Agamennone, Maurizio, “Risonanze interiori nella musica di Arvo Pärt,” Arte Organaria e Organistica (April–June 1997), 8–11.Google Scholar

Aquila, Dominic, “The Music of Arvo Pärt,” Image 2 (1992), 110–119.Google Scholar

Ballinger, Allan, “In Quest of the Sacred: Arvo Pärt and Sieben Magnificat-Antiphonen” (D.M.A. diss., University of Connecticut, 2013).Google Scholar

Banks, Frederick W, “Arvo Pärt’s Expression of Crisis: An Analysis of Credo (1968)” (Master’s thesis, University of Washington, 1995).Google Scholar

Bernhardt, Ross, “The Interrelationships of Text, Musical Form, and Tintinnabuli Technique in Arvo Pärt’s Berliner Messe and Litany, and Their Implications for Choral Rehearsal and Performance” (D.M.A. diss., Michigan State University, 1997).Google Scholar

Bishop, James, “A Performance Guide to Arvo Pärt’s Concerto Piccolo über B-A-C-H for Trumpet, Strings, Harpsichord, and Piano” (D.M.A. diss., University of North Texas, 2013), http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc283781/.Google Scholar

Bostonia, Marguerite, “Musical, Cultural, and Performance Structures in the Organ Works of Arvo Pärt” (D.M.A. diss., West Virginia University, 2009).Google Scholar

Bouteneff, Peter C., Out of Silence (Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Bowen, José, “The History of Remembered Innovation: Tradition and Its Role in the Relationship between Musical Works and Their Performances,” Journal of Musicology 11 (Spring 1993), 139–173.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Susan, “Arvo Paart,” Contact 26 (Spring 1983), 25–28.Google Scholar

Brauneiss, Leopold, “Arvo Pärt’s Tintinnabuli-Style: Contemporary Music toward a New Middle Ages?” Studies in Medievalism 13 (2005), 27–34.Google Scholar

Brauneiss, Leopold, “Grundsätzliches zum Tintinnabulistil Arvo Pärts,” Musiktheorie 16 (2001), 41–57.Google Scholar

Brauneiss, Leopold, “Music Archetypes: The Basic Elements of the Tintinnabuli Style,” in The Cambridge Companion to Arvo Pärt, 49–75.Google Scholar

Brauneiss, Leopold, “Pärts einfache kleine Regeln. Die Kompositionstechnik des Tintinnabuli Stils in systematischer Darstellung,” in Arvo Pärt: Die Musik des Tintinnabuli-Stils, ed. Conen, Hermann (Cologne: Dohr, 2006), 103–161.Google Scholar

Brauneiss, Leopold, “Die Rationalität des Heiligen Geistes Analytische Annäherungen an Arvo Pärt,” in Brauneiss, Zahlen zwischen Struktur und Bedeutung: Zehn analytische Studien zu Kompositionen von Josquin bis Ligeti und Pärt (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang-Verlag, 1997), 9–30.Google Scholar

Brauneiss, Leopold, “Tintinnabuli – eine Einführung,” in Arvo Pärt im Gespräch (Vienna: Universal Edition, 2010); 98–155; translated by Crowe, Robert as “Tintinnabuli: An Introduction,” in Restagno et al., Arvo Pärt in Conversation (London: Dalkey Archive Press, 2012), 107–162.Google Scholar

Buber, Martin, A Believing Humanism: My Testament, 1902–1965 (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1967).Google Scholar

Burkholder, Peter, “A Simple Model for Associative Musical Meaning,” in Approaches to Meaning in Music, ed. Almén, Byron and Pearsall, Edward (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006), 76–106.Google Scholar

Caldwell, John, and Boyd, Malcolm, “Stabat Mater dolorosa,” Grove Music Online.Google Scholar

Cargile, Kimberly Anne, “An Analytical Conductor’s Guide to the SATB A Cappella Works of Arvo Pärt” (D.M.A. diss., University of Southern Mississippi, 2008).Google Scholar

Carrara, Vittorio, “Dare calore al suono freddo dell’organo: colloquio con Arvo Pärt,” Arte Organaria e Organistica (April-June 1997), 12–13.Google Scholar

