Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:56:32.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2020

Ana Kotarcic
Ana Kotarcic
Affiliation:
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Aristotle on Language and Style
The Concept of <I>Lexis</I>
 , pp. 182 - 203
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackrill, J. L. (1963), Aristotle’s Categories and De interpretatione (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. L. (1984), ‘De interpretatione’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, I (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 25–38.Google Scholar
Adam, J. (ed.), (1963), The Republic of Plato (2nd edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Adamik, T. (1984), ‘Aristotle’s theory of the period’, Philologus, 128(2), 184–201.Google Scholar
Ademollo, F. (2011), The Cratylus of Plato (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Alexiou, E. (2010), Der Evagoras des Isokrates: ein Kommentar (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Allan, D. J. (ed.), (1936), Aristotelis De Caelo (Oxford Classical Texts, Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Allan, K. (2004), ‘Aristotle’s footprints in the linguist’s garden’, Language Sciences, 26, 317–342.Google Scholar
Alonso, D. (1942), ‘The stylistic interpretation of literary texts’, Modern Language Notes, 57(7), 489–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, O. (2003), ‘Some problems of hypokrisis in Aristotle’s Rhetoric’, in Piltz, A. et al. (eds.), For particular reasons, studies in honour of Jerker Blomqvist (Lund: Nordic Academic Press), 19–32.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1981), An introduction to Plato’s Republic (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1982), ‘Knowledge and language: the Theaetetus and the Cratylus’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 95–114.Google Scholar
Anson, E. M. (2009), ‘Greek ethnicity and the Greek language’, Glotta, 85, 5–30.Google Scholar
Arens, H. (1984), Aristotle’s theory of language and its tradition: texts from 500 to 1750 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
Argyropoulos, R. D. and Caras, I. (1980), Inventaire des manuscripts grecs d’Aristote et de ses commentateurs (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Arnott, W. G. (1985), ‘Aristotle on comedy? Aristotle on comedy: towards a reconstruction of Poetics II by Richard Janko’, The Classical Review, n.s., 35(2), 304–306.Google Scholar
Atkinson, B. F. C. (1933), The Greek language (London: Faber & Faber).Google Scholar
Aubenque, P. (1957), ‘Sur la définition aristotélicienne de la colère’, Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Etranger, 147, 300–317.Google Scholar
Aubenque, P. (1962), Le problème de l’être chez Aristote (Paris: Presses universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1946), Mimesis. Dargestellte Wirklichkeit in der abendländischen Literatur (Bern: Francke).Google Scholar
Austin, C. and Olson, S. D. (eds.), (2004), Aristophanes Thesmophoriazusae (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1980), How to do things with words (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ax, W. (1986), Laut, Stimme und Sprache: Studien zu drei Grundbegriffen der antiken Sprachtheorie (Hypomnemata, Untersuchungen zur Antike und zu ihrem Nachleben; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Ax, W. (2000), Lexis und Logos (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner).Google Scholar
Bain, D. (1984), ‘Female speech in Menander’, Antichthon, 18, 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bally, C. (1945), Manuel d’accentuation grecque (Bern: Francke).Google Scholar
Bally, C. (1951), Traité de stylistique française, I–II (Genève: Librairie Georg).Google Scholar
Bally, Ch., Sechehaye, A., Reidlinger, A. (eds.), (1959), Ferdinand de Saussure Course in general linguistics. Translated by Wade Baskin (New York: The Philosophical Library).Google Scholar
Barcroft, J., Sunderman, G., and Schmitt, N. (2011), ‘Lexis’, in Simpson, J. (ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (London: Routledge), 571–583.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1971), ‘Homonymy in Aristotle and Speusippus’, The Classical Quarterly, n.s., 21(1), 65–80.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1984), ‘Posterior Analytics’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, I (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 114–166.Google Scholar
Barney, R. (2001), Names and nature in Plato’s Cratylus (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Basset, L. (2003), ‘Aristote et la syntaxe’, in Swiggers, P. and Wouters, A. (eds.), Syntax in antiquity (Leuven: Peeters), 43–60.Google Scholar
Bates, W. N. (1937), ‘Notes on the text of Aristotle’s Poetics’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 68, 84–87.Google Scholar
Baxter, T. (1992), The Cratylus Plato’s critique of naming (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Beck, G. (1996), ‘Aristoteles und das Theorem der Drei-Funktionalität der Sprache’, Antike und Abendland, 42, 17–41.Google Scholar
Benoit, W. (1990), ‘Isocrates and Aristotle on rhetoric’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 20(3), 251–259.Google Scholar
Black, M. (1954), ‘Metaphor’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, n.s., 55, 273–294.Google Scholar
Black, M. (1962), Models and metaphors (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
Black, M. (1979), ‘More about metaphor’, in Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 19–43.Google Scholar
Blair, A. (1999), ‘Authorship in the popular “Problemata Aristotelis”’, Early Science and Medicine, 4(3), 189–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blass, F. (1901), Die Rhythmen der attischen Kunstprosa (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Blettner, E. (1983), ‘One made many and many made one: the role of asyndeton in Aristotle’s Rhetoric’, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 16(1), 49–54.Google Scholar
Blundell, S. (1995), Women in ancient Greece (London: British Museum Press).Google Scholar
Bonitz, H., Meyer, J. B., and Langkavel, B. A. (1870), Index Aristotelicus (Berlin: Reimer).Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. (2002), ‘Protagoras, l’orthoepeia et la justesse des noms’, in Dixsaut, M. and Brancacci, A. (eds.), Platon source des présocratiques (Paris: Vrin), 169–190.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. (1988), ‘Aristotle on comedy: towards a reconstruction of Poetics II by Richard Janko’, Mnemosyne, 4th ser., 41(1/2), 166–170.Google Scholar
Brixhe, C. (1988), ‘La langue de l’étranger non Grec chez Aristophane’, in Lonis, R. (ed.), L’étranger dans le monde Grec (Nancy: Presses universitaires de Nancy), 113–138.Google Scholar
Buck, C. D. (1955), The Greek dialects (Bristol: Bristol Classical Press).Google Scholar
Bühler, K. (1982), Sprachtheorie (Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer).Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1959), ‘στοιχεῖον. Eine semasiologische Studie’, Philologus, 103(1), 167–197.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1975), ‘Aristoteles im Theater: zur Datierung des 3. Buchs der “Rhetorik” und der “Poetik”’, Museum Helveticum: schweizerische Zeitschrift für klassische Altertumswissenschaft, 32(2), 67–72.Google Scholar
Burnet, J. (ed.), (1900–1907), Platonis opera, 5 vols. (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Bywater, I. (ed.), (1894), Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Calboli, G. (1998), ‘From Aristotelian lexis to elocutio’, A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 16(1), 47–80.Google Scholar
Caston, V. and Labarrière, J.-L. (1997), ‘Pourquoi Aristote a besoin de l’imagination’, Les Études philosophiques, 1 (Aristote sur l’imagination), 3–39.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. and Trudgill, P. (1998), Dialectology (2nd edn.; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. (1956), ‘Different meanings of the term energeia in the philosophy of Aristotle’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 17(1), 56–65.Google Scholar
Chen, C. (1982), ‘Onomatopoeia in the Cratylus’, Apeiron: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science, 16(2), 86–101.Google Scholar
Chiesa, C. (1986), ‘Symbole et signe dans le De interpretatione’, Philosophie du langage et grammaire dans l’antiquité – Cahier du groupe de recherches sur la philosophie et le langage, 6–7, 203–218.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1976), ‘The study of language amongst Socrates’ contemporaries’, in Classen, C. J. (ed.), Sophistik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 215–247.Google Scholar
Clayton, E. W. (2004), ‘The audience for Aristotle’s Rhetoric’, Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 22(2), 183–203.Google Scholar
Colvin, S. (2014), A brief history of ancient Greek (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar
Consigny, S. (1987), ‘Transparency and displacement: Aristotle’s concept of rhetorical clarity’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 17(4), 413–419.Google Scholar
Cooper, L. (1924), An Aristotelian theory of comedy (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Cope, E. M. (1856), ‘On the sophistical rhetoric’, Journal of Classical and Sacred Philology, 3, 34–80.Google Scholar
Cope, E. M. (1867), An introduction to Aristotle’s Rhetoric: with analysis, notes and appendices (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Cope, E. M. and Sandys, J. E. (eds.), (1877), Aristotle: Rhetoric, 3 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Coseriu, E. (1969), Geschichte der Sprachphilosophie: von den Anfängen bis Rousseau (Tübingen: Gunter Narr).Google Scholar
Couloubaritsis, L. (1987), ‘λέξις et διήγησις dans la République, II–III’, in Servais, J., Hackens, T., and Servais-Soyez, B. (eds.), Stemmata, Mélanges de philologie, d’histoire et d’archéologie grecques offerts à Jules Labarbe (Brussels: Antiquité Classique), 101–109.Google Scholar
Crespo, E. (2010), ‘The significance of Attic for the continued evolution of Greek’, in Caragounis, C. C. (ed.), Greek, a language in evolution (Zurich: Olms), 119–136.Google Scholar
Crisp, R. (ed.), (2000), Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Crowley, T. (2005), ‘On the use of stoicheion in the sense of “element”’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 29, 367–394.Google Scholar
Crowley, T. (2008), ‘Aristotle’s “So-called elements”’, Phronesis, 53(3), 223–242.Google Scholar
Dahiyat, I. M. (1974), Avicenna’s commentary on the Poetics of Aristotle (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1984), Inquiries in truth and interpretation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Daylight, R. (2011), What if Derrida was wrong about Saussure (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
De Cremoux, A. (2013), ‘Les figures de poètes et la définition de la philosophia isocratique: quelques remarques’, in Vial, H. and Favreau-Linder, A. (eds.), Poètes et orateurs dans l’antiquité (Clermont-Ferrand: Presses universitaires Blaise-Pascal), 75–87.Google Scholar
De Cuypere, L. and Willems, K. (2008), ‘Meaning and reference in Aristotle’s concept of the linguistic sign’, Foundations of Science, 13(3/4), 307–324.Google Scholar
De Jong, I. (1987), Narrators and focalizers: the presentation of the story in the Iliad (Amsterdam: Grüner).Google Scholar
De Jong, I. (2005), ‘Aristotle on the Homeric narrator’, The Classical Quarterly, 55(2), 616–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jonge, C. C. (2008), Between grammar and rhetoric (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
De Jonge, C. C. (2014), ‘Style (“léxis”), Ancient Theories of’, in Giannakis, G. K. et al. (eds.), Encyclopedia of ancient Greek language and linguistics, III (Leiden: Brill), 326–331.Google Scholar
De Jonge, C. C. (2015), ‘Grammatical theory and rhetorical teaching’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s companion of ancient Greek scholarship, I (Leiden: Brill), 981–1011.Google Scholar
De Jonge, C. C. and Van Ophuijsen, J. M. (2010), ‘Greek philosophers on language’, in Bakker, E. (ed.), A companion to the Ancient Greek language (Oxford: Blackwell), 485–498.Google Scholar
De Pater, W. A. and Swiggers, P. (2000), Taal en teken (Leuven: Universitaire Pers Leuven).Google Scholar
De Rijk, L. M. (2002), Aristotle semantics and ontology, 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Denniston, J. D. (1954), The Greek particles (2nd edn.; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1972a), De la grammatologie (Paris: Minuit).Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1972b), Marges de la philosophie (Paris: Minuit).Google Scholar
DeWitt, N. W. and DeWitt, N. J. (eds.), (1986), Demosthenes, VII (Loeb Classical Library; London: William Heinemann).Google Scholar
Di Cesare, D. (1991), ‘Die Geschmeidigkeit der Sprache: zur Sprachauffassung und Sprachbetrachtung der Sophistik’, in Schmitter, P. (ed.), Geschichte der Sprachtheorie 2, Sprachtheorien der abendländischen Antike (Tübingen: Gunter Narr), 87–117.Google Scholar
Di Lascio, E. V. (2013), ‘The theoretical rationale behind Aristotle’s classification of linguistic fallacies in the Sophisticial Refutations’, in Rapp, C. and Hasper, P. (eds.), Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, XV (Münster: mentis), 55–89.Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (1996), Greek forms of address: from Herodotus to Lucian (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2007), Ancient Greek scholarship (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dickey, E. (2010), ‘Forms of address and markers of status’, in Bakker, E. (ed.), A companion to the Ancient Greek language (Oxford: Blackwell), 327–337.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1899), Elementum: Eine Vorarbeit zum griechischen und lateinischen Thesaurus (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1968), ‘Über das dritte Buch der Aristotelischen Rhetorik’, in Stark, R. (ed.), Rhetorika (Hildesheim: Olmssbuchhandlung), 1–32.Google Scholar
Diels, H. and Kranz, W. (eds.), (1964), Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker: griechisch und deutsch, 3 vols. (2 edn.; Zurich and Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar
Dilts, M. R. (ed.), (2009), Demosthenis Orationes, IV (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dittmeyer, L. (ed.), (1907), Aristotelis De animalibus historia (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Dorion, L. (ed.), (1995), Aristote Les réfutations sophistiques (Paris: Presses de l’Université Laval).Google Scholar
Dornseiff, F. (1921), Pindars Stil (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1997), The evolution of Greek prose style (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dow, J. (2007), ‘A supposed contradiction about emotion-arousal in Aristotle’s “Rhetoric”’, Phronesis, 52(4), 382–402.Google Scholar
Dow, J. (2008), ‘The role of emotion-arousal in Aristotle’s Rhetoric’, PhD (University of St Andrews). http://hdl.handle.net/10023/501 [accessed 4 May 2012].Google Scholar
Dow, J. (2015), Passions and persuasion in Aristotle’s Rhetoric (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Drossaart Lulofs, H. J. (ed.), (1965), Aristotelis De generatione animalium (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Druart, T. (1968), ‘La notion de “stoicheïon” (élément) dans le “Théétète” de Platon’, Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 66(91), 420–434.Google Scholar
Dufour, M. and Wartelle, A. (eds.), (1932), Aristote Rhétorique, III (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Dupont-Roc, R. and Lallot, J. (eds.), (1980), Aristote: La poétique (Paris: Seuil).Google Scholar
Dupréel, E. (1948), Les sophistes (Neuchâtel: Griffon).Google Scholar
Düring, I. (1957), Aristotle in the ancient biographical tradition (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell).Google Scholar
Ebbesen, S. (1981), Commentaries and commentators on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi: A study of post-Aristotelian ancient and medieval writings on fallacies, I (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Elden, S. (2005), ‘Reading logos as speech: Heidegger, Aristotle and rhetorical politics’, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 38(4), 281–301.Google Scholar
Else, G. F. (1957a), Aristotle’s ‘Poetics’: the argument (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Else, G. F. (1957b), ‘The origin of ΤΡΑΓΩΙΔΙΑ’, Hermes, 85(1), 17–46.Google Scholar
Else, G. F. (1986), Plato and Aristotle on poetry (Chapel Hill, NC and London: The University of North Carolina Press).Google Scholar
Emlyn-Jones, C. and Preddy, W. (eds.), (2013), Plato, Republic books 1–5 (Loeb Classical Library, London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
Enkvist, N. E. (1964), ‘On defining style’, in Enkvist, N. E., Spencer, J., and Gregory, M. J. (eds.), Linguistics and style (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 3–56.Google Scholar
Enkvist, N. E. (1971), ‘On the place of style in some linguistic theories’, in Chatman, S. (ed.), Literary style: a symposium (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 47–64.Google Scholar
Ernesti, H. C. G. (1983), Lexicon Technologicae Graecorum Rhetoricae (Hildesheim: Olms ).Google Scholar
Fahnestock, J. (2000), ‘Aristotle and theories of figuration’, in Gross, A. G. and Walzer, A. E. (eds.), Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press), 166–184.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. (2017), Commentators on Aristotle. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-commentators/ [accessed 26 January 2018].Google Scholar
Fehling, D. (1976), ‘Protagoras und die ὀρθοέπεια’, in Classen, C. J. (ed.), Sophistik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 341–347.Google Scholar
Femenias, M. L. (1994), ‘Women and natural hierarchy in Aristotle’, Hypatia, 9(1), 164–172.Google Scholar
Fine, G. (1977), ‘Plato on naming’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 27(109), 289–301.Google Scholar
Flacelière, R. (1965), Daily life in Greece at the time of Pericles, trans. P. Green (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson).Google Scholar
Flashar, H. (2013), Aristoteles Lehrer des Abendlandes (Munich: Beck).Google Scholar
Fleming, T. (2006), ‘The origin of the period’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica, n.s., 82(1), 95–102.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2010), ‘Female speech’, in Bakker, E. (ed.), A companion to the Ancient Greek language (Oxford: Blackwell), 311–326.Google Scholar
Forbes, P. B. R. (1933), ‘Greek pioneers in philology and grammar’, The Classical Review, 47(3), 105–112.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1986), ‘Aristotle on comedy: towards a reconstruction of Poetics II by Richard Janko’, The Classical World, 79(6), 426.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2013), ‘The poetics of dithyramb’, in Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Dithyramb in context (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 313–331.Google Scholar
Forster, E. S. (1984), ‘Problems’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, II (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 1319–1527.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1975), Aristotle on emotion (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1986), ‘Aristotle’s Platonic attitude toward delivery’, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 19(4), 242–254.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W. (1987), ‘Aristotle on comedy: towards a reconstruction of Poetics II by Richard Janko’, Classical Philology, 82(2), 156–164.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, W. W., Hugby, P. M., and Long, A. A. (eds.), (1985), Theophrastus of Eresus on his life and work (New Brunswick: Transaction).Google Scholar
Fortson, B. W. (2010), Indo-European language and culture (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1966), ‘Linguistic theory and the study of literature’, in Fowler, R. (ed.), Essays on style and language (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1972), ‘Style and the concept of deep structure’, Journal of Literary Semantics, 1, 5–24.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. (1982), ‘Aristotle on the period (Rhet. 3.9)’, The Classical Quarterly, n.s., 32(1), 89–99.Google Scholar
Frede, D. (1992), ‘The cognitive role of phantasia in Aristotle’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De anima (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 279–295.Google Scholar
Freese, J. H. (ed.), (1926), Aristotle The ‘art’ of rhetoric (Loeb Classical Library; London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (1996), Ideas of slavery from Aristotle to Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Garver, E. (2004), ‘Philosophy, rhetoric, and civic education in Aristotle and Isocrates’, in Poulakos, T. and Depew, D. (eds.), Isocrates and civic education (Austin: University of Texas Press), 186–213.Google Scholar
Gaudreault, A. (1989), ‘Mimésis et diègèsis chez Platon’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale, 94(1), 79–92.Google Scholar
Gerbrandy, P. and De Jonge, C. (2017), Aristoteles Poëtica (Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij).Google Scholar
Gigon, O. (1959), ‘Cicero und Aristoteles’, Hermes, 87(2), 143–162.Google Scholar
Gigon, O.(ed.), (1987), Aristotelis Opera; Volumen tertium librorum depreditorum fragmenta (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Giuliano, F. M. (2005), Platone e la poesia (St. Augustin: Academia).Google Scholar
Golden, L. (1986), ‘Aristotle on comedy: towards a reconstruction of Poetics II by Richard Janko’, The American Journal of Philology, 107(3), 440–442.Google Scholar
Golden, L. (1992), Aristotle on tragic and comic mimesis (American Philological Association, American Classical Studies; Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press).Google Scholar
Golden, M. (1990), Childhood in classical Athens (London: The Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Golden, M. (1995), ‘Baby talk and child language in ancient Greece’, in De Martino, F. and Sommerstein, A. (eds.), Lo spettacolo delle voci (Bari: Levante), 11–34.Google Scholar
Gomperz, H. (1976), ‘Sophistik und Rhetorik’, in Classen, C. J. (ed.), Sophistik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 21–37.Google Scholar
González, J. M. (2006), ‘The meaning and function of phantasia in Aristotle’s Rhetoric III.1’, Transactions of the American Philological Association, 136(1), 99–131.Google Scholar
Graff, R. (2001), ‘Reading and the “written style” in Aristotle’s “Rhetoric”’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 31(4), 19–44.Google Scholar
Graff, R. (2005), ‘Prose versus poetry in early Greek theories of style’, Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 23(4), 303–335.Google Scholar
Graham, D. and Barney, J. (2013), ‘Γραμματική in Plato and Aristotle’, Apeiron, 49, 1–13.Google Scholar
Grayeff, F. (1956), ‘The problem of the genesis of Aristotle’s text’, Phronesis, 1(2), 105–122.Google Scholar
Green, L. D. (2000), ‘Aristotelian lexis and Renaissance elocutio’, in Gross, A. G. and Walzer, A. E. (eds.), Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press), 149–165.Google Scholar
Greene, W. C. (1946), ‘Aristotle on metaphor’, The Classical Weekly, 39(12), 94–95.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, W. M. A. (1980), Aristotle, Rhetoric I, a commentary (New York: Fordham University Press).Google Scholar
Grimaldi, W. M. A. (1988), Aristotle, Rhetoric II, a commentary (New York: Fordham University Press).Google Scholar
Grintser, N. P. (2002), ‘Grammar of poetry (Aristotle and beyond)’, in Swiggers, P. and Wouters, A. (eds.), Grammatical theory and philosophy of language in antiquity (Leuven: Peeters), 71–99.Google Scholar
Gross, A. G. and Dascal, M. (2001), ‘The conceptual unity of Aristotle’s Rhetoric’, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 34(4), 275–291.Google Scholar
Gudeman, A. (ed.), (1934), Aristoteles Peri poietikes: mit Einleitung, Text und Adnotatio critica, exegetischem Kommentar, kritischem Anhang und Indices nominum, rerum, locorum (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. (1971), The Sophists (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1989a), ‘The archer scene in Aristophanes’ Thesmophoriazusae’, Philologus, 133, 38–54.Google Scholar
Hall, E. (1989b), Inventing the barbarian: Greek self-definition through tragedy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hall, J. M. (1995), ‘The role of language in Greek ethnicities’, in Hardie, P. R. and Oakley, S. P. (eds.), Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society), 83–100.Google Scholar
Hall, J. M. (1997), Ethnic identity in Greek antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1986), Aristotle’s Poetics: a study of philosophical criticism (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Halliwell, S.(ed.), (1987), The Poetics of Aristotle: translation and commentary (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1990a), ‘Aristotelian mimesis reevaluated’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 28(4), 487–510.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1990b), ‘The sounds of the voice in old comedy’, in Craik, E. M. (ed.), ‘Owls to Athens’: Essays on classical subjects presented to Sir Kenneth Dover (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 69–79.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1993), ‘Style and sense in Aristotle’s Rhetoric book 3’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 47, 50–69.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S.(ed.), (1995), Aristotle, Poetics (Loeb Classical Library; London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2001), ‘Aristotelian mimesis and human understanding’, in Anderson, Ø. and Haarberg, J. (eds.), Making sense of Aristotle: essays in poetics (London: Duckworth), 87–107.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2002), The aesthetics of mimesis: ancient texts and modern problems (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2008), Greek laughter: a study of cultural psychology from Homer to Early Christianity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2009), ‘The theory and practice of narrative in Plato’, in Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Narratology and Interpretation (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 15–41.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2011), Between Ecstasy and Truth (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1997), ‘Fifth-century Athenian and Augustan images of the barbarian other’, Classics Ireland, 4, 46–56.Google Scholar
