Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables
- List of case studies
- List of figures
- Acknowledgements for the first edition
- Acknowledgements for the second edition
- Preface to the second edition
- Introduction: problems of definition and the discourse of American independent cinema
- Part I American independent cinema in the studio years (mid-1920s to late 1940s)
- 1 Independent filmmaking in the studio era: tendencies within the studio system
- 2 Independent filmmaking in the studio era: the Poverty Row studios and beyond (1930s to 1950s)
- Part II American independent cinema in the post-studio era (late 1940s to late 1960s)
- Part III American independent cinema and the ‘New Hollywood’ (late 1960s to late 1970s)
- Part IV Contemporary American independent cinema (1980s to date)
- Epilogue: from independent cinema to specialty content
- Bibliography
- Index
2 - Independent filmmaking in the studio era: the Poverty Row studios and beyond (1930s to 1950s)
from Part I - American independent cinema in the studio years (mid-1920s to late 1940s)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2017
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables
- List of case studies
- List of figures
- Acknowledgements for the first edition
- Acknowledgements for the second edition
- Preface to the second edition
- Introduction: problems of definition and the discourse of American independent cinema
- Part I American independent cinema in the studio years (mid-1920s to late 1940s)
- 1 Independent filmmaking in the studio era: tendencies within the studio system
- 2 Independent filmmaking in the studio era: the Poverty Row studios and beyond (1930s to 1950s)
- Part II American independent cinema in the post-studio era (late 1940s to late 1960s)
- Part III American independent cinema and the ‘New Hollywood’ (late 1960s to late 1970s)
- Part IV Contemporary American independent cinema (1980s to date)
- Epilogue: from independent cinema to specialty content
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Not everybody likes to eat cake. Some people like bread, and even a certain number of people like stale bread than fresh bread.
Steven Broidy, chairman of Monogram PicturesIntroduction
The above statement by the once president and chief executive officer of Poverty Row outfit Monogram Pictures represents an appropriate introduction to a different form of independent filmmaking during the studio years: low-end independent production, which, in Broidy's analogy, is represented by the phrase ‘stale bread’. The analogy seems apt. If one accepts that the films of top-rank independent producers and the studio prestige productions represent American cinema's ‘cake’, and the standard studio film production corresponds to its ‘bread’, then films from studios like Monogram, Republic, Grand National, Producers Releasing Corporation (PRC) and a large number of other smaller companies operating in the margins of the industry certainly represent American cinema's ‘stale bread’. In other words, they represent film production of a particularly low quality and cheap look that could never be confused with the top-rank product examined in the previous chapter. For instance, according to film historian Wheeler Dixon, the key features of Monogram films were ‘shoddy sets, dim lighting restricted mostly to simple key spots, non-existent camerawork and extremely poor sound recording’, elements far removed from prestige-level independent production or studio filmmaking. Even the most successful financially and ‘artistically’ Poverty Row studio in the 1930s and 1940s, Republic Pictures, was widely known by industry practitioners as ‘Repulsive Pictures’.
Despite the lack of quality and the absence of production values, however, low-end independent production represents a less controversial form of independent filmmaking. This is because the ties with the major studios that top-rank independents such as Selznick International Pictures enjoyed did not exist for companies like Grand National and Producers Releasing Corporation. Indeed, these companies operated completely ‘independently’ from the majors, producing their films in their own studios (or in hired soundstages), releasing them through self-owned distribution networks (or through the states rights system) and exhibiting them in small independent theatres located mainly in the neighbourhoods of big cities, small towns and rural areas.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- American Independent CinemaSecond Edition, pp. 58 - 92Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2017