Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:32:10.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Cyclic Evolution of Classical Novae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Dina Prialnik
Dina Prialnik*
Affiliation:
Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences, Raymond and Beverly Sackler Faculty of Exact Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The cyclic evolution of classical novae (CN) cannot be observed, as in the case of recurrent or dwarf novae. The duration of a typical cycle may range from a few thousand to a few 105 years. Thus we have to rely on theoretical studies for understanding the periodic outbursts — due to thermonuclear runaways (TNR) — on the surface of accreting white dwarfs (WD). One may distinguish between two kinds of studies: a) detailed investigations of a specific aspect or a particular evolutionary phase; b) studies which emphasize the cyclic behavior of novae and their long-term evolution. The latter, which form the subject of this brief review, may be divided into four groups, each adopting a different approach to the problem:

  1. 1. Steady-state (semi-analytic) solutions;

  2. 2. One- (or two-) zone models;

  3. 3. Quasi-static (and/or steady burning) numerical calculations;

  4. 4. Full-scale hydrodynamic evolutionary computations.

Type
3. Theory
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 122: Physics of Classical Novae , 1990 , pp. 351 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1990

References

Buchler, J.R. and Perdang, J. 1979, Ap. J., 231, 524.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, Y.F. 1982a, Ap. J., 257, 752.Google Scholar
Fujimoto, Y.F. 1982b, Ap. J., 257, 767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iben, I. Jr. 1982, Ap. J., 259, 244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, M. and Hachisu, I. 1988, Ap. J., 329, 808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovetz, A. and Prialnik, D. 1985, Ap. J., 291, 812.Google Scholar
Livio, M., Prialnik, D. and Regev, O. 1989, Ap. J., 341, 299.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. 1983, Ap. J., 264, 282.Google Scholar
Paczynski, B. and Zytkow, A.N. 1978, Ap. J., 222, 604.Google Scholar
Papaloizou, J.C.B., Pringle, J.E. and MacDonald, J. 1982, M.N.R.A.S., 198, 215.Google Scholar
Prialnik, D. 1986, Ap. J., 310, 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prialnik, D. 1987, Mem. S.A.It., 58, 139.Google Scholar
Prialnik, D. and Kovetz, A. 1984, Ap. J., 281, 367.Google Scholar
Sion, E.M. and Starrfield, S. 1986, Ap. J., 303, 130.Google Scholar