Hardie, R. P. and Gaye, R. K. (1984), ‘Physics’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, I (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 315–446.Google Scholar
Hartmann, R. A. (2007), Philosophies of language and linguistics (Edinburgh: Haralex).Google Scholar
Hartog, F. (1988), The mirror of Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Haskins, E. V. (2000), ‘“Mimesis” between Poetics and Rhetoric: performance culture and civic education in Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 30(3), 7–33.Google Scholar
Haskins, E. V. (2004), Logos and power in Isocrates and Aristotle (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press).Google Scholar
Haskins, E. V. (2006), ‘Choosing between Isocrates and Aristotle: disciplinary assumptions and pedagogical implications’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 36(2), 191–201.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1989), ‘Aristotelian comedy’, The Classical Quarterly, n.s., 39(2), 344–354.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1996), Aristotle Poetics (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
Heath, M. (2008), ‘Aristotle on natural slavery’, Phronesis, 53(3), 243–270.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (2009a), ‘Codifications of rhetoric’, in Gunderson, E. (ed.), The Cambridge companion to ancient rhetoric (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 59–74.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (2009b), ‘Cognition in Aristotle’s “Poetics”’, Mnemosyne, 4th ser., 62(1), 51–75.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (2012), Ancient philosophical poetics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hellwig, A. (1973), Untersuchungen zur Theorie der Rhetorik bei Platon und Aristoteles (Hypomnemata, 38; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Hendricks, W. O. (1969), ‘Three models for the description of poetry’, Journal of Linguistics, 5(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L., Hubbell, H. M. (eds.), (1939), Cicero. Brutus. Orator (Loeb Classical Library; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Hesse, M. (1965), ‘Aristotle’s logic of analogy’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 15(61), 328–340.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, D. (2003), ‘Logos as composition’, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 33(3), 27–53.Google Scholar
Hogan, J. C. (1973), ‘Aristotle’s criticism of Homer in the Poetics’, Classical Philology, 68(2), 95–108.Google Scholar
Hordern, J. H. (2002), The fragments of Timotheus of Miletus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Horrocks, G. (1997), Greek: A history of the language and its speakers (London: Longman).Google Scholar
Hough, G. (1969), Style and stylistics (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. S. (1986), The virtues of Aristotle (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Innes, D. (1985), ‘Theophrastus and the theory of style’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W., Hugby, P. M. and Long, A. A. (eds.), Theophrastus of Eresus on his life and works (New Brunswick: Transaction), 251–267.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1981), ‘Homonymy in Aristotle’, The Review of Metaphysics, 34(3), 523–544.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. (1982), ‘Aristotle’s concept of signification’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 241–266.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (ed.), (1957), Aristotelis Metaphysica (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960), ‘Closing statements: linguistics and poetics’, in Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in language (Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press), 350–377.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1963), Essais de linguistique générale, I (Paris: Minuit).Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. and Halle, M. (1980), Fundamentals of language (The Hague: Mouton).Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. and Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962), ‘“Les Chats” de Charles Baudelaire’, L’Homme, 2(1), 5–21.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1984), Aristotle on comedy: towards a reconstruction of Poetics II (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Jenkinson, A. J. (1984), ‘Prior Analytics’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, I (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 39–113.Google Scholar
Joly, H. (1986), ‘Platon entre maître d’école et le fabriquant de mots. Remarques sur les “grammata”’, Philosophie du langage et grammaire dans l’antiquité – Cahier du groupe de recherches sur la philosophie et le langage, 6 and 7, 105–136.Google Scholar
Jowett, B. (1984), ‘Politics’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, II (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1986–2129.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1973), ‘Language and ontology in the Cratylus’, in Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D. and Rorty, R. M. (eds.), Exegesis and argument (Assen: Van Gorum & Co.).Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1986), ‘Les mots et les formes dans le “Cratyle” de Platon’, Philosophie du langage et grammaire dans l’antiquité – Cahier du groupe de recherches sur la philosophie et le langage, 6–7, 91–103.Google Scholar
Kannicht, R. (ed.), (2004), Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta, V (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Kassel, R. (ed.), (1965), Aristotelis De arte poetica liber (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kassel, R.(ed.), (1976), Aristotelis Ars rhetorica (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Keller, S. (2000), ‘An interpretation of Plato’s “Cratylus”’, Phronesis, 45(4), 284–305.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1957), ‘Theophrastus and stylistic distinctions’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 62, 93–104.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1958), ‘Aristotle on the period’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 63, 283–288.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1963), The art of persuasion in Greece (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1994), A new history of classical rhetoric (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Kerferd, G. B. (1981), The sophistic movement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Kirby, J. T. (1997), ‘Aristotle on metaphor’, The American Journal of Philology, 118(4), 517–554.Google Scholar
Kloss, G. (2001), Erscheinungsformen komischen Sprechens bei Aristophanes (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Koch, N. J. (2000), ‘Schema: zur Interferenz technischer Begriffe in Rhetorik und Kunstschriftstellerei’, International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 6(4), 503–515.Google Scholar
Koller, H. (1954), Die Mimesis in der Antike (Bern: Francke).Google Scholar
Koller, H. (1955), ‘Stoicheion’, Glotta, 34(3/4), 161–174.Google Scholar
Koller, H. (1959), ‘Das Modell der griechischen Logik’, Glotta, 38(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
Koster, J. (1996), ‘Saussure meets the brain’, in Jonkers, R., Kaan, E. and Wiegel, J. K. (eds.), Language and Cognition 5. Yearbook 1992 of the research group for linguistic theory and knowledge representation of Groningen (Groningen: University of Groningen), 115–120.Google Scholar
Kotarcic, A. (2015), ‘Aristotle’s concept of lexis – a theory of language and style’, PhD Thesis (University of St Andrews).Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.), (2013a), Dithyramb in context (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (2013b), ‘Introduction: the world of dithyramb’, in Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P. (eds.), Dithyramb in context (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1–27.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N. (1971), ‘Plato on the correctness of names’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 8(2), 126–138.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, N. (1974), ‘Aristotle on spoken sound significant by convention’, in Corcoran, J. (ed.), Ancient logic and its modern interpretations (Dordrecht: Reidel).Google Scholar
