Ackerman, F. 1992. ‘Does Philosophy Only State What Everyone Admits? Discussion of the Method of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 27, 246–54.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. 1951. Minima Moralia. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp [trans. Jephcott, E. F. N.. London: NLB, 1974].Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. 1966. Negative Dialektik, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp [trans. as Negative Dialectics, by E. B. Ashton, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973]. Alternative translation, by D. Redmond, available online: www.efn.org/~dredmond/ndtrans.html; last accessed 22 August 2011.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. 1977. ‘The Actuality of Philosophy’[1931], Telos 10 (1) 120–33.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. 1984. ‘Essay as Form’, trans. Hullot-Kentor, B. and Will, F., New German Critique 32, 151–71.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. 1998. ‘Why Still Philosophy’[‘Wozu noch Philosophie’, 1963], trans. Pickford, H. W. in Critical Models. New York: Columbia University Press, 5–17.Google Scholar

Aflalo, T. et al. 2015. ‘Decoding Motor Imagery from the Posterior Parietal Cortex of a Tetraplegic Human’, Science 348 (6237), 906–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alcock, J. 2013. Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach, 10th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar

Alexander, J. 2012. Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Alexander, J. 2016. ‘Philosophical Expertise’, in A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, eds Systma, J. and Buckwalter, W.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 555–67.Google Scholar

Alexander, J., and Weinberg, J. 2007. ‘Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy’, Philosophy Compass 2, 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, J., and Weinberg, J. 2014. ‘The “Unreliability” of Epistemic Intuitions’, in Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy, eds Machery, E. and O’Neill, E.. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 128–44.Google Scholar

Allen, A. 2016. The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. 2011. ‘Situating Axel Honneth in the Frankfurt School Tradition’, in Axel Honneth: Critical Essays, ed. Petherbridge, D.. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, K. 2015. The Animal Mind. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Apel, K.-O. 1997. ‘Regulative Ideas or Truth-Happening? An Attempt to Answer the Question of the Conditions of Possibility of Valid Understanding’, trans. Sommermeier, R., in The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer, ed. Hahn, L. E.. Chicago: Open Court, 67–95.Google Scholar

Aristotle, 1955. Aristotelis Fragmenta Selecta, ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Augustine, 2009. Confessions, ed. and trans. de Labriolle, P., Paris : Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1970. Philosophical Papers, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. 1952. Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. 1956. The Problem of Knowledge, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M. W., and Anderson, M. C. 2009. Memory. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Baggott, J. M. D., and Duff, M. 2013. ‘A Theory of Everything … Has Physics Gone Too Far?’ The Guardian, 16 June 2013. Online: www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jun/16/has-physics-gone-too-farGoogle Scholar

Baker, L. R. 2000. Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, L. R. 2012. Naturalism and the First-person Perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barlow, H. B. 1985. ‘The Role of Single Neurons in the Psychology of Perception’, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37A, 121–45.Google Scholar

Barnes, B. 1977. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bealer, G. 1998. ‘Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy’, in Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and its Role in Philosophical Theorizing, eds DePaul, M. and Ramsey, W.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 201–39.Google Scholar

Bealer, G. 1998. ‘Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy’, in Rethinking Intuition, eds DePaul, M. and Ramsey, W.. Rowman and Littlefield, 201–40.Google Scholar

Beebe, J., and Shea, J. 2013. ‘Gettierized Knobe Effects’, Episteme 10, 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiser, F. C. 1992. Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought, 1790–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, J., Cutrofello, A., and Livingston, P. (eds) 2015a. Beyond the Analytic–Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, J., Cutrofello, A., and Livingston, P. 2015b. ‘Introduction: Contemporary Philosophy as Synthetic Philosophy’, in Beyond the Analytic–Continental Divide, eds Bell, J., Cutrofello, C., and Livingston, P.. London: Routledge, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bengson, John. 2013. ‘Experimental Attacks on Intuitions and Answers’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3), 495–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, K. 2009. ‘Composition, Colocation and Metaontology’, in Metametaphysics, eds Chalmers, D. J., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford University Press, 38–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, K. 2015. ‘There is No Special Problem with Metaphysics’, Philosophical Studies. DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0439-0.Google Scholar

Bennett, M. R., andHacker, P. M. S. 2003. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. 1977. The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, trans. Audra, R. A. and Brereton, C., with the assistance of Carter, W. H.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. 1992. The Creative Mind, trans. Andison, M. L.. New York: The Citadel Press.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. 2007. Mind-Energy, trans. Carr, H. Wildon. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Berlin, I. 2000. Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder, ed. Hardy, H.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bernet, R., Kern, I., and Marbach, E. 1993. An Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, N. 1996. ‘On Dexterity and Its Development’, in Dexterity and Its Development, eds Latash, M. L. and Turvey, M. T.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J. 1983. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Practice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Berthoz, A. 2009. La Simplexité. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Berthoz, A., and Petit, J.-L. (eds) 2014. Complexité-Simplexité. Paris: Collège de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertram, C. 2012. ‘Jean Jacques Rousseau’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., available online at URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/rousseau/>..>Google Scholar

Bird, A. 2010. ‘Social Knowing: The Social Sense of “Scientific Knowledge”’, Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1), 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, S. 1993. ‘Review of Paul Johnston’s Wittgenstein and Moral Philosophy’, Ethics 103, 588–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blattner, W. D. 2000. ‘Life Is Not Literature’, in The Many Faces of Time, eds Brough, J. B. and Embree, L. E.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boas, F. 1989. ‘The History of Anthropology’, in A Franz Boas Reader. The University of Chicago Press, 23–36.Google Scholar

Bogen, J., and Woodward, J. 1988. ‘Saving the Phenomena’, Philosophical Review, 97, 303–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boghossian, P. 1996. ‘Analyticity Reconsidered’, Nous 30 (3), 360–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bollacher, M. 1987. ‘“Natur” und “Vernunft” in Herders Entwurf einer Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit’, in Johann Gottfried Herder 1744–1803, ed. Sauder, Gerhard. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 114–24.Google Scholar

BonJour, L. 1998. In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bookchin, M. 1995. Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism, available online at URL = <http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bookchin/soclife.htm>..>Google Scholar

