Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Lessons from Hollywood's American Revolution
- 2 Rattling the chains of history: Steven Spielberg's Amistad and ‘telling everyone's story’
- 3 Hollywood's Civil War dilemma: to imagine or unravel the nation?
- 4 Saving the Good War: Hollywood and World War II in the post-Cold War world
- 5 Oliver Stone and the decade of trauma
- 6 From Civil Rights to Black Nationalism: Hollywood v. black America?
- 7 Hollywood's post-Cold War history: the ‘righteousness’ of American interventionism
- Select Bibliography
- Index
2 - Rattling the chains of history: Steven Spielberg's Amistad and ‘telling everyone's story’
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2013
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Lessons from Hollywood's American Revolution
- 2 Rattling the chains of history: Steven Spielberg's Amistad and ‘telling everyone's story’
- 3 Hollywood's Civil War dilemma: to imagine or unravel the nation?
- 4 Saving the Good War: Hollywood and World War II in the post-Cold War world
- 5 Oliver Stone and the decade of trauma
- 6 From Civil Rights to Black Nationalism: Hollywood v. black America?
- 7 Hollywood's post-Cold War history: the ‘righteousness’ of American interventionism
- Select Bibliography
- Index
Summary
If the American Revolution is a brilliant mirror for the nation's dominant ideologies, an event whose image encapsulates all that its boosters imagine or desire ‘America’ to be, then slavery is its unpalatable alter ego; an indelible stain on the collective consciousness, a system or institution whose impact is both invisible and yet impossible to ignore and, like a ghost in the machine, whose presence continues to be felt in all areas of American life. Nowhere, one might add, is this ambivalence felt more acutely than in Hollywood. The cultural moment for Gone with the Wind-style representations of slavery as domestic idyll and ‘Uncle Toms’ contentedly serving their white ‘massas’ has long since passed but what, if anything, to replace them with remains a contentious subject. The dilemma, at least, is a simple one. Portray the slave plantation as anything less than a blood-soaked prison camp, a regime founded upon the systematic brutalisation of African descendents, and a multitude of protesting voices are all but guaranteed. But represent the slave plantation in its full, unremitting grimness and you run the risk of alienating audiences – black and white - who are either unwilling or unable to deal with such images, though for different reasons. If silence and obfuscation mark contemporary attitudes towards slavery across the racial spectrum, Tara Mack makes a useful distinction: whereas white Americans have used this silence ‘to distance themselves from the guilt and responsibility’, black Americans have used it ‘to distance themselves from the shame’.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- American History and Contemporary Hollywood Film , pp. 39 - 63Publisher: Edinburgh University PressPrint publication year: 2005