Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-29T18:35:32.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-time PCR versus traditional and Nano-based ELISA in early detection of murine trichinellosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2023

S. M. Mohammad
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
L. A. Hegazy
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
R. S. Abdel Hady
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
M. A. Salama
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
S. K. Hammad*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
S. M. Ibrahim
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
*
Corresponding author: S. K. Hammad; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trichinellosis is a serious foodborne zoonosis. It poses a serious risk to public health worldwide. Early serological diagnosis of trichinellosis is influenced by an immunological ‘silent’ phase following infection. This highlights the necessity for developing sensitive diagnostic approaches to be employed when antibodies cannot be detected. In this work, the validity of traditional ELISA, Nano-ELISA and real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were evaluated in early diagnosis of Trichinella spiralis. Swiss albino mice were orally infected with 100 and 300 muscle larvae/mouse. Mice were sacrificed 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, and 28 days post-infection (dpi). Blood samples were tested for circulating antigen by traditional ELISA and Nano-ELISA using anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG conjugated with AgNPs and for Rep gene by SYBR green real-time PCR. Rep gene detection by SYBR green real-time PCR could detect T. spiralis with 100% sensitivity in the mild infection group at 8 dpi, while in the severe infection group it reached 100% sensitivity at 4 dpi. Nano-ELISA could detect T. spiralis circulating antigen from 4 dpi in both mild and severe infection and reached 100% sensitivity at 8 dpi and 6 dpi in mild and severe infection, respectively. However, traditional ELISA could detect T. spiralis circulating antigen from 6 dpi and reached maximum sensitivity at 15 dpi in the mild infection group, while in the severe infection group detection began at 4 dpi and reached 100% sensitivity at 8 dpi. Nano-ELISA and real time PCR, using Rep gene, are useful tools for the detection of early T. spiralis infection even in its mild infection state.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Trichinellosis is a widespread meat-borne zoonotic disease caused by the nematode genus Trichinella. It affects a wide range of animal species and humans (Pozio Reference Pozio2015). FAO/WHO (2013) listed trichinellosis as the seventh most important foodborne parasitic disease in the world. It has a global fundamental influence on socio-economic consequences such as the international trade of animals and as a public health problem (Murrell Reference Murrell2016). Trichinellosis in man is caused by the pathogenic species Trichinella spiralis (T. spiralis) (Appleton et al. Reference Appleton, Blum, Gebreselassie and Lamb2012). The adult worms of T. spiralis reside in the mucosa of the small intestine of mammals, birds, and reptiles. However, the larvae are found inside skeletal muscles. Humans are infected via consumption of infected raw or inadequately cooked pork meat containing T. spiralis larvae (Pozio Reference Pozio2007). The clinical manifestation of trichinellosis exists in two phases: the intestinal phase, characterised by abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, and the muscle phase, resulting from the inflammatory response caused by muscle cell invasion by the larvae, which may be accompanied by fever, myalgia, eosinophilia, and palpebral or facial edema (Dvorožnáková et al. Reference Dvorožnáková, Kolodziej-Sobocinska and Hurníková2012). Early clinical diagnosis of trichinellosis is quite challenging due to non-specific symptoms and signs. Likewise, chronic forms of the disease are difficult to diagnose as it largely depends on the history of ingestion of raw or inadequately cooked meat and detection of Trichinella larvae in the muscle (Gomaa Reference Gomaa2020).

Currently, human trichinellosis can be diagnosed by identification of larvae in a muscle biopsy or the serological detection of specific anti-Trichinella IgG antibodies in serum (Sun et al. Reference Sun, Song, Jiang, Ren, Yan, Han, Liu, Zhang, Wang and Ciu2018). Nevertheless, microscopic examination of muscle biopsy specimens is not sensitive during the early stage of the disease or in cases of light infection, in addition to being unable to distinguish species. Furthermore, highly invasive tissue sampling may result in medical complications and undermine the utility of these procedures (Riddle et al. Reference Riddle, DuPont and Connor2016).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blotting are frequently used tests for serological diagnosis of human trichinellosis. Detection of anti-Trichinella IgG is achieved by using excretory/secretory antigens of T. spiralis muscle larvae. (Gamble et al. Reference Gamble, Pozio, Bruschi, Nöckler, Kapel and Gajadhar2004). However, the main drawback of ELISA is false negative results in the early stage of infection (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Shi, Liu, Jiang, Guan, Chen and Cui2017a). Previous studies have observed that 100% detection of IgG antibodies may not be reached until at least 1–3 months after human infection (Gamble et al. Reference Gamble, Pozio, Bruschi, Nöckler, Kapel and Gajadhar2004). Furthermore, it is difficult to distinguish between recent and past infection as both human and animal hosts develop a detectable antibody response lasts for a long time after the acute phase of the disease (Yang et al. Reference Yang, Cai, Tong, Sun, Xuan, Kang, Vallée, Boireau, Cheng and Liu2016).

Nano-ELISA is a sensitive protein detection procedure based upon the use of nanoparticles and ELISA. Nanotechnology improves identification of microorganisms (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Hu, Jin, Yao and Li2006). Combination of nano technique with traditional ELISA can improve its detection limit depending on the unique physical and chemical properties of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles (Jia et al. Reference Jia, Zhong, Hua, Liu, Jing, Lou, Yao, Xiang, Jin and Zhao2009). Nanoparticles are transporters that load enzymes and antibodies for signal amplification, have enzyme-mimicking activity that replaces the natural enzyme labels, and act as signal transducers to deliver fluorescence or luminescence signals as an alternate output (Gao et al. Reference Gao, Zhou and Chandrawati2019). Promising outcomes from using nano assays in the diagnosis of cancer (Jia et al. Reference Jia, Zhong, Hua, Liu, Jing, Lou, Yao, Xiang, Jin and Zhao2009) and infectious diseases (Guirgis et al. Reference Guirgis, Sáe-Cunha, Gomes, Cavadas, Silva, Doria, Blatch, Baptista, Pereira, Azzazy, Mota, Prudêncio and Franco2012; Kamel et al. Reference Kamel, El-Baz, Demerdash, El-Karaksy, El-Gendy, Hassan, Salah, El-Moneem, Hendawy and Aly2016; Khodadadi et al. Reference Khodadadi, Madani, Hoghooghi Rad and Atyabi2021) have offered the challenge to employ it in the diagnosis of the experimental trichinellosis.

The use of DNA/RNA-based methods derives from the fact that each species of parasite carries unique DNA or RNA sequences that differentiate it from other parasites (Verma et al. Reference Verma, Das, Manjunathachar and Muwel2018). The advancement of molecular tools has resulted in great improvement in the diagnosis of infectious diseases (Bauer et al. Reference Bauer, Perez, Forrest and Goff2014). Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a highly sensitive method in the detection of Trichinella in faeces, blood, and meat (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Ren, Shi, Hu, Song, Duan, Zhang, Du, Liu, Jiang, Wang and Cui2017; Ashour et al. Reference Ashour, Aboul Assad, El-Kowrany and Abdel Ghaffar2018; Ojodale et al. Reference Ojodale, Inabo, Ella and Okubanjo2021). However, real-time PCR outperforms conventional PCR in speed, simplicity, reproducibility, and quantitative capability (Yang & Rothman Reference Yang and Rothman2004). Using fluorescent DNA intercalating dyes, such as SYBR-Green I in real-time PCR, affords considerable cost-benefit (Tajadini et al. Reference Tajadini, Panjehpour and Javanmard2014). Rep primer is a nuclear 1.6 kb repetitive element from T. spiralis DNA sequences. It can detect newborn larvae (NBL) early in mice (from 5 days post-infection, or dpi) and last for a long time (up to 19 dpi). Therefore, it could be a useful tool in early diagnosis when antibodies are not detectable (Krivokapich et al. Reference Krivokapich, Prous, Gatti and Arbusti2019). The aim of this study was to compare parasitological, serological, and molecular diagnostic methods in the early detection of trichinellosis in both its mild and severe states of infection and to detect the sensitivity of Nano-based ELISA versus real time PCR in the diagnosis of T. spiralis infection.

