Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R.W. 2004. ‘Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Bilateral Opportunism and the Rules of GATT/WTO’. Journal of International Economics 63(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bown, Chad P. 2005. ‘Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Complainants Interested Parties, and Free Riders’. World Bank Economic Review 19: 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bown, Chad P. 2009. Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2001. ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in GATT/WTO Disputes’. Fordham International Law Journal 24: 158–172.Google Scholar

Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2006. ‘Three’s a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement’. World Politics 58: 446–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, Marc L., Reinhardt, Eric and Shaffer, Gregory. 2009. ‘Does Legal Capacity Matter? Explaining Dispute Initiation and Antidumping Actions in the WTO’. World Trade Review 8: 559–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busch, Marc L. and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2010. ‘The Politics of Judicial Economy at the World Trade Organization’. International Organization 64: 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daku, Mark and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2016. ‘Who Holds Most Influence Over WTO Jurisprudence?’ Working Paper, McGill University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davey, William J. and Porges, Amelia. 1998. ‘Comments on Performance of the System I: Consultations and Deterrence’. International Lawyer 32: 695–707.Google Scholar

Davis, Christina L. and Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett. 2009. ‘Who Files? Developing Country Participation in GATT/WTO Adjudication’. Journal of Politics 71: 1033–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elsig, Manfred and Stucki, Philipp. 2011. ‘Low-Income Developing Countries and WTO Litigation: Why Wake Up the Sleeping Dog?’ Review of International Political Economy 19: 292–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilligan, Michael, Johns, Leslie and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2010. ‘Strengthening International Courts and the Early Settlement of Disputes’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 54: 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horlick, Gary N. 1998. ‘The Consultation Phase of WTO Dispute Resolution: A Private Practitioner’s View’. International Lawyer 32: 685–693.Google Scholar

Johns, Leslie and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2014. ‘Who Gets to Be in the Room? Manipulating Participation in WTO Disputes’. International Organization 68: 663–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johns, Leslie and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2016. ‘Fear of Crowds in WTO Disputes: Why Don’t More Countries Participate?’ Journal of Politics 78 (1): 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kucik, Jeffrey and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2016. ‘Measuring the Cost of Privacy: A Look at the Distributional Effects of Private Bargaining’. British Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 861–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2010. ‘Constraining Coercion? Legitimacy and Its Role in US Trade Policy, 1975–2000’. International Organization 64(01): 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2011. ‘Why Do Some Countries Get Better WTO Accession Terms Than Others?’ International Organization 65(4): 639–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2014. ‘The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application’. American Political Science Review 108(3): 547–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stasavage, David. 2004. ‘Open-Door or Closed-Door? Transparency in Domestic and International Bargaining’. International Organization 58: 667–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. ‘In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO’. International Organization 56: 339–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arato, Julian. 2013. ‘Treaty Interpretation and Constitutional Transformation: Informal Change in International Organizations’. Yale J. Int’l L. 38: 289–357.Google Scholar

Baroncini, Elisa. 2013. ‘The Applicability of GATT Article XX to China’s WTO Accession Protocol in the Appellate Body Report of the China – Raw Materials Case: Suggestions for a Different Interpretive Approach’. China-EU L.J. 1 (3): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berrisch, George M. 1991. ‘The Establishment of New Law Through Subsequent Practice in GATT’. N.C.J. Int’l L. & Com. Reg. 16: 497.Google Scholar

Bronckers, Marco and Maskus, Keith E. 2014. ‘China – Raw Materials: A Controversial Step Towards Evenhanded Exploitation of Natural Resources’. World Trade Review 13 (2): 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartland, Michel, Depayre, Gérard, and Woznowski, Jan. 2012. ‘Is Something Going Wrong in the WTO Dispute Settlement?’ J. World Trade 46 (5): 979–1015, at 1006.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve. 2008. ‘Mapping the Law of WTO Accession’. In The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement & Developing Countries, edited by Janow, Merit E., Donaldson, Victoria and Yanovich, Alan, 855–920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve and Hoekman, Bernard. 2013. ‘US – Tyres, Upholding a WTO Accession Contract – Imposing Pain for Little Gain’. World Trade Review 12 (2): 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gardiner, Richard K. 2007. Treaty Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 204.Google Scholar

