Book contents
- Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil
- CAMBRIDGE CRITICAL GUIDES
- Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Glossary
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Metaphysical themes in De malo, 1
- Chapter 2 Weakness and willful wrongdoing in Aquinas’s De malo
- Chapter 3 Free choice
- Chapter 4 Venial sin and the ultimate end
- Chapter 5 The promise and pitfalls of glory: Aquinas on the forgotten vice of vainglory
- Chapter 6 The goodness and evil of objects and ends
- Chapter 7 Evil and moral failure in De malo
- Chapter 8 Attention, intentionality, and mind-reading in Aquinas’s De malo, q. 16, a. 8
- Chapter 9 Evil as privation: the Neoplatonic background to Aquinas’s De malo, 1
- Chapter 10 Moral luck and the capital vices in De malo: gluttony and lust
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
Edited by
Book contents
- Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil
- CAMBRIDGE CRITICAL GUIDES
- Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Glossary
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Metaphysical themes in De malo, 1
- Chapter 2 Weakness and willful wrongdoing in Aquinas’s De malo
- Chapter 3 Free choice
- Chapter 4 Venial sin and the ultimate end
- Chapter 5 The promise and pitfalls of glory: Aquinas on the forgotten vice of vainglory
- Chapter 6 The goodness and evil of objects and ends
- Chapter 7 Evil and moral failure in De malo
- Chapter 8 Attention, intentionality, and mind-reading in Aquinas’s De malo, q. 16, a. 8
- Chapter 9 Evil as privation: the Neoplatonic background to Aquinas’s De malo, 1
- Chapter 10 Moral luck and the capital vices in De malo: gluttony and lust
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Aquinas's Disputed Questions on EvilA Critical Guide, pp. 235 - 244Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Primary Sources
(Various authors). Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis, ed. Denifle, Henricus and Chatelain, Aemilio, vol. 1 (Paris: Delalain, 1889).Google Scholar
(Various authors). Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum (Vienna: Apud C. Geroldi Filium Bibliopolam, 1866).Google Scholar
(Various authors). The Sayings of the Desert Fathers: The Alphabetical Collection, trans. Ward, Benedicta, rev. ed. (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1984).Google Scholar
Albert the Great, . Opera omnia, ed. Borgnet, Auguste, 38 vols. (Paris: Vivès, 1890–1899).Google Scholar
Albert the Great, . Opera omnia, ed. Geyer, Bernhard and Kübel, Wilhelm (Münster: Aschendorff, 1951–).Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales, . Summa theologica, 4 vols. (Clarae Aquae [Quaracchi]: Typographia Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1924–1928).Google Scholar
Anselm of Canterbury, . Opera omnia, ed. Schmitt, Franciscus Salesius, 2 vols. (Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1984).Google Scholar
Augustine, . Confessions, trans. Chadwick, Henry (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Augustine, . Confessions and Enchiridion, trans. Outler, Albert C. (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1955).Google Scholar
Augustine, . Contra Academicos, De beata vita, De ordine, De magistro, De libero arbitrio, ed. Green, W. M. and Daur, K.-D., CCSL 29 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1970).Google Scholar
Augustine, . Contra Iulianum (Opus imperfectum), ed. Zelzer, Michaela, vol. 1, CSEL 85.1 (Vienna: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1974).Google Scholar
Augustine, . De civitate Dei, ed. Dombart, Bernard and Kalb, Alphonsus, 2 vols., CCSL 47–48 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1955).Google Scholar
Augustine, . De diversis quaestionibus octoginta tribus, De octo Dulcitii quaestionibus, ed. Mutzenbecher, Almut, CCSL 44-A (Turnhout: Brepols, 1975).Google Scholar
Augustine, . De fide rerum invisibilium, Enchiridion ad Laurentium de fide et spe et caritate, De catechizandis rudibus, Sermo ad catechumenos de symbolo, Sermo de disciplina christiana, De utilitate ieiunii, Sermo de excidio urbis Romae, De haeresibus, ed. van den Hout, M. P. J et al., CCSL 46 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1969).Google Scholar
Augustine, . De Genesi ad litteram, ed. Zycha, Joseph, CSEL 28.1 (Vienna: Tempsky, 1894).Google Scholar
Augustine, . Retractationum libri II, ed. Mutzenbecher, Almut, CCSL 57 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1984).Google Scholar
Augustine, . Sermons, trans. Hill, Edmund, vol. III.9, The Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century (Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Averroes, . Aristotelis opera cum Averrois commentariis, 12 vols. (Venice: 1562–1574).Google Scholar
