Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:26:20.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The IP–Antitrust Interface in China: Uncharted Territory

from Part II - Institutional Design: Country Overviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

Roger D. Blair
Affiliation:
University of Florida
D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bloch, Gabriel, and Milner, Gordon A.. 2013. Compulsory Patent Licensing in China. Available at www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3d04e562-16df-49b8-b88c-6cd535adffc9.Google Scholar
Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U.S. 29 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genevaz, Simon. 2004. Against Immunity for Unilateral Refusals to Deal in Intellectual Property: Why Antitrust Law Should Not Distinguish Between IP and Other Property Rights. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 19, 741–84.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert, Janis, Mark D., Lemley, Mark A., and Leslie, Christopher R.. 2009. IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law. Austin, TX: Aspen.Google Scholar
Huawei v. Interdigital, Westlaw (Guangdong High People’s Ct., Oct. 21, 2013).Google Scholar
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc., 547 U.S. 28 (2006).Google Scholar
Image Technical Services v. Eastman Kodak, 125 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 1997).Google Scholar
Jamaica Fair Trade Commission. 2006. Response to Unilateral Conduct Working Group Questionnaire. International Competition Network 4. Available at www.internationalcompetitionnetwork.org/uploads/questionnaires/uc%20objectives/jamaica%20response.pdf.Google Scholar
Jefferson Parish Hospital No. 2 v. Hyde, 466 U.S. 2 (1984).Google Scholar
Kaplow, Louis. 1984. The Patent-Antitrust Intersection: A Reappraisal. Harvard Law Review, 97, 1813–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, 576 U.S. __, 135 S. Ct. 2401 (2015).Google Scholar
Lear v. Adkins, Inc., 395 U.S. 653 (1969).Google Scholar
MCI Communications v. AT&T Co., 708 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1983).Google Scholar
Miller, Alan S. and Gal, Michal S.. 2015. Licensee Patent Challenges. Yale Journal on Regulation, 32, 121–60.Google Scholar
Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. 2011a. Rules on Regulating the Market Order of Internet Information Services. Available at www.miit.gov.cn/n11293472/n11293832/n12843926/n13917012/14414975.html.Google Scholar
Ministry of Industry and Information Technology. 2011b. An Interpretation on the Rules on Regulating the Market Order of Internet Information Services. Available at www.miit.gov.cn/n11293472/n11293832/n12771663/14417071.html.Google Scholar
National Development and Reform Commission. 2015. NDRC Price Supervision Bureau Penalty [2015] No.1. Available at http://jjs.ndrc.gov.cn/fjgld/201503/t20150302_666170.html.Google Scholar
National People’s Congress Standing Committee. 2007. Anti-Monopoly Law. Available at www.saic.gov.cn/zcfg/fl/200712/t20071206_45811.html.Google Scholar
National People’s Congress Standing Committee. 2008. Patent Law. Available at www.sipo.gov.cn/zcfg/flfg/zl/fljxzfg/200812/t20081230_435796.html.Google Scholar
Qihoo v. Tencent, Supreme People’s Court, (2013) Min 3 Zhong No. 4.Google Scholar
Rambus, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 522 F.3d 456 (Fed. Cir. 2008).Google Scholar
State Administration of Trade and Commerce. 2015. Provisions on Prohibiting the Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights to Exclude and Restrain Competition. Available at www.saic.gov.cn/zcfg/xzgzjgfxwj/201508/t20150820_160841.html.Google Scholar
State Intellectual Property Office. 2001. Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law. Available at http://english.sipo.gov.cn/laws/lawsregulations/200804/t20080416_380326.html.Google Scholar
State Intellectual Property Office. 2012. Order of the Director of State Intellectual Property Office No. 64 – Measures for Compulsory Licensing of Patent Implementation. Available at www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/cn/cn191en.pdf.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×