Gu, Bin. 2012. ‘Applicability of GATT Article XX in China – Raw Materials: A Clash within the WTO Agreement’. J. Int’l Econ. L. 15 (4) 1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kennedy, Matthew. 2013. ‘The Integration of Accession Protocols into the WTO Agreement’. J. World Trade 47 (1): 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milhaupt, Curtis J. and Zheng, Wentong. 2015. ‘Beyond Ownership: State Capitalism and the Chinese Firm’. Georgetown Law J. 103 (3): 665–722.Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg. 2013. ‘Reports for the ILC Study Group on Treaties Over Time’. In Treaties and Subsequent Practice, edited by Nolte, Georg. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169.Google Scholar

O’Connor, Bernard. 2015. ‘The EU Does Not Have to Make China a Market Economy in 2016’. www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c13fe452-8e29-40d5-87d9-bc792daf15a7Google Scholar

Oliver, Christian, Donnan, Shawn and Mitchell, Tom. 2015. ‘US Warns Europe over Granting Market Economy Status to China’. Financial Times 28 December 2015.Google Scholar

Parenti, Antonio. 2000. ‘Accession to the World Trade Organisation: A Legal Analysis’. Legal Issues of Economic Integration 27 (2): 141–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost. 2003. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law, 356–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost. 2010. ‘Case Note, Squaring Free Trade in Culture with Chinese Censorship: The WTO Appellate Body Report on China – Audiovisuals’. Melbourne Journal of International Law 11 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar

Price, Alan H., Brightbill, Timothy C. and Nance, D. Scott. 2015. ‘China Can Still Be Treated as a Nonmarket Economy After 2016’. www.wileyrein/publication/159_China-Can-Still-Be-Treated-As-A-Nonmarket-Economy-After-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar

Qin, Julia Y. 2003. ‘“WTO-Plus” Obligations and Their Implications for the WTO Legal System: An Appraisal of the China Accession Protocol’. J. World Trade 37 (3): 483–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qin, Julia Y. 2004. ‘WTO Regulation of Subsidies to State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) – A Critical Appraisal of the China Accession Protocol’. J. Int’l Econ. L. 7 (4): 863–919, at 899–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qin, Julia Y. 2011. ‘Pushing the Limits of Global Governance: Trading Rights, Censorship and WTO Jurisprudence – A Commentary on the China – Publications Case’. Chinese J. Int’l L. 10 (2): 271–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qin, Julia Y. 2012a. ‘Reforming WTO Discipline on Export Duties: Sovereignty over Natural Resources, Economic Development and Environmental Protection’. J. World Trade 46 (5): 1147–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qin, Julia. Y. 2012b. ‘Editorial Comments, The Predicament of China’s “WTO-Plus” Obligation to Eliminate Export Duties: A Commentary on the China – Raw Materials Case’. Chinese J. Int’l L. 11 (2): 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Qin, Julia Y. 2015. ‘The Conundrum of WTO Accession Protocols: In Search of Legality and Legitimacy’. Virginia J. Int’l L. 55 (2) 369–450.Google Scholar

Roessler, Frieder. 2011. ‘Comment, Appellate Body Ruling in China – Publications and Audiovisual Products’. 10 World Trade Review 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyagi, Mitali. 2012. ‘Flesh on a Legal Fiction: Early Practice in the WTO on Accession Protocols’. J. Int’l Econ. L. 15: 391–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

World Trade Organization. 1999. The Legal Texts: The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges. 2006. ‘The Appellate Body and Treaty Interpretation’. In The WTO at Ten: The Contribution of the Dispute Settlement System, edited by Sacerdoti, Giorgio, Yanovich, Alan and Bohanes, Jan Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 453–464.Google Scholar

