Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:53:10.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crush absorbing energy of white spot lesions measured by indentation tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Alison M. Fallgatter
Affiliation:
Division of Orthodontics, Department of Developmental and Surgical Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455and Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Ching-Chang Ko
Affiliation:
Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Get access

Abstract

White spot lesions are clinically detectable areas of demineralized enamel that often form during orthodontic treatment. Fluoride has been shown to prevent demineralization from occurring. Mechanical properties of white spot lesions are not well characterized. Bovine enamel slabs, with and without fluoride treatment, were placed under demineralization conditions. Through a series of microindentations at incremental loads, mechanical strength was measured using a novel method, specific volume absorbing energy (SVAE). SVAE is equal to work energy divided by the indentation volume. The supra-surface area (outermost 5 μm) of enamel slabs with fluoride demonstrated decreased mechanical strength compared to enamel slabs without fluoride. Fluoride may not impart protection over long periods of demineralization.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Zachrisson, B., Zachrisson, S.: Caries incidence and orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 79, 183 (1971).Google Scholar
2.Hals, E., Mürch, T., Sand, H.: Effect of lactate buffers on dental enamel in vitro when observed in polarizing microscope. Acta Odont. Scand. 13, 85 (1955).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Gray, J.: Kinetics of enamel dissolution during formation of incipient caries-like lesions. Arch. Oral Biol. 11, 397 (1966).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Chang, H., Walsh, L., Freer, T.: Enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment. Aetiology and prevention. Aust. Dent. J. 42, 322 (1997).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Shern, R.J.: Augmenting the benefits of fluoride. J. Clin. Dent. 5(4), 119 (1994).Google Scholar
6.Roosevelt, M. Not in my water supply. Time, October 24, 2005, pp. 6263.Google Scholar
7.Yiamouyiannis, J.: Water fluoridation and tooth decay: Results from the 1986–1987 national survey of U.S. schoolchildren. Fluoride 23, 55 (1990).Google Scholar
8.Brunelle, J.A., Carlos, J.P.: Recent trends in dental caries in U.S. children and the effect of water fluoridation. J. Dent. Res. 69, 723 (1990).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Mascarenhas, A.K.: Risk factors for dental fluorosis: A review of the recent literature. Pediatr. Dent. 22, 269 (2000).Google ScholarPubMed
10.Cooper, C., Wickham, C.A., Barker, D.J., Jacobsen, S.J.: Water fluoridation and hip fracture. JAMA 266, 513 (1991).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Danielson, C., Lyon, J.L., Egger, M., Goodenough, G.K.: Hip fractures and fluoridation in Utah's elderly population. JAMA 268, 746 (1992).Google Scholar
12.Takahashi, K., Akiniwa, K., Narita, K.: Regression analysis of cancer incidence rates and water fluoride in the U.S.A. based on IACR/IARC (WHO) data (1978-1992). International Agency for Research on Cancer. J. Epidemiol. 11(4), 170 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Bassin, E.B.: Association between fluoride in drinking water during growth and development and the incidence of osteosarcoma for children and adolescents. Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Cambridge, MA (2001).Google Scholar
14.Lu, Y., Sun, Z.R., Wu, L.N., Wang, X., Lu, W., Liu, S.S.: Effect of high-fluoride water on intelligence in children. Fluoride 33(2), 74 (2000).Google Scholar
15.Mullenix, P., Denbesten, P., Schunior, A., Kernan, W.: Neurotoxicity of sodium fluoride in rats. Neurotox. Teratology 17(2), 169 (1995).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Ogaard, B., Rolla, G., Arends, J.: In vivo progress of enamel and root surface lesions under plaque as a function of time. Caries Res. 22, 302 1988c.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Silverstone, L.M.: The histopathology of enamel lesion produced /in vitro/ and their relation with enamel caries. Ph.D. Thesis, Bristol, UK (1976).Google Scholar
18.Wefel, J.S., Harless, J.D.: Comparison of artificial white spots by microradiography and polarized light microscopy. J. Dent. Res. 63, 1271 (1984).Google Scholar
19.Featherstone, J.D., Cate, J.M. ten, Shariati, M., Arends, J.: Comparison of artificial caries-like lesions by quantitative microradiography and microhardness profiles. Caries Res. 17, 385 (1983).Google Scholar
20.Primrose, J., Geddes, D.A.M., Weetman, D.A.: Development of a screen test for the determination of the cariogenic potential of foods. Caries Res. 23, 165 (1989).Google Scholar
21.Tao, W., Robertson, R., Thornton, P.: Effects of material properties and crush conditions on the crush energy absorption of fiber composite rods. Compos. Sci. Technol. 47, 405 (1993).Google Scholar
22.Cate, J.M. ten, Duijsters, P.P.: Influence of fluoride in solution on tooth demineralization. I. Chemical data. Caries Res. 17, 193 (1983).Google Scholar
23.Aasenden, R., Allukian, M., Brudevold, F., Wollock, W.: An in vivo study of enamel fluoride in children living in fluoridated communities and in non-fluoridated areas. Archs. Oral Biol. 16, 1399 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Christoffersen, J., Christoffersen, M., Arends, J., Leonardsen, E.: Formation of phosphate-containing calcium fluoride at the expense of enamel, hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite. Caries Res. 29, 223 (1995).Google Scholar
25.Geiger, S.B., Weiner, S.: Fluoridated carbonatoapatite in the intermediate layer between glass ionomer and dentin. Dent. Mater. 9, 33 (1993).Google Scholar
26.Tyas, M.: Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: A five-year clinical study. Aust. Dent. J. 36, 236 (1991).Google Scholar
27.Swift, E.: Effects of glass ionomers on recurrent caries. Oper. Dent. 14, 40 (1989).Google Scholar
28.Caldwell, R.C., Gilmore, R.W., Timberlake, P., Pigman, J., Pigman, W.: Semiquantitative studies of in vitro caries by microhardness tests. J. Dent. Res. 37, 301 (1958).Google Scholar
29.Stookey, G.K. Early detection of dental caries, Indiana University School of Dentistry: 1996.Google Scholar
30.Arends, J., Bosch, J.J. Ten In vivo de- and remineralization of dental enamel, in Factors Relating to Demineralisation and Remineralisation of the Teeth edited by Leach, S.A. (IRL Press Limited, Oxford, UK, 1986), pp. 111.Google Scholar
31.Jensen, A., Toda, S., Rapozo-Hilo, M., and Featherstone, J.D.B.: Development of an in vitro bovine enamel pH-cycling model, Abstract 2548, International Association for Dental Research/American Association for Dental Research/Canadian Association for Dental Research, 83rd General Session (Baltimore, MD, March 2005).Google Scholar