^{page 202 note 1} J.R.I.B.A., Ser. iii, xxix (1921–1922), p. 558Google Scholar, fig. 6.

^{page 202 note 2} It is much to be hoped that the third edition of Hülsen's invaluable work on the Roman Forum will soon be published and such corrections as this included in it.

^{page 202 note 3} I may note that the statement on p. 16, that a piece of the cornice must have been known before 1500, rests on a confusion between the first and the second hand of the so-called Coner sketch-book (P.B.S.R.` ii, f. 104). The drawing in question is by the latter—a copyist who worked for Cassiano dal Pozzo in the seventeenth century (ibid, vi, 187).

^{page 202 note 4} I may note here that fig, 39 seems to have been omitted and that on p. 43, n. 1, the reference to Coner should be 126b, not 105d, which is a cornice.

^{page 202 note 5} Oxyrhyncus Papyri, iii, p. 39.

^{page 203 note 1} Lib. Pontif. (ed. Duchesne) vol. ii, p. 108, l. 20, ‘huius beati tempore praesulis terre motus in urbe Roma per indictionem factus est X (i.e. before August 31, 847, Leo having become Pope on April 10), ita ut omnia elementa concussa viderentur ab omnibus.’