Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T08:02:52.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Microstructural Analysis of Iberian Expanded Clay Aggregates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2012

J. Alexandre Bogas*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Georesources DECivil/ICIST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
António Mauricio
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Georesources DECivil/CEPGIST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
M.F.C. Pereira
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Georesources DECivil/CEPGIST, Instituto Superior Técnico, Technical University of Lisbon, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article presents a detailed study of the microstructure of Iberian expanded clay lightweight aggregates (LWA). Other than more commonly used mercury porosimetry (MP) and water absorption methods, the experimental study involves optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and microtomography (μ-CT). Pore connectivity and how it is deployed are shown to some degree, and the pore size spectrum is estimated. LWA are in general characterized by a dense outer shell up to 200 μm thick, encasing an inner cellular structure of 10–100 times bigger pore size. Aggregate pore sizes may span from some hundreds of nanometers up to over 1 mm, though the range of 1–25 μm is more typical. A noteworthy fraction of these pores is closed, and they are mainly up to 1 μm. It is also shown that macropore spatial arrangement is affected by the manufacturing process. A step forward is given to understanding how the outer shell and the inner pore network influence the mechanical and physical LWA properties, particularly the density and water absorption. The joint consideration of μ-CT and SEM seems to be the most appropriate methodology to study LWA microstructure. MP analysis is likely to distort LWA pore spectrum assessment.

Type
Materials Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACI (2003). Guide for Structural Lightweight-Aggregate Concrete. ACI 213R. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.Google Scholar
Bogas, J.A. (2011). Characterization of structural lightweight expanded clay aggregate concrete. PhD Thesis in civil engineering. Lisbon, Portugal: Technical University of Lisbon, Instituto Superior Técnico (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
Chandra, S. & Berntsson, L. (2003). Lightweight Aggregate Concrete: Science, Technology and Applications. Norwich, NJ: Noyes Publications/William Andrew Publishing.Google Scholar
Edgcombe, C.J. & Valdrè, U. (2000). Field emission and electron microscopy. Microsc Microanal 6, 380387.Google Scholar
EN 1097-6 (2000). Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates—Part 6. Determination of particle density and water absorption. Technical document BS EN 1096-6:2000. London: British Standards Institution.Google Scholar
EuroLightConR20 (2000). The effect of the moisture history on the water absorption of lightweight aggregates. Economic Design and Construction with Light Weight Aggregate Concrete, Project Programme of Brite/EuRam project BE96-3942. Available at www.sintef.no/static/BM/projects/EuroLightCon.Google Scholar
Faust, T. & Beck, M. (1999). Pore structure of different LWAs. Lacer 4, 123132.Google Scholar
Fragoulis, D., Stamatakis, M.G., Chaniotakis, E. & Columbus, G. (2004). Characterization of light aggregates produced with clayey diatomite rocks originating from Greece. Mater Charact 53, 307316.Google Scholar
Hammer, T.A. (1995). The influence of lightweight aggregates properties on material properties of the concrete. International Symposium of Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete, Sandefjord, Norway, June 20–24, 1995, Holand, I. et al. (Eds.), pp. 517532. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Concrete Association.Google Scholar
Harmon, K.S. (2000). Physical characteristics of rotary kiln expanded slate lightweight aggregate. 2nd International Symposium of Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete, Kristiansand, Norway, June 18–22, 2000, Helland, S. et al. (Eds.), pp. 574583. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Concrete Association.Google Scholar
Hilderbrand, T. & Ruegsegger, P. (1997). A new method for the model independent assessment of thickness in 3D images. J Microsc 185, 6775.Google Scholar
Holm, T.A. & Bremner, T.W. (2000). State-of-the-art report on high-strength, high-durability structural low-density concrete for applications in severe marine environments. Structural Laboratory, ERDC/SL TR-00-3. Washington, DC: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.Google Scholar
Holm, T.A., Ooi, O.S & Bremner, T.W. (2003). Moisture dynamics in lightweight aggregate and concrete. In Theodore Bremner Symposium on High-Performance Lightweight Concrete, Proceedings of the Sixth CANMET/ACI International Conference on Durability of Concrete, June, Thessalonika, Greece, Ries, J. & Holm, T. (Eds.), pp. 167184. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.Google Scholar
Hyväluoma, J.P., Raiskinmäki, A., Jäsberg, A.K., Kataja, M. & Timonen, J. (2004). Evaluation of a lattice-Boltzmann method for mercury intrusion porosimetry simulations. Future Gener Comp Syst 20(6), 10031011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuebel, C. (2007). Recent developments in electron tomography, possibilities and a few limitations. Microsc Microanal 13(Suppl 2), 152153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, Y., Gao, X.F. & Jeary, A.P. (1999). Microstructure of pre-wetted aggregate on lightweight concrete. Build Environ 34(6), 759764.Google Scholar
Moravia, W.G., Oliveira, C.A.S., Gumieri, A.G & Vasconcelos, W.L. (2006). Microstructural evaluation of expanded clay to be used as lightweight aggregate in structural concrete. Cerâmica 52(322), 193199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, P.L. (1993). Lightweight aggregates for structural concrete. In Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete, Clarke, J.L. (Eds.), pp. 118. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S.L., Chandra, S. & Berntsson, L. (1992). Interdependence of microstructure and strength of structural lightweight aggregate concrete. Cement Concrete Comp 14(4), 239248.Google Scholar
SkyScan (2005). Desktop X-ray microtomograph. SkyScan 1172 Instruction manual. Antwerp, Belgium: SkyScan.Google Scholar
Smeplass, S. (2000). Drying of LWAC. 2nd International Symposium of Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete, Kristiansand, Norway, June 18–22, 2000, Helland, S. et al. (Eds.), pp. 833843. Oslo, Norway: Norwegian Concrete Association.Google Scholar
Swamy, R.N. & Lambert, G.H. (1981). The microstructure of Lytag aggregate. Int J Cement Composites Lightweight Concrete 3(4), 273282.Google Scholar
Thornton, K. & Poulsen, H.F. (2008). Three-dimensional materials science: An intersection of three-dimensional reconstructions and simulations. MRS Bull 33, 587595.Google Scholar
Wasserman, R. & Bentur, A. (1997). Effect of lightweight fly ash aggregate microstructure on the strength of concretes. Cement Concrete Res 27(4), 525537.Google Scholar
Webb, P.A. & Clyde, O. (1997). Analytical Methods in Fine Particle Technology. Norcross, GA: Micrometrics Instrument Corporation.Google Scholar
Zhang, M.H. & Gjørv, O.E. (1989). Characteristics of lightweight aggregates for high strength LWA concrete. Report No. 2.2. STF70 A92022. Materialutvikling Hoyfast Betong.Google Scholar
Zhang, M.H. & Gjørv, O.E. (1991). Characteristics of lightweight aggregates for high-strength concrete. ACI Mater J 88-M19, 150158.Google Scholar