Bourget, D., and Chalmers, D. J. 2014. ‘What do Philosophers Believe?’, Philosophical Studies 170 (3), 465–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, K., and Nagel, J. 2014. ‘The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions’, in Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy, eds Machery, E. and O’Neill, E.. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 109–27.Google Scholar

Bradley, F. H. 1897. Appearance and Reality, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. B. 2011. Perspectives on Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Braver, L. 2007. A Thing of This World: A History of Continental Anti-Realism. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bricker, P. forthcoming. ‘Realism without Parochialism’, in Modal Matters: Essays in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, P. 2007. ‘Abnormal Oscillatory Synchronization in the Motor System Leads to Impaired Movement’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 17, 656–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brudney, D. 1998. Marx’s Attempt to Leave Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buck-Morss, S. 1977. The Origin of Negative Dialectics: Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, and the Frankfurt School. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Buckwalter, W. forthcoming. ‘Epistemic Contextualism and Linguistic Behavior’, in The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism, ed. Ichikawa, J.. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bultmann, C. 1999. Die biblische Urgeschichte in der Aufklärung. Johann Gottfried Herders Interpretation der Genesis als Antwort auf die Religionskritik David Humes. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar

Burgess, A., and Plunkett, D. 2013a. ‘Conceptual Ethics I’, Philosophy Compass 8 (12), 1091–101.Google Scholar

Burgess, A., and Plunkett, D. 2013b. ‘Conceptual Ethics II’, Philosophy Compass 8 (12), 1102–10.Google Scholar

Burke, T. F. 2013. What Pragmatism Was. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cappelen, H. 2011. ‘Against Assertion’, in Assertion: New Philosophical Essays, eds Brown, J. and Cappelen, H.. Oxford University Press, 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cappelen, H., and Dever, J. 2013. The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cardwell, M. 1996. Dictionary of Psychology. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1950. ‘Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (2), 20–40.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1956a. Meaning and Necessity, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1956b. ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’ [1950]. Reprinted in Meaning and Necessity, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, 205–21.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. 2011. The Opacity of Mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carus, A. W. 2007. ‘Carnap’s Intellectual Development’, in The Cambridge Companion to Carnap, eds Friedman, M. and Creath, R.. Cambridge University Press, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassirer, E. 1961. Freiheit und Form. Studien zur deutschen Geistesgeschichte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. 1969. Must We Mean What We Say. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. 1979. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. 2002. Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays, updated edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caviness, J. N. 2014. ‘Pathophysiology of Parkinson’s Disease Behaviour – a View from the Network’, Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 20 (Suppl. 1), S39–S43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cerbone, D. R. 2003. ‘Distance and Proximity in Phenomenology: Husserl and Heidegger’, The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy III, 1–26.Google Scholar

Cerbone, D. R. forthcoming. ‘Making Sense of Phenomenological Sense-Making: On Moore on Husserl’, in Philosophical Topics.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. J. 2011. ‘Verbal Disputes’, Philosophical Review 120 (4), 515–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, D. J. 2012. Constructing the World. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. J. 2015. ‘Why Isn’t there More Progress in Philosophy?’, Philosophy 90 (1), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, D. J., and Jackson, F. 2001. ‘Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation’, Philosophical Review 110 (3), 315–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R. (eds) 2009. Metametaphysics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, J. 1993. Wild Swans: Three Daughters of China. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar

Changeux, J.-P., and Ricoeur, P. 1998. Ce qui nous fait penser. La nature et la règle. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Chase, J., and Reynolds, J. 2011. Analytic versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy. Durham: Acumen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheney, D. L., and Seyfarth, R. M. 2007. Baboon Metaphysics. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chisholm, R. 1989. Theory of Knowledge, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Amsterdam: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chroust, A.-H. 1969. Aristotle, Protrepicus: A Reconstruction. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Clark, R. T. 1955. Herder: His Life and Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, D. 2012. ‘Blaise Pascal’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., available online at URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/pascal/>..>Google Scholar

Cohen, H. 1904. Ethik des reinen Willens. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 1993. The Idea of History [1946]. Revised edition, with an introduction by J. Van der Dussen. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 1998a. An Essay on Metaphysics with an Introduction and Additional Material, ed. Martin, R.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 1998b. An Essay on Metaphysics [1940]. Revised edition with an introduction by R. Martin. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 1999. The Principles of History, eds Dray, W. H. and Van der Dussen, Jan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 2005a. An Essay on Philosophical Method with an Introduction and Additional Material, eds Connolly, J. and D’Oro, G.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 2005b. An Essay on Philosophical Method [1933]. Revised edition with an introduction by J. Connelly and G. D’Oro. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Conant, J. B. (ed.) 1950. The Overthrow of the Phlogiston Theory: The Chemical Revolution of 1775–1789. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cook, D. 2011. Adorno on Nature. Durham, UK: Acumen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, S. G. 1999. ‘Spectral History: Narrative, Nostalgia, and the Time of the I’, Research in Phenomenology 29, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, S. G. 2001a. ‘Question, Reflection, and Philosophical Method in Heidegger’s Early Freiburg Lectures’, in his Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 129–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, S. G. 2001b. ‘Gnostic Phenomenology: Eugen Fink and the Critique of Transcendental Reason’, in his Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 244–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowell, S. (ed.) 2012. The Cambridge Companion to Existentialism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curley, E. 1996. ‘Kissinger, Spinoza and Genghis Khan’, in The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. Garrett, D.. Cambridge University Press, 315–82.Google Scholar

Dahlstrom, D. 1994. ‘Heidegger’s Method: Philosophical Concepts as Formal Indications’, The Review of Metaphysics 47, 775–95.Google Scholar

