Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T01:32:09.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2017

Ruth Bloch Rubin
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Building the Bloc
Intraparty Organization in the US Congress
, pp. 333 - 342
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce and Nou, Jennifer. “Canonizing the Civil Rights Revolution: The People and the Poll Tax,” Northwestern University Law Review 103 (2009): 63148.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John and Rohde, David. “The Transition to Republican Rule in the House: Implications for Theories of Congressional Politics,” Political Science Quarterly 112 (1997): 541567.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John. Why Parties: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Donald F. William Howard Taft (London: Cornell University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Atkinson, Charles R. The Committee on Rules and the Overthrow of Speaker Cannon (New York: Columbia University Press, 1911).Google Scholar
Bach, Stanley. “Filibusters and Cloture in the Senate,” Congressional Research Service (2001): 123.Google Scholar
Bach, Stanley. “The Legislative Process on the House Floor: An Introduction,” Congressional Research Service (2001): 114.Google Scholar
Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton S.. “Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytic Framework,” American Political Science Review 57 (1963): 632642.Google Scholar
Badger, Tony. “Southerners Who Refused to Sign the Southern Manifesto,” The Historical Journal 42 (1999): 517534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Henry E.The Association of Southern Women for the Prevention of Lynching,” Phylon 34 (1974: 378389.Google Scholar
Barry, John M. The Ambition and the Power (New York: Viking, 1989).Google Scholar
Bass, Jack and De Vries, Walter, The Transformation of Southern Politics: Social Change and Political Consequence (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard F. The Political Economy of American Industrialization, 1877–1900 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard F. Passion and Preferences: William Jennings Bryan and the 1896 Democratic National Convention (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Berk, Gerald. “Constituting Corporations and Markets: Railroads in Gilded Age Politics,” Studies in American Political Development 4 (1990): 130168.Google Scholar
Berman, Daniel M. A Bill Becomes Law: Congress Enacts Civil Rights Legislation (New York: The MacMillan Co., 1966).Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. and Smith, Steven S., Politics or Principle: Filibustering in the United States Senate (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute, 1997).Google Scholar
Bolles, Blair. Tyrant from Illinois: Uncle Joe Cannon’s Experiment with Personal Power (New York: Norton & Company, 1951).Google Scholar
Bolling, Richard. House Out of Order (New York: Dutton, 1966).Google Scholar
Bowers, Claude G. Beveridge and the Progressive Era (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1932).Google Scholar
Brady, David W. and Bullock, Charles S. III. “Is There a Conservative Coalition in the House?The Journal of Politics 42 (1980): 549559.Google Scholar
Brady, David and Epstein, David. “Intraparty Preferences, Heterogeneity and the Origins of the Modern Congress: Progressive Reformers in the House and Senate, 1890–1920,” Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 13 (1997): 2649.Google Scholar
Brady, David W. and Volden, Craig, Revolving Gridlock (Boulder: Westview, 1998).Google Scholar
Brandt, Karl Gerard. Ronald Reagan and the House Democrats: Gridlock, Partisanship and the Fiscal Crisis (Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Brandt, Karl Gerard. Deficit Politics and Democratic Unity: The Saga of Tip O’Neill, Jim Wright and the Conservative Democrats in the House of Representatives During the Reagan Era (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University, 2003).Google Scholar
Brewer, William M.The Poll Tax and Poll Taxers,” Journal of Negro History 29 (1944): 260299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdette, Franklin L. Filibustering in the Senate (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Butt, Archibald W. Taft and Roosevelt: The Intimate Letters of Archie Butt, Military Aide (New York: Doubleday, Doran & Co., 1930).Google Scholar
Cannan, John. “A Legislative History of the Affordable Care Act: How Legislative Procedure Shapes Legislative History,” Law Library Journal 105 (2013): 131173.Google Scholar
Carney, Eliza Newlin. “Don’t Count Us Out,” National Journal 27 (1995): 10221027.Google Scholar
Caro, Robert A. Master of the Senate: The Lyndon Johnson Years (New York: Vintage Books, 2002).Google Scholar
Caro, Robert A. The Passage of Power: The Lyndon Johnson Years (New York: Vintage Books, 2012).Google Scholar
Caughey, Devin M. Congress, Public Opinion and Representation in the One-Party South, 1930s–1960s (Ph.D. Diss., University of California, Berkeley, 2012).Google Scholar
Ceaser, James W.Political Parties – Declining, Stabilizing, or Resurging?” in The New American Political System ed. King, Anthony (Washington, DC: AEI Press, 1990): 87138.Google Scholar
