Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:42:07.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Backlash and Appropriation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2021

Fran Amery
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Get access

Summary

The abortion debates of the 1980s and 1990s came to focus on the problem of ‘late’ abortions above all else. Recent advances in medical technology meant that premature babies were surviving at earlier stages of gestation, and many people had come to see the 28-week upper limit for legal abortion as outdated. Advances in foetal imaging technology had also resulted in a proliferation of images of the foetus, used by opponents of abortion as ‘evidence’ of foetal personhood. This ‘technicization’ of abortion was one of the most important developments in abortion rhetoric during this period (McNeil, 1991: 157). The debates took place on the watch of the government of Margaret Thatcher that was increasingly coming to be seen as ‘uncaring’ due to its cuts to the NHS and failure to provide high-tech facilities (1991: 150). These cuts meant that those seeking abortions on the NHS were faced with many difficulties and delays; in this sense, ‘late’ abortions were to an extent a creation of the system. However, many of the Bills introduced in this period would have ‘solved’ the problem by policing abortion patients, not the NHS, more closely (1991: 150) (see Table 5.1).

Academic accounts note that the debates took place in a new moral climate involving heightened fears about sexuality, where abortion was viewed as a symptom of moral decline. These fears became evident in the idea that women might suffer from ‘post-abortion syndrome’ – the implication being that a price must be paid for separating women's sexuality from reproduction (McNeil, 1991: 157– 8; Lee, 2003: 85). Such accounts are indicative of the broader backlash against feminism taking place in the 1980s and early 1990s. According to Susan Faludi's influential book on the subject, the backlash had two elements: first, attempts to halt or turn back the tide on advances in women's equality; and, second, attempts to blame feminism itself for women's unhappiness (Faludi, 1991: 9– 10).

For Faludi, the anti-abortion movement in the US was an exemplar of backlash politics. Abortion and birth control were seen as threatening, as they gave women the freedom to have sex on their own terms (1991: 412), and were therefore subject to antifeminist attack.

Type
Chapter
Information
Beyond Pro-life and Pro-choice
The Changing Politics of Abortion in Britain
, pp. 95 - 122
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Backlash and Appropriation
  • Fran Amery, University of Bath
  • Book: Beyond Pro-life and Pro-choice
  • Online publication: 10 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529205367.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Backlash and Appropriation
  • Fran Amery, University of Bath
  • Book: Beyond Pro-life and Pro-choice
  • Online publication: 10 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529205367.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Backlash and Appropriation
  • Fran Amery, University of Bath
  • Book: Beyond Pro-life and Pro-choice
  • Online publication: 10 March 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529205367.005
Available formats
×