Dauer, W., and Przedborski, S. 2003. ‘Parkinson’s Disease: Mechanisms and Models’, Neuron 39, 889–909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davies, D. 2004. Art as Performance. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, T. M. et al. 2010. ‘Genetic Animal Models of Parkinson’s Disease’, Neuron 66, 646–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

de Beauvoir, S. 1976. The Prime of Life, trans. Green, P.. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. 1990. Logic of Sense, trans. Lester, M. with Stivale, C., ed. Boundas, C.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. 1991a. Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature, trans. Boundas, C. V.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. 1991b. Bergsonism, trans. Tomlinson, H. and Habberjam, B.. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and Repetition, trans. Patton, P.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. 1995. Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. 1987. Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Vol. 2: A Thousand Plateaus, trans. Massumi, B.. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus, trans. Massumi, B.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. 1994. What is Philosophy?, trans. Tomlinson, Hugh and Burchill, Graham. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Delong, M. R. 1990. ‘Primate Models of Movement Disorders of Basal Ganglia Origin’, Trends in Neurosciences 13 (7), 281–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dennett, D. C. 1971. ‘Intentional Systems’, Journal of Philosophy 68 (4), 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1981. Positions, trans. Bass, A.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1982. Margins of Philosophy, trans. Bass, A.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1992. ‘Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority’, trans. Quaintance, M., in Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, eds Cornell, D., Rosenfeld, M., and Carlson, D. G.. New York: Routledge, 3–67.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1993. Aporias, trans. Dutoit, T.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1994. Specters of Marx, trans. Kamuf, P.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1997a. Politics of Friendship, trans. Collins, G.. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1997b. Of Grammatology, corrected edn, trans. Spivak, G.. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 2000. ‘Et Cetera’, in Deconstructions: a User’s Guide, ed. Royle, Nicholas. New York: Palgrave, 282–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derrida, J. 2001. A Taste for the Secret, trans. Donis, G.. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 2005. Sovereignties in Question: The Poetics of Paul Celan. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 2011. Voice and Phenomenon, trans. Lawlor, L.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1993. Meditations on First Philosophy, trans. Cress, D.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

DeSouza, N. 2012. ‘Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century: Herder’s Critical Reflections on the Principles of Nature and Grace’, The British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4), 773–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devitt, M. 2010. Putting Metaphysics First. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. 1969–91. The Collected Works of John Dewey: The Early Works, The Middle Works, The Later Works, 37 vols, ed. Boydston, J. A.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Dietrich, E. 2010. ‘There Is No Progress in Philosophy’, Essays in Philosophy 12, (2), 9.Google Scholar

Dillon, R. S. 2007. ‘Arrogance, Self-Respect and Personhood’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (5-1), 101–26.Google Scholar

Dilthey, W. 1914–. Gesammelte Schriften, 26 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Dilthey, W. 1985. ‘Three Epochs of Modern Aesthetics’, trans. Neville, Michael, in Selected Works, eds Makkreel, R. and Rodi, F., vol. V, Poetry and Experience. Princeton University Press, 175–222.Google Scholar

Dilthey, W. 1996. Selected Works, eds Makkreel, R. A. and Rodi, F., vol. IV, Hermeneutics and the Study of History, trans. Nordenhaug, T. et al. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Doris, J., and the Moral Psychology Research Group (eds) 2010. The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Oro, G. 2002. Collingwood and the Metaphysics of Experience. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Oro, G. 2011. ‘Davidson and the Autonomy of the Human Sciences’, in Dialogues with Davidson: New Perspectives on his Philosophy, ed. Malpas, J.. MIT Press, 283–96.Google Scholar

D’Oro, G. 2012. ‘Reasons and Causes: the Philosophical Battle and the Meta-philosophical War’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2), 207–21.Google Scholar

D’Oro, G. 2015. ‘Unlikely Bedfellows? ‘Collingwood, Carnap and the Internal/External Distinction’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (4), 802–17.Google Scholar

D’Oro, G., and Sandis, C. 2013. ‘From Anti-Causalism to Causalism and Back’ in Reasons and Causes: Causalism and Anti-Causalism in The Philosophy of Action, eds D’Oro, G. and Sandis, C.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 7–48.Google Scholar

Douven, I. 2011. ‘Abduction’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., available online at URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/abduction/>..>Google Scholar

Dray, W. H. 1957. Laws and Explanation in History. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dray, W. H. 1963. ‘The Historical Explanation of Actions Reconsidered’, in Philosophy and History, ed. Hook, S.. New York University Press, 105–35.Google Scholar

Drummond, J. 2007. ‘Personal Perspectives’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1), 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dummett, M. 1978. ‘Can Analytical Philosophy Be Systematic, and Ought It to Be?’[1975] reprinted in his Truth and Other Enigmas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 437[3n]58.Google Scholar

Dupré, J. 2002. Humans and Other Animals. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eichenbaum, H. 2008. Learning and Memory. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. 1950. ‘On the Generalized Theory of Relativity’, Scientific American 182 (4), 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eklund, M. 2013. ‘Carnap’s Metaontology’, Nous 47 (2), 229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eklund, M. 2015. ‘Intuitions, Conceptual Engineering, and Conceptual Fixed Points’, in Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods, ed. Daly, C.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 363–85.Google Scholar

Feltz, A., and Cokely, E. 2009. ‘Do Judgments about Freedom and Responsibility Depend on Who You Are? Personality Differences in Intuitions about Compatibilism and Incompatibilism’, Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1), 342–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feyerabend, P. 1975. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Fink, E. 1970. ‘The Phenomenological Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Contemporary Criticism’, in The Phenomenology of Husserl, ed. Elveton, R. O.. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 73–147.Google Scholar

Fink, E. 1995. Sixth Cartesian Meditation: The Idea of a Transcendental Theory of Method, trans. Bruzina, R.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Finlayson, J. G. 2002. ‘Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable’, European Journal of Philosophy 10 (1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, E., Engelhardt, P. E., and Herbelot, A. 2015. ‘Intuitions and Illusions: From Explanation and Experiment to Assessment’, in Experimental Philosophy, Rationalism, and Naturalism, eds Fischer, E. and Collins, J.. London: Routledge, 259–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fleischacker, S. 2013. What is Enlightenment? London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. A. 2003. Hume Variations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Forst, R. 2015. Normativität und Macht. Zur Analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Forster, M. N. 2010. After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Forster, P. 2011. Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. 1965. Madness and Civilization, trans. Howard, R.. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1994. ‘What Is Enlightenment?’[1984] in The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, P.. New York: Pantheon, 32–50.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 2001. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, trans. Sheridan, A.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Frances, B. forthcoming. ‘The Epistemically Troubling Philosophical Survey’.Google Scholar

