: Lit Verlag, 273–8.Google Scholar
Michalski, M. (2016). Spelling Moroccan Arabic in Arabic script: The case of literary texts. In Grigore, G. and Bițună, G., eds., Arabic Varieties: Far and Wide. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of AIDA – Bucharest (2015). Bucharest: Editura Universității din București, 385–94.Google Scholar
Miller, C. (2017). Contemporary Dārija writings in Morocco: Ideology and practices. In Høigilt, J. and Mejdell, G., eds., The Politics of Written Language in the Arab World: Writing Change, Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics. Leiden: Brill, 90–115.Google Scholar
Moestrup, E. (2012). Diglossia and the ideology of language: The use of the vernacular in a work by Youssef Fadel. Orientalia Suecana, 61(Supplement), 139–51.Google Scholar
Nicosia, A. (2016). Le Petit Prince in Algerian Arabic: A lexical perspective. In Grigore, G. and Bițună, G., eds., Arabic Varieties: Far and Wide. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of AIDA – Bucharest (2015). Bucharest: Editura Universității din București, 421–30.Google Scholar
Nordenson, J. (2017a). The language of online activism: A case from Kuwait. In Høigilt, J. and Mejdell, G., eds., The Politics of Written Language in the Arab World. Leiden: Brill, 266–89.Google Scholar
Nordenson, J. (2017b). #بيتحرش_ليه Vs. #لن_نسمح_لك Arabic language use on Twitter in Egypt and Kuwait. In Eggen, N. S. and Issa, R., eds., Philologists in the World: A Festschrift in Honour of Gunvor Mejdell. Oslo: Novus, 341–64.Google Scholar
Pepe, T. (2017). Mixed Arabic as a subversive literary style. In Eggen, N. S. and Issa, R., eds., Philologists in the World: A Festschrift in Honour of Gunvor Mejdell. Oslo: Novus, 365–97.Google Scholar
Pepe, T. (2019). Blogging from Egypt: Digital Literature, 2005–2016. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Plonka, A. (2006). Le Nationalisme Linguistique Au Liban Autour De Saʿīd ʿaql Et L’idée De Langue Libanaise Dans La Revue ‘Lebnaan’ En Nouvel Alphabet. Arabica, 53(4), 423–71.Google Scholar
Plonka, A. (2016). Between linguistics, poetry, and ideology: The literary periodical L-ʾarzyāda in the Lebanese language (June 2009– October 2014), general presentation, intellectual impacts, index of authors, and ‘Lebanese’ lexis. In Sartori, M., Giolfo, M. E. B., and Cassuto, P., eds., Approaches to the History and Dialectology of Arabic in Honor of Pierre Larcher. Leiden: Brill, 493–515.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, G. M. (2000a). Fuṣḥammiyya: Alternating style in Egyptian prose. Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 38, 68–87.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, G. M. (2000b). Do you parler ‘Arabi’? Mixing colloquial Arabic and European languages in Egyptian literature. Materiaux arabes et sudarabiques – Groupe d’études des linguistique et de literature arabes et sudarabiques, 10, 11–48.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, G. M. (2004). Egyptian Arabic as a written language. Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, 29, 281–340.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, G. M. (2008a). Mixing colloquial and literary Arabic in modern Egyptian prose through the use of free indirect style and interior monologue. In Lentin, J. and Grand’Henry, J., eds., Moyen arabe et variétés mixtes de l’arabe à travers l’historie. Louvain-la-Neuve: Universite Catholique de Louvain, 391–404.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, G. M. (2008b). Ṣaʿīdī and Fallāḥī versus Cairene dialects: Use and function in Egyptian culture and literature. In Procházka, S. and Ritt-Benmimoun, V., eds., Between the Atlantic and Indian Oceans: Studies on Contemporary Arabic Dialects: Proceedings from the 7th AIDA Conference Held in Vienna from 5–9 September 2006. Münster: LIT Verlag, 383–94.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, G. M. (2010). I want to write in the colloquial: An example of the language of contemporary Egyptian prose. Folia Orientalia, 47, 71–97.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, G. M. (2011). The rise and expansion of colloquial Egyptian Arabic as a literary language. In Sela-Sheffy, R. and Toury, G., eds., Culture Contacts and the Making of Cultures. Papers in Homage to Itamar Even-Zohar. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University: Unit of Culture Research, 323–43.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, G. M. (2012). Mixed Arabic and stylistic choices in contemporary Egyptian writing. In Bettini, L. and La Spisa, P., eds., Au-Delà de l’arabe standard: Moyen Arabe et Arabe Mixte dans les sources médiévales, modernes et contemporaines, vol. 28: Quaderni Di Semitistica. Florence: Dipartimento di scienze dell’antichità, Medioevo e Rinascimento e linguistica, Università di Firenze, 291–306.Google Scholar