Carus, Louise, The Real St. Nicholas: Tales of Generosity and Hope from around the World (Wheaton, IL: Quest Books, 2002).Google Scholar

Cizmic, Maria, “Transcending the Icon: Spirituality and Postmodernism in Arvo Pärt’s Tabula Rasa and Spiegel im Spiegel,” Twentieth-Century Music 5, no. 1, March 1, 2008), 45–78.Google Scholar

Clarke, David, “Parting Glances,” Musical Times 134 (December 1993), 680–684.Google Scholar

Cobussen, Marcel, Thresholds: Rethinking Spirituality through Music (New York: Routledge, 2008).Google Scholar

Conen, Hermann (ed.), Arvo Pärt: Die Musik des Tintinnabuli-Stils (Cologne: Dohr-Verlag, 2006).Google Scholar

Cook, Nicholas, “Methods for Analyzing Recordings,” in The Cambridge Companion to Recorded Music, ed. Cook, Nicholas et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 221–245.Google Scholar

Cowgill, Rachel, “Sacred Music in Secular Times: Arvo Pärt, an Anachronism in the Twentieth Century?” (B.Mus. thesis, Goldsmiths College, University of London, 1989).Google Scholar

Current Biography Yearbook, 56th ed. (New York: H. Wilson Co., 1995).Google Scholar

d’Aguiar, Felipe Pinto, “Tintinnabulation under the Microscope,” unpublished paper, available at academia.edu.Google Scholar

Davidson, Joseph Frederick III, “Ancient Texts, New Voices” (D.M.A. thesis, University of California, 2002).Google Scholar

Dermann, Peter, “Un-er-hört: Johann Sebastian Bachs Präludium C-Dur im Credo von Arvo Pärt,” Musik & Bildung: Praxis Musikunterricht 2 (March-April 1997), 22–26.Google Scholar

Dobbs, Quincy Oad, “‘Holy Minimalism’: A Performer’s Analysis and Guide to the Solo Organ Works of Arvo Pärt” (D.M.A. diss., Arizona State University, 2000).Google Scholar

Dolp, Laura, “Arvo Pärt in the Marketplace,” in The Cambridge Companion to Arvo Pärt, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dolp, Laura, “The Silent Garden: Inventive Procedure and Ancient Principle in the Berlin Mass of Arvo Pärt” (Master’s thesis, Boston University, 1997).Google Scholar

Dolp, Laura (ed.), Arvo Pärt’s White Light: Media, Culture, Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Drobner, Hubertus R., The Fathers of the Church: A Comprehensive Introduction, trans. Schatzmann, Siegfried S. (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007).Google Scholar

Eichert, Randolf G., “Satztechnik: Form und Harmonik in der Musik von Arvo Pärt,“ Musiktheorie 14 (1999), 47–63.Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S., Four Quartets. Reprint edition (London: Faber & Faber, 1966).Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S., On Poetry and Poets (London: Faber & Faber, 1948).Google Scholar

Eliot, T. S., “Poetry and Drama,” in T. S. Eliot On Poetry and Poets (London: Faber & Faber, 1957), 75–95.Google Scholar

Elste, Martin, “An Interview with Arvo Pärt,” Fanfare 11 (March/April 1988), 337–341.Google Scholar

Elste, Martin, “Late- and Post-Soviet Music Scholarship and the Tenacious Ecumenicity of Christian Musics in Estonia,” Journal of Baltic Studies 39, no. 3 (September 2008), 239–262.Google Scholar

Engelhardt, Jeffers, “Arvo Pärt and the Idea of a Christian Europe: The Musical Effects and Affects of Post-Ideological Religion,” in Resounding Transcendence: Transitions in Music, Religion, and Ritual, ed. Engelhardt, Jeffers and Bohlman, Philip (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), 214–232.Google Scholar

Engelhardt, Jeffers, “Aural Icons: Multiple Ontologies and the Work of Recognition in Arvo Pärt’s Tintinnabuli Music,” unpublished paper (2010).Google Scholar