Frank, M. 1977. Das individuelle Allgemeine. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Frazer, M. L. 2010. The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freyenhagen, F. 2013. Adorno’s Practical Philosophy: Living Less Wrongly. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freyenhagen, F. 2014. ‘Adorno’s Politics: Theory and Praxis in Germany’s 1960s’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 40 (9), 867–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. 1942. Volk und Geschichte im Denken Herders. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. 1990. Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. 1991. Plato’s Dialectical Ethics. Phenomenological Interpretations Relating to the Philebus, trans. Wallace, R. M.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. 1994. Truth and Method, trans. Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall, D. G.. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. 1999. Gesammelte Werke. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar

Garber, D. 1998. ‘Descartes, or the Cultivation of the Intellect’, in Philosophers on Education: Historical Perspectives, ed. Rorty, A. O.. London: Routledge, 124–39.Google Scholar

Gasser, T., et al. 2011. ‘Milestones in PD Genetics’, Movement Disorders 26 (6), 1042–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gaukroger, S. 1995. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gaukroger, S. 2010. The Collapse of Mechanism and the Rise of Sensibility: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1680–1760. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerken, M. ms. On Folk Epistemology.Google Scholar

Gettier, E. 1963. ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’ Analysis 23, 121–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilson, E. 1967. Etudes sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans la formation du système cartésien. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

Gjesdal, K. 2006. ‘Hermeneutics and Philology: A Reconsideration of Gadamer’s Critique of Schleiermacher’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1), 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gjesdal, K. 2008. ‘Between Enlightenment and Romanticism: Some Problems and Challenges in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2), 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gjesdal, K. 2009. Gadamer and the Legacy of German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gjesdal, K. 2011. ‘Heidegger, Husserl, and the Cartesian Legacy in Phenomenology’, in Acta Philosophica Fennica. Special issue: Rearticulations of Reason. ed. Haaparanta, L., 117–43.Google Scholar

Gjesdal, K. 2013. ‘A Not Yet Invented Logic: Herder on Bildung, Anthropology, and the Future of Philosophy’, in Die Bildung der Moderne, eds Dreyer, M., Forster, M., Hoffmann, K.-U., and Vieweg, K.. Tübingen: Francke-Verlag, 53–69.Google Scholar

Gjesdal, K. 2014. ‘Hermeneutics, Individuality, and Tradition: Schleiermacher’s Idea of Bildung in the Landscape of Hegelian Thought’, in The Relevance of Romanticism, ed. Nassar, Dalia. Oxford University Press, 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 1996. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 2003. Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glock, H.-J. 2008. What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. 1992a. ‘What is Justified Belief?’ [1979], reprinted in his Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 105–26.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. 1992b. ‘Psychology and Philosophical Analysis’ [1989], reprinted in his Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 143–53.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. 2007. ‘Philosophical Intuitions: Their Target, Their Source, and Their Epistemic Status’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 74, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gopnik, A. 1993. ‘How We Know Our Minds: The Illusion of First-Person Knowledge of Intentionality’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gregory, R. 1987. ‘In Defense of Artificial Intelligence – a Reply to John Searle’, in Mindwaves, eds Blakemore, C. and Greenfield, S. A.. Oxford: Blackwell, 235–44.Google Scholar

Griffin, D. 1981. The Question of Animal Awareness, 2nd edn. New York: Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar

Haack, S. 1993. Evidence and Inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1981a. Philosophisch-politische Profile. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Extended edn[trans. as Philosophical-Political Profiles by F. G. Lawrence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983].Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1981b. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Vol. 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Vol. 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp [trans. as The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society; Vol. II: Lifeworld and System by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon, 1984; 1987].Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1982. Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1983. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp [trans. as Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action by C. Lenhardt and S. Weber Nicholsen, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990].Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1985. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp [trans. as Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures by F. Lawrence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987].Google Scholar

Habermas, J. 1990. ‘The Hermeneutic Claim to Universality’, trans. Bleicher, J., in The Hermeneutic Tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur, eds Ormiston, G. and Schrift, A. D.. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 245–72.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 1996. Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 2007. Human Nature: The Categorial Framework. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, A. 2014. Interpreting On Certainty. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanfling, O. 2000. Philosophy and Ordinary Language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hanna, R. 2001. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hanna, R. 2011. ‘The Myth of the Given and the Grip of the Given’, Diametros 27, 25–46.Google Scholar

Hanna, R. 2015a. Cognition, Content, and the A Priori: A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanna, R. 2015b. Kantian Ethics and Human Existence: A Study in Moral Philosophy (unpublished ms, Winter 2015 version), available online at URL = <www.academia.edu/11991023/Kantian_Ethics_and_Human_Existence_A_Study_in_Moral_Philosophy_Winter_2015_version_comments_welcomed>..>Google Scholar

Hanna, R. 2015c. Deep Freedom and Real Persons: A Study in Metaphysics (unpublished ms, Fall 2015 version), working draft available online at URL = <www.academia.edu/14493090/Deep_Freedom_and_Real_Persons_A_Study_in_Metaphysics_Fall_2015_version_comments_welcomed>..>Google Scholar

Hanna, R. 2016a. ‘Kant, the Copernican Devolution, and Real Metaphysics’, in Kant Handbook, ed. Altman, M.. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hanna, R. 2016b. ‘Directions in Space, Non-Conceptual Form, and the Foundations of Transcendental Idealism’, in Kantian Nonconceptualism, ed. Schulting, D.. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hanna, R. 2016c. ‘You Must Reject and Exit the State, For God’s Sake, Or, The Gap Between Right and Virtue in Kant’s Practical Philosophy’ (unpublished ms, Spring 2016 version), available online at URL = <www.academia.edu/24118385/You_Must_Reject_and_Exit_the_State_For_Gods_Sake_Or_The_Gap_Between_Right_and_Virtue_in_Kants_Practical_Philosophy_Spring_2016_version_comments_welcomed>..>Google Scholar

Hanna, R., and Chapman, A. 2016. Kant, Agnosticism, and Anarchism: A Theological-Political Treatise (unpublished ms, Spring 2016 version), available online at URL = <www.academia.edu/15300656/Kant_Agnosticism_and_Anarchism_A_Theological-Political_Treatise_Spring_2016_version_comments_welcomed>..>Google Scholar