Kriz, A. (1961), ‘Die Aristotelische Lehre über den Begriff des stoicheion’, in Novotny, C. (ed.), Charisteria Francisco Novotny Octogenario Oblata (Prague: Statni pedagogicke nakladatelstvi), 131–141.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (2006), The social stratification of English in New York City (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Laistner, M. L. W. (ed.), (1927), Isocrates: De pace and Philippus (New York: Longmans, Green and Co.).Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973), ‘Language and woman’s place’, Language in Society, 2(1), 45–80.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975), Language and woman’s place (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
Lallot, J. (1988), ‘METAΦORA: le fonctionnement sémiotique de la métaphore selon Aristote’, in Ballack, J. et al. (eds.), Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage: la métaphore, actes du colloque du 14/15 octobre 1987, IX (Grenoble: Université des Sciences Sociales de Grenoble), 47–58.Google Scholar
Lallot, J.(ed.), (1989), La grammaire de Denys le Thrace (Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique).Google Scholar
Lallot, J.(ed.), (1998), La grammaire de Denys le Thrace: Traduite et annotée (Paris: CNRS).Google Scholar
Lallot, J. (2012), Études sur la grammaire alexandrine (Paris: Vrin).Google Scholar
Lapini, W. (2015), ‘Philological observations and approaches to language in the philosophical context’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s companion of ancient Greek scholarship, I (Leiden: Brill), 1012–1056.Google Scholar
Larkin, M. T. (1971), Language in the philosophy of Aristotle (The Hague: Mouton).Google Scholar
Lausberg, H. (1990), Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner ).Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, M. R. and Fant, M. B. (eds.), (2005), Women’s life in Greece and Rome (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Lennartz, K. (2010), Iambos: Philologische Untersuchungen zur Geschichte einer Gattung in der Antike (Wiesbaden: Reichert).Google Scholar
Leo, U. (1966), Stilforschung und dichterische Einheit (Munich: Hueber).Google Scholar
Lersch, L. (1838), Die Sprachphilosophie der Alten (Bonn: König).Google Scholar
Levin, S. R. (1982), ‘Aristotle’s theory of metaphor’, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 15(1), 24–46.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. T. and Short, C. (1879), A Latin Dictionary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lewis, F. (2004), ‘Aristotle on the homonymy of being’, Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, 68(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
Liddell, H. G. and Scott, R. (eds.), (1968), A Greek–English lexicon (rev. edn., ed. Jones, H. S. et al.; with a supplement, 1968; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lieb, H. (1981), ‘Das “semiotische Dreieck” bei Ogden und Richards: eine Neuformulierung des Zeichenmodells von Aristoteles’, in Trabant, J. (ed.), Logos Semantikos (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), 137–156.Google Scholar
Liske, M.-Th. (1991), ‘Kinesis und Energeia bei Aristoteles’, Phronesis, 36(2), 161–178.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1987), The revolutions of wisdom (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Lo Piparo, F. (1999), ‘II corpo vivente della Léxis e le sue parti annotazioni sulla linguistica di Aristotele’, Histoire Epistémologie Langage, 21(1), 119–132.Google Scholar
Lo Piparo, F. (2007), ‘Saussure et les Grecs’, Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 60, 139–162.Google Scholar
Long, H. S. (ed.), (1964), Diogenis Laertii Vitae philosophorum, 2 vols. (Oxford Classical Texts, I; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lord, C. (1974), ‘Aristotle’s history of poetry’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 104, 195–229.Google Scholar
Lord, C. (1981), ‘The intention of Aristotle’s “Rhetoric”’, Hermes, 109(3), 326–339.Google Scholar
Lord, C. (1986), ‘On the early history of the Aristotelian Corpus’, The American Journal of Philology, 107(2), 137–161.Google Scholar
Louis, P. (ed.), (1991), Aristote Problème, 3 vols. (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Lucas, D. W. (ed.), (1968), Aristotle Poetics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Luppe, W. (1991), ‘Das neue Fragment aus der Hypothesis zu Euripides’ “Melanippe Sophe”’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 89, 15–17.Google Scholar
Masters, R. D. (1977), ‘The case of Aristotle’s missing dialogues: who wrote the Sophist, the Statesman, and the Politics?’, Political Theory, 5(1), 31–60.Google Scholar
Mathieu-Castellani, G. (2001), ‘La colère d’Aristote: Défense et illustration d’un emportement plus doux que le miel …’, Littérature, 122, 75–89.Google Scholar
Matthaios, S. (1999), Untersuchungen zur Grammatik Aristarchs: Texte und Interpretation zur Wortartenlehre (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Mayhew, R. (ed.), (2011), Aristotle Problems (Loeb Classical Library; London: William Heinemann Ltd).Google Scholar
McClure, L. (1995), ‘Female speech and characterisation in Euripides’, in De Martino, F. and Sommerstein, A. (eds.), Lo spettacolo delle voci (Bari: Levante), 35–60.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. P. (1917), ‘On the second book of Aristotle’s Poetics and the source of Theophrastus’ definition of tragedy’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 28, 1–46.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1930), Aperçu d’une histoire de la langue Grecque (3rd edn.; Paris: Hachette).Google Scholar
Melberg, A. (1995), Theories of mimesis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1987a), Language and social networks (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1987b), Observing and analysing natural language: a critical account of sociolinguistic method (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Minio-Paluello, L. (ed.), (1956), Aristotelis Categoriae et liber De interpretatione (repr. from corr. sheets of the 1st edn., Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), (2015), Brill’s companion of ancient Greek scholarship, 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1951), Les listes anciennes des ouvrages d’Aristote (Louvain: Éditions universitaires de Louvain).Google Scholar
Moraux, P. and Wiesner, J. (eds.), (1983), Zweifelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelicum (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, A. (2002), ‘The Greek notion of dialect’, in Harrison, T. (ed.), Greeks and barbarians (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 153–171.Google Scholar
Morpurgo-Tagliabue, G. (1967), Linguistica e stilistica di Aristotele (Rome: Ateneo).Google Scholar
Müller, K. O. (1840), History of the literature of ancient Greece, I (London: Baldwin & Cradock).Google Scholar
Murray, G. (1946), Greek Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Netz, R. (2002), ‘On the Aristotelian paragraph’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 47, 211–231.Google Scholar
Newman, S. (2002), ‘Aristotle’s notion of “bringing-before-the-eyes”: Its contributions to Aristotelian and contemporary conceptualizations of metaphor, style, and audience’, Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 20(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Newman, S. (2005), Aristotle and style (New York: Edwin Mellen Press).Google Scholar
Noriega-Olmos, S. (2013), Aristotle’s psychology of signification (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Norlin, G. (ed.), (1928–1945), Isocrates, 3 vols. (Loeb Classical Library; London: William Heinemann).Google Scholar
Novokhatko, A. (2015), ‘Greek scholarship from its beginnings to Alexandria’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s companion of ancient Greek scholarship, II (Leiden: Brill), 3–59.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2015), ‘Poetics and literary criticism in the framework of ancient Greek scholarship’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s companion of ancient Greek scholarship, I (Leiden: Brill), 706–755.Google Scholar
O’Connor, J. B. (1908), ‘Chapters in the history of actors and acting in ancient Greece: together with a prosopographia histrionum graecorum’, PhD Thesis (University of Chicago).Google Scholar
O’Gorman, N. (2005), ‘Aristotle’s “phantasia” in the “Rhetoric”: “lexis”, appearance, and the epideictic function of discourse’, Philosophy & Rhetoric, 38(1), 16–40.Google Scholar
O’Grady, P. (ed.), (2008), The Sophists (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. (1992), Alcidamas, Aristophanes and the beginnings of Greek stylistic theory (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner).Google Scholar
Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A. (1938), The meaning of meaning (London: Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Osborne, R. (2004), ‘Law, the democratic citizen and the representation of women in classical Athens’, in Osborne, R. (ed.), Studies in ancient Greek and Roman society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 38–60.Google Scholar