Engelhardt, Jeffers, “Perspectives on Pärt after 1980,” in The Cambridge Companion to Arvo Pärt, 29–48.Google Scholar

Fan, Denise, “The Musical Rhetoric in Arvo Pärt’s Te Deum” (unpublished term paper, Boston University).Google Scholar

Fink, Robert, “‘Rigoroso (♪ = 126)’: ‘The Rite of Spring’ and the Forging of a Modernist Performing Style,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 52, no. 2 (1999), 299–362.Google Scholar

Fischer, Kurt von, “Zur Johannes-Passion von Arvo Pärt,” Kirchenmusikalisches Jahrbuch 75 (1991), 133–138.Google Scholar

Fisk, Josiah, “The New Simplicity: The Music of Górecki, Tavener and Pärt,” Hudson Review 47 (Autumn 1994), 394–412.Google Scholar

Forrestal, John, “A Poet from the North: Arvo Pärt, Orient & Occident, and the Aural Architecture of His Orthodox Faith” (Master’s thesis, Boston University, 2014).Google Scholar

Forrestal, John, “Two Tangled Golden Threads: Arvo Pärt, His Tintinnabulation Technique and His Berliner Messe,” unpublished term paper, Berklee College of Music, 2011.Google Scholar

Frühwald, Wolfgang, “Die artistische Konstruktion des Volkstones. Zu Clemens Brentanos ‘Der Spinnerin Nachtlied,’” in Gedichte und Interpretationen. Band 3. Klassik und Romantik, ed. Segebrecht, Wulf (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1984), 268–279.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Truth and Method (New York: Continuum, 2004).Google Scholar

Gehring, Steven Wayne, “Religion and Spirituality in Late 20th Century Music: Arvo Pärt, Jonathan Harvey, and John Coltrane” (Ph.D. diss., Stony Brook University, 2011).Google Scholar

Gojowy, Detlef, “Arvo Pärt im sowjetischen Umfeld,” in Symposion Arvo Pärt: Rezeption und Wirkung seiner Musik, ed. Kautney, Oliver (Osnabrück, Germany: Electronic Publishing, 2001), www.epos.uos.de/music/templates/buch.php?id=3&page=/music/books/k/kauo001/pages/.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Clemens, “Text und Liturgie bei Arvo Pärt,” Musik als Text (Kassel, Germany: Bärenreiter, 1998), 416–422.Google Scholar

Graham, Daniel W., “Heraclitus,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), ed. Zalta, Edward N., http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/heraclitus/.Google Scholar

Greenbaum, Stuart, “Arvo Pärt’s Te Deum: A Compositional Watershed” (Ph.D. diss., University of Melbourne, 1999).Google Scholar

Hatzis, Christos, “Towards a New Musical Paradigm,” MikroPolyphonie 2 (July–December 1996).Google Scholar

Haydon, Geoffrey, John Tavener: Glimpses of Paradise (London: Victor Gollancz, 1995).Google Scholar

Helbig, Adriana, “Arvo Pärt: The Search for the Eternal Silence at the Heart of Sound” (B.A. thesis, Drew University, 1997).Google Scholar

Henderson, Lyn, “A Solitary Genius: The Establishment of Pärt’s Technique (1958–68),” Musical Times 149, no. 1904 (Autumn 2008): 81–88.Google Scholar

Hillier, Paul, Arvo Pärt, Oxford Studies of Composers (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Hillier, Paul, Arvo Pärt Collected Choral Works; Introduction by Paul Hillier (New York: Universal Edition, 2008).Google Scholar

Hillier, Paul, “Arvo Pärt – Magister Ludi,” Musical Times 130 (March 1989), 134–137.Google Scholar

Hillier, Paul, and Tormis, Tõnu, On Pärt (Copenhagen: Edition Samfundet, 2005).Google Scholar

Hoek, Klaas, “Orgelmuziek van Arvo Pärt,” Het Orgel 88, no. 4 (1992), 121–125.Google Scholar

Holm, Thomas Robert, “Analysis and Comparison of Three Major Vocal/Instrumental Works of Arvo Pärt: Passio, Miserere, and Litany” (D.M.A. diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998).Google Scholar