Hanna, R., and Maiese, M. 2009. Embodied Minds in Action. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Han-Pile, B. 2002. Foucault’s Critical Project: Between the Transcendental and the Historical. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, M., et al. 2003. ‘Role of Protein Aggregation in Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases’, NeuroMolecular Medicine 4, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Haslanger, S. 2012. Resisting Reality. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haug, M. (ed.) 2014. Philosophical Methods: The Armchair or the Laboratory? London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haug, M. C. (ed.) 2014. The Armchair or the Laboratory? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haugeland, J. 1998. Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hawking, S., and Mlodinow, L. 2012. The Grand Design. London: Bantam.Google Scholar

Haym, R. 1954. Herder, 2 vols. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1927a. Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1927b. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1962a. Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1962b. Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1975. Early Greek Thinking, trans. Krell, D. F. and Capuzzi, F. A.. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1976. Wegmarken. Gesamtausgabe, vol. 9. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1982. Basic Problems of Phenomenology, revised. edn, trans. Hofstadter, A.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1985a. The History of the Concept of Time: Prologomena, trans. Kisiel, T.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1985b. Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles. Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung, eds Bröcker, W. and Bröcker-Oltmanns, K., Gesamtausgabe, vol. 61. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1994. Einfuhrüng in die Phenomenologische Forschung. Der Beginn der neuzeitlichen Philosophie, Gesamtausgabe, vol. 17. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1995. Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens, eds Jung, M., Regehly, T., and Strube, C., Gesamtausgabe, vol. 60. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1996. Being and Time, trans. Stambaugh, J.. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1997. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 5th edn, enlarged, trans. Taft, R.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 1998. ‘Letter on Humanism’, trans. Capuzzi, F. A., in Pathmarks, ed. McNeill, W.. Cambridge University Press, 239–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, M. 2001a. Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research, trans. Rojcewicz, R.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 2001b. Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research, trans. Rojcewicz, R.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 2004. The Phenomenology of Religious Life, trans. Fritsch, M. and Gosetti-Ferencei, J. A.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 2005. Introduction to Phenomenological Research, trans. Dahlstrom, D. O.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heidegger, M. 2006. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 2010a. Phenomenology of Intuition and Expression, trans. Colony, T.. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 2010b. Being and Time, trans. Schmidt, D. J.. Albany, NY: The SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Heil, J. 2003. From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heinz, M., and Clairmont, H.. 2009. ‘Herder’s Epistemology’, in A Companion to the Works of Johann Gottfried Herder, eds Adler, H. and Koepke, W.. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 43–64.Google Scholar

Hempel, C. 1942. ‘The Function of General Laws in History’, Journal of Philosophy 39, 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hempel, C. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Herder, J. G. 1887–. Sämtliche Werke, eds Suphan, B. L. et al. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Herder, J. G. 1985–. Werke in zehn Bänden, eds Arnold, G. et al. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar

Herder, J. G. 1992. Selected Early Works, 1764–1767, eds Menze, E. A. and Menges, K., trans. Menze, E. A. and Palma, M.. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Herder, J. G. 2002a. Philosophical Writings, ed. and trans. Forster, M. N.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Herder, J. G. 2002b. Sculpture: Some Observations on Shape and Form from Pygmalion’s Creative Dream, ed. and trans. Gaiger, J.. The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herder, J. G. 2006. Selected Writings on Aesthetics, ed. and trans. Moore, G.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Herder, J. G. 2008. Shakespeare, ed. and trans. Moore, G.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Herman, L., and Morrel-Samuels, P. 1990. ‘Knowledge Acquisition and Asymmetry Between Language Comprehension and Production: Dolphins and Apes as General Models for Animals’, in Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Animal Behavior, vol. 1, eds Beckoff, M. and Jamieson, D.. Boulder, CO: Westview, 283–312.Google Scholar

Hetherington, S. 2012. ‘The Gettier-illusion: Gettier-partialism and Infallibilism’, Synthese 188, 217–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, E. 2009. ‘Ontology and Alternative Languages’ in Metametaphysics, eds Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 231–59. [Reprinted in Hirsch 2011a.]Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. 2011a. Quantifier Variance and Realism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, E. 2011b. ‘Quantifier Variance and Realism’, in his Quantifier Variance and Realism. Oxford University Press, 68–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, E. 2011c. ‘Physical Object Ontology, Verbal Disputes and Common Sense’, in his Quantifier Variance and Realism. Oxford University Press, 144–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hirsch, E. C., et al. 2013. ‘Pathogenesis of PD’, Movement Disorders 28 (1), 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hofweber, T. 2009. ‘Ambitious Yet Modest Metaphysics’, in Metametaphysics, eds Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 260–89.Google Scholar

Honneth, A. 2008. ‘Critical Theory’, in The Routledge Companion to Twentieth Century Philosophy, ed. Moran, D.. London and New York: Routledge, 784–813.Google Scholar

Honneth, A. 2011. Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp [trans. as Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life by J. Ganahl. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014].Google Scholar

Hookway, C. 2000. Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hookway, C. 2012. The Pragmatic Maxim. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horkheimer, M. 1972. Critical Theory: Selected Essays, trans. O’Connell, M. J.. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, M., and Adorno, T. W. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment[1944, 1947] trans. Jephcott, E.. New York: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar

Horne, Z., and Livengood, J. 2015. ‘Ordering Effects, Updating Effects, and the Specter of Global Skepticism’, Synthese 1–30.Google Scholar