Safouan, M. (2007). Why Are the Arabs Not Free? The Politics of Writing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sawaie, M. (2011). Jordan. In Edzard, L. and de Jong, R., eds., Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics. Brill Online.Google Scholar
Sayahi, L. (2014). Diglossia and Language Contact: Language Variation and Change in North Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Somekh, S. (1991). Genre and Language in Modern Arabic Literature. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Šuhayyib, M. (2016). كل الطرق تؤدي ل60 داهية [All Roads Lead to Disaster]. Al-Qāhira: Dār Tūyā.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Y. (2004). A War of Words: Language and Conflict in the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walters, K. (2003). Fergie’s prescience: The changing nature of diglossia in Tunisia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 163, 77–109.Google Scholar
Wardini, E. (2011). Lebanon. In Edzard, L. and de Jong, R., eds., Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics. Brill Online.Google Scholar
Woidich, M. (2010). Von der wörtlichen Rede zur Sachprosa: Zur Entwicklung der Ägyptisch-Arabischen Dialektliteratur. In Munske, H. H., ed., Dialektliteratur heute – regional und international Forschungskolloquium am Interdisziplinären Zentrum für Dialektforschung, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 19–20 November 2009. http://dialektforschung.phil.uni-erlangen.de/dialektliteratur/; last accessed 18 December 2020.Google Scholar
Zack, E. (2001). The use of colloquial Arabic in prose literature: ‘Laban Ilʿaṣfūr’ by Yūsuf Al-Qaʿīd. Quaderni di Studi Arabi, 19, 193–219.Google Scholar
References
Al-Amri, K. (2005). Arabic/English/Arabic Translation: Shifts of Cohesive Markers in the Translation of Argumentative Texts: A Contrastive Arabic–English Text-Linguistic Study. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Durham, UK.Google Scholar
Al-Ghalayini, M. (1993). Jāmiʿal-durūs al-zarabiyyah. Beirut: Al-Maktabah Al-ʿAṣriyyah.Google Scholar
Al-Masri, H. (2008). Linguistic losses in the translation of Arabic literary texts. In Parkinson, D., ed., Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, vol. XXI. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 173–204.Google Scholar
Al-Tabariy, M. J. (1968). Jāmi al-bayān fi tafsir al-qur’ān [The Unabridged Commentary on the Qur’ān]. Beirut: Dār al-Maʾrifah.Google Scholar
Alotaibi, H. M. (2017). Arabic–English Parallel Corpus: A new resource for translation training and language teaching. Arab World English Journal, 8(3), 319–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boase-Beier, J. (2006). Stylistic Approaches to Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Boase-Beier, J. (2014). Stylistics and translation. In Burk, M., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. New York: Routledge, 393–407.Google Scholar
Boase-Beier, J. (2018). Stylistics and translation. In Malmkjaer, K., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies and Linguistics. New York: Routledge, 194–207.Google Scholar
Bosseaux, C. (2007). How Does It Feel? Point of View in Translation: The Case of Virginia Woolf into French, Approaches to Translation Studies, 29. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Burke, M. (2014). Rhetoric and poetics: The classical heritage of stylistics. In Burke, M., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. New York: Routledge, 11–30.Google Scholar
Cantarino, V. (1974). Syntax of Modern Arabic Prose. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, R. (1990). English demonstratives: A case of semantic expansion. Language Sciences, 12(2/3), 139–53.Google Scholar
Cornish, F. (1999). Anaphora, Discourse and Understanding: Evidence from English and French. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cornish, F. (2001). Modal that as determiner and pronoun: The primacy of the cognitive-interactive dimension. English Language and Linguistics, 5(2), 297–315.Google Scholar
Croft, W. and Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diessel, H. (1999). Demonstratives: Form, Function and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Doiz-Bienzobas, A. (2003). An analysis of English, Spanish and Basque demonstratives in narrative: A matter of viewpoint. International Journal of English Studies, 3 (2), 63–84.Google Scholar
Eid, R. (1993). Stylistic Research: Present and Past. Alexandria: Munshātul-Maʿāref of Alexandria.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, M. (1995). Deictic shift theory and the poetics of involvement in narrative. In Duchan, J., Bruder, G., and Hewitt, L., eds., Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. New York: Routledge, 19–60.Google Scholar
Gray, B. (2010). On the use of demonstrative pronouns and determiners as cohesive devices: A focus on sentence-initial this/these in academic prose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 167–83.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N., and Zacharski, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274–307.Google Scholar
Gutt, E. (2000). Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context, 2nd ed. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P. (1996). Demonstratives in narrative discourse: A taxonomy of universal uses. In Fox, B., ed., Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 205–54.Google Scholar
Ibn Al-Hajib, U. (1980). Sharḥ al-wāfiyah nadhm al-kāfiyah. Al-Najaf Al-Ashraf: Al-ādāb Press.Google Scholar
Ibn Kathīr, E. A. (1419). Tafsīr al-qur’ān al-‘azīm (the exegesis of the great Qur’ān). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-Ilmīyya.Google Scholar
Jeffries, L. and McIntyre, D. (2010). Stylistics (Cambridge textbooks in linguistics). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kemmerer, D. (1999). ‘Near’ and ‘far’ in language and perception. Cognition, 73(1), 35–63.Google Scholar
Labrador, B. (2011). A corpus-based study of the use of Spanish demonstratives as translation equivalents of English demonstratives. Perspectives, 19(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1974). Remarks on this and that. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 10, 345–56.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vols. I and II. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Leonetti, M. (2000). The asymmetries between the definite article and demonstratives: A procedural account. Paper presented to the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, Budapest, July.Google Scholar
Malmkjaer, K. (2003). What happened to God and the angels: An exercise in translational stylistics. Target, 15, 37–58.Google Scholar
Malmkjaer, K. (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies and Linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
McIntyre, D. and Walker, B. (2019). Corpus Stylistics: Theory and Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejdell, G. (2006). Mixed Styles in Spoken Arabic in Egypt: Somewhere between Order and Chaos. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Morini, M. (2014). Translation, stylistics and To the Lighthouse: A deictic shift theory analysis. Target, 26(1), 128–45.Google Scholar
Munday, J. (1998). A computer-assisted approach to the analysis of translation shifts. Meta, 43(3), 1–16.Google Scholar
Nasr, S. H. (2015). The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary, 1st ed. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
Neary, C. (2014). Stylistics, point of view and modality. In Burke, M., ed., The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. London: Routledge, 175–90.Google Scholar
Pantopoulos, I. (2012). Two different faces of Cavafy in English: A corpus-assisted approach to translational stylistics. International Journal of English Studies, 12(2), 93–110.Google Scholar
Peer, W. and Graf, E. (2002). Between the lines: Spatial language and its developmental representation in Stephen King’s IT. In Semino, E. and Culpeper, J., eds., Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 123–52.Google Scholar
Ribera, J. and Cuenca, M. J. (2013). Use and translation of demonstratives in fiction: A contrastive approach (English–Catalan). Catalan Review, XXVII, 27–49.Google Scholar
Richardson, B. (1998). Deictic features and the translator. In Hickey, L., ed., The Pragmatics of Translation. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 124–42.Google Scholar
Segal, E. (1995). Narrative comprehension and the role of deictic shift theory. In Duchan, J., Bruder, G., and Hewitt, L., eds, Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. New York: Routledge, 3–18.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P. (2002). Miltonic texture and the feeling of reading. In Semino, E. and Culpeper, J., eds., Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis (Linguistic approaches to literature, vol. 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 73–94.Google Scholar
Sulaiman, F. (1990). Stylistics: Theoretical and Practical Introduction. Cairo: Al-Matbaʿah Al-Fanniyah.Google Scholar
Wales, K. (2006). Stylistics. In Brown, K., ed., The Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., vol. 12. Oxford: Elsevier, 213–17.Google Scholar
Woodworth, N. (1991). Sound symbolism in proximal and distal forms. Linguistics, 29(2), 273–99.Google Scholar
Wu, Y. (2004). Spatial Demonstratives in English and Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zaki, M. (2012). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Demonstratives in English and Arabic: A Corpus-Based Study. Saarbrücken, Germany: Lap Lambert Academic Publishers.Google Scholar