Material and methods

Parasite and animals

Larvae of T. spiralis were obtained from infected pig muscles from the Cairo Slaughterhouse, Cairo, Egypt and maintained at the Theodor Bilharz Research Institute, Giza, Egypt by serial passage in rats in accordance with the method described by Mayer-Scholl et al. (Reference Mayer-Scholl, Pozio, Gayda, Thaben, Bahn and Nöckler2017). Ninety-nine laboratory bred, Swiss albino male mice, about 5–6 weeks of age and weighing 20–25g, were supplied from theTheodor Bilharz Research Institute animal house and maintained in accordance with national and institutional guidelines.

Experimental study design

Animals were divided into two main groups; a control group (9 mice; Group I, normal non-infected) and experimental groups (90 mice; Groups 2 and 3). Mice were orally infected by gavage with 100 muscle larvae/mouse in Group 2 and 300 muscle larvae/mouse in Group 3 (Sun et al. Reference Sun, Wang, Liu, Jiang and Liu2015a, Reference Sun, Liu, Wang, Jiang, Wang, Liu, Liu, Zhang and Cuib). Each experimental group was then subdivided into 5 subgroups (A, B, C, D, E; 9 mice each) according to the time of sacrifice; 4, 6, 8, 10, and 15 dpi. At scarification time, the small intestine was removed, longitudinally opened, and washed for counting adult worms. Blood samples were collected, centrifuged at 1000 g for 20 min to separate serum. The collected serum was stored at -20°C until tested for T. spiralis circulating antigen by traditional and Nano-based ELISA. Blood samples were also tested for T. spiralis by SYBR Green real-time PCR using Rep primer.

Parasitological assessment

Isolation and adult worm counting

Infected mice were euthanized, and the abdominal cavity was dissected. The small intestine was taken off, washed, opened longitudinally along its whole length then cut into small pieces (about 2 cm) and kept in normal saline for 3–4 h at 37°C. The intestinal specimens were shaken well in saline, rinsed, and finally removed. Adults were allowed to sediment for 0.5 h, then the supernatant fluid was discarded, and the remaining fluid was poured into a petri dish with parallel lines drawn at its base using a permanent ink marker. Adults were counted under the dissecting microscope at 10X power (Wakelin & Lioyed Reference Wakelin and Lloyd1976).

Verification of T. spiralis infection

Two mice from each subgroup were maintained and sacrificed at 28 dpi. To verify infection, a piece of diaphragm was taken and microscopically examined to detect T. spiralis muscle larvae (Chu et al. Reference Chu, Kim, Lee, Lee, Kim and Quan2016).

T. spiralis adult worm-crude extract-antigen (CEA) preparation

Thirty mice were orally inoculated with 5000 T. spiralis muscle larvae/mouse. At 5 dpi, mice were euthanized, and the small intestine was collected, opened, washed in prewarmed phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), cut into small pieces, and incubated in PBS for 1.5 h at 37°C on a 300 μm sieve. The intestinal debris was filtered through a 200 μm sieve, and the released worms were allowed to settle for 30 min then centrifuged at 600 g for 10 min after multiple washes in PBS supplemented with 100 units of penicillin/mL and 100 μg streptomycin/mL then collected in a clean tube (Zocevic et al. Reference Zocevic, Vallee, Blaga, Liu, Lacour and Boireau2011). To prepare the crude antigen, the collected worms were suspended in deionized water, exposed to 5 freeze-thaw cycles, then homogenized on ice in a glass tissue grinder. The remaining fragments were subjected to an additional round of ultrasonication (99 times 3-s cycle on ice) for further homogenization (Cui et al. Reference Cui, Liu, Wang, Zhang, Jiang, Liu and Wang2013). The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000 g for 1 h at 4°C, then the supernatant was collected and stored at -20°C to be used as T. spiralis crude extract antigen (Yang et al. Reference Yang, Li, Liu, Sun, Liu, Zhang, Jiang, Zhang, Ren, Wang and Cui2015). The amount of protein content in prepared antigen was measured by mass spectrometry (Gillette & Carr Reference Gillette and Carr2013).

Control serum

The normal mice serum was diluted to be used as a negative control. Regarding positive control, the prepared T. spiralis crude extract antigen was added to the normal mice serum.

Polyclonal antibodies against T. spiralis adult crude extract antigen preparation

New Zealand white rabbits, 8 months old and weighing about 1.5 kg, were purchased from Rabbit Research Unit (RRU), Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Egypt. Each rabbit was immunized intramuscularly at four sites with a priming dose of 1 mg of prepared T. spiralis crude extract antigen mixed with 50 μl of aluminium hydroxide (13 mg/mL). After 15 d, rabbits were injected with the first booster dose (0.5 mg antigen mixed with 50 μl of aluminium hydroxide) followed by three booster doses at one-week intervals (Gillette & Carr Reference Gillette and Carr2013). Blood samples were taken from rabbits before the priming dose and examined with ELISA for cross-reaction with other parasites to ensure that the rabbits were parasite-free. Samples were also examined at each booster to detect the titre of anti-T. spiralis antibodies (Guobadia & Fagbemi Reference Guobadia and Fagbemi1997). When the titre was high, blood samples were collected, and anti-serum was stored at -70°C until used. Polyclonal IgG against T. spiralis crude extract antigen was purified from collected serum by Ammonium sulfate precipitation (Kent Reference Kent and Javois1999) and caprylic acid (Mckinney & Parkinson Reference McKinney and Parkinson1987).

Labeling of anti-T. spiralis IgG antibody with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (periodate method)

As demonstrated by Tijssen & Kurstak (Reference Tijssen and Kurstak1984), 5 mg of HRP (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was resuspended in 1.2 mL of distilled water, after addition of 0.3 mL of freshly prepared sodium periodate then kept for 20 min at room temperature. The mixture was dialyzed against 1 mm sodium acetate buffer pH 4 at 4°C with multiple changes overnight. After removal from the dialysis tube, 0.5 mL of antibody solution (polyclonal solution of 5 mg/mL in 0.02 M carbonate buffer, pH 9.6) was added. After the mixture was incubated for 2 h at room temperature, 100 μl of sodium borohydride was added, then the solution was re-incubated for 2 h at 4°C. The HRP-antibody conjugate was dialysed with several changes against 0.01M PBS, pH 7.2.

Synthesis of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)

In brief, an Erlenmeyer flask containing 30 mL of 0.002M sodium borohydride (NaBH4) was placed in an ice bath and stirred on a stir plate for 20 min. After stirring, 2 mL of 0.001M silver nitrate (AgNO3) was dripped into the NaBH4 solution (about 1 drop/sec) followed by a few drops of 1.5M sodium chloride (NaCl) solution. Change in color of the mixture from a transparent colorless solution to a distinctively pale yellow and black color is indicative of the formation of silver nanoparticles. To prevent aggregation, 0.3% polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) was added, then the mixture was decanted into a mold to leave air bubbles and unmelted PVP particles in the beaker. The solution was then centrifuged at 20,000g 14°C for 30 min to separate silver nanoparticles and freeze-dried nanoparticles kept at 5 ± 3°C. The weights of freeze-dried nanoparticles were measured (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Qiao, Chen and Ding2005).

Silver nano probes (Ag nano probes) preparation

AgNPs were coupled with anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG antibodies and HRP. AgNPs-HRP-PAb 600 ug of the prepared anti-T. spiralis antigen IgG-PAb or (HRP polyclonal antibody, HRP-PAb) (30 ug/mL, in phosphate-buffer, pH 7.5) were added to 20 mL pH adjusted AgNPs solution and mixed gently for 3 h. After mixing, 4 mL of 10 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution was added and the mixture was then centrifuged three times at 13,000 rpm for 45 min at 4oC after 20 min incubation period at room temperature. The pellets were re-suspended in 2 mL phosphate buffer after the last centrifugation (pH 7.2, 0.01M containing 1% BSA and 0.05% sodium azide) and then stored at 4oC before being used (Ambrosi et al. Reference Ambrosi, Castaneda, Killard, Smyth, Alegret and Merkoçi2007).

