Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:50:53.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvement of Ultrathin Oxides by Post-Oxidation Annealing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Tomoyuki Sakoda ,
Mieko Matsumura  and
Yasushiro Nishioka
Tomoyuki Sakoda
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials & Processes, Texas Instruments Tsukuba Research & Development Center Ltd., 17 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
Mieko Matsumura
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials & Processes, Texas Instruments Tsukuba Research & Development Center Ltd., 17 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
Yasushiro Nishioka
Affiliation:
Advanced Materials & Processes, Texas Instruments Tsukuba Research & Development Center Ltd., 17 Miyukigaoka, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The low temperature oxidation is effective for the atomically-controlled gate oxide growth. We focused the effects of post-oxidation annealing (POA) and attempted to improve the properties of the low-temperature-grown ultrathin oxides with a thickness of 3nm by POA. POA abruptly reduced the leakage current at a low gate voltage below 1.5V and the interface trap density. The correlation between the interface trap and the leakage current at a low applied voltage region were confirmed. We found that the stressing immunity of the ultrathin oxides grown at a low temperature, 650°C, is drastically improved by POA at 850°C.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 448: Symposium M – Control of Semiconductor Surfaces and Interfaces , 1996 , 315
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cohen, Simon S., J. Electrochem. Soc. 130, 929 (1983).Google Scholar
2 Weinberg, Z.A., Young, D.R., Calise, J.A., Cohen, S.A., Deluca, J.C. and Deline, V.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 45, 1204 (1984).Google Scholar
3 Nicollian, E.H. and Brews, J.R., MQS Physics and Technology (John Wiely & Sons, New York, 1982)Google Scholar
4 Ma, T.P. and Barker, R.C., Solid-State Electronics 17, 913 (1974).Google Scholar
5 Chen, I.C., Teng, C.W., Coleman, D.J. and Nishimura, A., IEEE Electron Device Lett. 10, 216 (1989).Google Scholar
6 Wang, T., Huang, C., Chang, T.E., Chou, J.W. and Chang, C.Y., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 41, 2475 (1994).Google Scholar
7 White, M.H. and Cricchi, J.R., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 19, 1280 (1972).Google Scholar