Hulatt, O. forthcoming. Adorno’s Theory of Aesthetic and Philosophical Truth: Texture and Performance. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husserl, E. 1956. Erste Philosophie. 1 Theil, Husserliana VII. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 1959. Erste Philosophie (1923/24), Zweiter Teil. Theorie der Phänomenologischen Reduktion. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 1962. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, trans. Gibson, W. R. Boyce. New York: Collier.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 1964. The Paris Lectures, trans. Koestenbaum, P.. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husserl, E. 1970a. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, trans. Carr, D.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 1970b. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. Carr, D.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 1973a. Cartesian Meditations, trans. Cairns, D.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husserl, E. 1973b. Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Husserliana I, ed. Strasser, S.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 1976. Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die Transzendentale Phänomenologie, Husserliana VI. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husserl, E. 1977. Cartesian Meditations, trans. Cairns, D.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husserl, E. 1981. Shorter Works, eds McCormick, P. and Elliston, F.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 1982. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, trans. Kersten, F.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husserl, E. 1988. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans. Cairns, D.. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 2006. Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929–1934). Die C-Manuskripte, ed. Lohmar, D., Husserliana Materialien VIII. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. 2014. Ideas 1, trans. Dahlstrom, D. O.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutto, D. 2003. Wittgenstein and the End of Philosophy: Neither Theory nor Therapy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutto, D. 2009. ‘Philosophical Clarification, its Possibility and Point’, Philosophia 37 (4), 629–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ichikawa, J. 2010. ‘Explaining away Intuitions’, Studia Philosophica Estonica 2, 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2005. ‘Why Most Published Research Findings are False’, PLoS Medicine 2 (8 (e124)), 696–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Irwin, T. 1977. Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, F. 1994. ‘Armchair Metaphysics’, in Philosophy in Mind, Philosophical Studies Series, 60, eds Michaelis, M. and O’Leary Hawthorne, J.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, F. 2002. ‘Critical Notice of Knowledge and Its Limits by T. Williamson’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80, 516–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, F. 2010. Language, Names, and Information. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, F. 2011. ‘On Gettier Holdouts’, Mind and Language 26, 468–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackson, F. forthcoming. ‘In Defence of Reductionism in Ethics’, in Does Anything Really Matter? Parfit on Objectivity, ed. Singer, P.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, W. 1977. The Writings of William James, ed. McDermott, J. J.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Janz, B. 2015. ‘Hermeneutics and Intercultural Understanding’, in The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics, eds Malpas, J. and Gander, H.-H.. London: Routledge, 474–85.Google Scholar

Jarvis, S. 1998, Adorno – A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Jaspers, K. 1971. Philosophy of Existence, trans. Grabau, R. F.. University of Philadelphia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, A., Dodell-Feder, D., Saxe, R., and Knobe, J. 2014. ‘The Neural Bases of Directed and Spontaneous Mental State Attributions to Group Agents’, PLoS ONE 9 (8), e105341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jenner, P., et al. 2013. ‘Parkinson’s Disease – the Debate on the Clinical Phenomenology, Aetiology, Pathology and Pathogenesis’, Journal of Parkinson’s Disease 3, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, V. E. 2013. ‘Revised Standards for Statistical Evidence’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (48), 19313–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jones, K. 2012 ‘The Politics of Intellectual Self-Trust’, Social Epistemology 26 (2), 237–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joseph, F., Reynolds, J., and Woodward, A. (eds) 2011. Bloomsbury Companion to Existentialism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Joughin, M. 1990. ‘Translator’s Preface’ to G. Deleuze, Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. Joughin, M.. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Joyce, R. 2006. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 1933. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, N. K., 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1950. Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals [1785], trans. Paton, H. J.. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1985. Critique of Pure Reason [1781], trans. Smith, N. K.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1992a. ‘On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible World (Inaugural Dissertation)’, in Immanuel Kant: Theoretical Philosophy: 1755–1770. Cambridge University Press, 373–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 1992b. ‘The Jäsche Logic’, trans. Young, J. M., in Immanuel Kant: Lectures on Logic. Cambridge University Press, 519–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 1996a. ‘An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’’ trans. Gregor, M., in Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 1996b. ‘Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals’, trans. Gregor, M., in Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 37–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 1996c. ‘Critique of Practical Reason’, trans. Gregor, M., in Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 139–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 1997. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Guyer, P. and Wood, A.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and eds Guyer, P. and Wood, A.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 1999. Immanuel Kant: Correspondence, trans. Zweig, A.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kant, I. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Guyer, P. and Matthews, E.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 2004. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, trans. Hatfield, G.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 2007a. ‘Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim’, trans. Wood, A., in Immanuel Kant: Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge University Press, 107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kant, I. 2007b. ‘The Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim’, in Anthropology, History and Education, eds Zoller, G. and Loundon, R.. Cambridge University Press, 107–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kekes, J. 1980. The Nature of Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Kelletat, A. F. 1984. Herder und die Weltliteratur. Zur Geschichte des Übersetzens im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Kelly, M. (ed.) 1994. Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kelly, T. (2016) ‘Disagreement in Philosophy: Its Epistemic Significance’, in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, eds Cappelen, H., Szabó, T. S., and Hawthorne, J.. Oxford University Press, 374–94.Google Scholar

Kelly, T., and McGrath, S. forthcoming. ‘Are there any Successful Philosophical Arguments?’ in Being, Freedom, and Method: Themes from van Inwagen, ed. Keller, J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S. 1985. Philosophical Fragments and Johannes Climacus, trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kierkegaard, S. 1992. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Kim, M., and Yuan, Y. 2015. ‘No Cross-cultural Differences in the Gettier Car Case Intuition: A Replication Study of Weinberg et al. 2001’, Episteme 12 (3), 355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kisiel, T. 1993. The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. 1978. ‘Theories, Theorists and Theoretical Change’, Philosophical Review 87, 519–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, P. 1983. The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kleingeld, P., and Brown, E. 2013. ‘Cosmopolitanism’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., available online at URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/cosmopolitanism>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar

Knobe, J. 2010. ‘Person as Scientist, Person as Moralist’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33, 315–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Knobe, J. 2016. ‘Experimental Philosophy is Cognitive Science’, in A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, eds Systma, J. and Buckwalter, W.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knobe, J., and Nichols, S. (eds) 2008. Experimental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koopman, C. 2009. Pragmatism as Transition: Historicity and Hope in James, Dewey, and Rorty. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Kornblith, H. 1998. ‘The Role of Intuition in Philosophical Theorizing’, in Rethinking Intuition, eds DePaul, M. and Ramsey, W.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 129–41.Google Scholar

Kornblith, H. 2002. Knowledge and its Place in Nature. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornblith, H. 2006. ‘Appeals to Intuition and the Ambitions of Epistemology’, in Epistemology Futures, ed. Hetherington, S.. Oxford University Press, 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornblith, H. 2007. ‘How to Refer to Artifacts’, in Creations of the Mind: Essays on Artifacts and their Representations, eds Margolis, E. and Laurence, S.. Oxford University Press, 138–49.Google Scholar