Pagani, L. (2014), ‘Linguistic correctness (hellēnismós), Ancient Theories of’, in Giannakis, G. K. et al. (eds.), Encyclopedia of ancient Greek language and linguistics, II (Leiden: Brill), 360–364.Google Scholar
Pagani, L. (2015), ‘Language correctness (hellenismos) and its criteria’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s companion of ancient Greek scholarship, I (Leiden: Brill), 798–849.Google Scholar
Palmer, L. R. (1980), The Greek language (London: Faber & Faber).Google Scholar
Palumbo, L. (2008), μίμησις Rappresentazione, teatro e mondo nei dialoghi di Platone e nella Poetica di Aristotele (Naples: Loffredo).Google Scholar
Partee, M. H. (1972), ‘Plato’s theory of language’, Foundations of Language, 8(1), 113–132.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. (1998a), ‘The ethics of terminology’, in Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (eds.), The Essential Peirce, II (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 263–266.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. (1998b), ‘Sundry logical conceptions’, in Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (eds.), The Essential Peirce, II (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 267–288.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. (1998c), ‘What is a sign?’, in Houser, N. and Kloesel, C. (eds.), The Essential Peirce, II (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), 4–10.Google Scholar
Pemberton, E. G. (1976), ‘A note on skiagraphia’, American Journal of Archeology, 80(1), 82–84.Google Scholar
Pepe, C. (2013), The genres of rhetorical speeches in Greek and Roman antiquity (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Petit, A. (1988), ‘Métaphore et mathesis dans la Rhetorique d’Aristote’, in Ballack, J. et al. (eds.), Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage: la métaphore, actes du colloque du 14/15 octobre 1987, IX (Grenoble: Université des Sciences Sociales de Grenoble), 59–71.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1976), ‘Die Sophisten, ihre Zeitgenossen und Schüler im fünften und vierten Jahrhundert’, in Classen, C. J. (ed.), Sophistik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 170–214.Google Scholar
Pickard-Cambridge, W. A. (1984), ‘Sophistical Refutations’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, I (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 278–314.Google Scholar
Platt, A. (1984), ‘Generation of animals’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, I (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 1111–1218.Google Scholar
Polansky, R. (2007), Aristotle’s De anima (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Porter, J. (2010), The origins of aesthetic thought in Ancient Greece (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Potolsky, M. (2006), Mimesis (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Poulakos, T. (1997), Speaking for the Polis (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press).Google Scholar
Primmer, A. (1966), ‘Schlichter Stil und eingliedrige Periode in Aristoteles’ Rhetorik III 9’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Neue Folge, 109(1), 73–77.Google Scholar
Rackham, H. (ed.), (1942), Cicero. On the Orator: Book 3. On Fate. Stoic Paradoxes. Divisions of Oratory (Loeb Classical Library; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (ed.), (1951), Artium scriptores (Reste der voraristotelischen Rhetorik) (Vienna: Rohrer).Google Scholar
Radermacher, L. (1966), Demetrii Phalerei qui dicitur de elocutione libellus (Stuttgart: Teubner).Google Scholar
Rankin, H. D. (1983), Sophists, Socratics and Cynics (Kent: Croom Helm).Google Scholar
Rannie, D. W. (1915), The elements of style, an introduction to literary criticism (London: Dent).Google Scholar
Rapp, C. (2002a), ‘Aristotle’s Rhetoric’, Stanford Encyclopedia in Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-rhetoric/ [accessed 2 May 2012].Google Scholar
Rapp, C. (2002b), Aristoteles Rhetorik, 2 vols. (Berlin: Akademie).Google Scholar
Rau, P. (1967), Paratragodia (Munich: Beck).Google Scholar
Revermann, M. (2006), ‘The competence of theatre audiences in fifth- and fourth-century Athens’, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 126, 99–124.Google Scholar
Rhys Roberts, W. (1902), Demetrius on style (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Rhys Roberts, W. (1984), ‘Rhetoric’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, II (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 2152–2269.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1975), La métaphore vive (Paris: Seuil).Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1985), Temps et récit, III (Paris: Seuil).Google Scholar
Riffaterre, M. (1966), ‘Describing poetic structures: two approaches to Baudelaire’s les Chats’, Yale French Studies, 36(37), 200–242.Google Scholar
Riffaterre, M. (1971), Essais de stylistique structurale (Paris: Flammarion).Google Scholar
Roberts, W. R. (1901), ‘The Greek words for “style” (with special reference to Demetrius περὶ Ἑρμηνείας)’, The Classical Review, 15(5), 252–255.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1967), A short history of linguistics (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Rodrigo, P. (1988), ‘L’euphorie de la langue – Sur le statut artistotélicien de la métaphore –’, in Ballack, J. et al. (eds.), Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage: la métaphore, actes du colloque du 14/15 octobre 1987, IX (Grenoble: Université des Sciences Sociales de Grenoble), 73–90.Google Scholar
Rollo, W. M. (1937), ‘Nationalism and internationalism in the Ancient world’, Greece & Rome, 6(18), 130–143.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. G. (1985), ‘Aristotle on comedy: towards a reconstruction of Poetics II by Richard Janko’, Phoenix, 39(4), 392–395.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (ed.), (1950), Aristotelis Physica (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ross, W. D.(ed.), (1956), Aristotelis De anima (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ross, W. D.(ed.), (1958), Aristotelis Topica et Sophistici Elenchi (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ross, W. D.(ed.), (1962), Aristotelis Politica (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (1984), ‘Metaphysics’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, II (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 1552–1728.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D.Ross, W. D. and Minio-Paluello, L. (eds.), (1964), Aristotelis Analytica priora et posteriora (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Rotstein, A. (2004), ‘Aristotle, “Poetics” 1447a13–16 and musical contests’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 149, 39–42.Google Scholar
Rotstein, A. (2010), The idea of iambos (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (1981), Criticism in antiquity (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. (ed.), (2002), Quintilian. The Orator’s Education. Volume I: Books 1–2 (Loeb Classical Library; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Rusten, J. (2006), ‘Who “invented” comedy? The ancient candidates for the origins of comedy and the visual evidence’, The American Journal of Philology, 127(1), 37–66.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1960), ‘Letters and syllables in Plato’, The Philosophical Review, 69(4), 431–451.Google Scholar
Saller, R. P. (1998), ‘Symbols of gender and status hierarchies in the roman household’, in Joshel, S. and Murnaghan, S. (eds.), Women and slaves in Greco-Roman culture (London: Routledge), 85–91.Google Scholar
Saussure, de F. (1949), Cours de linguistique générale (Paris: Payot).Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (ed.), (1964), Studies in Demetrius ‘Style’ (Amsterdam: Hakkert).Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1986), ‘Aristotle on comedy: towards a reconstruction of Poetics II by Richard Janko’, Gnomon, 58(3), 212–217.Google Scholar
Schenkeveld, D. M. (1993), ‘The lacuna at Aristotle’s Poetics 1457b33’, The American Journal of Philology, 114(1), 85–89.Google Scholar
Schloemann, J. (2000), ‘Spontaner und vorbereiteter Vortrag’, Philologus, 144(2), 206–216.Google Scholar
Schmid, W. (1959), Über die klassische Theorie und Praxis des antiken Prosarhythmus (Hermes, Einzelschriften, 12; Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner).Google Scholar
Schmitt, A. (2008), Aristoteles Poetik (Berlin: Akademie).Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1982), ‘The dénouement of the Cratylus’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 61–81.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1992), ‘Aristotle on the imagination’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De anima (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 247–277.Google Scholar
Schramm, M. (2005), ‘Σύνδεσμος und ἄρθρον in Aristoteles’ Poetik’, Glotta, 81, 187–213.Google Scholar