Characterization of AgNPs and Ag nano probes

Briefly, the silver nanoparticle powder in the freeze-drying cuvette was re-dissolved in deionized water and the suspension then homogenized using a Fisher Bioblock Scientific ultrasonic cleaning container (Surrey, UK). The protein content (free) in the supernatant was measured using the Bradford protein assay spectrophotometric method at 595 nm after the supernatant was collected. To determine the encapsulation efficiency (AE) and loading capacity (LC) of nanoparticles, the following formulas were used: A represents the total amount of Ab, B represents the free amount of Ab, and C represents the weight of nanoparticles.

$$ \%\mathrm{AE}=\left[\left(\mathrm{A}\hbox{-} \mathrm{B}\right)/\mathrm{A}\right]\times 100 $$
$$ \%\mathrm{LC}=\left[\left(\mathrm{A}\hbox{-} \mathrm{B}\right)/\mathrm{C}\right]\times 100 $$

The scanning electron microscopy (HR-TEM) images were performed at Nanotech Company (Giza, Egypt) for photo-electronic purposes. The HR-TEM used JOEL JEM-2100 operating at 200 kilovolts (kV) equipped with a Gatan Erlangshen ES500 digital camera (Pleasanton, CA) (Brice et al. Reference Brice-Profeta, Arrio, Tronc, Menguy, Letard, Cartier dit Moulin, Noguès, Chanéac, Jolivet and Sainctavit2005). Samples of AgNPs were produced by putting one drop of a dilute suspension of AgNPs in water on a carbon-coated copper grid for 3 min at room temperature (Figure 1).

Figure 1. (a) SEM silver nanoparticles 50 nm size; (b) Size distribution analysis.

Standard ELISA

The purified polyclonal T. spiralis IgG worked as capture and detector antibodies whereas polyclonal T. spiralis IgG-HRP conjugate served as secondary antibodies. The selected concentrations and dilutions were as follows: 1/10 dilution of negative control and positive control serum, 10 μg/mL polyclonal T. spiralis IgG, and 1/5000 dilution of anti-rabbit IgG-HRP conjugate.

All wells of polystyrene microplate were coated with polyclonal T. spiralis IgG, then blocked with PBS pH 7.2 containing 1% foetal calf serum and 0.05% Tween® 20 (Sigma-Aldrich P7949). To each well, tested serum samples, negative and positive control serum samples were separately added. After that, polyclonal IgG against T. spiralis CEA, antirabbit polyclonal IgG-HRP conjugate, and ortho-phenylenediamine (OPD) substrate dissolved in phosphate-citrate buffer solution pH 5 were added. The optical densities (OD) were read by an ELISA reader at a wavelength of 492 nm after the reaction was halted by 2 M-sulfuric acid (Zumaquero-Ríos et al. Reference Zumaquero-Ríos, García-Juarez, De-la-Rosa-Arana, Marcet and Sarracent- Pérez2012).

Nano-based ELISA

Nano-based ELISA was performed to detect T. spiralis circulating antigen in both the tested and control serum, as was done under standard ELISA. However, in Nano-based ELISA the prepared Ag nano probes served as secondary antibodies instead of the anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG-HRP conjugate.

Calculation and interpretation of ELISA readings

The OD values of the tested and control serum were evaluated by calculating the mean OD of the readings. The mean OD of the negative control was added to twice the standard deviation to calculate the cut off value (COV). If the sample’s OD was equal to or greater than the COV, it was considered positive for T. spiralis, while OD values less than the COV were considered a negative sample. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of different assays were calculated according to DeLong (Reference DeLong, Vernon and Bollinger1985).

Design of primers

Primer was designed based on a nuclear 1.6 kb repetitive element (Rep) from the T. spiralis DNA sequences existing in the GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/) with access number X06625. Amplicon length was 144 bp for Rep (Synbio Technologies, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA).

DNA isolation and real-time PCR

For DNA extraction, each blood sample was collected individually in 5 mM EDTA and stored at -20°C prior to DNA purification. DNA was extracted using GF-1 Blood DNA Extraction Kit (#GF-BD-100, Vivantis Technologies, Oceanside, CA, USA) as guided by the manufacturer’s instructions.

Real time PCR was done with SensiFAST™ Direct Probe SuperMix PCR kit (Cat# BIO-86120, Meridian, Bioline, Memphis, TN, USA), which was utilized for amplification of extracted DNA followed by PCR. The components of the real-time PCR mixture were 25 μL SensiFAST Probe Direct SuperMix (2x), 2.5 μL forward primer (REP (5´ TTCTATTCTGCTACTGCTAACACTTCGA ´3) (Synbio Technologies), 2.5 μL, reverse primer (5´ TGGTGTGGCTCAAGAATGGA ´3) (Synbio Technologies),10μl Template DNA, and 10μl nuclease free water in a 50 μl final volume. The prepared reaction mix samples were applied in real time PCR (Step One Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) under the following cycling conditions: Reverse Transcription (RT) by 1 cycle at 55°C for 10 min; real time enzyme inactivation by 1 cycle at 95°C for 2 min; amplification by 40 cycles; denaturation at 95°C for 10 sec; annealing at 55°C for 10 sec; and extension at 72°C for 30 sec then 1 cycle final extension at 72°C for 5 min.

Calculation of Relative Quantification (RQ) (relative expression)

The data of RT-PCR were expressed in Cycle threshold (Ct). The PCR data sheet involves Ct values of the assessed gene (REP) compared to the corresponding housekeeping gene (β-actin). A control sample was used to assess the expression of certain genes. The RQ of each target gene was measured and normalized to the housekeeping gene consistent with the calculation of delta-delta Ct (ΔΔCt) (Muller et al. Reference Muller, Janovjak, Miserez and Dobbie2002). The RQ of each gene was calculated by taking 2-∆∆Ct.

Statistical analysis

Agreement in the form of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of standard ELISA, Nano-based ELISA, and PCR as well as positive predictive and negative predictive values of the assays were calculated. Fisher’s exact (FE) test was used to compare the studied groups.

$$ \mathrm{Sensitivity}=\mathrm{TP}\times 100/\mathrm{TP}+\mathrm{FN}\hskip1.5em \mathrm{Specificity}=\mathrm{TN}\times 100/\mathrm{TN}+\mathrm{FP} $$
$$ \mathrm{Accuracy}=\mathrm{TN}+\mathrm{TP}\times 100/\mathrm{N} $$
$$ \mathrm{Positive}\ \mathrm{predictive}\ \mathrm{value}=\mathrm{TP}\times 100/\mathrm{TP}+\mathrm{FP} $$
$$ \mathrm{Negative}\ \mathrm{predictive}\ \mathrm{value}=\mathrm{TN}\times 100/\mathrm{TN}+\mathrm{FN} $$

N is the total sample number, TP is true positive, FP is false positive, TN is true negative, and FN is false negative. The diagnostic indices (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of different assays were calculated according to DeLong (Reference DeLong, Vernon and Bollinger1985).

Results

Parasitological results

Regarding the number of adult worms, the highest means and SDs in both mild and severe infection were detected at 6 dpi in group 2B (38.67 ± 5.68) and 3B (97.89 ± 6.88), whereas the lowest means and SDs in both mild and severe infection were detected at 15 dpi in group 2E (8.56 ± 1.81) and 3E (23.56 ± 6.04), with statistically significant differences between the studied groups (P < 0.001) (Table 1).

Table 1. Comparison between mean and SD of intestinal adult trichinellosis among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infection groups

* F = One way ANOVA test;

** P ≤ 0.001 is highly statistically significant

Serological assays

Detection of T. spiralis circulating antigen by traditional ELISA

Standard ELISA began to detect T. spiralis circulating antigen in serum collected at 6 dpi in the mild infection group (subgroup 2B) with sensitivity of 44.4%, which reached 77.7%, 88.8%, and 100% at 8 dpi, 10 dpi, and 15 dpi, respectively. However, in severely infected subgroups it could detect T. spiralis circulating antigen in serum collected at 4 dpi (subgroup 3A) with sensitivity of 44.4%, which reached 66.7% at 6 dpi and 100% at 8 dpi, 10 dpi, and 15 dpi. There were statistically significant differences between studied groups (P = 0.002) (Table 2).

Table 2. Sensitivity of the traditional ELISA test among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infection groups

* P ≤ 0.05 is statistically significant.

** P ≤ 0.001 is highly statistically significant.

Detection of T. spiralis circulating antigen by Nano-ELISA test

Nano-based ELISA began to detect T. spiralis circulating antigen in both the mild and severe infection groups in serum collected at 4 dpi in subgroups 2A and 3A, with sensitivity of 55.5% and 77.8% and accuracy of 63.6% and 81.8%, respectively. This sensitivity reached 100% at 8 dpi in the mild infection subgroup (subgroup 2C) and at 6 dpi in the severe infection subgroup (subgroup 3B), with statistically significant differences between studied groups (P < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3. Performance of Nano-based ELISA test among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infection groups

* P ≤ 0.05 is statistically significant.