Bacchus, James. 2005. ‘Appellators: The Quest for the Meaning of and/or’. World Trade Review 4 (3): 499–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartels, Lorand. 2004. ‘The Separation of Powers in the WTO: How to Avoid Judicial Activism’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 53 (4): 877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bengoextea, Joxerammon, MacCormick, Neil, and Moral Soriano, Leonor. 2001. ‘Integration and Integrity and Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice’. In The European Court of Justice, edited by De Burca, Grainne and Weiler, Joseph, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 43, at 44.Google Scholar

Brown, Neville and Jacobs, Francis. 2000. The Court of Justice of the European Communities, 5th edition. London: Sweet and Maxwell.Google Scholar

Cartland, Michael, Depayre, Gérard, and Woznowski, Jan. 2012. ‘Is Something Going Wrong in the WTO Dispute Settlement?’ Journal of World Trade 46 (5): 979–1016.Google Scholar

Charnovitz, Steve and Fischer, Carolyn. 2015. ‘Canada – Renewable Energy. Implications for WTO Law on Green and Not-So Green Subsidies’. World Trade Review 14 (2): 177–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cosbey, Aaron and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2014. ‘A Turquoise Mess: Green Subsidies, Blue Industrial Policy and Renewable Energy: the Case for Redrafting the Subsidies Agreement of the WTO’. Journal of International Economic Law 7 (1): 1–37.Google Scholar

Diamond, Richard. 2008. ‘Privatization and the Definition of Subsidy: A Critical Study of Appellate Body Texturalism’. Journal of International Economic Law 11 (3): 649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ehlermann, Claus-Dieter. 2002. ‘Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court” – Some Personal Experiences as Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’. Journal of World Trade 36 (4): 606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

European University Institute. 2015. ‘WTO Appellate Body @ 20: Taking Stock and Looking Forward’. 15 May 2015. Florence: EUI.Google Scholar

Graham, Thomas. 2013. ‘Present at the Creation’. Speech at Hofstra University Law School, 6 February 2013.Google Scholar

Greenwald, John D. 2013. ‘A Comparison of WTO and CIT/CAFC Jurisprudence in Review of US Commerce Department Decisions in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings’. Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 21 (2): 261–272.Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2003. ‘Here Today? Gone Tomorrow?’ In The WTO Case Law of 2001, edited by Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 170.Google Scholar

Grossman, Gene and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2005. ‘Recurring Misunderstandings of Non-Recurring Subsidies’. In The WTO Case Law of 2002, edited by Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hillman, Jennifer. 2010–11. ‘An Emerging International Rule of Law? – The WTO Dispute Settlement System’s Role in its Evolution’. Ottawa Law Review 42 (2): 269–284.Google Scholar

Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros. 2006. ‘United States – Final Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada (AB-2003–6, WT/DS257/AB/R)’. World Trade Review 5 (S1): 130–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howse, Robert. 2016. ‘The World Trade Organization 20 Years On: Global Governance by Judiciary’. European Journal of International Law 27 (1) 9–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudec, Robert. 1999. Essays on the Nature of International Trade Law. London: Cameron May.Google Scholar

Hudec, Robert. 2002. ‘Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy: The Future of the World Trade Organization’. World Trade Review 1 (2): 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudec, Robert. 2003. ‘Industrial Subsidies: Tax Treatment of “Foreign Sales Corporations”’. In Transatlantic Economic Disputes – The EU, the US, and the WTO, edited by Petersmann, Ernest-Ullrich and Pollack, Mark A. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175.Google Scholar

Irwin, Douglas, Mavroidis, Petros, and Sykes, Alan O. 2010. The Genesis of the GATT. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H. 1998. The World Trade Organization – Constitution and Jurisprudence. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar

Jackson, John H. 2006. Sovereignty, the WTO, and the Changing Fundamentals of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaplow, Louis. 1992–93. ‘Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’. Duke Law Journal 42: 557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lang, Andrew. 2014. Governing ‘As If’: Global Subsidies Regulation and the Benchmark Problem. LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 12/2014 (http://ssrn.com/abstract=2432642 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2432642).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lenaerts, Koen and Guitiérrez-Fons, José. 2013. To Say What the Law of the EU Is: Methods of Interpretation and the European Court of Justice. AEL 2013/9 Academy of European Law Distinguished Lectures of the Academy.Google Scholar

Mancini, Federico. 1989. ‘The Making of a Constitution for Europe’. Common Market Law Review 26 (4): 595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marceau, Gabrielle (ed.). 2015. A History of Law and Lawyers in the GATT/WTO – The Development of the Rule of Law in the Multilateral Trading System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros. 2012. Trade in Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mavroidis, Petros. 2016. Dispute Settlement in the WTO: Mind over Matter. Research Paper No. RSCAS 2016/04. Italy: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost. 2003. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law. How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pauwelyn, Joost. 2013. ‘The Balancing Act of Keeping Up “Respect” for AB Rulings (according to an AB Member)’. International Economic Law and Policy Blog 15 February 2013.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard. 2004–05. ‘Law and Economics of Contract Interpretation’. Texas Law Review 83: 1581, 1583.Google Scholar

Roessler, Frieder. 2015. ‘Changes in the Jurisprudence of the WTO Appellate Body during the Past Twenty Years’. Working Paper 2015/72. Italy: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Global Governance Programme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubini, Luca. 2009. The Definition of Subsidy and State Aid: WTO Law and EC Law in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubini, Luca. 2012. ‘Ain’t Wastin’ Time No More. Subsidies for Renewable Energy, the SCM Agreement, Policy Space, and Law Reform’. Journal of International Economic Law 15 (2): 525, 541–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubini, Luca. 2014. ‘The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Lessons on Methodology in Legal Analysis from the Recent WTO Litigation on Renewable Energy Subsidies’. Journal of World Trade 48 (5): 895–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubini, Luca. 2015. ‘The Wide and the Narrow Gate. Benchmarking in the SCM Agreement after the Canada – Renewable Energy/FIT Ruling’. World Trade Review 14 (2): 211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubini, Luca. 2016. What Shapes the Law? Reflections on the History, Law, Politics and Economics of International and European Subsidy Disciplines. Italy: European University Institute, Global Governance Programme.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Greg. 2016. Will the US Undermine the World Trade Organization? The World Post.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shlomo-Agon, Sivan. 2015. ‘Clearing the Smoke: The Legitimation of Judicial Power at the WTO’. Journal of World Trade 49 (4): 539–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sinclair, Ian. 1984. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Stewart, Terence P., McDonough, Patrick J., Smith, Jennifer M., and Jorgensen, Sandra K. 2013. ‘The Increasing Recognition of Problems with WTO Appellate Body Decision-Making: Will the Message Be Heard?’ Global Trade and Customs Journal 8 (11/12): 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sykes, Alan O. 2010. ‘The Questionable Case of Subsidy Regulation: A Comparative Analysis’. Journal of Legal Analysis 2 (2): 473–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarullo, Dan K. 1986–87. ‘Beyond Normalcy in the Regulation of International Trade’. Harvard Law Review 100: 546, 570–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Damme, Isabelle. 2009a. ‘Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, and Interpretation’. In The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law, edited by Bethlemen, David, McRae, Donald, Neufeuld, Rodney and Van Damme, Isabelle, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 298, 326.Google Scholar

Van Damme, Isabelle. 2009b. Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Damme, Isabelle. 2010. ‘Treaty Interpretation by the WTO Appellate Body’. European Journal of International Law 21 (3): 605, 608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van den Bossche, Peter. 2006. ‘From Afterthought to Centrepiece: the WTO Appellate Body and Its Rise to Prominence in the World Trading System’. In The WTO at Ten, edited by Sacerdoti, Giorgio, Yanovic, Alan, and Bohanes, Jan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 289–325.Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph. 2000. The EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA – Towards a Common Law of International Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Weiler, Joseph. 2013. ‘Epilogue: Judging the Judges – Apology and Critique’. In Judging Europe’s Judges – The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice, edited by Adams, Maurice, de Waele, Henri, Meeusen, Johan and Straetmans, Gert. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 235.Google Scholar