Certain, Geni. “A Blue Dog Knows the Way: How the Blue Dog Democrats Shaped the 1996 Federal Budget as Portrayed in the Alabama Press” (Jacksonville: Jacksonville State University, 2005).Google Scholar
Clapp, Charles. The Congressman: His Work as He Sees It (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1963).Google Scholar
Collie, Melissa P. and Brady, David W.. “The Decline of Partisan Voting Coalitions in the House of Representatives,” in Congress Reconsidered ed. Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce (Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1985): 272287.Google Scholar
Connally, Tom. My Name Is Tom Connally (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company, 1954).Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, Brady, David W., and Hurley, Patricia A.. “The Electoral Basis of Party Voting: Patterns and Trends in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1887–1969,” in The Impact of the Electoral Process ed. Maisel, Louis and Cooper, Joseph (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1979): 133165.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph and Brady, David W.. “Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House from Cannon to Rayburn,” American Political Science Review 75 (1981): 411425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. “Bonding, Structure, and the Stability of Political Parties: Party Government in the House,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 19 (1994): 215231.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W. and Magar, Eric. “How Much Is Majority Status in the U.S. Congress Worth?American Political Science Review 93 (1999): 299309.Google Scholar
Curry, James M. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Daschle, Tom and Nather, David, Getting It Done: How Obama and Congress Finally Broke the Stalemate to Make Way for Health Care Reform (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Davidson, Roger H.Subcommittee Government: New Channels for Policy Making,” in The New Congress ed. Mann, Thomas and Ornstein, Norman J. (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1981): 99133.Google Scholar
Davidson, Roger H. The Postreform Congress (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Davies, Gareth and Derthick, Martha. “Race and Social Welfare Policy: The Social Security Act of 1935,” Political Science Quarterly 112 (1997): 217235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detzer, David W.Businessmen, Reformers and Tariff Revision: The Payne-Aldrich Tariff of 1909,” The Historian 35 (1973): 196204.Google Scholar
Dewan, Torun and Squintani, Francesco. “In Defense of Factions,” American Journal of Political Science 60 (2015): 860881.Google Scholar
DeWitt, Larry. “The Decision to Exclude Agricultural and Domestic Workers from the 1935 Social Security Act,” Social Security Bulletin 70 (2010): 4968.Google Scholar
Disalvo, Daniel. Engines of Change: Party Factions in American Politics, 1868–2010 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash K. Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Dixon, Frank Haigh. “The Mann-Elkins Act, Amending the Act to Regulate Commerce,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 24 (1910): 593633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. Congress Reconsidered (New York: Praeger, 1977).Google Scholar
Douglas, Paul H. In the Fullness of Time: The Memoirs of Paul H. Douglas (New York: Harcourt Brace Javonovich, 1971).Google Scholar
Dunlavy, Collen. “Political Structure, State Policy and Industrial Change: Early Railroad Policy in the United States and Prussia,” in Structuring Politics ed. Steinmo, Sven and Thelen, Kathleen (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992): 114154.Google Scholar
Eisenhower, Dwight D. The White House Years: Waging Peace, 1956–1961 (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1965).Google Scholar
Ewing, Cortez A.M. Primary Elections in the South: A Study in Uniparty Politics (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Farhang, Sean and Katznelson, Ira. “The Southern Imposition: Congress and Labor in the New Deal and Fair Deal,” Studies in American Political Development 19 (2005): 130.Google Scholar
Ferber, Mark F. The Democratic Study Group: A Study of Intra-Party Organization in the House of Representatives (Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation, 1964).Google Scholar
Feulner, Edwin J. Conservatives Stalk the House: The Republican Study Committee, 1970–1982 (Ottawa, IL: Green Hill Publishers, 1983).Google Scholar
Finley, Keith M. Delaying the Dream: Southern Senators and the Fight Against Civil Rights (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Fisk, George M.The Payne-Aldrich Tariff,” Political Science Quarterly 25 (1910): 3568.Google Scholar
Fite, Gilbert. Russell, Richard B. Jr., Senator from Georgia (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Gallup, George H. The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion, 1935–1971 Vol. 2 (New York: Random House, 1972).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Green, Matthew N.Institutional Change, Party Discipline, and the House Democratic Caucus, 1911–19,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27 (2002): 601633.Google Scholar
Haldeman, H.R. The Haldeman Diaries: Inside the Nixon White House (New York: G.P Putnam’s Sons, 1994).Google Scholar