Schreiber, S. G. (2003), Aristotle on false reasoning (New York: State University of New York Press).Google Scholar
Schulz, V. (2014), Die Stimme in der antiken Rhetorik (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Schütrumpf, E. (1970), Die Bedeutung des Wortes ethos in der Poetik des Aristoteles (Zetemata, 49; Munich: Beck).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1998), ‘The etymologies in Plato’s Cratylus’, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 118, 140–154.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2003a), ‘Etymology as a techne in Plato’s Cratylus’, in Nifadopoulos, C. (ed.), Etymologia, Studies in ancient etymology (Münster: Nodus), 21–32.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2003b), Plato’s Cratylus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (2013), ‘Plato’s Cratylus’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, August 2013. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/plato-cratylus/ [accessed 4 June 2014].Google Scholar
Seitz, E. (2013), ‘λέξις γελοία: zu Aristoteles Poetik 1449a15–28’, Hermes, 141(1), 8–33.Google Scholar
Sheppard, A. (2014), The poetics of phantasia (London: Bloomsbury).Google Scholar
Shields, C. (1999), Order and multiplicity: homonymy in the philosophy of Aristotle (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Shields, C. (2003) Order in multiplicity: homonymy in the philosophy of Aristotle (Oxford: Oxford University Press), www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199253072.001.0001/acprof-9780199253074 [accessed 20 May 2013].Google Scholar
Shields, C. (2007), Aristotle (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Shorey, P. (ed.), (1937), Plato, The Republic Books I–V (Loeb Classical Library, London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
Shute, R. (1976), History of the Aristotelian writings (New York: Arno).Google Scholar
Siebenborn, E. (1976), Die Lehre von der Sprachrichtigkeit und ihren Kriterien (Amsterdam: Grüner).Google Scholar
Sier, K. (1992), ‘Die Rolle des Skythen in den Thesmophoriazusen des Aristophanes’, in Müller, K. W., Sier, K. and Werner, J. (eds.), Zum Umgang mit fremden Sprachen in der griechisch-römischen Antike (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner), 63–83.Google Scholar
Sifakis, G. M. (1987), ‘Aristotle on comedy: towards a reconstruction of Poetics II by R. Janko’, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 107, 202–203.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. (1993), ‘Aristophanic paratragedy’, in Sommerstein, A. et al. (eds.), Tragedy, comedy and the polis (Bari: Levante), 477–504.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. (1994), ‘The ‘six parts of tragedy’ in Aristotle’s Poetics: compositional process and processive chronology’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, 40, 108–115.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. (1995), ‘Nestor, Amphitryon, Philocleon, Cephalus: the language of old men in Greek literature from Homer to Menander’, in De Martino, F. and Sommerstein, A. (eds.), Lo spettacolo delle voci (Bari: Levante), 165–214.Google Scholar
Sinnott, A. E. (1989), Untersuchungen zu Kommunikation und Bedeutung bei Aristoteles (Münster: Nodus).Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. (ed.), (2003), Platonis Respublica (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Smith, J. A. (1984), ‘On the Soul’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, I (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 641–692.Google Scholar
Söffing, W. (1981), Deskriptive und normative Bestimmungen in der Poetik des Aristoteles (Amsterdam: Grüner).Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1941a), ‘The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric’, The American Journal of Philology, 62(1), 35–50.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1941b), ‘The Aristotelian tradition in ancient rhetoric’, The American Journal of Philology, 62(2), 169–190.Google Scholar
Solomon, J. (1984), ‘Eudemian Ethics’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, II (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 1922–1981.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. (1995), ‘The language of Athenian women’, in De Martino, F. and Sommerstein, A. (eds.), Lo spettacolo delle voci, II (Bari: Levante), 61–85.Google Scholar
Sonkowsky, R. P. (1959), ‘An aspect of delivery in ancient rhetorical theory’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 90, 256–274.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1980), ‘Aristotle on the role of intellect in virtue’, in Oksenberg Rorty, A. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s ethics (Berkeley: University of California Press), 201–219.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R., Griffin, M., and Sellars, J. (n.d.) Ancient commentators on Aristotle. www.ancientcommentators.org.uk/ [accessed 15 January 2016].Google Scholar
Soulez, A. (1991), La grammaire philosophique chez Platon (Paris: Presses universitaires de France).Google Scholar
Spengel, L. (ed.), (1828), Συναγογὴ Τεχνῶν sive artium scriptores ab initiis usque ad editos Aristotelis de rhetorica libros (Osnabrück: Zeller).Google Scholar
Spengel, L.(ed.), (1853–1856), Rhetores Graeci, 3 vols. (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. (1962), Linguistics and literary history: essays in stylistics (New York: Russell & Russell).Google Scholar
Steinrück, M. (2004), ‘Der reihende Prosastil (εἰρομένη) und sein Verhältnis zur Periode’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Neue Folge, 147(2), 109–135.Google Scholar
Steinthal, H. (1971), Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die Logik, 2 vols. (Hildesheim: Olms).Google Scholar
Stock, S. G. (1984), ‘Magna Moralia’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, II (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 1868–1921.Google Scholar
Stocks, J. L. (1984), ‘On the heavens’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, I (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 447–511.Google Scholar
Susemihl, F. (ed.), (1883), Aristotelis quae feruntur Magna Moralia (Leipzig: Teubner).Google Scholar
Sutton, D. F. (1983), ‘Dithyramb as Δρᾶμα: Philoxenus of Cythera’s “Cyclops or Galatea”’, Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica, n.s., 13(1), 37–43.Google Scholar
Sutton, E. W. and Rackham, H. (eds.), (1942), Cicero. On the Orator: Books 1–2 (Loeb Classical Library; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. (1984), ‘Cognitive aspects of Aristotle’s theory of metaphor’, Glotta, 62(1/2), 40–45.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. (1997), ‘Histoire et historiographie de la sémantique lexicale préstructurale’, in Hoinkes, U. and Dietrich, W. (eds.), Kaleidoskop der lexikalischen Semantik (Tübingen: Gunter Narr), 159–171.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. (2013), ‘Linguistics through its proper mirror-glass: Saussure, signs, segments’, Semiotica, 193, 1–29.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. and Wouters, A. (2002), ‘Grammatical theory in Aristotle’s Poetics chapter XX’, in Swiggers, P. and Wouters, A. (eds.), Grammatical theory and philosophy of language in antiquity (Leuven: Peeters), 101–120.Google Scholar
Swiggers, P. and Wouters, A. (2015), ‘Description of the constituent elements of the (Greek) language’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s companion of ancient Greek scholarship, I (Leiden: Brill), 759–797.Google Scholar
Tamba-Mecz, I. and Veyne, P. (1979), ‘Metaphora et comparaison selon Aristote’, Revue des Études Grecques, 92, 77–98.Google Scholar
Tanner, R. (1969), ‘Aristotle as a structural linguist’, Transactions of the Philological Society, 68(1), 99–164.Google Scholar
Taran, L. (1978), ‘Speusippus and Aristotle on homonymy and synonymy’, Hermes, 106(1), 73–99.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. (1994), ‘Classical antiquity: language study’, in Asher, R. E. (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, II (Oxford: Pergamon Press), 559–565.Google Scholar
Thomas, O. (2010), ‘Ancient Greek awareness of child language acquisition’, Glotta, 86, 185–223.Google Scholar
Thompson, d’ A. W. (1984), ‘History of animals’, in Barnes, J. (ed.), The complete works of Aristotle, I (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 774–993.Google Scholar
Thorne, J. P. (1964), ‘Stylistics and generative grammars’, Journal of Linguistics, 1(1), 49–59.Google Scholar
Thorne, J. P. (1969), ‘Poetry, stylistics and imaginary grammars’, Journal of Linguistics, 5(1), 147–150.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. M. (1986), ‘Logos-phrase et logos-texte chez Platon et Aristote’, Philosophie du langage et grammaire dans l’antiquité – Cahier du groupe de recherches sur la philosophie et le langage, 6 and 7, 165–179.Google Scholar
Tierney, M. (1944), ‘Dionysus, the dithyramb, and the origin of tragedy’, Studies: An Irish Quarterly Review, 33(131), 331–341.Google Scholar
Timmerman, D. M. (1999), ‘Aristotle’s disciplining of epideictic’, in Schiappa, E. (ed.), The beginnings of rhetorical theory in Classical Greece (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press), 185–225.Google Scholar
Too, Y. L. (2008), A commentary on Isocrates’ Antidosis (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Tordesillas, A. (1988), ‘Métaphores sporadiques et linéarité du signifiant chez Gorgias de Léontinoi’, in Ballack, J. et al. (eds.), Recherches sur la philosophie et le langage: la métaphore, actes du colloque du 14/15 octobre 1987, IX (Grenoble: Université des Sciences Sociales de Grenoble), 33–46.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1994), Dialects (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
Tuominen, M. (2009), The ancient commentators on Plato and Aristotle (New York: Acumen).Google Scholar
Tuominen, M. (2012), ‘Philosophy of the ancient commentators on Aristotle’, Philosophy Compass, 7(12), 852–895.Google Scholar
Ullmann, S. (1957), Style in the French novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Usher, S. (1973), ‘The style of Isocrates’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, 20(1), 39–67.Google Scholar
Vahlen, J. (1914), Beiträge zu Aristoteles’ Poetik (Hildesheim: Olms).Google Scholar
Van Hook, L. (ed.), (1986), Isocrates, III (Loeb Classical Library; London: William Heinemann Ltd).Google Scholar
Van Noppen, J.-P. (1981), Publications on metaphor after 1970: a preliminary bibliography: linguistic approaches and issues (Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel).Google Scholar
Van Noppen, J.-P. (1985), Metaphor: a bibliography of post-1970 publications (Amsterdam: Benjamins).Google Scholar
Van Noppen, J.-P. and Hols, E. (1990), Metaphor II: a classified bibliography of publications 1985 to 1900 (Amsterdam: Benjamins).Google Scholar
Vatri, A. (2016), ‘Between song and prose: the meaning(s) of harmonia in Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Poetics’, Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 34(4), 372–392.Google Scholar
Vegetti, M. (ed.), (1998), Platone la Repubblica, II (Naples: Bibliopolis).Google Scholar
Walz, C. (ed.), (1832–1836), Rhetores Graeci, 9 vols. (Osnabrück: Zeller).Google Scholar
Walzer, A. E. (2000), ‘Aristotle’s Rhetoric a guide to scholarship’, in Gross, A. G. and Walzer, A. E. (eds.), Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press), 185–203.Google Scholar
Walzer, A. E., Tiffany, M., and Gross, A. G. (2000), ‘Aristotle’s Rhetoric: a guide to the scholarship’, in Gross, A. G. and Walzer, A. E. (eds.), Rereading Aristotle’s Rhetoric (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press), 185–203.Google Scholar
Walzer, R. R. and Mingay, J. M. (eds.), (1991), Aristotelis Ethica Eudemia (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Ward, J. K. (2008), Aristotle on homonymy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wartelle, A. (1963), Inventaire des manuscrits grecs d’Aristote et de ses commentateurs (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1982), ‘Phantasia in Aristotle, De anima 3.3’, The Classical Quarterly, n.s., 32(1), 100–113.Google Scholar
Watson, W. (2012), The lost second book of Aristotle’s Poetics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Weber, S. (1976), ‘Saussure and the apparition of language: the critical perspective’, Modern Language Notes, 91(5), 913–938.Google Scholar
Weidemann, H. (ed.), (1994), Aristoteles Peri hermeneias (Berlin: Akademie).Google Scholar
Wellek, R. (1971), ‘Stylistics, poetics, and criticism’, in Chatman, S. (ed.), Literary style: a symposium (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 65–76.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1992), Ancient Greek music (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Whitaker, C. W. A. (ed.), (1996), Aristotle’s De interpretatione (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
White, N. P. (1979), A companion to Plato’s Republic (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Wilkins, A. S. (ed.), (1902), M. Tulli Ciceronis Rhetorica, 2 vols. (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2002), ‘Languages on stage: Aristophanic language, cultural history, and Athenian identity’, in Willi, A. (ed.), The language of Greek comedy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 111–149.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2003), The languages of Aristophanes (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2010a), ‘Attic as language of the Classics’, in Caragounis, C. C. (ed.), Greek, a language in evolution (Zurich: Olms), 101–118.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2010b), ‘Register variation’, in Bakker, E. (ed.), A companion to the Ancient Greek language (Oxford: Blackwell), 297–310.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (1982), ‘Cratylus’ theory of names and its refutation’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 83–93.Google Scholar
Williams, C. (1985), ‘Aristotle’s theory of descriptions’, The Philosophical Review, 94(1), 63–80.Google Scholar
Winslow, R. (2012), ‘Stylistics’, in Greene, P. et al. (eds.), The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics (4th edn.; Princeton: Princeton University Press). http://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/prpoetry/stylistics/0 [accessed 21 May 2015].Google Scholar
Winterbottom, M. (ed.), (1970), M. Fabi Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae libri duodecimus, 2 vols. (Oxford Classical Texts; Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Woerther, F. (2005), ‘Λέξις ἠθική (ethical style) in book III of Aristotle’s Rhetoric? The uses of ἠθικός in the Aristotelian corpus’, Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 23(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
Woerther, F. (2008), ‘Music and the education of the soul in Plato and Aristotle: homoeopathy and the formation of character’, The Classical Quarterly, 58(1), 89–103.Google Scholar
Wood, M. S. (2017), ‘Aristotle’s theory of metaphor revisited’, Mouseion, 3rd ser., 14, 63–90.Google Scholar
Worman, N. (2002), The cast of character, style in Greek literature (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar
Worman, N. (2008), Abusive mouths in classical Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Worman, N. (2015) Landscape and the spaces of metaphor in ancient literary theory and criticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Wouters, A. and Swiggers, P. (2015), ‘Definitions of grammar’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s companion of ancient Greek scholarship, II (Leiden: Brill), 515–544.Google Scholar
Wrenhaven, K. L. (2012), Reconstructing the slave: the image of the slave in ancient Greece (London: Bristol Classical Press).Google Scholar
Wünsch, R. (1894), ‘Zu den Melanippen des Euripides’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Neue Folge, 49, 91–110.Google Scholar
Zaslawsky, D. (1986), ‘Paradoxes linguistiques – A propos de Λέξις chez Aristote’, Philosophie du langage et grammaire dans l’antiquité – Cahier du groupe de recherches sur la philosophie et le langage, 6–7, 239–260.Google Scholar
Zehetmeier, J. (1930), Die Periodenlehre des Aristoteles (Philologus, 85; Leipzig: Dieterich’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung), 192–208; 255–284; 414–436.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A. (1971), Verzeichnis ungedruckter Kommentare zur Metaphysik und Physik des Aristoteles (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, B. (1989), Dithyrambos (Hypomnemata, 98; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
Zimmermann, B. (1993), ‘Das Lied der Polis: Zur Geschichte des Dithyrambos’, in Sommerstein, A. et al. (eds.), Tragedy, comedy and the polis (Bari: Levante), 39–54.Google Scholar
Zirin, R. (1974), ‘Inarticulate noises’, in Corcoran, J. (ed.), Ancient logic and its modern interpretations (Boston: Reidel), 22–25.Google Scholar
Zoran, G. (2014), Bodies of speech (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Ana Kotarcic, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Aristotle on Language and Style
  • Online publication: 30 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108583442.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Ana Kotarcic, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Aristotle on Language and Style
  • Online publication: 30 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108583442.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Ana Kotarcic, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • Book: Aristotle on Language and Style
  • Online publication: 30 October 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108583442.010
Available formats
×