** P ≤ 0.001 is highly statistically significant.

Molecular assay

Rep gene was detected in the mild infection group at 4 dpi with sensitivity 55.6% (subgroup 2A). This sensitivity increased to reach 88.9% at 6 dpi (subgroup 2B) and 100% sensitivity and accuracy at 8 dpi (subgroup 2C) with statistically significant differences between studied subgroups (P < 0.001). However, in severe infection groups, sensitivity and accuracy reached 100% at 4 dpi (subgroup 3A) with statistically non-significant differences between subgroups (P > 0.999) (Table 4). The best cutoff of quantitative PCR in prediction of severe infection was ≥ 2.5841 with area under the curve of 0.9, sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 81.5%, and positive and overall accuracy of 80.8% (P < 0.001) (Table 5, Figure 2).

Table 4. Performance of Rep gene PCR test among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infected group

** P ≤ 0.001 is highly statistically significant.

Table 5. Performance of quantitative PCR in diagnosis of severity in all studied groups

** P ≤ 0.001 is highly statistically significant.

Figure 2. (a) SYBR Green fluorescence chart for DNA samples of mice, resulting from quantitative PCR and Rep gene expression; (b) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showing performance of quantitative PCR in diagnosis of severe infection. The best cutoff of quantitative PCR in prediction of severe infection was ≥ 2.5841 with area under curve of 0.9, sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 81.5%, positive predictive value of 78.3%, negative predictive value of 83%, and overall accuracy of 80.8% (P < 0.001).

When comparing the validity of traditional ELISA and Nano-based ELISA with PCR as a gold standard technique, it was observed that Nano-based ELISA gave the best results at Time 3 (8 dpi) in the mild infection group, and it had good results compared to PCR in early diagnosis of severe trichinellosis. It could detect infection from Time 1 (4 dpi) with sensitivity of 77.8%, which is lower than PCR sensitivity (100%) at this time, and gave the same results as PCR at Time 2 (6 dpi). Traditional ELISA had the lowest results in early diagnosis of T. spiralis. It attained the best results at 15 dpi in the mild infection group; however, in the severely infected group it could detect infection at Time 1 (4 dpi) but with lower sensitivity of 44.4%. At Time 2 (6 dpi) its sensitivity was still lower than PCR and Nano-ELISA then reached the same sensitivity as PCR and Nano-ELISA (100%) at Time 3 (8 dpi), 4 (10 dpi), and 5 (15 dpi) (Table 6).

Table 6. Validity of ELISA and Nano-ELISA in diagnosis of parasitic infection after using PCR as a gold standard test

Discussion

Trichinellosis is a common meat-borne zoonotic infection that affects humans and a wide variety of animal species (Pozio Reference Pozio2015). In severe cases, complications usually develop in the first two weeks of infection, although they have been reported in moderate cases with late treatment (Zarlenga et al. Reference Zarlenga, Wang and Mitreva2016). Early diagnosis of infection is crucial to initiation of effective treatment and prevention of deadly complications (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Shi, Liu, Jiang, Guan, Chen and Cui2017a).

Confirming a clinical diagnosis of human trichinellosis during the early stage of infection is difficult, and it can be misdiagnosed as alimentary intoxication or enterobacterial infection (Bai et al. Reference Bai, Hu, Liu, Tang and Liu2017). Many serological tests have been used for diagnosis of human trichinellosis, but even so, there is an apparent time gap (window period) between the development of clinical symptoms and positive serology. This window period coincides with the start of the parenteral phase when the NBL are released into circulation (Cui et al. Reference Cui, Wang, Sun, Liu, Zhang, Liu, Zhang, Jiang and Wang2015). ELISA using excretory/secretory antigens of T. spiralis muscle larvae is the frequently used serological test for diagnosis of trichinellosis (Gottstein et al. Reference Gottstein, Pozio and Nöckler2009). However, a high rate of false negative results can be obtained because most T. spiralis muscle larvae excretory-secretory antigens are stage-specific and are not detected by antibodies elicited by the parasites during the enteral phase (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Shi, Liu, Jiang, Guan, Chen and Cui2017a). Moreover, muscle larvae excretory-secretory antigens are cross-reactive with other helminths infections (Yera et al. Reference Yera, Andiva, Perret, Limonne, Boireau and Dupouy-Camet2003; Cui et al. Reference Cui, Wang, Sun, Liu, Zhang, Liu, Zhang, Jiang and Wang2015). Since the IgG and IgM antibodies can persist in humans for at least one year after infection, diagnostic procedures dependent on antibody detection are unable to distinguish between acute and past infections (Sun et al. Reference Sun, Wang, Liu, Jiang and Liu2015a). T. spiralis circulating antigen detection is a reliable approach to distinguish between previous and new infection. Therefore, improving the sensitivity of the ELISA assays currently in use for detecting T. spiralis antigen may facilitate accurate early diagnosis.

Nano-based ELISA was developed by combination of conventional ELISA and nanotechnology found to be an early sensitive diagnostic assay in the acute phase of T. spiralis infection in an animal model (Gomaa, Reference Gomaa2020). Molecular detection of the NBL of Trichinella utilizing a repetitive DNA element could be a valuable assay at the early phase of the infection when antibodies are not yet detectable (Krivokapich et al. Reference Krivokapich, Prous, Gatti and Arbusti2019). Several studies have stated that PCR is a highly sensitive method for detection of Trichinella in meat, faeces, and blood (Cuttell et al. Reference Cuttell, Corley, Gray, Vanderlinde, Jackson and Traub2012; Liu et al. Reference Liu, Ren, Shi, Hu, Song, Duan, Zhang, Du, Liu, Jiang, Wang and Cui2017; Ashour et al. Reference Ashour, Aboul Assad, El-Kowrany and Abdel Ghaffar2018; Ojodale et al. Reference Ojodale, Inabo, Ella and Okubanjo2021). In this context, the existing work is concerned with comparing parasitological, serological, and molecular diagnostic methods in early detection of trichinellosis and detecting the sensitivity of Nano-based ELISA and real time PCR in the diagnosis of T. spiralis infection.

In the present study, a statistically significant difference in mean and SD of adult T. spiralis was observed among different subgroups in the mild infection group (G2) (P < 0.001). The highest mean and SD of number of T. spiralis adults was noted in the group sacrificed at 6 dpi, while the lowest mean and SD was in the group sacrificed at 15 dpi. This aligns with Sadaow et al. Reference Sadaow, Intapan, Boonmars, Morakote and Maleewong2013 who found that there is a reduction rate of 33.7% when compared to the number of intestinal T. spiralis adult in mice infected with 100 larvae and sacrificed at 6 dpi and 10 dpi. Another study done on a different species of Trichinella reveled that at 15 dpi, T. spiralis adults count in the intestine was sporadic (0.13 ± 0.35) (Dvorožňáková et al. Reference Dvorožňáková, Hurníková and Kołodziej Sobocińska2010).

Regarding the severe infection group (G3), there was a statistically significant difference among the studied groups (P < 0.001). The highest mean and SD was observed for the group sacrificed at 6 dpi while the lowest mean and SD was in the group sacrificed at 15 dpi. Kołodziej-Sobocińska et al. Reference Kołodziej-Sobocińska, Dvoroznakova and Dzieman2006 reported that, after infection of mice with 400 larvae, the highest number of adult T. spiralis was detected in mouse intestine at 5 dpi with a decline in numbers from the start of the experiment until 20 dpi.

On the other hand, Ding et al. Reference Ding, Bai, Wang, Wang, Shi, Rosenthal, Boireau, Wu, Liu and Liu2016 noticed that the recovery rate of adults was 60% at 1 dpi without any significant change from 5 to 9 dpi. They added that mice infected with a high dose of muscle larvae had eliminated adult worms completely from their gut at 17 dpi. This means that the highest number of adult T. spiralis in mouse intestine was seen at the beginning of the infection at 6 dpis, then the number decreased. This is consistent with the report of Lawrence et al. (Reference Lawrence, Paterson, Wright, Knight and Miller2004) who declared that resistance to the parasite is correlated with expulsion of adults from the intestine via cellular and antibody-dependent mechanisms.

