Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:52:09.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Does Trade Comply?

The Economic Effect(iveness) of the WTO Dispute Settlement Process

from Part III - General Trends and Patterns in WTO Dispute Settlement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2017

By
Soo Yeon Kim  and
Tobias Hofmann
Edited by
Manfred Elsig ,
Bernard Hoekman  and
Joost Pauwelyn
Manfred Elsig
Affiliation:
World Trade Institute, Universität Bern, Switzerland
Bernard Hoekman
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Florence
Joost Pauwelyn
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Assessing the World Trade Organization
Fit for Purpose?
 , pp. 175 - 200
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. ‘The Concept of Legalization’. International Organization 54 (3): 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, Scott L. and Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 2007. ‘Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members International Trade?’ Journal of International Economics 71 (1) 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, Jagdish. 1988. Protectionism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bechtel, Michael M. and Sattler, Thomas. 2015. ‘What Is Litigation in the World Trade Organization Worth?’ International Organization 69 (2): 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bello, Judith H. and Holmer, Alan F. 1998. ‘GATT Dispute Settlement Agreement: Internationalization v. Elimination of Section 301’. International Lawyer 26: 795–803.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. 2004. ‘On the Economic Success of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement’. Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 811–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. 2010. ‘Temporary Trade Barriers Database’. World Bank. Available online at http://go.worldbank.org/W5AGKE6DH0.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2001. ‘Bargaining in the Shadow of Law: Early Settlements in GATT/WTO Disputes’. Fordham International Law Journal 24: 158–172.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2002. ‘Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement’. In The Political Economy of International Trade Law. Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, edited by Kennedy, Daniel and Southwick, James, 457–481. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2003. ‘Developing Countries and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement’. Journal of World Trade 37: 719–735.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2006. ‘Three’s a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement’. World Politics 58: 446–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büthe, Tim and Milner, Helen V. 2008. ‘The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements?’ American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 741–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, James and Campbell, Karen. 1998. Dispute Resolution in the World Trade Organization. London: Cameron May.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram and Handler Chayes, Antonia. 1993. ‘On Compliance’. International Organization 47: 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudoin, Stephen, Kucik, Jeffrey, and Pelc, Krzysztof. 2016. ‘Do WTO Disputes Actually Increase Trade?’ International Studies Quarterly, 60 (2): 294–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan. 2007. International Institutions and National Policies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Christina L. and Blodgett Bermeo, Sarah. 2009. ‘Who Files? Developing Country Participation in GATT/WTO Adjudication’. Journal of Politics 71: 1033–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M. and Barsoom, Peter N. 1996. ‘Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation?’ International Organization 50: 379–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esserman, Susan and Howse, Robert. 2003. ‘The WTO on Trial’. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2003-01-01/wto-trial.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Roger. 1981. Improving Compliance with International Law. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne and Kim, SooYeon. 2005. ‘An Exclusive Country Club: The Effects of the GATT on Trade, 1950–94’. World Politics 57: 453–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinols, Earl L. and Perrelli, Robert. 2002. ‘Politics, the WTO, and Trade Disputes: Evidence from US Cases’. Pacific Economic Review 7 (2): 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinols, Earl L. and Perrelli, Roberto. 2006. ‘The WTO Impact on International Trade Disputes: An Event History Analysis’. Review of Economics and Statistics 88: 613–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew and Simmons, Beth A. 2002. ‘To Settle or Empanel? An Empirical Analysis of Litigation and Settlement at the World Trade Organization’. Journal of Legal Studies 16: 205–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, Andrew and Simmons, Beth A. 2005. ‘Power Plays and Capacity Constraints: The Selection of Defendants in World Trade Organization Disputes’. Journal of Legal Studies 34: 557–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M. 2005. ‘Trading Human Rights: How Preferential Trade Agreements Influence Government Repression’. International Organization 59: 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, Carsten and Sprinz, Detlef F. 2000. ‘Measuring the Effectiveness of International Environmental Regimes’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45: 630–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Tobias and Kim, SooYeon. 2010. The Domestic Politics of Compliance: Explaining Time-to-Compliance in WTO Disputes. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Tobias, and Kim, SooYeon. 2011. Picking Fights: Rising Powers in WTO Disputes. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Tobias and Schaffer, Lena M. 2009. Currency Unions and the Demand for Protection. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hollyer, James R. and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2011. ‘Why Do Authoritarian Regimes Sign the Convention Against Torture? Signaling, Domestic Politics and Non-Compliance’. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6: 275–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Henrik and Mavroidis, Petros C. 2008. The WTO Dispute Settlement Data Set 1995–2006. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Nordström, Hakan. 1999. ‘Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?’ CEPR Discussion Paper 2340.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H. 2000. The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO: Insights on Treaty Law and Economic Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, John H. 2001. ‘The Role and Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism’. In Brookings Trade Forum: 2000, edited by Dollins, Susan M. and Rodrik, Dani, 179–219. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kono, Daniel Y. 2006. ‘Optimal Obfuscation: Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency’. American Political Science Review 100: 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucik, Jeffrey and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2016. ‘Measuring the Cost of Privacy: A Look at the Distributional Effects of Private Bargaining’. British Journal of Political Science, available on CJO2015. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvel, Howard P. and Ray, Edward J. 1984. ‘The Pattern of Protection in the Industrial World’. Review of Economics and Statistics 66: 452–458.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald. 1994. ‘Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance’. International Organization 48: 425–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2005. ‘Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights?’ Journal of Conflict Resolution 49: 925–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicita, Alessandro and Olarreaga, Marcelo. 2006. ‘Trade, Production and Protection 1976–2004’. World Bank Economic Review 21: 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peinhardt, Clint and Allee, Todd. 2012. ‘Failure to Deliver: The Investment Effects of US Preferential Economic Agreements’. World Economy 35: 757–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragosta, John, Joneja, Navin and Zeldovich, Mikhail. 2003. ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: The System Is Flawed and Must Be Fixed’. In International Lawyer 37 (3): 697–752.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Eric. 2000. Aggressive Multilateralism: The Determinants of GATT/WTO Dispute Initiation, 1948–1998. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Rose, Andrew K. 2004. ‘Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?’ American Economic Review 94: 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramanian, Arvind and Wei, Shang-Jin. 2007. ‘The WTO Promotes Trade, Strongly but Unevenly’. Journal of International Economics 72: 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Weiss, Edith and Jacobson, Harold K., (eds.). 1998. Engaging Countries: Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2009. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 4th edition. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Young, Michael K. 1995. ‘Dispute Resolution in the Uruguay Round: Lawyers Triumph over Diplomats’. International Lawyer 29: 389–409.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1979. Compliance and Public Authority: A Theory with International Applications. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×