Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:34:22.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thickness Dependence of Electroluminescence in a-Si:H P-I-N Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1993

Keda Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy , University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,, NC 27599-3244
Daxing Han
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy , University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,, NC 27599-3244
M. Silver
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy , University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,, NC 27599-3244
Get access

Abstract

Electroluminescence studies in a-Si:H p-i-n devices have been made as a function of i-layer thickness (0.4 - 10 (μm), temperature (80 -300 K) and applied electric field (2xl03 – lx105 V/cm field across the i-layer). In particular, the spectral emission and lifetime distributions have been determined. With increasing temperature, there is a shift toward defect luminescence (0.9 eV) in all samples as found in photoluminescence. However, thicker samples (> 2.0 μm) show significantly more main band emission (1.2 eV) than thin samples. This trend is particularly true at higher applied voltages. Further, in thin samples, the lifetime distribution peaks at 10-6 sec in whole temperature range while in thick samples at lower temperature (< 250 K) the lifetime distribution is double peaked at 10-6 sec and at 10-3Sec.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Street, R. A., Adv. Phys. 30, 593 (1981);Semiconductors and Semimetals, edited by Pankove, J.I. (Academic, Orlando, 1984) vol. 21b, p. 197.Google Scholar
2. Pankove, J.I. and Carlson, D.E., Appl. Phys. Lett., 29 (1976) 620.Google Scholar
3. Nashashibi, T. S., Austin, I. G. and Searle, T. M., Gibson, R. A., Spear, W. E., and Le Comber, P. G., Philos. Mag. B45, (1982) 553.Google Scholar
4. Searle, T. M., Hopkinson, M., Edmeades, M., Kalem, S., Austin, I. G., and Gibson, R. A., Disordered Semiconductors, edited by Kastner, M. A., Thomas, G. A., and Ovshinsky, S. R. (New York, Plenum, 1987), p.357.Google Scholar
5. Carius, R., MRS proceeding 192 (1990) 101; J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 137&138 (1991) 595.Google Scholar
6. Wang, Keda, Silver, M., and Han, Daxing; annual report for NREL sub-contract, (1990-1991); J. Appl. Phys. to be published (1993, 5).Google Scholar
7. Wang, Keda, Han, Daxing, Silver, M., and Branz, H. M., Solar Cells 30 (1991) 219.Google Scholar
8. Wang, Keda, Han, Daxing, Kemp, M., and Silver, M., J. Non-Cryst. Sol. 137&138 (1991)599;Google Scholar
9. Wang, Keda, Han, Daxing, Kemp, M., and Silver, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 (1993) 157.Google Scholar
10. Ristein, J., Hautala, J., and Taylor, P.C., Phys. Rev. B40, (1989) 88.Google Scholar