The observed highest means and SDs in groups 2B and 3B, and lowest means and SDs in groups 2E and 3E may possibly indicate that the higher the infective dose, the higher the number of adult worms in the intestine. Our findings were consistent with Xu et al. Reference Xu, Wen, Wang, Hu, Qi, Sun, Liu, Wang and Cui2017—who reported that the recovery of adult worm from their mice infected with 1000 and 2000 muscle larvae was statistically lower than that from mice infected with 3000, 4000, or 5000 muscle larvae—and Dvorožňáková et al. (Reference Dvorožňáková, Hurníková and Kołodziej Sobocińska2010), who noted that mice infected with a low dose of larvae completely eliminated parasite adults from the small intestine until day 20 dpi.

Likewise, Mista et al. (Reference Mista, Piekarska, Houszka, Zawadzki and Gorczykowski2010) reported that the number of adult Trichinella was higher at 7 dpi in mice infected with 500 larvae than those infected with 250 larvae. However, at 10 dpi they observed that the number of adults in their lightly infected group (250 larvae) was higher than in their severely infected group (500 larvae), which was contrary to our finding. They explained their finding by attributing it to the self-cure phenomenon, which occurs as a result of the rapid expulsion of the parasites in the early intestinal phase, as well as the aggregation of inflammatory cells (mostly mast cells), eosinophils, Th1 and Th2 lymphocyte responses, IgE antibody production, and the release of mediators and cytokines. These variable results discouraged us from relying on adult worm count as an assistive method for diagnosis of trichinellosis, both in mild and severe infections.

It is well recognized that antigen detection is a worthy confirmatory test for an early clinical diagnosis since it provides a clear indication of the presence of parasite products in blood (Gomaa Reference Gomaa2020). Therefore, we tested detection of circulating antigen for early diagnosis of T. spiralis infection. In the current work, traditional ELISA could not detect circulating antigen of Trichinella among mild infection subgroups (G2) at 4 dpi and began to detect it at 6 dpi; however, in the severe infection group T. spiralis circulating antigen was detected in serum at 4 dpi with sensitivity of 44.5%, reaching 100% at 8 dpi, 10 dpi and 15 dpi.

Many studies have reported the performance of traditional ELISA in detecting T. spiralis infection. Gomaa (Reference Gomaa2020) found that traditional ELISA begin to detect circulating antigen on 12 dpi with sensitivity of 83.33% and reached 100% at 22 dpi in mice infected with 100 larvae. Also, Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Fu, Jing, Jin, Ren, Jiang and Cui2012) found that T. spiralis circulating antigen was detected as early as 3 dpi in the serum of mice infected with 500 T. spiralis muscle larvae, and its level increased gradually and reached two peaks with detection rate of 40% and 100% at 13 and 24 dpi, respectively. Furthermore, Jing et al. (Reference Jing, Cui, Liu, Liu, Jiang and Wang2014) reported that T. spiralis circulating antigen was detectable as early as 8 dpi then increased radically during 13–15 dpi, peaking at 22 dpi in serum of mice infected with 500 larvae.

The observed statistically significant difference between mild (G2) and severe (G3) infected groups (P = 0.002) means that the level of circulating antigen may relate to the worm burden in the host. This coincides with the study done by Liu et al. (Reference Liu, Jing, Cui, Fu and Wang2013) who found that circulating antigen was detected as early as 4 dpi in the serum of both heavily (300 larvae) and lightly (100 larvae) infected groups. The antigen then increased rapidly, with a peak detection rate of 100% in severely infected mice at 10 dpi and 80% in lightly infected mice at 22 dpi, respectively, using a sandwich ELISA assay based on egg yolk immunoglobulin and IgM monoclonal antibody against T. spiralis muscle larvae excretory-secretory antigens.

Nanotechnology empowers identification of some of microorganisms (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Hu, Jin, Yao and Li2006). The advancement of in vitro diagnostics to the next level of performance is promised by the usage of nanoparticles (1–100 nm size range) (Azzazy et al. Reference Azzazy, Mansour and Kazmierczak2007).

In the current study the performance of Nano-based ELISA was assessed in the early diagnosis of T. spiralis infection. In the mildly infected group (G2), a statistically significant difference was observed between subgroups (P = 0.005). Nano-based ELISA could detect T. spiralis circulating antigen in serum collected at mice sacrificed at 4 dpi; sensitivity and accuracy increased at 6 dpi and reached 100% at 8 dpi, 10 dpi, and 15 dpi. Our results are comparable to those of Gomaa (Reference Gomaa2020), who reported that Nano-based ELISA began to detect circulating antigen at 6 dpi and recorded a statistically significant high sensitivity (58.33%, 91.67%) and accuracy (72.22%, 94.44%) at 8 dpi and 10 dpi, respectively, and reached 100% sensitivity and accuracy at 12 dpi in mice inoculated with 100 muscle larvae.

Regarding the effectiveness of Nano-based ELISA in early diagnosis of T. spiralis in the severe infection group (G3), we observed a statistically non-significant difference between G3 subgroups (P = 0.079). Nano-based ELISA could detect circulating T. spiralis antigen in serum collected at 4 dpi and reached 100% sensitivity and accuracy at 6 dpi, 8 dpi, 10 dpi, and 15 dpi. However, there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) among different subgroups of both the mild (G2) and severe (G3) infection groups. These results signify that Nano-based ELISA has better performance in detecting T. spiralis infection in both the mild (G2) and severe (G3) infection groups.

Our findings are in line with previous studies that used Nano-based ELISA in diagnosis of parasitic infection. Kamel et al. (Reference Kamel, El-Baz, Demerdash, El-Karaksy, El-Gendy, Hassan, Salah, El-Moneem, Hendawy and Aly2016) found that anti-Schistosoma monoclonal antibody conjugated AuNPs exhibited high performance in identifying the circulating Schistosoma mansoni antigen. It was a remarkable finding that AuNPs-immunochromatographic strip test exhibited quicker detection and good performance in diagnosis of brugian filariasis (Makhsin et al. Reference Makhsin, Razak, Noordin, Zakaria and Chun2012).

The advantage of Nano-based ELISA over traditional ELISA in diagnosis of different parasitic infections was previously elucidated by several studies (Moharm et al. Reference Moharm, El Enain, El-Deen, El Aswad, Hendawy and Aly2014; Naser et al. Reference Naser, Younis, Bayoumi, Eraky, Aly and El Attar2017; El-Shafey et al. Reference El-Shafey, Afifi, Oshiba, Aly and Lasheen2018; Khodadadi et al. Reference Khodadadi, Madani, Hoghooghi Rad and Atyabi2021). This promising high performance of Nano-based ELISA was explained by many studies. The immobilized HRP molecules act as signal amplification molecules that catalyze the oxidation of chromogenic substrate into colorful products and detect the presence of the target antigen. The targeted antigen concentration is proportionate to the absorbance value of the emerging-colored yields as determined by the ELISA reader. The traditional ELISA system has a limited sensitivity since it uses enzyme-conjugated antibody and only one antibody molecule can ultimately bind one HRP molecule. Moreover, Nano-based ELISA claims that one secondary antibody can be bonded with several HRP molecules across the nanoparticle bridge, significantly amplifying the signal and increasing the sensitivity of detection (Jia et al. Reference Jia, Zhong, Hua, Liu, Jing, Lou, Yao, Xiang, Jin and Zhao2009). Also, Ding et al. (Reference Ding, Zhao, Peng, He, Zhou, Yuan and Zhang2012) claimed that the use of nanoparticles functionalized with antibodies produces an assay with magnitude sensitivity higher than traditional ELISA because the background noise is reduced by minimizing the non-specific antibodies’ binding. Our finding indicated that obtained high sensitivity of the Nano-based ELISA may potentially be attributable to the use of polyclonal antibody IgG against T. spiralis adult worm circulating antigen given that intestinal worm circulating antigen manifests in blood circulation earlier than muscle larval circulating antigen, and this agrees with Sun et al. (Reference Sun, Wang, Liu, Jiang and Liu2015a, Reference Sun, Liu, Wang, Jiang, Wang, Liu, Liu, Zhang and Cuib), Liu et al. (Reference Liu, Ren, Shi, Hu, Song, Duan, Zhang, Du, Liu, Jiang, Wang and Cui2017), and Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Liu, Sun, Song, Jiang, Zhang and Cui2017b).