Kornblith, H. 2009. ‘Review of The Philosophy of Philosophy by T. Williamson’, Analysis 69, 109–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornblith, H. 2012. On Reflection. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kornblith, H. 2014. ‘Is There Room for Armchair Theorizing in Epistemology’, in Philosophical Methods: The Armchair or the Laboratory?, ed. Haug, M. C.. London: Routledge, 195–216.Google Scholar

Kornblith, H. forthcoming. ‘Philosophy, Science, and Common Sense’, in Scientism, eds Peels, R. and van Woudenberg, R.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. M. C. 1983. ‘Two Distinctions in Goodness’, The Philosophical Review 92 (2), 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kreitzer, A. C., and Malenka, R. C.. 2008. ‘Striatal Plasticity and Basal Ganglia Circuit Function’, Neuron 60, 543–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kriegel, U. 2013. ‘The Epistemological Challenge of Revisionary Metaphysics’, Philosopher’s Imprint 13 (12), 1–30.Google Scholar

Kripke, S. 1980a. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kripke, S. A. 1980b. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kroon, F. 1987. ‘Causal Descriptivism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kropotkin, P. 1910. ‘Anarchism’, Encyclopedia Britannica [1910], available online at URL = <www.marxists.org/reference/archive/kropotkin-peter/1910/britannica.htm>..>Google Scholar

Kuehn, M. 1987. Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800: A Contribution to the History of Critical Philosophy. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd enlarged edn. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kukla, R. 2002. ‘The Ontology and Temporality of Conscience’, Continental Philosophy Review 35, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunda, Z. 1999. Social Psychology: Making Sense of People. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kusch, M. 2002. Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lackey, J. 2014. ‘Socially Extended Knowledge’, Philosophical Issues 24 (1), 282–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langston, J. W., et al. 1983. ‘Chronic Parkinsonism in Humans Due to a Product of Meperidine-analog Synthesis’, Science 219, 979–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Larmore, C. 2002. ‘Attending to Reasons’, in Reading McDowell on Mind and World, ed. Smith, N.. New York: Routledge, 47–66.Google Scholar

Lawlor, L. 2003. Thinking through French Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawlor, L. 2016. From Violence to Speaking out. Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazerowitz, M. 1970. ‘A Note on “Metaphilosophy”’, Metaphilosophy 1, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi, I. 1991. The Fixation of Belief and its Undoing. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, C. I. 1923. ‘A Pragmatic Conception of the A Priori’, The Journal of Philosophy 20, 169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. 1990. ‘Noneism or Allism’, Mind 99, 23–31.Google Scholar

Lewy, F. J. 1912. ‘Paralysis agitans. I. Pathologische Anatomie’, in Handbuch der Neurologie, ed. Lewandowski, M.. Berlin: Springer, 920–33.Google Scholar

Liao, S. M., Wiegmann, A., Alexander, J., and Vong, G. 2012. ‘Putting the Trolley in Order: Experimental Philosophy and the Loop Case’, Philosophical Psychology 25 (5), 661–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lieberman, D. 2011. Human Learning and Memory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipton, P. 1991. Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Locke, J. 1964. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding[1690]. Glasgow: Collins and Sons.Google Scholar

Lowe, J. 1998. The Possibility of Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Macarthur, D. 2014. ‘Cavell on Skepticism and the Importance of Not-Knowing’, Conversations: The Journal of Cavellian Studies 2, 2–23.Google Scholar

Macarthur, D. forthcoming. ‘The Ethical Significance of Metaphysical Quietism: Remarks on the Wittgenstein–Malcolm Incident Involving an Alleged British Plot to Kill Hitler’, in Later Wittgenstein Now, ed. Malachowski, A.. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Machery, E. 2011. ‘Thought Experiments and Philosophical Knowledge’, Metaphilosophy 42 (3), 191–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machery, E. 2012. ‘Expertise and Intuitions about Reference’, THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (1), 37–54.Google Scholar

Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nicols, S., and Stich, S. P. 2004. ‘Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style’, Cognition 92, B1–B12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Machery, E., Sytsma, J., and Deutsch, M. 2015. ‘Speaker’s Reference and Cross-Cultural Semantics’ in On Reference, ed. Bianchi, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machery, E., Stich, S., Rose, D., Chatterjee, A., Karasawa, K., Struchiner, N., Sirker, S., Usui, N., and Hashimoto, T. forthcoming-a. ‘Gettier was Framed!’ in Epistemology for the Rest of the World: Linguistic and Cultural Diversity and Epistemology, eds McCready, E., Mizumoto, M., Stanley, J. and Stich, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Machery, E., Stich, S., Rose, D., Chatterjee, A., Karasawa, K., Struchiner, N., Sirker, S., Usui, N., and Hashimoto, T. forthcoming-b. ‘Gettier across Cultures’, Noûs.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Maddy, P. 2007. Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magee, B. 1982. Talking Philosophy: Dialogues with Fifteen Leading Philosophers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. 2001. Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Malpas, J., and Gander, H.-H. (eds) 2015. The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Manley, D. 2009. ‘Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics’, in Metametaphysics, eds Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1–37.Google Scholar

Marcuse, H. 2009. ‘Philosophie und Kritische Theorie’ [1937], in his Negations: Essays in Critical Theory, trans. Shapiro, J. J.. London: MayFlyBooks, 99–118.Google Scholar

Marx, K., and Engels, F. 1956–90. Marx Engels Werke[MEW]. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar

Marx, K., and Engels, F. 1975–2005. Marx Engels Collected Works[MECW]. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

Matthews, G. B. 1992. Thought’s Ego in Augustine and Descartes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mattson, M. P., and Liu, D. 2002. ‘Energetics and Oxidative Stress in Synaptic Plasticity and Neurodegenerative Disorders’, NeuroMolecular Medicine 2, 215–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mayo, R. S. 1969. Herder and the Beginnings of Comparative Literature. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Mazzoni, P., et al. 2007. ‘Why Don’t We Move Faster? Parkinson’s Disease, Movement Vigor, and Implicit Motivation’, The Journal of Neuroscience 27 (27), 7105–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McCarthy, T. 1985. ‘Complexity and Democracy, or the Seducements of Systems Theory’, New German Critique 35, 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, T. 1990. ‘The Critique of Impure Reason: Foucault and the Frankfurt School’, Political Theory 18 (3), 437–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDowell, J. 1996. Mind and World. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 2002. ‘Reply to Larmore’, in Reading McDowell on Mind and World, ed. Smith, N.. New York: Routledge, 294–6.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 2009. ‘Wittgensteinian Quietism’, Common Knowledge 15 (3), 365–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGinn, C. 1993. Problems in Philosophy: The Limits of Inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

McGinn, C. 2002. The Making of a Philosopher: My Journey Through Twentieth Century Philosophy. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar

McManus, D. 2013. ‘The Provocation to Look and See: Appropriation, Recollection, and Formal Indication’, in Wittgenstein and Heidegger, eds Egan, D., Reynolds, S., and Wendland, A.. London: Routledge, 50–65.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 1998. Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Smith, C.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. 2008. Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Landes, D.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Merricks, T. 2000. ‘No Statues’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (1), 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Misak, C. 1991. Truth and the End of Inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Misak, C. 1995. Verificationism: Its History and Prospects. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Misak, C. 2013. The American Pragmatists. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Moore, A. W. 1997. Points of View. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moore, A. W. 2012. The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. 1955. ‘Notes on Wittgenstein’s Lectures, 1930–33’, Mind 64 (253), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moran, R. 2001. Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Morgan, C. L. 1894. An Introduction to Comparative Psychology. London: Walter Scott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nado, J. 2014. ‘Philosophical Expertise’, Philosophy Compass 9, 631–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nado, J. 2015. ‘Intuition, Philosophical Theorizing, and the Threat of Skepticism’, in Experimental Philosophy, Rationalism, and Naturalism, eds Fischer, E. and Collins, J.. London: Routledge, 204–21.Google Scholar

Nagel, J. 2012. ‘Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85, 495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nichols, S., Pinillos, N., and Mallon, R. 2016. ‘Ambiguous Reference’, Mind 125 (497), 145–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nietzsche, F. 1974. The Gay Science: With a Prelude in Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs, ed. Kaufmann, W. A.. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Nisbet, H. B. 1970. Herder and the Philosophy and History of Science. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nisbett, R.E., and Wilson, T.D. 1977. ‘Telling More than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes’, Psychological Review 84 (3), 231–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Noë, A. (ed.) 2007. ‘Special Issue on Dennett and Heterophenomenology’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1–2), 1–270.Google Scholar

Nolan, D. 2015. ‘The A Posteriori Armchair’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93, 211–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norton, R. E. 1991. Herder’s Aesthetics and the European Enlightenment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nozick, R. 1981a. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Nozick, R. 1981b. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Overgaard, S., Gilbert, P., and Burwood, S. 2013. An Introduction to Metaphilosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pagin, P. forthcoming. ‘Problems with Norms of Assertion’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12209.Google Scholar

Papineau, D. 2009. ‘The Poverty of Analysis’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parkinson, J. 1817. An Essay on the Shaking Palsy. London: Sherwood, Neely, and Jones.Google Scholar

Paul, L. A. 2014. Transformative Experiences. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peirce, C. S. 1931. Collected Papers, Vol. II, ed. Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. 1931–58. The Collected Works of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. 1934. Collected Papers, Vol. V, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. 1955. ‘The Fixation of Belief’, in Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. Buchler, J.. New York: Dover, 5–22.Google Scholar

Petit, J.-L. (dir.) 2015. ‘La naturalisation de la phénoménologie 20 ans après’, Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg, 38.Google Scholar

Petitot, J., Varela, F., Pachoud, B., and Roy, J.-M. (eds) 1999. Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Petitot, J., et al. (eds) 1999. Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. 2004. ‘Existentialism, Quietism, and the Role of Philosophy’, in The Future of Philosophy, ed. Leiter, B.. London: Routledge, 304–27.Google Scholar

Philp, M. 2013. ‘William Godwin’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., available online at URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/godwin/>..>Google Scholar

Piercey, R. 2003. ‘Doing Philosophy Historically’, Review of Metaphysics 56 (June), 815–36.Google Scholar

Piercey, R. 2009a. The Crisis in Continental Philosophy: History, Truth and the Hegelian Legacy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Piercey, R. 2009b. The Uses of the Past From Heidegger to Rorty: Doing Philosophy Historically. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piercey, R. 2010. ‘Metaphilosophy as First Philosophy’, International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3) (September), 335–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plant, B. 2012. ‘Philosophical Diversity and Disagreement’, Metaphilosophy 43 (5), 567–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plato, , 1927. Charmides, Alcibiades 1 and 2 Hipparchus, the Lovers, Theages, Minos, Epinomis; with an English Translation, trans. Lamb, W. R. M., ed. Page, T. E.. Vol. 201, Loeb Classical Library. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Plato, , 1971. Gorgias, trans. Hamilton, W.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Plato, , 1981. Meno, trans. Grube, G. M. A., in Five Dialogues. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Pleasants, N. 1999. Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens, Habermas and Bhaskar. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plunkett, D. 2015. ‘Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and the Methodology of Philosophy’, Inquiry 58 (7–8), 828–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plunkett, D., and Sundell, T. (2013). ‘Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms’, Philosopher’s Imprint 13 (23), 1–37.Google Scholar

Polymeropoulos, M. H., et al. 1997. ‘Mutation in the α-Synuclein Gene Identified in Families with Parkinson’s Disease’, Science 276, 2045–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Popper, K. R. 1968. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Popper, K. R. 1975. ‘How I See Philosophy’, in The Owl of Minerva: Philosophers on Philosophy, eds Bontempo, C. J. and Odell, S. J.. New York: McGraw-Hill, 41–55.Google Scholar

Prado, C. (ed.) 2003. A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar

Price, H. 2003. ‘Truth as Convenient Friction’, Journal of Philosophy 100, 167–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Price, H. 2004. ‘Naturalism Without Representationalism’, in Naturalism in Question, ed. Macarthur, D. and de Caro, M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 71–88.Google Scholar

Price, H. 2009. ‘Metaphysics after Carnap: The Ghost Who Walks?’ in Metametaphysics, eds Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 320–47.Google Scholar