Averroes, . Commentarium magnum in Aristotelis De anima libros, ed. Crawford, F. Stuart (Cambridge, MA: The Mediaeval Academy of America, 1953).Google Scholar
Medina, Bartholomew. Scholastica Commentaria in D. Thomae Aquinatis Doct. Angelici Primam Secundae (Cologne: Petrus Henningius, 1618).Google Scholar
Benedict of Nursia, . St. Benedict’s Rule for Monasteries, trans. Butler, Cuthbert (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 1948).Google Scholar
Bonaventure, . Opera omnia, 10 vols. (Quaracchi: Collegium S. Bonaventurae, 1882–1902).Google Scholar
Bonaventure, . The Book of Constitutions and Ordinations of the Brothers of the Order of Preachers (Dublin: Dominican Publications, 2012).Google Scholar
Cajetan, Thomas de Vio. Commentaria in Summam Theologiae St. Thomae, in vols. 4–12 of Thomas Aquinas, Opera omnia (Rome: Ex Typographia Polyglotta, 1888–1906).Google Scholar
Evagrius of Pontus, . Talking Back: A Monastic Handbook for Combating Demons, trans. Brakke, David (Collegeville, MN: Cistercian Publications / Liturgical Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Evagrius of Pontus, . The Greek Ascetic Corpus, trans. Sinkewicz, Robert E. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Gregory the Great, . Moralia in Iob, ed. Adriaen, Marcus, 3 vols, CCSL 143 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1979–1985).Google Scholar
Isidore of Seville, . Sententiae, ed. Cazier, Pierre, CCSL 111 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1998).Google Scholar
Cassian, John. The Conferences, trans. Ramsey, Boniface (New York: Paulist Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Cassian, John. The Institutes, trans. Ramsey, Boniface (New York: Newman Press, 2000).Google Scholar
John of St. Thomas, . Cursus theologicus: In Primam secundae, vol. 1 (Lyon: Sumptibus Philippi Borde, Lavrentii Arnaud, Petri Borde, & Guilielmi Barbier, 1643).Google Scholar
Abelard, Peter. Peter Abelard’s ‘Ethics,’ ed. and trans. Luscombe, D. E. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter. Sententiae in IV libris distinctae, vol. 1, part 2 (Grottaferrata: Collegium S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas, 1971).Google Scholar
Plotinus, . Enneads I–VI, trans. Armstrong, A. H., 7 vols. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966–1993).Google Scholar
Proclus, . On the Existence of Evils, trans. Opsomer, Jan and Steel, Carlos (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Proclus, . Tria opuscula (De Providentia, Libertate, Malo). Latine Guilelmo de Moerbeka vertente et Graece ex Isaacii Sebastocratoris aliorumque scriptis collecta, ed. Boese, Helmut (Berlin: de Gruyter, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Areopagita, Pseudo-Dioniysius. Corpus Dionysiacum, vol. 1: ‘De divinis nominibus,’ ed. Suchla, Beate Regina (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1990).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Basic Writings of Saint Thomas Aquinas, ed. Pegis, Anton C., 2 vols. (New York: Random House, 1945).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Cuestiones disputadas sobre el mal, trans. Maqueo, Ezequiel Téllez (Pamplona: EUNSA / Ediciones Universidad de Navarra, 1997).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis Expositio, ed. Cathala, M. R. and Spiazzi, Raymundus M. (Turin / Rome: Marietti, 1950).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. In librum Beati Dionysii De Divinis Nominibus Expositio, ed. Pera, Ceslaus (Turin / Rome: Marietti, 1950).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. On Evil, trans. Oesterle, Jean (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. On Evil, trans. Regan, Richard, ed. Davies, Brian (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Opera omnia, 50 vols. (Rome: Ex Typographia Polyglotta / Commissio Leonina, 1882–).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Opera omnia, ed. Fretté, Stanislaus and Maré, Paulus, 34 vols. (Paris: Vivès, 1871–1880).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae, ed. Bazzi, P. et al., 2 vols., rev. ed. (Turin / Rome: Marietti, 1953).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de malo / Untersuchungen über das Böse, trans. Barthold, Claudia and Barthold, Peter (Mühlheim an der Mosel: Carthusianus Verlag, 2009).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae de malo. Opera omnia, vol. XXIII (Rome: Commissio Leonina / Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1982).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Questions disputées sur le mal / De malo, trans. de Fontgombault, les moines, 2 vols. (Paris: Nouvelles Éditions Latines, 1992).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum, ed. Mandonnet, P. and Moos, Maria Fabianus, 4 vols. (Paris: Lethielleux, 1929–1947).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra Gentiles, trans. Pegis, Anton C. et al., 5 vols. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province [Laurence Shapcote] (New York: Benziger Brothers, 1948).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Super epistolas S. Pauli lectura, ed. Cai, Raphael, 2 vols., rev. ed. (Turin / Rome: Marietti, 1953).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. The ‘De Malo’ of Thomas Aquinas, trans. Regan, Richard, ed. Davies, Brian (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Vom Übel / De malo, ed. and trans. Schick, Stefan and Schäfer, Christian, 2 vols. (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2009–2010).Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Aumann, Jordan. “The Theology of Venial Sin,” Proceedings of the Catholic Theological Society of America 10 (1955): 74–94.Google Scholar
Barnwell, Michael. The Problem of Negligent Omissions: Medieval Action Theories to the Rescue (Leiden: Brill, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazán, Bernardo C. “Les questions disputées, principalement dans les facultés de théologie,” in Les questions disputées et les questions quodlibétiques dans les facultés de théologie, de droit et de médecine,” by Bazán, Bernardo C. et al. (Turnhout: Brepols, 1985), 15–149.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Morton W. The Seven Deadly Sins: An Introduction to the History of a Religious Concept (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Bonner, Gerald. St. Augustine of Hippo: Life and Controversies, 3rd ed. (Norwich: Canterbury Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Bowlin, John. Contingency and Fortune in Aquinas’s Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael E. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Brock, Stephen L. “What is the Use of usus in Aquinas’ Psychology of Action?” in Les philosophies morales et politiques au Moyen Âge: Actes du IXe Congrès international de Philosophie Médiévale, Ottawa, du 17 au 22 août 1992, ed. Bazán, B. Carlos, Andújar, Eduardo, and Sbrocchi, Léonard G., vol. 2 (Ottawa: Legas, 1995), 654–664.Google Scholar
Brock, Stephen L. “Intentional Being, Natural Being, and the First-Person Perspective in Thomas Aquinas,” The Thomist 77 (2013), 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brower, Jeffrey E. and Brower-Toland, Susan. “Aquinas on Mental Representation: Concepts and Intentionality,” The Philosophical Review 117 (2008): 193–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busa, Roberto, et al., Index Thomistica, ed. Eduardo Bernot and Enrique Alarcón. URL = http://www.corpusthomisticum.org/it/index.age.Google Scholar
Brunn, Emilie Zum. St. Augustine: Being and Nothingness (New York: Paragon House, 1988).Google Scholar
Collins, James. The Thomistic Philosophy of the Angels (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1947).Google Scholar
Cory, Therese Scarpelli. Aquinas on Human Self-Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Cory, Therese Scarpelli. “Diachronically Unified Consciousness in Augustine and Aquinas,” Vivarium 50 (2012): 354–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Stanley B. Reclaiming Moral Agency: The Moral Philosophy of Albert the Great (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Davies, Brian. Thomas Aquinas on God and Evil (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deman, Thomas. “Péché véniel et fin dernière,” in Dictionnaire de Théologie Catholique, v. 12 (Paris: Letouzey et Ané, 1933), 237–244.Google Scholar
Dewan, Lawrence. “St. Thomas and the First Cause of Moral Evil,” in Wisdom, Law, and Virtue: Essays in Thomistic Ethics (New York: Fordham University Press, 2008), 186–196.Google Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. “Aquinas on the Vice of Sloth: Three Interpretive Issues,” The Thomist 75 (2011): 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. Glittering Vices: A New Look at the Seven Deadly Sins and Their Remedies (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2009).Google Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. “Resistance to the Demands of Love: Aquinas on Acedia,” The Thomist 68 (2004): 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. “Sloth: Some Historical Reflections on Laziness, Effort, and Resistance to the Demands of Love,” in Virtues and Their Vices, ed. Timpe, Kevin and Boyd, Craig A. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 177–198.Google Scholar