During early T. spiralis infection, the NBL enter and circulate in the blood until the adult worms are expelled from the intestine, so PCR may be a suitable tool for diagnosis of Trichinella infection at an early stage in humans and animals who test negative for anti-Trichinella antibodies (Li et al. Reference Li, Wang and Cui2010). Nevertheless, real time PCR provides several benefits over conventional PCR including rapidity, simplicity, reproducibility, and quantitative capability (Yang & Rothman Reference Yang and Rothman2004).

In our study, PCR performance was detected for early diagnosis of T. spiralis infection using Rep primer. Rep was effective in diagnosis of T. spiralis in the immunological ‘silent’ period by SYBR Green real time PCR. Interestingly, it provided an earlier and longer detection of NBL in mice (5–19 dpi) than other nuclear and mitochondrial primers used by Krivokapich et al. (Reference Krivokapich, Prous, Gatti and Arbusti2019).

Regarding the mild infection group (G2), there was a highly significant difference between subgroups (P < 0.001). PCR could detect Rep gene in blood at 4 dpi, with increasing sensitivity at 6 dpi and 8 dpi. These results were near those obtained by Li et al. (Reference Li, Wang and Cui2010), who detected DNA of T. spiralis in blood of mice infected with 20 larvae and 100 larvae at 5–6 dpi and 5–12 dpi, respectively. Also, Attia et al. (Reference Attia, Mahmoud, Othman and Sayed2016), who used PCR to detect DNA of T. spiralis migrating larva in blood samples of mice infected with 200 larvae, showed early detection of infection at 4, 6, and 14 dpi.

In severely infected groups (G3), the Rep gene PCR test showed a statistically non-significant difference between subgroups (P > 0.999). PCR began to detect Rep gene in blood collected at 4 dpi, with sensitivity and accuracy at 100% in all subgroups. These findings imply that PCR may be effective in early detection of Trichinella infection. Likewise, Caballero-Garcia & Jimenez-Cardoso (Reference Caballero-Garcia and Jimenez-Cardoso2001) reported that PCR using the pPRA primers detected T. spiralis DNA in mice infected with 300 larvae from 5–17 dpi. Krivokapich et al. Reference Krivokapich, Prous, Gatti and Arbusti2019 stated that in mice infected with 500 larvae, PCR detected T. spiralis infection from 5 to 19 dpi, and the first day of recognition of the repetitive DNA element by Rep was at 5 dpi. Our findings, however, conflict with some of their findings, as they reported that the detection was intermittent during this period since the used primer gave negative results at days 9, 10, 17, and 18 dpi.

When comparing the performance of PCR among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infection groups, a statistically significant difference was found (P < 0.001). The early detection of Rep gene in both mild and severe infection groups at 4 dpi, but with sensitivity of 100% in the severely infected group, means that the infecting dose of T. spiralis and the time after infection at which the PCR was conducted both affected the diagnostic value of PCR. This agreed with Li et al. (Reference Li, Wang and Cui2010), who indicated that the severity of infection determines the sensitivity of PCR for detecting DNA of the migrating larvae of T. spiralis in mouse blood. They found that T. spiralis DNA was detectable at 5 and 6 dpi in mice infected with 20 larvae with a detection rate of 7.69%. In mice inoculated with 100 larvae, they detected T. spiralis DNA at 5–12 dpi with a maximum rate of 38.46% at 7 dpi, while in mice inoculated with 300 larvae at 5–17 dpi, the rate exceeded 50% from 5 to 10 dpi and attained a peak rate of 61.54% at 7 dpi.

For the first time in the literature, our study compared the validity of traditional ELISA, Nano-ELISA, and PCR in the diagnosis of Trichinella infection. Given that the best results were obtained by PCR, we used PCR as the gold standard technique to which to compare our other tests results. This was done following Beyhan & Tas Cengiz (Reference Beyhan and Taş Cengiz2017), who used real time PCR as the gold standard to test the validity of conventional microscopy and an antigen detection ELISA kit for detection of Giardia intestinalis in human stool specimens. Also, Khalifa et al. (Reference Khalifa, Abdel-Rahman, Bakir, Othman and El-Mokhtar2020) considered nested PCR as the gold standard test in finding the sensitivity and specificity of the Copro-ELISA test to diagnose Capillaria philippinensis infections.

Our finding revealed that PCR was superior to the other tests in early detection of trichinellosis both in mild and severe infection followed by Nano-ELISA. Traditional ELISA gave the lowest results of the three examined tests. This reveals that PCR is best in early diagnosis of mild T. spiralis infection and is considered a valid and reliable test in detecting severe infection. Our finding was consistent with Gomaa (Reference Gomaa2020), who found that circulating antigen was only detected by Nano-based ELISA at 6, 8, and 10 dpi and by both traditional ELISA and Nano-based ELISA at 12–28 dpi. Also, Krivokapich et al. (Reference Krivokapich, Prous, Gatti and Arbusti2019) indicated that molecular techniques for detection of NBL of Trichinella using the repetitive DNA element (Rep) could be beneficial during the early stage of the infection when antibodies are not detectable by traditional ELISA.

Conclusion

We concluded that Rep gene was efficient to detect T.spiralis during the ‘silent’ period by SYBR Green real time PCR with a great role in early diagnosis of mild as well as severe T. spiralis infection. Also, Nano-based ELISA is a promising and sensitive method for early diagnosis of the acute phase of mild and severe T.spiralis, with results as sensitive and early as PCR, so this assay could be used as a potential alternative to PCR. Traditional ELISA had the lowest sensitivity in early diagnosis of T. spiralis mild and severe infection compared to PCR and Nano-ELISA.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt (approval number ZU-IACUC/3/F/38/2021).

