Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T10:32:35.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detection of low-level humic acid in water using room temperature-synthesized copper (I) oxide colloids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2019

Olayemi J. Fakayode Open the ORCID record for Olayemi J. Fakayode [Opens in a new window] ,
Abolanle S. Adekunle Open the ORCID record for Abolanle S. Adekunle [Opens in a new window]  and
Thabo T.I. Nkambule Open the ORCID record for Thabo T.I. Nkambule [Opens in a new window]
Olayemi J. Fakayode*
Affiliation:
Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability Research Unit (NanoWS), College of Science, Engineering and Technology (CSET), University of South Africa (UNISA), 60 Christian De Wet Street, P.O. Box 2820, Roodepoort, Florida, South Africa
Abolanle S. Adekunle
Affiliation:
Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability Research Unit (NanoWS), College of Science, Engineering and Technology (CSET), University of South Africa (UNISA), 60 Christian De Wet Street, P.O. Box 2820, Roodepoort, Florida, South Africa Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ibadan RoadIle-Ife, Osun220005, Nigeria
Thabo T.I. Nkambule
Affiliation:
Nanotechnology and Water Sustainability Research Unit (NanoWS), College of Science, Engineering and Technology (CSET), University of South Africa (UNISA), 60 Christian De Wet Street, P.O. Box 2820, Roodepoort, Florida, South Africa
*
Address all correspondence to Olayemi J. Fakayode at [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A glucose-reduced, room temperature-synthesized colloidal Cu2O solution (CCS) was used for the first time to detect humic acid (HA), a carcinogen-promoting substance in aqueous solution. The CCS sensor was characterized using standard spectroscopy and microscopy techniques. The sensor evolved as a carboxylic acid-capped peach-pink solution after synthesis. The result of the interaction of the sensor with HA in phosphate buffer solution (pH 7) showed a detection limit of 1.5891 × 10−2 mg/L over a concentration range of 0.00–0.41 mg/L. This finding suggests that the sensor may be useful for monitoring low levels of HA in aqueous environments.

Type
Research Letters
Information
MRS Communications , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 1317 - 1322
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Jamalludin, M.R., Harun, Z., Hubadillah, S.K., Bari, H., Ismail, A.F., Othman, M.H.D., Shohur, M.F., and Yunos, M.Z.: Antifouling polysulfone membranes blended with green SiO2 from rice husk ash (RHA) for humic acid. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 114, 268–279 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Kawasaki, N., Matsushige, K., Komatsu, K., Kohzu, A., Nara, F.W., Ogishi, F., Yahata, M., Mikami, H., Goto, T., and Imai, A.: Fast and precise method for HPLC-size exclusion chromatography with UV and TOC (NDIR) detection: importance of multiple detectors to evaluate the characteristics of dissolved organic matter. Water Res. 45, 6240–6248 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Qin, X., Liu, F., Wang, G., and Weng, L.: Simultaneous analysis of small organic acids and humic acids using high performance size exclusion chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 35, 3455–3460 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Ma, C., Chen, M., Liu, H., Wu, K., He, H., and Wang, K.: A rapid method for the detection of humic acid based on the poly(thymine)-templated copper nanoparticles. Chin. Chem. Lett. 29, 136–138 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Basumallick, S. and Santra, S.: Monitoring of ppm level humic acid in surface water using ZnO-chitosan nano-composite as fluorescence probe. Appl. Water Sci 7, 1025–1031 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Lamar, R.T., Daniel, C.O., Lawrence, M., and Paul, R.B.: A new standardized method for quantification of humic and fulvic acids in humic ores and commercial products. J. AOAC Int 97, 721–730 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Rodrigues, A., Brito, A., Janknecht, P., Proenca, M.F., and Nogueira, R.: Quantification of humic acids in surface water: effects of divalent cations, pH, and filtration. J. Environ. Monit 11, 377–382 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Yuan, X., Yang, S., Fang, J., Wang, X., Ma, H., Wang, Z., Wang, R., and Zhao, Y.: Interaction mechanism between antibiotics and humic acid by UV-Vis spectrometry. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 1–13 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Azzouz, A., Goud, K.Y., Raza, N., Ballesteros, E., Lee, S-E., Hong, J., Deep, A., and Kim, K-H: Nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors for the detection of neurochemicals in biological matrices. Trends Anal. Chem 110, 15–34 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Li, M., Gou, H., Al-Ogaidi, I., and Wu, N.: Nanostructured sensors for detection of heavy metals: a review. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 1, 713–723 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Gan, T., Wang, Z., Gao, J., Sun, J., Wu, K., and Wang, H.: Morphology-dependent electrochemical activity of Cu2O polyhedrons and construction of sensor for simultaneous determination of phenolic compounds with graphene oxide as reinforcement. Sens. Actuators B 282, 549–558 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Fakayode, O.J., Songca, S.P., and Oluwafemi, O.S.: Neutral red separation property of ultrasmall-gluconic acid capped superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoclusters coprecipitated with goethite and hematite. Sep. Purif. Technol. 192, 475–482 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Fakayode, O.J., Songca, S.P., and Oluwafemi, O.S.: Singlet oxygen generation potential of thiolated methoxy- polyethyleneglycol encapsulated superparamagnetic iron oxide. Mater. Lett. 199, 37–40 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Fakayode, O.J., Kruger, C.A., Songca, S.P., Abrahamse, H., and Oluwafemi, O.S.: Photodynamic therapy evaluation of methoxypolyethyleneglycol-thiol-SPIONs-gold-meso-tetrakis (4-hydroxyphenyl) porphyrin conjugate against breast cancer cells. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 92, 737–744 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Singh, S.A., Mukherjee, S., and Madras, G.: Role of CO2 methanation into the kinetics of preferential CO oxidation on Cu/Co3O4. Mol. Catal. 466, 167–180 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Manisha, H., Priya Swetha, P.D., Shim, Y-B., and Prasad, K.S.: Microwave assisted synthesis of hybrid Cu2O microcubes for photocatalysis and electrocatalysis. Mater. Today: Proc 5, 16390–16393 (2018).Google Scholar
17.Balık, M., Bulut, V., and Erdogan, I.Y.: Optical, structural and phase transition properties of Cu2O, CuO and Cu2O/CuO: their photoelectrochemical sensor applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44, 18744–18755 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Zhu, H., Li, Y., and Jiang, X.: Room-temperature synthesis of cuprous oxide and its heterogeneous nanostructures for photocatalytic applications. J. Alloys Compd. 772, 447–459 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Kerour, A., Boudjadar, S., Bourzami, R., and Allouche, B.: Eco-friendly synthesis of cuprous oxide (Cu2O) nanoparticles and improvement of their solar photocatalytic activities. J. Solid State Chem. 263, 79–83 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Fakayode, O.J., Tsolekile, N., Songca, S.P., and Oluwafemi, O.S.: Applications of functionalized nanomaterials in photodynamic therapy. Biophys. Rev. 10, 49–67 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Kumar, V.S. and Ganesan, S.: Preparation and characterization of gold nanoparticles with different capping agents. Int. J. Green Nanotechnol. 3, 47–55 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Novotný, O., Cejpek, K., and Velíšek, J.: Formation of carboxylic acids during degradation of monosaccharides. Czech J. Food Sci. 26, 117–131 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Paucean, A., Vodnar, D.C., Muresan, V., Fetea, F., Ranga, F., Man, S.M., Muste, S., and Socaciu, C.: Monitoring lactic acid concentration by infrared spectroscopy: a new developed method for Lactobacillus fermenting media with potential food applications. Acta Aliment. 46, 420–427 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Cheraghipour, E., Javadpour, S., and Mehdizadeh, A.R.: Citrate capped superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles used for hyperthermia therapy. J. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 5, 715–719 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Cheng, X., Zhao, L., Wang, X., and Lin, J.: Sensitive monitoring of humic acid in various aquatic environments with acidic cerium chemiluminescence detection. Anal. Sci. 23, 1189–1193 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Tarhan, I. and Kara, H.: A chemometric study: automated flow injection analysis method for the quantitative determination of humic acid in Ilgin lignite. Arab. J. Chem. 9, 713–720 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Cui, X. and Choo, K-H.: Natural organic matter removal and fouling control in low-pressure membrane filtration for water treatment. Environ. Eng. Res 19, 1–8 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Zhang, X., Fan, L., and Roddick, F.A.: Impact of the interaction between aquatic humic substances and algal organic matter on the fouling of a ceramic microfiltration membrane. Membranes 8, 1–10 (2018).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Zhang, W. and Jia, B.: Toward antifouling capacitive deionization by using visible-light reduced TiO2/graphene nanocomposites. MRS Commun. 5, 613–617 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Younas, H., Shao, J., He, Y., Fatima, G., Jaffar, S.T.A., and Afridi, Z.U.R.: Fouling-free ultrafiltration for humic acid removal. RSC Adv. 8, 24961–24969 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar