The habitual labor of thought is easy and can be prolonged at will. Intuition is arduous and cannot last … and intuition, like all thought, finally becomes lodged in concepts such as duration, qualitative or heterogeneous multiplicity, unconsciousness – even differentiation.

Thus a multiplicity of different systems will arise, as many systems as there are external viewpoints on the reality one is examining, or as there are larger circles in which to enclose it. The simple concepts, therefore, not only have the disadvantage of dividing the concrete unity of the object into so many symbolical expressions; they also divide philosophy into distinct schools, each of which takes its seat, chooses its counters, and begins with the others a game that will never end.

Philosophy is an affair of movements and becomings, of lines and vectors, of reversals and displacements – it mostly uses transcendence, which comes (in a circular although broken manner) from experience toward the ground, from being toward Being, from Being toward the Affair of thought.

My problem is that of the re-orientation of thought.