Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T12:45:25.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Legal elements and ongoing development of the international climate change regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Alexander Zahar
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney
Jacqueline Peel
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Lee Godden
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter undertakes a close examination of the key provisions of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, reflecting on the significance of these provisions and their links with broader climate change issues. For twenty years the UNFCCC has defined the international climate change regime. It will probably retain this role for many years to come. While it lacks the specificity of the Kyoto Protocol in the critical area of emission reductions, its ongoing role as a ‘framework’ for international cooperation is generally accepted. A careful study of the Convention is still a requirement for understanding the present state of the international negotiations and the international law on climate change. As the Kyoto Protocol’s fortunes have diminished, the UNFCCC has reasserted itself as the treaty of greatest consequence. While the Convention will certainly outlast the Protocol as an operative treaty, the Protocol also repays close study, both for the governance model it represents and for the institutions it has created.

Background to the UNFCCC

Work on an international climate change convention began in 1988 with the creation of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by the World Meteorological Organization and the UN Environment Programme. The work of the IPCC underpins not only the science but also the law of climate change. In December 1988, the UN General Assembly endorsed the IPCC as an institution ‘to provide internationally co-ordinated scientific assessments of the magnitude, timing and potential environmental and socio-economic impact of climate change and realistic response strategies’.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

UN General Assembly 1990
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007
2007 30
2002
Nicaragua, Summary of the Second Session of the Preparatory Committee for the UN Conference on Sustainable Development: 7–8 March 2011 2011 27 Earth Negotiations Bulletin4Google Scholar
2010 8
UNFCCC 2011
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeClimate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCCCambridge University Press 2007 137Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007
2007
Wu, P.Temporary Acceleration of the Hydrological Cycle in Response to a CO2 Rampdown 37 Geophysical Research Letters 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, C. M.Abrupt Climate Change in the Arctic 2 Nature Climate Change 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 31 International Legal Materials874 1992
Bernstein, L.Climate Change 2007: Synthesis ReportIPCC 2007 44Google Scholar
Bernstein, L. 2007
1994
UNFCCC 1995
UNFCCC 1999
UNFCCC 2005
2005
2007
2007 3
Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population DivisionWorld Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, Volume II: Demographic ProfilesUnited Nations 2011 167Google Scholar
1999
2007 6
2009
2004
2006
2006
UNFCCC 2002
Kyoto Protocol 2006
Kyoto Protocol 2006
Kyoto Protocol 2006
European UnionCase C-366/10: Reference for a Preliminary Ruling from High Court of Justice Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom) Made on 22 July 2010 – The Air Transport Association of America, American Airlines, Inc., Continental Airlines, Inc., United Airlines, Inc. v The Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change 53 Official Journal of the European Union [C 260]9 2010Google Scholar
Court of Justice of the European Union 2011
Court of Justice of the European Union 2011
2011
2011
2011
EditorialThe Mask Slips 480 Nature292 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×