Hossfeld, Frank Lothar, and Zenger, Erich, Psalms 3: A Commentary on Psalms 101–150 (Hermeneia: A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible) (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Jarg, Tiia, “Arvo Pardi kvintetiino,” Teater. Muusika. Kino 12 (December 1994), 19–22.Google Scholar

Jourdain, Robert, Music, the Brain and Ecstasy: How Music Captures Our Imagination (New York: William Morrow & Co., 1997).Google Scholar

Kähler, Andreas Peer, “Radiating from Silence: The Works of Arvo Pärt Seen through the Musician’s Eyes,” in The Cambridge Companion to Arvo Pärt, 193–197.Google Scholar

Kareda, Saale, “Enigmatic Tintinnabuli: About Problems in Study of Pärt’s Tintinnabuli-Style,” Music in Estonia: Estonian Music Review, no. 5 (May 2003), 24–32.Google Scholar

Kautny, Oliver, “‛Alle Länder, in ihrer Verschiedenheit, sind eins …’ Der Schein des Orientalischen bei Arvo Pärt,” Neue Zeitschrift für Musik 2 (February 2003), 24–27.Google Scholar

Kautny, Oliver, “Arvo Pärts Passio und Johann Sebastian Bachs Johannespassion: Rezeptionsästhetische Perspektiven,” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft (March 1999), 198–222.Google Scholar

Kautny, Oliver, Arvo Pärt zwischen Ost und West: Rezeptionsgeschichte (Stuttgart: Metzler Verlag, 2002).Google Scholar

Kautny, Oliver, “Thema: Der Schein des Orientalischen bei Arvo Part,” Neue Zeitschrift für Musik 164, vo. 2 (2003), 24.Google Scholar

Kautny, Oliver (ed.), Arvo Pärt. Rezeption und Wirkung seiner Musik. Vorträge des Wuppertaler Symposiums 1999 (Osnabrück, Germany: University of Osnabrück, 1999), epos.uni-osnabrueck.de.Google Scholar

Kongwattananon, Oranit, “Arvo Pärt and Three Types of His Tintinnabuli Technique” (M.M. thesis, University of North Texas, 2012).Google Scholar

Kosak, Gerard J., “Arvo Pärt’s Summa: An Example of Systematic Construction” (M.Mus. thesis, Northern Arizona University, 1994).Google Scholar

Kramer, Lawrence, Interpreting Music (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Langager, Graeme, “The Tintinnabuli Compositional Style of Arvo Pärt” (M.M. thesis, California State University, Long Beach, 1997).Google Scholar

Langer, Susanne, Feeling and Form (New York: Scribner, 1953).Google Scholar

LaRue, Jan. Guidelines for Style Analysis, expanded 2nd edition, with Models for Style Analysis, a companion text, ed. LaRue, Marian Green (Sterling Heights, MI: Harmonie Park Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Leech-Wilkinson, Daniel, The Changing Sound of Music: Approaches to Studying Recorded Musical Performance (London: CHARM, 2009).Google Scholar

Leech-Wilkinson, Daniel, “Recordings and Histories of Performance Style,” in The Cambridge Companion to Recorded Music, ed. Cook, Nicholas et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 246–266.Google Scholar

LeWitt, Sol, “Paragraphs on Conceptual Art,” Artforum 10 (Summer 1967), 79–84.Google Scholar

Liebreich, Leon, “The Songs of Ascents and the Priestly Blessing,” Journal of Biblical Literature 74, no. 1, 33–34.Google Scholar

Lubow, Arthur, “The Sound of Spirit,” New York Times Magazine, October 15, 2010.Google Scholar

Maimets-Volt, Kaire, “Arvo Pärt’s Tintinnabuli Music in Film,” Music and the Moving Image 5, no. 1 (2003), 55–71.Google Scholar

Maimets-Volt, Kaire, “Mediating the ‘Idea of One’: Arvo Pärt’s Pre-existing Film Music” (Ph.D. diss., Estonian Academy of Music and Theatre, 2009).Google Scholar

