Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:45:58.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Duration and Rhetorical Movement

from Part II - Unconditional Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2017

James Day
Affiliation:
PhD student at The Courtauld Institute of Art
John Mullarkey
Affiliation:
Kingston University, UK
Charlotte de Mille
Affiliation:
University of Sussex, UK
Get access

Summary

The two paintings we see in reproduction are James McNeill Whistler's Symphony in White, No. 1: The White Girl (1862) (Figure 9.1) and Edouard Manet's Luncheon on the Grass (1862) (Figure 9.2), but they are qualitatively multiple and the crowd writing this chapter sees many of them. The paintings share a history as successful scandals at the 1863 Paris refusals’ salon, after the academy had denied them wall space in the official salon. In their own time, these paintings were dissident works through their disruption of representative normalcy and their ambiguous, defiant gaze; however, their time is not their own. Both paintings contain past and future art objects and writings, which surge through their canvases. Art history has identified many of these works, and its writing can be seen to be transformative. More has been written about Luncheon on the Grass than about The White Girl, though art historical writing has elaborated art history's influence in both paintings. For example in Luncheon on the Grass there is Giorgione/Titian's Pastoral Concert (c. 1508), Marcantonio Raimondi after Raphael's Judgement of Paris (ca. 1515–16), Antoine Watteau's Tranquil Love (1718), Pablo Picasso's The Young Ladies of Avignon (Les Demoiselles d'vignon) (1907); and in The White Girl Jean-Baptiste Oudry's White Duck (1753), Watteau's Pierrot (Le Grand Gilles) (1717–19), Bartolome Esteban Murillo's Immaculate Conception of the Escorial (1678). The revisionary art historical project is perhaps more obvious in Luncheon on the Grass but is equally at work in The White Girl. Art historical identification is not supplementary but integral to the work because it realises possibility. The histories of these precedent and antecedent works can be thought of as transforming Luncheon on the Grass and The White Girl, which work retroactively upon them. To what extent, then, can art historical writing be seen as altered by and altering the history which these two paintings share in 1863? Michael Fried germanely refers to ‘the generation of 1863’ and this year is always being generated, by 1678, 1996, 1907, 1753 as recently as 2012.

Type
Chapter
Information
Bergson and the Art of Immanence
Painting, Photography, Film, Performance
, pp. 148 - 164
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×