References

Ambrosi, A, Castaneda, MT, Killard, AJ, Smyth, MR, Alegret, S, Merkoçi, A (2007). Double-codified gold nano labels for enhanced immunoanalysis. Analytical Chemistry 79, 52325240. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac070357mCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleton, JA, Blum, LK, Gebreselassie, NG (2012). Nematoda: Trichinella. In Lamb, TJ (ed). Immunity to Parasitic Infection. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 275285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashour, DS, Aboul Assad, IA, El-Kowrany, S, Abdel Ghaffar, AE (2018). Copro-diagnosis of early Trichinella spiralis infection in experimental animals. Acta Scientific Microbiology, 1, 2, 3238. https://doi.org/10.31080/ASMI.2018.01.0017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attia, RA, Mahmoud, AE, Othman, RM, Sayed, AA (2016). Application of polymerase chain reaction assay for early detection of cell free DNA in mice infected with the migratory larvae of Trichinella spiralis. Journal of Infection and Molecular Biology 4, 1, 915. https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.jimb/2016/4.1.9.15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzazy, HM, Mansour, MM, Kazmierczak, SC (2007). From diagnostics to therapy: prospects of quantum dots. Clinical Biochemistry 40, 1314, 917–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.05.018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bai, X, Hu, X, Liu, X, Tang, B, Liu, M (2017). Current research of trichinellosis in China. Frontiers in Microbiology 8, 1472. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, KA, Perez, KK, Forrest, GN, Goff, DA (2014). Review of rapid diagnostic tests used by antimicrobial stewardship programs. Clinical Infectious Diseases 59, Suppl 3, 134145. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciu547CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beyhan, YE, Taş Cengiz, Z (2017). Comparison of microscopy, ELISA, and real-time PCR for detection of Giardia intestinalis in human stool specimens. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 47, 4, 12951299. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1612-71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brice-Profeta, S, Arrio, MA, Tronc, E, Menguy, N, Letard, I, Cartier dit Moulin, C, Noguès, M, Chanéac, C, Jolivet, JP, Sainctavit, P (2005). Magnetic order in γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles: a XMCD study. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 288, 354365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.09.120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero-Garcia, ML, Jimenez-Cardoso, E (2001). Early detection of Trichinella spiralis infection by the polymerase chain reaction in blood samples of experimentally infected mice. Parasite (Paris, France) 8, 2 Suppl, S229S231. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/200108s2229Google Scholar
Chu, KB, Kim, SS, Lee, SH, Lee, DH, Kim, AR, Quan, FS. (2016). Immune correlates of resistance to Trichinella spiralis reinfection in mice. The Korean Journal of Parasitology 54, 5, 637643. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2016.54.5.637CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cui, J, Liu, RD, Wang, L, Zhang, X, Jiang, P, Liu, MY, Wang, ZQ (2013). Proteomic analysis of surface proteins of Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Parasites & Vectors 6, 355. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cui, J, Wang, L, Sun, GG, Liu, LN, Zhang, SB, Liu, RD, Zhang, X, Jiang, P, Wang, ZQ (2015). Characterization of a Trichinella spiralis 31 kDa protein and its potential application for the serodiagnosis of trichinellosis. Acta Tropica 142, 5763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.10.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuttell, GL, Corley, SW, Gray, CP, Vanderlinde, PB, Jackson, LA, Traub, RJ (2012). Real-time PCR as a surveillance tool for the detection of Trichinella infection in muscle samples from wildlife. Veterinary Parasitology 188, 34, 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.03.054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLong, ER, Vernon, WB, Bollinger, RR (1985). Sensitivity and specificity of a monitoring test. Biometrics, 41, 4, 947958.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, J, Bai, X, Wang, XL, Wang, YF, Shi, HN, Rosenthal, B, Boireau, P, Wu, XP, Liu, MY, Liu, XL (2016). Developmental profile of select immune cells in mice infected with Trichinella spiralis during the intestinal phase. Veterinary Parasitology 231, 7782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.07.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, N, Zhao, H, Peng, W, He, Y, Zhou, Y, Yuan, L, Zhang, Y (2012). A simple colorimetric sensor based on anti-aggregation of gold nanoparticles for Hg2+ detection. Colloids and Surfaces A. Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 395, 161167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.12.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvorožňáková, E, Hurníková, Z, Kołodziej Sobocińska, M (2010). Kinetics of specific humoral immune response of mice infected with low doses of Trichinella spiralis, T. britovi, and T. pseudospiralis larvae. Helminthologia 47, 3, 152157. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-010-0023-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvorožnáková, E, Kolodziej-Sobocinska, M, Hurníková, Z (2012). Trichinella spiralis reinfection: changes in cellular and humoral immune response in BALB/c mice. Helminthologia 49, 4, 201210. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-012-0039-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Shafey, OK, Afifi, AF, Oshiba, SF, Aly, IR, Lasheen, ME (2018). Evaluation of gold nanoparticles coated sandwich ELISA as innovative diagnosis for human bancroftian filariasis. Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 48, 2, 223232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization (FAO/WHO) (2013). Expert Committee on Food Additives. Safety evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants (Vol. 68). Seventy-Seventh Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Gamble, H, Pozio, E, Bruschi, F, Nöckler, K, Kapel, CM, Gajadhar, AA (2004). International commission on trichinellosis: recommendations on the use of serological tests for the detection of Trichinella infection in animals and man. Parasite 11, 313. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/20041113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, Y, Zhou, Y, Chandrawati, R (2019). Metal and metal oxide nanoparticles to enhance the performance of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). ACS Applied Nano Materials 3, 1, 121. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b02003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillette, MA, Carr, SA (2013). Quantitative analysis of peptides and proteins in biomedicine by targeted mass spectrometry. Nature Methods 10, 1, 2834. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2309CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomaa, MM (2020). Early diagnosis of experimental Trichinella spiralis infection by nano-based Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (Nano-based ELISA). Experimental Parasitology 212, 107867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2020.107867CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottstein, B, Pozio, E, Nöckler, K (2009). Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 22, 1, 127145. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00026-08CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guirgis, BS, Sáe-Cunha, C, Gomes, I, Cavadas, M, Silva, I, Doria, G, Blatch, GL, Baptista, PV, Pereira, E, Azzazy, HM, Mota, MM, Prudêncio, M, Franco, R (2012). Gold nanoparticle-based fluorescence immunoassay for malaria antigen detection. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry 402, 3, 10191027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-5489-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guobadia, EE, Fagbemi, BO (1997). The isolation of Fasciola gigantica-specific antigens and their use in the serodiagnosis of fasciolosis in sheep by the detection of circulating antigens. Veterinary Parasitology 68, 3, 269282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jia, CP, Zhong, XQ, Hua, B, Liu, MY, Jing, FX, Lou, XH, Yao, SH, Xiang, JQ, Jin, QH, Zhao, JL (2009). Nano-ELISA for highly sensitive protein detection. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 24, 9, 28362841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2009.02.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jing, F, Cui, J, Liu, R, Liu, L, Jiang, P, Wang, ZQ (2014). Detection of circulating antigens in serum samples of mice experimentally infected with Trichinella spiralis by a sandwich ELISA based on IgY. Helminthologia 51, 3, 181189. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11687-014-0227-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamel, M, El-Baz, H, Demerdash, Z, El-Karaksy, S, El-Gendy, N, Hassan, S, Salah, F, El-Moneem, E, Hendawy, M, Aly, I (2016). Nano-immunoassay for diagnosis of active schistosomal infection. World Journal of Medical Sciences 13, 1, 2737. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wjms.2016.13.1.96189Google Scholar
Kent, UM (1999). Purification of antibodies using ammonium sulfate fractionation or gel filtration. In Javois, LC (ed) Immunocytochemical Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 115. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.Google Scholar
Khalifa, MM, Abdel-Rahman, SM, Bakir, HY, Othman, RA, El-Mokhtar, MA (2020). Comparison of the diagnostic performance of microscopic examination, Copro-ELISA, and Copro-PCR in the diagnosis of Capillaria philippinensis infections. PloS One 15, 6, e0234746. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234746CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khodadadi, A, Madani, R, Hoghooghi Rad, N, Atyabi, N (2021). Development of nano-ELISA method for serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in mice. Archives of Razi Institute 75, 4, 419426. https://doi.org/10.22092/ari.2018.123028Google ScholarPubMed
Kołodziej-Sobocińska, M, Dvoroznakova, E, Dzieman, E (2006). Trichinella spiralis: macrophage activity and antibody response in chronic murine infection. Experimental Parasitology 112, 1, 5262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2005.09.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krivokapich, SJ, Prous, CLG, Gatti, GM, Arbusti, PA (2019). Assessment of mitochondrial and nuclear genes for molecular detection during early Trichinella spiralis infection. International Journal of Tropical Diseases 2, 3, 2:025. https://doi.org/10.23937/2643-461X/1710025Google Scholar