Maler, Anabel, “Compound Tintinnabulation in the Music of Arvo Pärt” (M.A. thesis, McGill University, 2012).Google Scholar

Mann, Thomas, Death in Venice/Tristan/Tonio Kröger, ed. Lowe-Porter, H. T. (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1955).Google Scholar

Marion, Jean-Luc, God without Being (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Mattner, Lothar, “Arvo Pärt: Tabula Rasa,” Melos 47 (February 1985), 82–99.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Jamie, “An Interview with Arvo Pärt,” Musical Times 130 (March 1989), 134–137. Reprinted in Contemporary Music Review 12 (1995), 55–64. Page citations here are from the CMR version.Google Scholar

McClowry, Sean G., “The Song of the Convert: Religious Conversion and its Impact on the Music of Franz Liszt, Arvo Pärt, and John Coltrane” (Ph.D. diss., Princeton University, 2012).Google Scholar

Mellers, Wilfrid, “Arvo Pärt, God and Gospel: Passio Domini Nostri Iesu Christi Secundum Iohannem,” Contemporary Music Review 12 (1995), 35–48.Google Scholar

Mellers, Wilfrid, Celestial Music? Some Masterpieces of European Religious Music (Suffolk: Boydell & Brewer, 2002).Google Scholar

Meyer, Leonard, Emotion and Meaning in Music (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956).Google Scholar

Meyer, Leonard, Explaining Music: Essays and Explorations (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Mihkelson, Immo, “The Cradle of Tintinnabuli: 30 Years after the Historic Concert,” trans. Hazlehurst, Robin, Music and Literature, Issue One (Fall 2012), 15–18.Google Scholar

Mihkelson, Immo, “A Narrow Path to Truth: Arvo Pärt and the 1960s and 1970s in Soviet Estonia,” in The Cambridge Companion to Arvo Pärt, 10–28.Google Scholar

Moody, Ivan, “Arvo Pärt: Aspects of Spirituality, Music and Text in the 21st Century,” in Principles of Music Composing: Sacred Music, Proceedings of the 10th International Music Theory Conference (Vilnius: Lietuvos musikos ir teatro akadeija, 2011), 209–213.Google Scholar

Motte-Haber, Helga de la, “Helga de la Motte-Haber im Gesprach mit Arvo Pärt: Klang und Linie als Einheit,” in Controlling Creative Processes in Music, ed. Kopiez, Reinhard and Auhagen, Wolfgang (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1998), 229–241.Google Scholar

Motte-Haber, Helga de la, “Struktur als Programm: Analytische Bemerkungen zur Komposition Summa von Arvo Pärt,” in Nahe Und Distanz: Nachgedachte Musik der Gegenwart, ed. Gratzer, Wolfgang (Hofheim, Germany: Wolke, 1996), 14–25.Google Scholar

Motte-Haber, Helga de la, “Wenn Bach Bienen gezüchtet hätte … Über das Verhältnis von neuer und alter Musik im Werk on Arvo Pärt,” Positionen: Beiträge zur neuen Musik 24 (March 1995), 18–21.Google Scholar

Muzzo, Grace Kingsbury, “An Examination of the Compositional Approach in Arvo Pärt’s Te Deum and John Taverner’s Ikon of Light” (D.M.A. diss., University of Georgia, 2004).Google Scholar

Narmour, Eugene, The Analysis and Cognition of Melodic Complexity: The Implication-Realization Model (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).Google Scholar

Nolte, Ewald, and others, “Johann Pachelbel. 4 (vi),” ed. Macy, Laura, in Grove Music Online.Google Scholar

Normet, Leo, “The Beginning Is Silence,” Teater. Muusika. Kino 7 (1988), 19–31.Google Scholar

Pärt, Arvo, “Tintinnabuli – Flucht in die freiwillige Armut,” in Sowjetische Musik im Licht der Perestroika: Interpretationen, Quellentexte, Komponistenmonographien, ed. Danuser, Hermann, Gerlach, Hannelore, and Laaber, Jürgen Köchel (Laaber: Laaber Verlag, 1990), 269–270.Google Scholar

