Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:44:08.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Impedance Analysis of Groove Electrodes In Aconducting Solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

H. Matsui  and
A. Kunugi
H. Matsui
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Tokushima, Minamijosanjima Tokushima, 770 Japan
A. Kunugi
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Tokushima, Minamijosanjima Tokushima, 770 Japan
Get access

Abstract

The effect of electrode surface unevenness on electrode impedance was examined at rectangular groove electrodes by numerically solving the Laplace equation. CPE behavior appeared for the double-layer charging at considerably large groove electrodes in the absence of outer solution layer at high frequencies. This behavior originated from the current concentration to the upper portions of the groove. In the presence of an outer solution layer, the current concentration was greatly weakened by the series connection of solution resistance, resulting in the disappearance of CPE behavior. The real part of the impedance at high frequencies was not additive in the presence of exposed electrode surfaces outside the groove. The origin of no impedance additivity was discussed based on equipotential-amplitude data.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 411: Symposium T – Electricaly-Based Microstructural Characterization , 1995 , 243
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1) de Levie, R. in Advances in Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Engineering, edited by Delahay, P. (Ed.), Vol.6, Interscience, New York, 1967, p. 358, 380.Google Scholar
2) Scheider, W., J. Phys. Chem., 79, p. 127 (1975).Google Scholar
3) Brug, G. T., Van den Eeden, A. L. G., Rebach, M. S. and Sluyters, J. H., J. Electroanal. Chem., 176, p. 275 (1984).Google Scholar
4) Schmid, G. M., Electrochim. Acta, 15, p. 65 (1970).Google Scholar
5) Keiser, H., Beccu, K. D., and Gutjahr, M. A., Electrochim. Acta, 21, p. 539 (1976).Google Scholar
6) Candy, J., Fouilloux, P., Keddam, M., and Takenouti, H., Electrochim. Acta, 26, p. 1029 (1981).Google Scholar
7) Koch, D. L. and Sangani, A. S., J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, p. 475 (1991).Google Scholar
8) Pajkossy, T. and Nyikos, L., J. Electrochem. Soc., 133, p. 2061 (1986).Google Scholar
9) Pajkossy, T., J. Electroanal. Chem., 300, p. 1 (1991).Google Scholar
10) de Levie, R., J. Electroanal. Chem., 281, p. 1 (1990).Google Scholar
11) Takahashi, R., in Applied Numerical Analysis, Asakura shoten (1993) p. 135.Google Scholar