Dillon, Robin S. “Toward a Feminist Conception of Self-Respect,” Hypatia 7 (1992): 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doolan, Gregory T. “Aquinas on the Demonstrability of Angels,” in A Companion to Angels in Medieval Philosophy, in Hoffmann 2012, 13–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doolan, Gregory T. (ed.). The Science of Being as Being: Metaphysical Investigations (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Dougherty, M. V. Moral Dilemmas in Medieval Thought: From Gratian to Aquinas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Eardley, P. S. “Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Will,” The Review of Metaphysics 56 (2003): 835–862.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kevin L. Acts Amid Precepts: The Aristotelian Logical Structure of Thomas Aquinas’s Moral Theory (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Flannery, Kevin L. “The Multifarious Moral Object of Thomas Aquinas,” The Thomist 67 (2003): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, Richard J. The Freedom of Simplicity: Finding Harmony in a Complex World (San Francisco, CA: HarperOne, 1973).Google Scholar
Gallagher, David M. “Free Choice and Free Judgment in Thomas Aquinas,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 76 (1994): 247–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, David M. “The Will and Its Acts (Ia IIae, qq. 6–17),” in The Ethics of Aquinas, ed. Pope, Stephen J. (Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press, 2002), 69–89.Google Scholar
Gallagher, David M. “Thomas Aquinas on Self-Love as the Basis for Love of Others,” Acta Philosophica 8 (1999): 23–44.Google Scholar
Garrigou-Lagrange, Reginald. “La fin ultime du péché véniel,” Revue Thomiste 29 (1924): 313–317.Google Scholar
Goris, Harm. “Angelic Knowledge in Aquinas and Bonaventure,” in Hoffmann 2012, 149–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goris, Harm. “Divine Foreknowledge, Providence, Predestination, and Human Freedom,” in The Theology of Thomas Aquinas, ed. van Nieuwenhove, Rik and Wawrykow, Joseph (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005), 99–122.Google Scholar
Goris, Harm. “The Angelic Doctor and Angelic Speech: The Development of Thomas Aquinas’s Thought of How Angels Communicate,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 11 (2003): 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Paul J. Intellectual Appetite: A Theological Grammar (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Griffiths, Paul J. The Vice of Curiosity: An Essay on Intellectual Appetite (Winnipeg, Manitoba: CMU Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, Germain. “The First Principle of Practical Reason: A Commentary on the Summa Theologiae, 1–2, Question 94, Article 2,” Natural Law Forum 10 (1965): 168–201.Google Scholar
Grisez, Germain. “The True Ultimate End of Human Beings: The Kingdom, Not God Alone,” Theological Studies 69 (2008): 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grisez, Germain, Boyle, Joseph, and Finnis, John. “Practical Principles, Moral Truth, and Ultimate Ends,” American Journal of Jurisprudence 32 (1987): 99–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanink, James G. (ed.). Aquinas & Maritain on Evil: Mystery and Metaphysics (Washington, D. C.: American Maritain Association, 2013).Google Scholar
Hause, Jeffrey. “Thomas Aquinas and the Voluntarists,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6 (1997): 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayen, André. L’intentionnel selon saint Thomas, 2nd rev. ed. (Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1954).Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias. (ed.). A Companion to Angels in Medieval Philosophy (Leiden: Brill, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias. “Aquinas and Intellectual Determinism: The Test Case of Angelic Sin,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2007): 122–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias. “Intellectualism and Voluntarism,” in The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, ed. Pasnau, Robert with Christina Van Dyke, rev. ed., vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), 414–427.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias. “Moral Action as Human Action: End and Object in Aquinas in Comparison with Abelard, Lombard, Albert, and Duns Scotus,” The Thomist 67 (2003): 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias. “Theories of Angelic Sin from Aquinas to Ockham,” in Hoffmann 2012, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias (ed.). Aquinas and the ‘Nicomachean Ethics’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iribarren, Isabel and Lenz, Martin (ed.). Angels in Medieval Philosophical Inquiry: Their Function and Significance (Aldershot: Ashgate: 2008).Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence. The Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, Volume 1: From Socrates to the Reformation (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Jensen, Steven J. Good and Evil Actions: A Journey through Saint Thomas Aquinas (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Jensen, Steven J. “The Error of the Passions,” The Thomist 73 (2009): 349–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, Mark D. Rewritten Theology: Aquinas after His Readers (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, David. Angels and Angelology in the Middle Ages (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Aquinas and Weakness of Will,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2007): 70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Evil in Later Medieval Philosophy,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2007): 177–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Losable Virtue: Aquinas on Character and Will,” in Hoffmann, Müller, and Perkams 2013, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “On the Track of Lust: Luxuria, Ockham, and the Scientists,” in Newhauser 2005, 349–370.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “The Moral Life,” in The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Philosophy, ed. McGrade, A. S. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. “Transitory Vice: Thomas Aquinas on Incontinence,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27 (1989): 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Bonnie. Virtues of the Will: The Transformation of Ethics in the Late Thirteenth Century (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1995).Google Scholar
King, Peter. “Aquinas on the Passions,” in Aquinas’s Moral Theory: Essays in Honor of Norman Kretzmann, ed. MacDonald, Scott and Stump, Eleonore (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999), 101–132.Google Scholar
Knasas, John F. X. Aquinas and the Cry of Rachel: Thomistic Reflections on the Problem of Evil (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo. Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuolt, Martin. Thomas d’Aquin: “Du mal.” Question 1: Le mal in général. Introduction et commentaire (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2009).Google Scholar
Lagerlund, Henrik. “Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), ed. Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/representation-medieval/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Charlton T., and Short, Charles. A Latin Dictionary (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Lombardo, Nicholas E. The Logic of Desire: Aquinas on Emotion (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. “La date de la Question Disputée ‘De malo’ de saint Thomas d’Aquin,” Revue d’histoire ecclésiastique 24 (1928): 373–388.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon. Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles, 6 vols. (Louvain: Abbaye du Mont César / Gembloux: Ducolot, 1942–1960).Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. “Aquinas’s Libertarian Account of Free Choice,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 52 (1998): 309–328.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott. “Ultimate Ends in Practical Reasoning: Aquinas’s Aristotelian Moral Psychology and Anscombe’s Fallacy,” The Philosophical Review 100 (1991): 31–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macierowski, Edward M. “Notes to Chapter 3,” in Aquinas, Thomas, Commentaries on Aristotle’s ‘On Sense and What is Sensed’ and ‘On Memory and Recollection,’ trans. White, Kevin and Macierowski, Edward M. (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005), 247–252.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques. St. Thomas and the Problem of Evil (Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1942).Google Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen. “Thomas Aquinas and the Epistemology of Moral Wrongdoing,” in Handlung und Wissenschaft: Die Epistemologie der praktischen Wissenschaften im 13. und 14. Jahrhundert, ed. Lutz-Bachmann, Matthias and Fidora, Alexander (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2008), 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen. “Willful Wrongdoing: Thomas Aquinas on certa malitia,” Studies in the History of Ethics 6 (2005): 1–54.Google Scholar
Miner, Robert. Thomas Aquinas on the Passions: A Study of “Summa Theologiae” 1a2ae 22–48 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulchahey, M. Michèle. “First the Bow is Bent in Study…” Dominican Education before 1350 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1998).Google Scholar
Mulligan, Dermot. “Moral Evil: St. Thomas and the Thomists,” Philosophical Studies (Ireland) 9 (1959): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Claudia Eisen. “Aquinas on Responsibility for Our Emotions,” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 8 (1999): 163–205.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. “What Is It Like To Be A Bat?” The Philosophical Review 83 (1974): 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newhauser, Richard (ed.). In the Garden of Evil: The Vices and Culture in the Middle Ages (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2005).Google Scholar
Nicolas, Jean-Hervé. “La permission du péché,” Revue thomiste 60 (1960): 5–37, 185–206, 509–546.Google Scholar
Nicolas, Jean-Hervé. “La volenté salvifique de Dieu contrariée par le péché,” Revue thomiste 92 (1992): 177–196.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Denis. “La matière chez Plotin: son origine, sa nature,” Phronesis 44 (1999): 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Denis. “Plotinus on the Making of Matter, Part III: The Essential Background,” The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6 (2012): 27–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Callaghan, John P. “Aquinas’s Rejection of Mind, Contra Kenny,” The Thomist 66 (2002): 15–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Callaghan, John P. “More Words on the Verbum: A Response to James Doig,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2003): 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Callaghan, John P. “Verbum Mentis: Philosophical or Theological Doctrine in Aquinas?” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 74 (2000): 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, Robert J. Images of Conversion in St. Augustine’s ‘Confessions’ (New York: Fordham University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
O’Connor, Bernadette E. “Insufficient Ado about the Human Capacity for Being and Maritain’s Dissymmetry Solution,” in Hanink 2013, 155–169.Google Scholar
Opsomer, Jan. “Proclus vs Plotinus on Matter (De mal. subs. 30–7),” Phronesis 46 (2001): 154–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opsomer, Jan, and Steel, Carlos. “Evil without a Cause: Proclus’ Doctrine on the Origin of Evil, and its Antecedents in Hellenistic Philosophy,” in Zur Rezeption der hellenistischen Philosophie in der Spätantike, ed. Fuhrer, Therese, Erler, Michael, and Schlapbach, Karin (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1999), 229–260.Google Scholar
Osborne, Jr., Thomas M. Human Action in Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Jr., Thomas M. Love of Self and Love of God in Thirteenth-Century Ethics (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Osborne, Jr., Thomas M. “The Threefold Referral of Acts to the Ultimate End in Thomas Aquinas and His Commentators,” Angelicum 85 (2008): 715–736.Google Scholar
Pakaluk, Michael. “Structure and Method in Aquinas’s Appropriation of Aristotelian Ethical Theory,” in Hoffmann, Müller, and Perkams 2013, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaccio, Claude. “Angel’s Talk, Mental Language, and the Transparency of the Mind,” in Vestigia, Imagines, Verba: Semiotics and Logic in Medieval Theological Texts (XIIth–XIVth Century), ed. Marmo, Costantino (Turnhout: Brepols, 1997), 323–335.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert. Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of ‘Summa theologiae’ Ia 75–89 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik. Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter, 2nd ed. (Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perler, Dominik. “Thought Experiments: The Methodological Function of Angels in Late Medieval Epistemology,” in Iribarren and Lenz 2008, 143–153.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik. “What Am I Thinking About? Duns Scotus and Peter Aureol on Intentional Objects,” Vivarium 32 (1994): 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickavé, Martin. “Aquinas on Incontinence and Psychological Weakness,” in Hoffmann, Müller, and Perkams 2013, 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilsner, Joseph. The Specification of Human Actions in St Thomas Aquinas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porro, Pasquale. “Il diavolo nella teologia scolastica: Il caso di Tommaso d’Aquino,” in Il diavolo nel Medioevo. Atti del XLIX Convegno storico internazionale del Centro Italiano di Studi sul Basso Medioevo (Spoleto: Centro Italiano di Studi sull’Alto Medioevo, 2013), 77–99.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. “Acrasia and Self-Control,” in The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s ‘Nicomachean Ethics,’ ed. Kraut, Richard (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006), 234–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez, Santiago. De actibus humanis: In I–II ‘Summa Theologiae’ Divi Thomae Expositio (QQ. VI–XXI), Edicion de las Obras Completas de Santiago Ramirez, vol. 4, ed. Victorino Rodriguez (Madrid: Instituto de Filosofia “Luis Vives,” 1972).Google Scholar
Reichberg, Gregory M. “Beyond Privation: Moral Evil in Aquinas’s De Malo,” The Review of Metaphysics 55 (2002): 751–784.Google Scholar