Pärt, Arvo, “Über Arvo Pärt,” Neue Zürcher Zeitung (September 27, 2003), 38.Google Scholar

Patrick, David, “Analysis of Summa by Arvo Pärt” (M.M. thesis, University of Cape Town, 2011).Google Scholar

Patten, Ryan, “Mein Weg hat Gipfel und Wellentäler” (unpublished term paper, Boston University, 2013).Google Scholar

Piatak, Richard Daniel, “The Tintinnabulation of Arvo Pärt: A Study of Style and Aesthetics” (M.M. thesis, Ohio State University, 2000).Google Scholar

Pinker, Steven, The Language Instinct (New York: HarperPerennial Modern Classics, 1994).Google Scholar

Pinkerton, David, “Minimalism, the Gothic Style, and Tintinnabulation in Selected Works of Arvo Pärt” (Master’s thesis, Duquesne University, 1996).Google Scholar

Quantrill, Peter, “The Face of the Unknown,” The Gramophone, December 10, 2010.Google Scholar

Quinn, Peter, “Arvo Pärt, Cantus in Memory of Benjamin Britten” (M.M. thesis, Goldsmiths College, University of London, 1991).Google Scholar

Quinn, Peter, “Muutumised: Andres Mustonen Arvo Pärdist ja iseendast,” Teater. Muusika. Kino 13 (November 1995), 33–40.Google Scholar

Quinn, Peter, “Out with the Old and in with the New: Arvo Pärt’s Credo,” Tempo, no. 211 (January 2000), 16.Google Scholar

Randalu, Ivalo, “Arvo Pärt in November 1978,” Teater. Muusika. Kino 7 (1988), 33–40.Google Scholar

Raun, Toivo U., Estonia and the Estonians, 2nd ed. (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Restagno, Enzo, Arvo Pärt allo specchio. Conversazioni, saggi e testimonianze (Milan: Il Saggiatore Collana Biblioteca, 2004).Google Scholar

Restagno, Enzo, Arvo Pärt peeglis vestlused, esseed ja artiklid, trans. Kangro, Maarja et al. (Tallinn: Eesti Entsüklopeediakirjastus, 2005).Google Scholar

Restagno, Enzo, and others, Arvo Pärt im Gespräch (Vienna: Universal Edition, 2010). Translated by Crowe, Robert as Arvo Pärt in Conversation (London: Dalkey Archive Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Robison, Clayne B., “Elements of Ethos and Pathos in Two Modern Choral Pieces, Arvo Pärt’s Magnificat and Dominick Argento’s Gloria” (B.A. thesis, Brigham Young University, 1993).Google Scholar

Robinson, Harlow, “Arvo Pärt and Medieval Modernism,” Stagebill (New York: Lincoln Center, November 1995).Google Scholar

Robinson, Thomas, “Analyzing Pärt,” in The Cambridge Companion to Arvo Pärt, 76–110.Google Scholar

Roeder, John, “Transformational Aspects of Arvo Pärt’s Tintinnabuli Music,” Journal of Music Theory, 55, no. 1 (2011), 1–41.Google Scholar

Rosma, Hedi, and others (eds.), In Principio: The Word in Arvo Pärt’s Music (Estonia: Arvo Pärt Centre, 2015).Google Scholar

Ross, Alex, The Rest Is Noise (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007).Google Scholar

Sandner, Wolfgang, “Der stille Ton,” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, September 1, 1984.Google Scholar

Sandner, Wolfgang, “Der stille Ton. Zu den Orchesterwerken von Arvo Pärt,” in Studien zur Instrumentalmusik: Lothar Hoffmann-Erbrecht zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. Bingmann, Anke et al. (Tutzing: Hans Schneide, 1988), 509–513.Google Scholar

Savall, Jordi, “A Conversation,” Music & Literature, no. 1 (Fall 2012), 7–14.Google Scholar

Savenko, Svetlana, “Musica Sacra of Arvo Pärt,” in Ex oriente … Ten Composers from the Former USSR, trans. Dunlop, Carolyn (Berlin: Verlag Ernst Kuhn, 2002).Google Scholar

