Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. The British Journal of Psychiatry
  4. Volume 211
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Volume 211 - October 2017

Contents

Page 6 of 8

Columns

  • Relationships between anti-stigma programme awareness, disclosure comfort and intended help-seeking regarding a mental health problem

  • Claire Henderson, Emily Robinson, Sara Evans-Lacko, Graham Thornicroft
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, pp. 316-322
    • Article
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation
  • Background

    Anti-stigma programmes should aim to increase disclosure to those who can support someone with a mental health problem and appropriate professional help-seeking.

    Aims

    We investigated associations among public awareness of England's Time to Change anti-stigma campaign and: (a) comfort envisaged in disclosing a mental health problem to family and friends; (b) comfort in disclosing to an employer; and (c) intended professional help-seeking from a general practitioner, i.e. a physician working in primary care.

    Method

    Using data from a survey of a nationally representative sample of adults, we created separate logistic regression models to test for campaign awareness and other variables as predictors of comfort in disclosure and intended help-seeking.

    Results

    We found positive relationships between campaign awareness and comfort in disclosing to family and friends (odds ratio (OR) = 1.27, 95% CI 1.14–1.43) and to a current or prospective employer (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.06–1.35); and likelihood of help-seeking (OR=1.18 95% CI 1.03–1.36).

    Conclusions

    Awareness of an anti-stigma campaign was associated with greater comfort in disclosing a mental health problem and intended help-seeking.

Correspondence

Columns

  • The evidence base and readability of Freeman et al on virtual reality for treating delusions

  • John L. Fresen
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. 118
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Authors' reply

  • Nav Kapur, Leah Quinlivan, Sarah Steeg, Rory O'Connor, Keith Hawton, David Gunnell
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, pp. 183-184
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Author's reply

  • Ian Kelleher
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. 251
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Community treatment orders and capacity to consent

  • Martin Zinkler, Kevin De Sabbata
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, pp. 118-119
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Psychiatry in pictures

Columns

  • The Lunatic House, Guy's Hospital, London, of 1797

  • Richard H. S. Mindham
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. 54
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Book reviews

Correspondence

Columns

  • Where is the argument for the conceptual slippery slope?

  • John M. Clifford
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. 397
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Observing our psychiatric practice

  • Adisha Kapila
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. 252
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Columns

  • Correction

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. 184
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Correspondence

Columns

  • Authors' reply

  • Christopher James Ryan, Giles Newton-Howes
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, pp. 119-120
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Book reviews

Book Reviews

Correspondence

Columns

  • Author's reply

  • Brendan D. Kelly
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. 397
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Book Reviews

Correspondence

Columns

  • Authors' reply

  • M. Verhofstadt, L. Thienpont, G.-J. Y. Peters, K. Chambaere
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, pp. 397-398
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Correction

  • Correction

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. 252
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Columns

  • Kaleidoscope

  • Derek K. Tracy, Dan W. Joyce, Sukhwinder S. Shergill
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, pp. 186-187
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • How much do different countries invest in mental health research compared with other branches of healthcare? As part of the ROAMER project, Hazo et al compared four European nations: the UK, France, Spain and Finland. Using 2011 data, public and private (not-for-profit) annual spends were calculated, respectively, at ₠127.6, ₠84.8, ₠16.8 and ₠10.2 million. To look on it another way, that equates to a national spend per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) of ₠48.7, ₠31.2, ₠39.5 and ₠12.5. How does this relate to wider research spending? In the UK, just 4% of health research funding goes on mental health – given that it accounts for 12% of total DALYs, that's an enormous underspend (the Finns do better at almost 10%). A recent paper in the BJPsych confirmed that greater national investment in mental health services produces better clinical outcomes, but the burden remains enormous and we need more research into prevention, intervention and treatment. We can all play a positive role: only 1.7% of charity research spend went to mental health – time to put your hands into your pockets.

Book reviews

Columns

  • Correction

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    02 January 2018, p. 120
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

Page 6 of 8