Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:37:44.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Micro Environments and Microorganisms on the Transport Properties of Redox-Sensitive Elements (E.G. Technetium)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Hanskarl Brühl
Affiliation:
Free University Berlin, Institut for Geology, Geophysic and Geoinformatic, Wichernstr. 16, D-1000 Berlin 33, Federal Republic of Germany.
Asaf Pekdeger
Affiliation:
Free University Berlin, Institut for Geology, Geophysic and Geoinformatic, Wichernstr. 16, D-1000 Berlin 33, Federal Republic of Germany.
Andreas Winkler
Affiliation:
Free University Berlin, Institut for Geology, Geophysic and Geoinformatic, Wichernstr. 16, D-1000 Berlin 33, Federal Republic of Germany.
Get access

Abstract

In laboratory experiments immobilisation of Tc under oxic conditions was observed. The transport behaviour of redox-sensitive elements is not only controlled by the geochemical “frame conditions” which can be measured within the macro environment. Immobilisation behaviour of Tc strongly depends on micro environments and on microbial metabolism. Micro environments which may develope on the mineral surfaces can detoriate the mobility of Tc, furthermore the fixation of Tc is influenced by microbial activities.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Brühl, H., Klusmann, H., Lange, D. and Trapp, C., Report for PTB, Berlin, FRG, 1986 (unpublished).Google Scholar
2. Winkler, A., Brühl, H. and Trapp, C., in Chemie und Migrationsverhalten der Aktinoide und Spaltprodukte in naturlichen aquatischen Svstemen, PTB-Seminar 66, PTB-SE-14 edited by Kim, J.I. and Warnecke, E., pp. 281292 (1986).Google Scholar
3. Brühl, H., Z. dt. geol. Ges. 132, pp. 121136 (1986).Google Scholar
4. Brühl, H., Trapp, C. and Winkler, A., Report for BMfT, Berlin, FRG 1987 (unpublished).Google Scholar
5. Wolter, R., Mühlenweg, U., Gehler, S., Barke, G., Sammler, H., and Brühl, H., Report PSE-Nr. 80/16 (1979).Google Scholar
6. Bock, W.-D., Brühl, H., Trapp, Chr. and Winkler, A., in Sclent. Basis for Nuc. Waste Management XII, edited by Lutze, W and Ewing, R.C., (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 122, Pittsburgh, PA 1989), pp. 973977.Google Scholar
7. Fried, S., Friedman, A.M., Cohen, D., Hines, J.J. and Strickert, R.G., Report ANL-78-46 (1977).Google Scholar
8. Strickert, R.G., Friedman, A.M. and Fried, S., Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc. 28, pp. 365366 (1978).Google Scholar
9. Winkler, A., Bock, W.-D., Brühl, H. and Trapp, C., Radiochem. Acta 44/45(1), (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Winkler, A., Phd thesis, Free University of Berlin, Berliner geowiss. Abh., (A), 177, Berlin (1989).Google Scholar
11. Francis, C.W. and Bondietti, E.A., Report CONF-7910160 Vol. 1, PNL-SA 8571, pp. 81133 (1980).Google Scholar