Rhonheimer, Martin. “The Moral Object of Human Acts and the Role of Reason According to Aquinas: A Restatement and Defense of My View,” Josephinum Journal of Theology 18 (2011): 454–506.Google Scholar
Roling, Bernd. “Angelic Language and Communication,” in Hoffmann 2012, 223–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousselot, Pierre. Pour L’histoire du problème de l’amour au Moyen Age (Münster: Aschendorffsche Buchhandlung, 1908).Google Scholar
Ryan, Peter F. “Must the Acting Person Have a Single Ultimate End?” Gregorianum 82 (2001): 325–356.Google Scholar
Saarinen, Risto. Weakness of the Will in Medieval Thought: From Augustine to Buridan (Leiden: Brill, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, Christian. Thomas von Aquins gründlichere Behandlung der Übel: eine Auswahlinterpretation der Schrift “De malo” (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönberger, Rolf, et al. (ed.), Repertorium edierter Texte des Mittelalters aus dem Bereich der Philosophie und angrenzender Gebiete, 3 vols., 2nd ed. (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sentis, Laurent. Saint Thomas d’Aquin et le mal: Foi chrétienne et théodicée (Paris: Beauchesne, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanley, Brian J. “Divine Causation and Human Freedom in Aquinas,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72 (1998): 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanley, Brian J. The Thomist Tradition (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanley, Brian J. “Thomas Aquinas on Demonstrating God’s Providence,” in Doolan 2012, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, Carlos. “Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on Evil,” in Avicenna and his Heritage, ed. Janssens, Jules and De Smet, Daniel (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2002), 171–196.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. “Does Evil have a Cause? Augustine’s Perplexity and Thomas’s Answer,” The Review of Metaphysics 48 (1994): 251–273.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. “Proclus et Denys: de l’existence du mal,” in Denys l’Aréopagite et sa postérité en Orient et en Occident. Actes du colloque international, Paris, 21–24 septembre 1994, ed. de Andia, Ysabel (Paris: Institut d’Études Augustiniennes, 1997), 89–108.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. “Proclus on the Existence of Evil,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 14 (1998): 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglmayr, Josef. “Der Neuplatoniker Proclus als Vorlage des sogen. Dionysius Areopagita in der Lehre vom Uebel,” Historisches Jahrbuch 16 (1895): 253–273, 721–748.Google Scholar
Suarez-Nani, Tiziana. Connaissance et langage des anges selon Thomas d’Aquin et Gilles de Rome (Paris: Vrin, 2003).Google Scholar
Suarez-Nani, Tiziana. Les anges et la philosophie: Subjectivité et fonction cosmologique des substances séparées à la fin du XIIIe siècle (Paris: Vrin, 2002).Google Scholar
Suarez-Nani, Tiziana, and de Mottoni, Barbara Faes. “I demoni e l’illusione dei sensi nel XIII secolo: Bonaventura e Tommaso d’Aquino,” in Jakobs Traum: Zur Bedeutung der Zwischenwelt in der Tradition des Platonismus, ed. Horn, Hans-Jürgen (St. Katharinen: Scripta Mercaturae Verlag, 2002), 77–94.Google Scholar
Sweeney, Eileen C. “Aquinas on the Seven Deadly Sins: Tradition and Innovation,” in Sin in Medieval and Early Modern Culture, ed. Newhauser, Richard G. and Ridyard, Susan J. (Suffolk: York Medieval Press / Boydell and Brewer, 2012), 85–106.Google Scholar
Torre, Michael D. Do Not Resist the Spirit’s Call: Francisco Marín-Sola on Sufficient Grace (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Torre, Michael D. “Francisco Marín-Sola, O. P., and the Origin of Jacques Maritain’s Doctrine on God’s Permission of Evil,” Nova et Vetera (English Edition) 4 (2006): 55–94.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. “Life and Works,” in The Oxford Handbook of Aquinas, ed. Davies, Brian and Stump, Eleonore (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), 15–32.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Saint Thomas Aquinas, vol. 1, rev. ed. (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Wenzel, Siegfried. “The Seven Deadly Sins: Some Problems of Research,” Speculum 43 (1968): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westberg, Daniel. “Did Aquinas Change His Mind about the Will?” The Thomist 58 (1994): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1982).Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas II (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas (Washington, D. C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. “Thomas Aquinas on Philosophy and the Preambles of Faith,” in Doolan 2012, 196–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar