Article contents
1108 – Esense 2 - Randomised Controlled 6-month Study Of As-needed Nalmefene: Subgroup Analysis Of Alcohol Dependent Patients With High Drinking Risk Level
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2020
Abstract
We describe the efficacy and safety of as-needed use of nalmefene in the subgroup of patients with a high drinking risk level (DRL; men:>60g/day; women:>40g/day); i.e. a group of patients with a great unmet medical need for.
To evaluate the 6 month efficacy and safety of as-needed use of nalmefene 18mg versus placebo in a subgroup of alcohol-dependent patients with high DRL from a randomised controlled trial [NCT00812461].
All patients received a motivational and adherence-enhancing intervention (BRENDA) in combination with either nalmefene or placebo. Number of heavy drinking days (HDDs) and total alcohol consumption (TAC) were measured using the Timeline Follow-back method. Additionally, data on clinical improvement, liver function and safety were collected throughout the study.
The study population consisted of 317 patients: placebo N=162; nalmefene N=155 (mean age 44.8±10.3 years; 69% men; mean HDDs: 22±6.2/month; mean TAC 111±47.9g/day). Mean number of HDDs decreased to 10 days/month and mean TAC decreased to 43g/day at month 6 in the nalmefene group. There was a superior effect of nalmefene compared to placebo in reducing the number of HDDs (-2.7 [95% CI: -5.0;-0.3];p=0.0253) and TAC -10.3 [-20.2;-0.5];p=0.0404). Improvements in clinical status and alanine amino transferase were greater in the nalmefene group compared to the placebo group (p< 0.05). Adverse events were more common with nalmefene; incidence of adverse events leading to dropout was at the placebo level.
As-needed nalmefene was efficacious in reducing alcohol consumption in patients with high risk for alcoholrelated harm.
- Type
- Abstract
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 28 , Issue S1: Abstracts of the 21th European Congress of Psychiatry , 2013 , 28-E501
- Copyright
- Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2013
- 2
- Cited by
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.