Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 2 - Proportionality in the Case Law of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador

  • from Part I - Proportionality and Processes of Constitutionalization
  • Edited by Francisca Pou-Giménez, Laura Clérico, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina, Esteban Restrepo-Saldarriaga, Universidad de los Andes, Colombia
  • Book:
    Proportionality and Transformation
    Published online:
    27 October 2022
    Print publication:
    03 November 2022, pp 41-62

  • Summary

    This chapter describes the application of the principle of proportionality in the case law of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador in a context that is highly favorable to its use, given the presence in the Constitution of 2008 of an amplified rights catalog, the reception of international human rights instruments into the constitutional block, and the explicit authority granted to the Court to resort to proportionality analysis to solve tensions and conflicts between rights. On the basis of decisions produced between 2008 and 2019, the authors show that the Constitutional Court has applied the method with different goals in mind and with regards an ample variety of subject matters covering civil and political rights but also economic, social, cultural and environmental rights. While the authors point out that the method has received inadequate uses, case law analysis also shows that it has been used to protect traditionally discriminated–against social groups, displaying a transformative potential.