Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:32:04.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Diversity to Sectarianism: the Definition of Anglican Identity in Nineteenth-Century England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Frances Knight
Frances Knight*
Affiliation:
University of Wales, Lampeter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the subject of Anglican identity in the period from about 1800 to about 1870. This is a complex topic, and it will be possible here only to highlight a few themes. It will be suggested that the understanding of who was and who was not a ‘real’ Anglican underwent several important shifts during the period, until by the 1870s the definition had become increasingly narrow and exclusive. The result was not unity, but an atmosphere of increasingly narrow sectarianism, which had the effect of repelling those who were on the fringes of Anglican allegiance, and thus narrowing the base of lay support for the Church of England in the country at large.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 32: Unity and Diversity in the Church , 1996 , pp. 377 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 CUL. E.D.R. Cl/6 1825.

2 Pelling, Henry, Popular Politics and Society in Late Victorian Britain (London, 1968), pp. 19–25.Google Scholar

3 Armstrong, Herbert B.J., Armstrong’s Norfolk Diary: Further Passages from the Diary of The Reverend Benjamin John Armstrong, Vicar of East Dereham. 1850-88 (London, 1963), p. 96.Google Scholar

4 David M. Thompson, ‘Baptism, Church and Society in Britain since 1800’, University of Cambridge Hulsean Lectures, 1983-4, p. 50. A copy of the lectures is deposited at CUL.

5 Shaw, Thomas, A History of Cornish Methodism (Truro, 1967), pp. 31, 44.Google Scholar

6 Clark, David, Between Pulpit and Pew: Folk Religion in a North Yorkshire Fishing Village (Cambridge, 1982), p. 118.Google Scholar

7 Knight, Frances, ‘Bishop, Clergy and People: John Kaye and the Diocese of Lincoln, 1827-1853’ (University of Cambridge Ph.D. thesis, 1990), pp. 285–9.Google Scholar

8 Jagger, Peter J., Clouded Witness: Initiation in the Church of England in the Mid-Victorian Period, 1850-1875 (Allison Park, Penn., 1982), p. 167.Google Scholar

9 Lincolnshire Archives Office [hereafter. LAO], CorB5/8/22, George Wilkins to John Kaye, 29 July 1839.

10 Ambler, R. W., ed., Lincolnshire Returns of the Census of Religious Worship, 1851, Lincolnshire Record Society, 72 (1979), p. 172.Google Scholar

11 Ibid., p. 236.

12 Ibid., p. 189.

13 Ibid., p. 109.

14 Watts, Michael, ed., Religion in Victorian Nottinghamshire: The Religious Census of 1851, 2 vols (Nottingham, 1988), vols 1 & 2, pp. 36, 202, 221.Google Scholar

15 Ibid., p. 183.

16 Gilbert, Alan D., Religion and Society in Industrial England: Church, Chapel and Social Change, 1740-1914 (London, 1976), p. 69.Google Scholar

17 Vickers, John A., ed., The Religious Census of Sussex, 1851, Sussex Record Society, 75 (1989)Google Scholar; idem, The Religious Census of Hampshire, 1851, Hampshire Record Series (1993).

18 Hempton, David. Methodism and Politics in British Society, 1750-1984 (London, 1984), p. 12.Google Scholar

19 LAO, CorB5/5/17/4, T. K. Bonney to Kaye, 25 Nov. 1839.

20 Gilbert, Religion and Society, p. 207.

21 LAO, CorB5/8/34, R.J. Hodgkinson to Kaye, Sept. 1851.

22 LAO, CorB5/4/54/1, T. Tunstall Smith to Kaye, 17 Jan. 1845.

23 Shaw, Cornish Methodism, p. 122.

24 LAO, CorB5/8/28/13, R. Evans to Kaye, 10 Oct. 1839; Kaye to Evans, 12 Oct. 1839.

25 CUL, E.D.R. C3/40, Archdeaconry of Bedford visitation returns, 1873.

26 Obelkevich, James, Religion and Rural Society: South Lindsey, 1825-1875 (Oxford, 1976), p. 139.Google Scholar