Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Foreword
- Contents
- Figures
- Plates
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Gallipoli battlefield place names
- Introduction
- 1 Boundary and divide: The antiquity of the Dardanelles
- 2 The Gallipoli campaign: History and legend
- 3 Recording the battlefield: First steps
- 4 Capturing the battlefield: Mapping and air photography at Gallipoli
- 5 Battlefield archaeology: Gallipoli
- 6 Forming the ANZAC battlefield
- 7 Forming the Ottoman battlefield
- 8 Artefacts from the battlefield
- 9 Remembering Gallipoli
- 10 Remembering Gallipoli from a Turkish perspective
- Conclusion
- Appendix Anzac Gallipoli Archaeological Database
- References
- Index
10 - Remembering Gallipoli from a Turkish perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2015
- Frontmatter
- Foreword
- Contents
- Figures
- Plates
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Gallipoli battlefield place names
- Introduction
- 1 Boundary and divide: The antiquity of the Dardanelles
- 2 The Gallipoli campaign: History and legend
- 3 Recording the battlefield: First steps
- 4 Capturing the battlefield: Mapping and air photography at Gallipoli
- 5 Battlefield archaeology: Gallipoli
- 6 Forming the ANZAC battlefield
- 7 Forming the Ottoman battlefield
- 8 Artefacts from the battlefield
- 9 Remembering Gallipoli
- 10 Remembering Gallipoli from a Turkish perspective
- Conclusion
- Appendix Anzac Gallipoli Archaeological Database
- References
- Index
Summary
The Turkish cemeteries at Gallipoli developed in a different manner from those of the Anzacs, and the ceremonies mirrored marked shifts in public opinion and the political circumstances of the time. In this chapter, we first discuss how Turkish commemoration ceremonies have evolved over the last century, after which we examine the monuments themselves.
18 MARCH NAVAL VICTORY COMMEMORATIONS AND VISITS TO THE CEMETERIES
Ceremonies held during the war period
The Ottoman victory at Gallipoli (Çanakkale Muzafferiyet-i Azimesi) was acclaimed throughout the empire and beyond. Celebratory gatherings and ceremonies were held across the empire, and especially in Istanbul. Caliph-Sultan Mehmet Reşat received the title Gazi (Veteran) to mark the victory, while the German Kaiser decorated the Çanakkale Fortified Zone Commander, Cevat Pasha. For his part, Cevat, anxious to proclaim the heroism of the gunners in the naval victory of 18 March 1915, obtained the approval of the Ottoman Supreme Command to rename the Dardanos Battery the Hasan-Mevsuf Battery in recognition of the bravery of the gunners Hasan, Mevsuf Bey and their friends.
The first commemoration of the 18 March victory in the Dardanelles was held one year on. On 12 March 1916, Nihat Pasha, commander of the Çanakkale Fortified Zone, issued an order for a military ceremony to take place on the anniversary of the naval victory ‘to cherish the memory of the soldiers who fell on that date’. This military ceremony and a parade would follow a religious ceremony. The Ottoman warship Yavuz came from Istanbul for the ceremonies, which were held in the Hastane Bayırı, Anadolu Hamidiye, Dardanos Bastion and Erenköy–Seddülbahir areas and were attended by Nihat Pasha, accompanied by Merten Pasha and Cevat Pasha. A German officer made the following statement during this first commemoration:
Passing through the sloshy pastures we are heading to a silent cemetery, the final resting place of four German and three Turkish heroes in the outskirts of the Dardanos Hills. When I first saw the graves a couple of weeks ago, they were surrounded by a mysterious palisade, with uniformed German and Turkish stonemasons working with hammers and chisels behind it. Today many hands have decorated it with flowers and trees, and spring flowers have blossomed over both the German and Turkish mass graves. Both have magnificent marble grave monuments erected over them. The inscriptions tell the names and heroism of the new March soldiers.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Anzac BattlefieldA Gallipoli Landscape of War and Memory, pp. 222 - 243Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
- 1
- Cited by