Hammond, Susan Webb. “Congressional Caucuses and Party Leaders in the House of Representatives,” Political Science Quarterly 106 (1991): 277294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Susan Webb. Congressional Caucuses in National Policy Making (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Harbeson, Robert W.Railroads and Regulation, 1877–1916: Conspiracy or Public Interest?The Journal of Economic History 27 (1967): 230242.Google Scholar
Hechler, Kenneth W. Insurgency: Personalities and Politics of the Taft Era (New York: Russell & Russell Inc., 1964).Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. “From Calhoun to the Dixiecrats,” Social Research 16 (1949): 144145.Google Scholar
Holt, James. Congressional Insurgents and the Party System, 1909–1916 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Ickes, Harold L. The Secret Diary of Harold L. Ickes (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1954).Google Scholar
Jackson, John E. and Kingdon, John W.. “Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes,” American Journal of Political Science 36 (1992): 805823.Google Scholar
James, Scott C. Presidents, Parties and the State (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jeffrey A. and Monroe, Nathan W.. “Buying Negative Agenda Control in the U.S. House,” American Journal of Political Science 56 (2012): 897912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Jeffrey A. and Stewart, Charles III. Fighting for the Speakership: The House and the Rise of Party Government (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Jones, Charles O.Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives,” Journal of Politics 30 (1968): 617646.Google Scholar
Kabaservice, Geoffrey. Rule and Ruin: The Downfall of Moderation and the Destruction of the Republican Party, from Eisenhower to the Tea Party (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Origins of Our Time (New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation, 2013).Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira. When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2005).Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira, Geiger, Kim and Kryder, Daniel. “Limiting Liberalism: The Southern Veto in Congress, 1933–1950,” Political Science Quarterly 108 (1993): 283306.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira and Mulroy, Quinn. “Was the South Pivotal? Situated Partisanship and Policy Coalitions during the New Deal and Fair Deal,” Journal of Politics 74 (2012): 604620.Google Scholar
Key, V.O. Southern Politics in State and Nation (New York: Knopf, 1949).Google Scholar
Kim, Anne The ‘Centrist Premium’: The High Price of Moderation (Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute, 2011).Google Scholar
King, Desmond S. and Smith, Rogers M.. “Racial Orders in American Political Development,” American Political Science Review 99 (2005): 7592.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004): 109110.Google Scholar
Koenig, Louis William. Bryan: A Political Biography of William Jennings Bryan (New York: Putnum, 1971).Google Scholar
Kofmehl, Kenneth. “The Institutionalization of a Voting Bloc,” Western Political Quarterly 17 (1964): 257258.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Robin. “Moderate Party Factions in the U.S House of Representatives,” in The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties ed. Green, John C. and Shea, Daniel M. (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998): 271285.Google Scholar
Kotlowski, Dean J.Unhappily Yoked? Hugh Scott and Richard Nixon,” The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography 125 (2001): 233266.Google Scholar
Kravitz, Walter. “The Advent of the Modern Congress: The Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15 (1990): 375399.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. Information and Legislative Organization (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. “Where’s the Party?British Journal of Political Science 23 (1993): 235266.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith and Wiseman, Alan. “Joseph G. Cannon: Majoritarian from Illinois,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (2001): 357389.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Stanley. “Culture and Values in the 1960s,” in Never a Matter of Indifference: Sustaining Virtue in a Free Republic ed. Berkowitz, Peter (Stanford: Hoover Institution Press, 2003): 2955.Google Scholar
La Follette, Robert M. A Personal Narrative of Political Experiences: La Follette’s Autobiography (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Laver, Michael and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Eric D., Maltzman, Forrest and Wahlbeck, Paul J.. “The Politics of Speaker Cannon’s Committee Assignments,” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2001): 551562.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Leloup, Lance T. Parties, Rules and the Evolution of Congressional Budgeting (Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Lewis, David Levering. “The Appeal of the New Deal,” Reviews in American History 12 (1984): 554556.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Robert C. Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Malbin, Michael J.New Democratic Procedures Affect Distribution of Power,” National Journal 6 (1974): 18811883.Google Scholar
Manley, John F.The Conservative Coalition in Congress,” American Behavioral Scientist 17 (1973): 223247.Google Scholar
Mann, Robert. The Walls of Jericho: Lyndon Johnson, Hubert Humphrey, Richard Russell and the Struggle for Civil Rights (New York: Harcourt Brace & Co., 1996).Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J.. It’s Even Worse than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism (New York: Basic Books, 2012).Google Scholar
Martin, Lanny W. and Vanberg, Georg. “Parties and Policymaking in Multiparty Governments: The Legislative Median, Ministerial Autonomy and the Coalition Compromise,” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2014): 979996.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. Congress: The Electoral Connection (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. Partisan Balance: Why Political Parties Don’t Kill the U.S. Constitutional System (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982).Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches (Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Mickey, Robert. Paths Out of Dixie: The Democratization of Authoritarian Enclaves in America’s Deep South, 1944–1972 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Mickey, Robert. “The Beginning of the End for Authoritarian Rule in America: Smith v. Allwright and the Abolition of the White Primary in the Deep South, 1944–1948,” Studies in American Political Development 22 (2008): 143182.Google Scholar
Mowry, George. Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive Movement (Madison: University of Wisconsin, 1938).Google Scholar
Moynihan, Daniel P. The Politics of a Guaranteed Income: The Nixon Administration and the Family Assistance Plan (New York: Random House, 1973).Google Scholar
Norris, George W. Fighting Liberal: The Autobiography of George W. Norris (New York: The MacMillan Co., 1945).Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and Theory (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Orren, Karen and Skowronek, Stephen. The Search for American Political Development (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Patterson, James T.A Conservative Coalition Forms in Congress, 1933–1939,” The Journal of American History 52 (1966): 757772.Google Scholar
Patty, John. “Equilibrium Party Government,” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2008): 636655.Google Scholar
Pearson, Kathryn. Party Discipline in the U.S. House of Representatives (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Pepper, Claude D. Eyewitness to a Century (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1987).Google Scholar
Perman, Michael. A Pursuit of Unity: A Political History of the American South (Greenville: University of North Carolina Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W.The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives,” American Political Science Review 62 (1968): 144168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polsby, Nelson W. How Congress Evolves: Social Bases of Institutional Change (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Quadagno, Jill. “From Old-Age Assistance to Supplemental Security Income: The Political Economy of Relief in the South, 1935–1972,” in The Politics of Social Policy in the United States ed. Weir, Margaret, Orloff, Ann Shola and Skocpol, Theda (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994): 235264.Google Scholar
Rae, Nicol C. Southern Democrats (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Rae, Nicol C. Conservative Reformers: The Republican Freshmen and the Lessons of the 104th Congress (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1998).Google Scholar
Ritter, Gretchen. Goldbugs and Greenbacks: The Antimonopoly Tradition and the Politics of Finance in America, 1865–1896 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Robinson, James A. The House Rules Committee (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963).Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Daniel B. and Weingast, Barry R.. “The Positive Political Theory of Legislative History: New Perspectives on the Act and Its Interpretation,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (2003): 14641465.Google Scholar
Rohde, David. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Sanders, Elizabeth. Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State 1877–1917 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric and Rich, Andrew. “Controlling the Floor: Parties as Procedural Coalitions in the House,” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1997): 13401375.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. “Institutional Development of Congress,” in The Legislative Branch ed. Quirk, Paul J. and Binder, Sarah A. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005): 3562.Google Scholar
Schiller, Wendy. Partners and Rivals: Representation in U.S. Senate Delegations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Schneider, Judy. “Minority Rights and Senate Procedures,” Congressional Research Service (2005), 19.Google Scholar
Schudson, Michael. The Rise of the Right to Know: Politics and the Culture of Transparency, 1945–1975 (New York: Belknap Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Scott, Anne Firor. “A Progressive Wind from the South,” Journal of Southern History 29 (1963): 5370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheingate, Adam. “Creativity and Constraint in the U.S. House of Representatives” in Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power, ed. Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010): 168203.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Burton D. Rethinking Congressional Reform (Cambridge: Schenkman, 1985).Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Skowronek, Stephen. The Politics Presidents Make (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. Party Influence in Congress (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Starr, Paul. Remedy and Reaction: The Peculiar American Struggle over Health Care Reform (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Stevens, Arthur G., Mulhollan, Daniel P., and Rundquist, Paul S.. “U.S. Congressional Structure and Representation: The Role of Informal Groups,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 6:3 (1981): 415437.Google Scholar
Stockman, David A. The Triumph of Politics: How the Reagan Revolution Failed (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1986).Google Scholar
Strahan, Randall. Leading Representatives: The Agency of Leaders in the Politics of the U.S. House (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Strom, Claire. “James J. Hill: Empire Builder as Farmer,” Minnesota History Magazine 54 (1995): 242253.Google Scholar
Taussig, F.W.The Tariff Debate of 1909 and the New Tariff Act,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 24:1 (1909): 138.Google Scholar
Taylor, Andrew J.Size, Power and Electoral Systems: Exogenous Determinants of Legislative Procedural Choice,” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (2006): 323345.Google Scholar
Thelen, David P. Robert M. La Follette and the Insurgent Spirit (New York: Little and Brown Co., 1976).Google Scholar
Truman, David. The Congressional Party: A Case Study (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1959).Google Scholar
Unger, Nancy C. Fighting Bob La Follette: The Righteous Reform (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Valelly, Richard M.The Reed Rules and Republican Party Building: A New Look,” Studies in American Political Development 23 (2009): 115142.Google Scholar
Waite, Charles V. Price Daniel: Texas Attorney General, Governor and Senator (Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University dissertation, 1998).Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952–1996, 5th Ed. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Wawro, Gregory and Schickler, Eric, Filibuster: Obstructionism and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Whalen, Charles and Whalen, Barbara, The Longest Debate: A Legislative History of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (Cabin John, MD: Seven Locks Press, 1985).Google Scholar
White, Richard. Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America (New York: W.W. Norton and Co., 2011).Google Scholar
White, Theodore H. The Making of a President 1964 (New York: Antheneum Publishers, 1965).Google Scholar
White, William S. Citadel: The Story of the U.S. Senate (New York: Harper & Bros., 1957).Google Scholar
Willis, H. Parker. “The Tariff of 1909,” The Journal of Political Economy 17 (1909): 589619.Google Scholar
Wilson, Woodrow. Congressional Government (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1885).Google Scholar
Wolfensberger, Donald R.The Motion to Recommit in the House: The Creation, Evisceration and Restoration of a Minority Right,” in Party, Process and Political Change Vol. 2 ed. Brady, David and McCubbins, Mathew D. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2007): 271293.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Julian E.The Forgotten Legacy of the New Deal: Fiscal Conservatism and the Roosevelt Administration, 1933–1938,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 30 (2000): 331358.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Julian E. Taxing America: Wilbur D. Mills, Congress and the State, 1945–1975 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)Google Scholar
Zelizer, Julian E. On Capitol Hill: The Struggle to Reform Congress and its Consequences, 1948–2000 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Zelizer, Julian. “Seizing Power: Conservatives and Congress Since the 1970s,” in The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism ed. Pierson, Paul and Skocpol, Theda (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007): 105134.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Ruth Bloch Rubin, University of Chicago
  • Book: Building the Bloc
  • Online publication: 05 September 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108226967.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Ruth Bloch Rubin, University of Chicago
  • Book: Building the Bloc
  • Online publication: 05 September 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108226967.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Ruth Bloch Rubin, University of Chicago
  • Book: Building the Bloc
  • Online publication: 05 September 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108226967.011
Available formats
×