Schenbeck, Lyn, “Discovering the Choral Music of Estonian Composer Arvo Pärt,” Choral Journal, 34, no. 1 (1993), 23–30.Google Scholar

Schmelz, Peter J., Such Freedom, If Only Musical: Unofficial Soviet Music during the Thaw (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Schubert, Werner, “Die lateinische Sprache in der Musik des 20. Jahrhunderts. III: Arvo Pärt,” International Journal of Musicology 6 (1997), 413–427.Google Scholar

Schwarz, K. Robert, Minimalists (London: Phaidon Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Shenton, Andrew, “Arvo Pärt’s Organ Music,” American Organist 45 (December 2010), 76–78.Google Scholar

Shenton, Andrew, “Composer as Performer, Recording as Text,” in Messiaen Studies, ed. Sholl, Robert (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011), 168–187.Google Scholar

Shenton, Andrew, “De orgelcomposities van Arvo Pärt: Minimal music met een spirituele laag,” Timbres 10 (Summer 2011), 38–43.Google Scholar

Shenton, Andrew, “For Whom the Bells Toll: Arvo Pärt’s Passio, Metamodernism and the Appealing Promise of Tintinnabulation,” in Contemporary Music and Spirituality, ed. Sholl, Robert and van Maas, Sander (New York: Routledge, 2016), 17–36.Google Scholar

Shenton, Andrew, “Magnificat: Arvo Pärt the Quiet Evangelist,” in Exploring Christian Song, ed. Bloxam, M. Jennifer and Shenton, Andrew (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2017), 155–170.Google Scholar

Shenton, Andrew, “Musical Settings of the Passion Texts,” in Engaging the Passion: Perspectives on the Death of Jesus, ed. Yarborough, Larry (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2014), 111–148.Google Scholar

Shenton, Andrew, “Performing Pärt,” in Arvo Pärt’s White Light: Media, Culture, Politics, ed. Dolp, Laura (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 212–237.Google Scholar

Shenton, Andrew (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Arvo Pärt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Sholl, Robert, “Arvo Pärt and Spirituality,” in The Cambridge Companion to Arvo Pärt, 140–158.Google Scholar

Sholl, Robert, and van Maas, Sander (eds.), Contemporary Music and Spirituality (New York: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Shvets, Anna, “Interactive Application for Visualisation of the Form of Written Postmodern Music,” 2014, www.researchgate.net.Google Scholar

Shvets, Anna, “Mathematical Bases of the Form Construction in Arvo Pärt’s Music,” Lietuvos muzikologija 15 (2014), 88–101.Google Scholar

Shvets, Anna, “Mein Weg of Arvo Pärt in the Context of Postmodernism,” Scientific Almanac of Lviv University, Series: Art Studies (2012), 31–44.Google Scholar

Shvets, Anna, and Santana, Charles de Paiva, “Modelling Arvo Pärt’s Music with Open Music,” 2014, www.researchgate.net.Google Scholar

Siitan, Toomas, “Introduction,” in The Word in Arvo Pärt’s Music (Tallinn: Arvo Pärt Centre, 2012).Google Scholar

Silvana, Chiesa, “Un progetto di analisi stilistica dello Stabat Mater di Arvo Pärt” [A Project for Stylistic Analysis of Arvo Pärt’s Stabat Mater], Analisi 6, no. 18 (September 1995), 12–21.Google Scholar

Simon, Allen H., “Deterministic Techniques in Arvo Pärt’s Magnificat,” Choral Journal 37 (October 1996), 21–24.Google Scholar

Skipp, Benjamin, “The Minimalism of Arvo Pärt: An ‘Antidote’ to Modernism and Multiplicity?” in The Cambridge Companion to Arvo Pärt, 159–176.Google Scholar

Smith, Geoffrey J., “Sources of Invention: An Interview with Arvo Pärt,” Musical Times 140 (Autumn 1999), 19–25.Google Scholar

Smith, Huston, The Illustrated World’s Religions (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1986).Google Scholar

Sophrony, Archimandrite, The Monk of Mount Athos: Staretz Silouan (1866–1938) (London: Mowbrays, 1973).Google Scholar

Sophrony, Archimandrite, Wisdom from Mount Athos: The Writings of Staretz Silouan, 1866–1938, trans. Edmonds, Rosemary (Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Steiner, George, Real Presences (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Sylvan, Robin, Traces of the Spirit: The Religious Dimensions of Popular Music (New York: NYU Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Tarling, Judy, The Weapons of Rhetoric: A Guide for Musicians and Audiences (St. Alban’s: Corda Music, 2004).Google Scholar

Urmet, Jaak, Enn Vetemaa: Mees Nagu Saksofon (Enn Vetemaa: A Man like the Saxophone) (Estonia: Tänapäev, 2012), 111–117.Google Scholar

Vahter, Artur, and Normet, Leo, Music in the Estonian SSR, trans. Liiv, G. (Tallinn: Eesti Raamat, 1965).Google Scholar

Vermeulen, Timotheus, and van den Akker, Robin, “Notes on Metamodernism,” Journal of Aesthetics and Culture 2 (2010), 2; http://aestheticsandculture.net/index.php/jac/article/view/5677/6304.Google Scholar

Vishio, Anton, “Asymmetries in Post-Tonal Counterpoint” (Ph.D. diss. Harvard University, 2008).Google Scholar

von Fischer, Kurt, “Zur Johannes-Passion von Arvo Pärt,” Kirchenmusikalisches Jahrbuch 75 (1991), 133–138.Google Scholar

Vuorinen, Mark, “Symbolic Chiasm in Arvo Pärt’s Passio (1982),” unpublished paper, 2010.Google Scholar

Wallrabenstein, Wolfram , “Arvo Pärt: Cantus in memoriam Benjamin Britten. Zur Bedeutung von Assoziativität und Subjektivität im Erkenntnisprozeß – Beispiele aus der Unterrichtspraxis,” Zeitschrift für Musikpädagogik 31 (October 1985), 13–31.Google Scholar

Wallrabenstein, Wolfram, “Arvo Pärt hören. Texte und Materialien zur Hörbegegung mit Pärts Collage über B-A-C-H,” Musik und Unterricht 2 (July 1991), 31–35.Google Scholar

Wallrabenstein, Wolfram, “Schüler interpretieren die Collage über B-A-C-H von Arvo Pärt. Sinnerschließung von Musik durch kontemplatives Hören (Alle Schulformen der Sekundarstufe I und II),” in Spiel-Räume fürs Leben: Musikerziehung in einer gefährdeten Welt, ed. Ehrenforth, Karl Heinrich (Mainz: Schott, 1989), 137–139.Google Scholar

Ward, Benedicta, The Desert Christian: Sayings of the Desert Fathers: The Alphabetical Collection (New York: Macmillan, 1980).Google Scholar

Whiteman, Carol L. Matthews, “Passio: The Iconography of Arvo Pärt” (Ph.D. diss., City University of New York, 1997).Google Scholar

Wieczorek, Anna, “Te Deum Arvo Pärta: Między kompozytorskim métier a gatunkowymarché,” Kwartalnik Młodych Muzykologów 23, no. 4 (2014), 4–20.Google Scholar

Wimsatt, William K. and Beardsley, Monroe C., “The Intentional Fallacy,” Sewanee Review 54 (1946), 468–488. Revised and republished in The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1954).Google Scholar

Wolf, Eric R., “The Virgin of Guadalupe: A Mexican National Symbol,” Journal of American Folklore 71, no. 279 (January–March 1958), 34–39.Google Scholar

Wong, Hoi Sze Susanna, “Timbre and Tintinnabulation in the Music of Arvo Pärt” (M.Phil. thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2001).Google Scholar

Wrathall, Sarah, “Arvo Pärt’s Six Versions of Fratres: An Analysis and Comparison” (Honors thesis, Brigham Young University, 2000).Google Scholar

Wright, Robert J., A Companion to Bede: A Reader’s Commentary on The Ecclesiastical History of the English People (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2008).Google Scholar

Wright, Stephen, “Stylistic Development in the Works of Arvo Pärt, 1958–1985” (Master’s thesis, University of Western Ontario, 1992).Google Scholar