Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:21:27.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of annealing on the structure and electrical conductivity of CVD alumina films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

A. S. Wong
Affiliation:
Electronics Design Center and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
G. M. Michal
Affiliation:
Electronics Design Center and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
I. E. Locci
Affiliation:
Electronics Design Center and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
P. W. Cheung
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering. University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Get access

Abstract

Alumina films, 160 nm thick, were deposited on (100) -oriented silicon single-crystal substrates by pyrohydrolysis of aluminum chloride. Such films are candidate gate materials for an improved pH ion-sensitive field-effect transistor (pH-ISFET) for industrial and medical pH measurements. The current-voltage (I–V) characteristics of films annealed for 30 min at temperatures of 850, 1000, and 1175 °C were determined, Annealing at 850 °C produced the optimum I–V behavior for the aluminum oxide pH-sensitive films as evidenced by minimum leakage current and maximum breakdown voltage. The structures of the annealed films were examined using transmission electron microscopy. The anneals at 1000 and 1175 °C caused partial and complete transformation, respectively, of the as-deposited α-alumina to the α-alumina phase. Associated with a-alumina formation was the creation of voids along the grain boundaries and in the grain interiors that provided paths of increased electrical conduction through the alumina films and degraded their dielectric behavior.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Bergverd, P., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-15, 70 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Lundstrom, I., Shivaraman, S., Svensson, C., and Lundkvist, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 26, 55 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Moss, S. D., Smith, J. B., Comte, P. A., and Johnson, C. C., in Theory, Design and Biomedical Applications of Solid State Chemical Sensors, edited by Cheung, P. W., Fleming, D. G., Ko, W. H., and Neuman, M. R. (CRC Press, West Palm Beach, FL, 1978), pp. 119134.Google Scholar
4Cheung, P. W., Ko, W. H., Fung, D. J., and Wong, A. S., in Ref. 3, pp. 91117.Google Scholar
5Abe, H., Esashi, M., and Matsuo, T., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices ED-26, 1939 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Yates, D. E., Levine, S., and Healy, T. W., J. Chem. Soc, Faraday Trans. 70, 1807 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Healy, T. W. and White, L. R., Advan. Colloid Interface Sci. 9, 303 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Fung, C. D., Chung, P. W., and Ko, W. H., IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices ED-33, 8 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Davis, J. A. and Leckie, J. O., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 74, 32 (March 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Robinson, M., Pask, J. A., and Fuerstenau, D. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 47, 516 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Schenck, J. F., IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices ED-23, 1251 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Nechaev, E. A. and Volgina, V. A., Elektrokhimiya 13(2), 177 (1977).Google Scholar
13Friche, R. and Keeger, H., Z. Naturforsch. 40, 76 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Wong, A. S. and Chung, P. W., in IEEE Ninth Annual Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE, New York, 1987), Vol. 2, p. 804.Google Scholar
15Kroger, F. A., in Structure and Properties of MgO and A12O3 Ceramics, edited by Kingery, W. D. (The American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH, 1984), p. 1.Google Scholar
16Sata, T., J. Appl. Chem. 12, 9 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Barker, A. S., Phys. Rev. 132, 1474 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Carniglia, S. C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 66(7), 495 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Tung, S. K. and Caffrey, R. E., Tran. Metall. Soc. AIME 233, 572 (March 1965).Google Scholar
20Iida, K. and Tsujide, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 11(6), 840 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Pliskin, W. A. and Conrad, E. E., IBM J. 8, 43 (January 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Wong, A. S. and Cheung, P. W., in 1986 IEEE Solid-State Sensors Workshop, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, 2-5 June 1986 (IEEE, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
23Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC, Cleveland, OH, 1977), p. B86.Google Scholar
24Lee, W. E. and Lagerlof, K. P. D., J. Elec. Microsc. Tech. 2, 247 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Wilson, S. J., Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 28, 281 (June 1979).Google Scholar
26Dynys, F. W. and Halloran, J. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 65(9), 442 (September 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27White, C. W., Sklad, P. S., Boatner, L. A., Farlow, G. C., McHargue, C. J., Sales, B. C., and Aziz, M. J., in Defect Properties and Processing of High-Technology Nonmetallic Materials, edited by Chen, Y., Kingery, W. D., and Stokes, R. J. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985), pp. 337344.Google Scholar
28Rooksby, H. P., in X-ray Identification and Crystal Stucture of Clay Minerals, edited by Brown, G. (Mineralogical Society, London, 1961), pp. 354392.Google Scholar
29National Bureau Standards (U.S.) Circ. 539, 9 (1959).Google Scholar
30Farlow, G. C., Sklad, P. S., White, C. W., McHargue, C. J-, and Appleton, B. R., in Ref. 27, pp. 387394.Google Scholar
31Doychak, J. K., Mitchell, T. E., and Smialek, J. L., in High Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys, edited by Koch, C. C., Liu, C. T., and Stoloff, N. S. (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985), pp. 475483.Google Scholar
32Wolf, S., Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era (Lattice, Sunset Beach, CA, 1986), Vol. 1, p. 649.Google Scholar