Lawrence, CE, Paterson, YY, Wright, SH, Knight, PA, Miller, HR (2004). Mouse mast cell protease-1 is required for the enteropathy induced by gastrointestinal helminth infection in the mouse. Gastroenterology 127, 1, 155165. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.04.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, F, Wang, ZQ, Cui, J (2010). Early detection by polymerase chain reaction of migratory Trichinella spiralis larvae in blood of experimentally infected mice. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 7, 8, 887892. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2009.0472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, LN, Jing, FJ, Cui, J, Fu, GY, Wang, ZQ (2013). Detection of circulating antigen in serum of mice infected with Trichinella spiralis by an IgY-IgM mAb sandwich ELISA. Experimental Parasitology 133, 2, 150155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2012.11.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, XL, Ren, HN, Shi, YL, Hu, CX, Song, YY, Duan, JY, Zhang, HP, Du, XR, Liu, RD, Jiang, P, Wang, ZQ, Cui, J (2017). Early detection of Trichinella spiralis DNA in the feces of experimentally infected mice by using PCR. Acta Tropica 166, 351355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.10.021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makhsin, SR, Razak, KA, Noordin, R, Zakaria, ND, Chun, TS (2012). The effects of size and synthesis methods of gold nanoparticle-conjugated MαHIgG4 for use in an immunochromatographic strip test to detect brugian filariasis. Nanotechnology 23, 49, 495719. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/49/495719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer-Scholl, A, Pozio, E, Gayda, J, Thaben, N, Bahn, P, Nöckler, K (2017). Magnetic stirrer method for the detection of Trichinella larvae in muscle samples. Journal of Visualized Experiments 121, e55354. https://doi.org/10.3791/55354Google Scholar
McKinney, MM, Parkinson, A (1987). A simple, non-chromatographic procedure to purify immunoglobulins from serum and ascites fluid. Journal of Immunological Methods 96, 2, 271278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(87)90324-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mista, D, Piekarska, J, Houszka, M, Zawadzki, W, Gorczykowski, M (2010). The influence of orally administered short chain fatty acids on intestinal histopathological changes and intensity of Trichinella spiralis infection in mice. Veterinarni Medicina 55, 264274. https://doi.org/10.17221/2992-VETMEDCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moharm, MI, El Enain, G, El-Deen, BW, El Aswad, MA, Hendawy, M, Aly, I (2014) Evaluation of nano-gold beads based-ELISA for detection of Giardia lamblia antigen in stool samples of infected patients. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 21, 12, 22642273. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.21.12.86132Google Scholar
Muller, PY, Janovjak, H, Miserez, AR, Dobbie, Z (2002). Processing of gene expression data generated by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Biotechniques 32, 6, 13721379.Google ScholarPubMed
Murrell, KD (2016). The dynamics of Trichinella spiralis epidemiology: Out to pasture? Veterinary Parasitology 231, 9296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.03.020CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naser, ME, Younis, MS, Bayoumi, IR, Eraky, MA, Aly, NS, El Attar, REO (2017). Evaluation of nanogold-beads-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of Cryptosporidium antigen in stool samples of diarrheic patients. Benha Medical Journal 34, 8892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojodale, PI, Inabo, HI, Ella, EE, Okubanjo, OO (2021). Serological and molecular evaluation of migratory Trichinella spiralis larvae in blood of humans in Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria. Fudma Journal of Sciences 4, 4, 281289. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2020-0404-441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozio, E (2007). World distribution of Trichinella spp. infections in animals and humans. Veterinary Parasitology 149, 12, 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.07.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pozio, E (2015). Trichinella spp. imported with live animals and meat. Veterinary Parasitology 213, 12, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riddle, MS, DuPont, HL, Connor, BA (2016). ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of acute diarrheal infections in adults. The American Journal of Gastroenterology 111, 5, 602622. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.126CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadaow, L, Intapan, PM, Boonmars, T, Morakote, N, Maleewong, W (2013). Susceptibility of laboratory rodents to Trichinella papuae. The Korean Journal of Parasitology 51, 6, 629632. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2013.51.6.629CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, GG, Wang, ZQ, Liu, CY, Jiang, P, Liu, RD (2015a). Early serodiagnosis of trichinellosis by ELISA using excretory–secretory antigens of Trichinella spiralis adult worms. Parasites Vectors 8, 484491. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1094-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, GG, Liu, RD, Wang, ZQ, Jiang, P, Wang, L, Liu, XL, Liu, CY, Zhang, X, Cui, J (2015b). New diagnostic antigens for early trichinellosis: the excretory–secretory antigens of Trichinella spiralis intestinal infective larvae. Parasitology Research 114, 12, 46374644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4709-3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, GG, Song, YY, Jiang, P, Ren, HN, Yan, SW, Han, Y, Liu, RD, Zhang, X, Wang, ZQ, Ciu, J (2018). Characterization of a Trichinella spiralis putative serine protease. Study of its potential as sero-diagnostic tool. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 12, 5, e0006485. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006485CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tajadini, M, Panjehpour, M, Javanmard, SH (2014). Comparison of SYBR green and taqman methods in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of four adenosine receptor subtypes. Advanced Biomedical Research 3, 85. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.127998CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tijssen, P, Kurstak, E (1984). Highly efficient and simple methods for the preparation of peroxidase and active peroxidase-antibody conjugates for enzyme immunoassay. Analytical Biochemistry 136, 451457. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(84)90243-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, R, Das, G, Manjunathachar, HV, Muwel, N (2018). Advances in diagnostics of parasitic diseases: current trends and future prospects. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7, 7, 32613277. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.707.380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakelin, D, Lloyd, M (1976). Immunity to primary and challenge infection of Trichinella spiralis in mice a re-examination of conventional parameters. Parasitology 72, 2, 173182. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000048472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, H, Qiao, X, Chen, J, Ding, S (2005). Preparation of silver nanoparticles by chemical reduction method. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 256, 23, 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.12.058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z, Hu, J, Jin, Y, Yao, X, Li, J (2006). In situ amplified chemiluminescent detection of DNA and immunoassay of IgG using special-shaped gold nanoparticles as label. Clinical Chemistry 52, 10, 19581961. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2006.071399CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, ZQ, Fu, GY, Jing, FJ, Jin, J, Ren, HJ, Jiang, P, Cui, J (2012). Detection of Trichinella spiralis circulating antigens in serum of experimentally infected mice by an IgY-mAb sandwich ELISA. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 9, 8, 727733. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2012.1157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, ZQ, Shi, YL, Liu, RD, Jiang, P, Guan, YY, Chen, YD, Cui, J (2017a). New insights on serodiagnosis of trichinellosis during window period: early diagnostic antigens from Trichinella spiralis intestinal worms. Infectious Diseases of Poverty 6, 1, 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-017-0252-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, ZQ, Liu, RD, Sun, GG, Song, YY, Jiang, P, Zhang, X, Cui, J (2017b). Proteomic analysis of Trichinella spiralis adult worm excretory-secretory proteins recognized by sera of patients with early trichinellosis. Frontiers in Microbiology 8, 986. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00986CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, DM, Wen, H, Wang, LA, Hu, CX, Qi, X, Sun, GG, Liu, RD, Wang, ZQ, Cui, J (2017). Identification of early diagnostic antigens in soluble proteins of Trichinella spiralis adult worms by Western blot. Tropical Biomedicine 34, 1, 191198.Google ScholarPubMed
Yang, S, Rothman, RE (2004). PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 4, 6, 337–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01044-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, W, Li, LG, Liu, RD, Sun, GG, Liu, CY, Zhang, SB, Jiang, P, Zhang, X, Ren, HJ, Wang, ZQ, Cui, J (2015). Molecular identification and characterization of Trichinella spiralis proteasome subunit beta type-7. Parasites Vectors 8, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-014-0626-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y, Cai, YN, Tong, MW, Sun, N, Xuan, YH, Kang, YJ, Vallée, I, Boireau, P, Cheng, SP, Liu, MY (2016). Serological tools for detection of Trichinella infection in animals and humans. One Health 2, 2530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2015.11.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yera, H, Andiva, S, Perret, C, Limonne, D, Boireau, P, Dupouy-Camet, J (2003). Development and evaluation of a Western blot kit for diagnosis of human trichinellosis. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 10, 5, 793796. https://doi.org/10.1128/cdli.10.5.793-796.2003Google ScholarPubMed
Zarlenga, D, Wang, Z, Mitreva, M (2016). Trichinella spiralis: Adaptation and parasitism. Veterinary parasitology 231, 821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.07.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zocevic, AMP, Vallee, I, Blaga, R, Liu, M, Lacour, SA, Boireau, P (2011). Identification of Trichinella spiralis early antigens at the pre-adult and adult stages. Parasitology 138, 4, 463471. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182010001526CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zumaquero-Ríos, JL, García-Juarez, J, De-la-Rosa-Arana, JL, Marcet, R, Sarracent- Pérez, J (2012). Trichinella spiralis: monoclonal antibody against the muscular larvae for the detection of circulating and fecal antigens in experimentally infected rats. Experimental Parasitology 132, 4, 444449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2012.09.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) SEM silver nanoparticles 50 nm size; (b) Size distribution analysis.

Figure 1

Table 1. Comparison between mean and SD of intestinal adult trichinellosis among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infection groups

Figure 2

Table 2. Sensitivity of the traditional ELISA test among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infection groups

Figure 3

Table 3. Performance of Nano-based ELISA test among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infection groups

Figure 4

Table 4. Performance of Rep gene PCR test among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infected group

Figure 5

Table 5. Performance of quantitative PCR in diagnosis of severity in all studied groups

Figure 6

Figure 2. (a) SYBR Green fluorescence chart for DNA samples of mice, resulting from quantitative PCR and Rep gene expression; (b) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showing performance of quantitative PCR in diagnosis of severe infection. The best cutoff of quantitative PCR in prediction of severe infection was ≥ 2.5841 with area under curve of 0.9, sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 81.5%, positive predictive value of 78.3%, negative predictive value of 83%, and overall accuracy of 80.8% (P < 0.001).

Figure 7

Table 6. Validity of ELISA and Nano-ELISA in diagnosis of parasitic infection after using PCR as a gold standard test